1932

Abstract

Extinction is rarely random across ecological and geological time scales. Traits that make some species more extinction-prone include individual traits, such as body size, and abundance. Substantial consistency appears across ecological and geological time scales in such traits. Evolutionary branching produces phylogenetic (as often measured by taxonomic) nesting of extinction-biasing traits at many scales. An example is the tendency, seen in both fossil and modern data, for higher taxa living in marine habitats to have generally lower species extinction rates. At lower taxononomic levels, recent bird and mammal extinctions are concentrated in certain genera and families. A fundamental result of such selectivity is that it can accelerate net loss of biodiversity compared to random loss of species among taxa. Replacement of vulnerable taxa by rapidly spreading taxa that thrive in human-altered environments will ultimately produce a spatially more homogenized biosphere with much lower net diversity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.495
1997-11-01
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ecolsys/28/1/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.495.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.495&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Angermeier PL. 1995. Ecological attributes of extinction-prone species: loss of freshwater fishes in Virginia.. Conserv. Biol. 9:143–58 [Google Scholar]
  2. Archibald JD. 1996. Dinosaur Extinction and the End of an Era. New York: Columbia Univ. Press 237 pp. [Google Scholar]
  3. Balmford A. 1996. Extinction filters and current resilience: the significance of past selection pressures for conservation biology.. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:193–97 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumiller TK. 1993. Survivorship analysis of Paleozoic Crioidea: effect of filter morphology on evolutionary rates.. Paleobiology 19:304–21 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ. 1994. Animal body size distributions: patterns, mechanisms, and implications.. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:471–74 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blackburn TM, Lawton JH, Gregory RD. 1996. Relationships between abundances and life histories of British birds.. J. Anim. Ecol. 65:52–62 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bodmer RE, Eisenberg JF, Redford KH. 1997. Hunting and the likelihood ofextinction of Amazonian mammals.. Conserv. Biol. 11:460–67 [Google Scholar]
  8. Briggs JC. 1995. Global Biogeography. Amsterdam: Elsevier 452 pp. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brooks DR, McLennan DA. 1993. Historical ecology: examining phylogenetic components of community evolution. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities, ed. RE Ricklefs, D Schluter 267–280 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown JH. 1995. Macroecology. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press.. 270 pp.
  11. Brown JH, Nicoletto PF. 1991. Spatial scaling of species composition: body masses of North American land mammals.. Am. Nat. 138:1478–512 [Google Scholar]
  12. Buzas MA, Culver SJ. 1989. Biogeographic and evolutionary patterns of continental margin benthic foraminifera.. Paleobiology 15:11–19 [Google Scholar]
  13. Buzas MA, Culver SJ. 1991. Species diversity and dispersal of benthic foraminifera.. BioScience 41:483–92 [Google Scholar]
  14. Calder WA. 1984. Size, Function and Life History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press 387 pp. [Google Scholar]
  15. Carlton JT. 1993. Neoextinctions in marine invertebrates.. Am. Zool. 33:499–507 [Google Scholar]
  16. Caughley G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology.. J. Anim. Ecol. 63:215–44 [Google Scholar]
  17. Coope GR. 1995. Insect faunas in ice age environments: Why so little extinction?. See Ref. 61A 55–74
  18. Cotgreave P. 1993. The relationship between body size and abundance in animals.. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:244–48 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cutler AH. 1991. Nested faunas and extinction in fragmented habitats.. Conserv. Biol. 5:496–505 [Google Scholar]
  20. Diamond JM. 1984. “Normal” extinctions of isolated populations. In Extinctions, ed. MH Nitecki 191–246 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Ehrenfeld DW. 1970. Biological Conservation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.. 421 pp.
  22. Erwin DH. 1993. The Great Paleozoic Crisis. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.. 327 pp.
  23. Flessa KW, Jablonski D. 1996. The geography of evolutionary turnover: a global analysis of extant bivalves.. See Ref. 51A 376–97
  24. Foote M. 1993. Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity.. Paleobiology 19:185–204 [Google Scholar]
  25. Foote M. 1996. Models of morphologicaldiversification.. See Ref. 51A 62–86
  26. Foote M. 1996. Perspective: evolutionary patterns in the fossil record.. Evolution 50:1–11 [Google Scholar]
  27. Foote M, Raup DM. 1996. Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of fossils.. Paleobiology 22:121–40 [Google Scholar]
  28. Futuyma DJ, Moreno G. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization.. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:207–33 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gaston KJ. 1994. Rarity. London: Chapman & Hall 205 pp. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gaston KJ, McArdle BH. 1994. The temporal variability of animal abundances: measures, methods and patterns.. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 345:335–58 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gittleman JL. 1994. Are the pandas successful specialists or evolutionary failures?. BioScience 44:456–64 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gittleman JL, Anderson CG, Cates SE, Luh H, Smith JD. 1997. Detecting ecological pattern in phylogenies. In Biodiversity Dynamics: Turnover of Populations, Taxa, and Communities, ed. M McKinney xx–xx New York: Columbia Univ. Press. In press [Google Scholar]
  33. Gotelli NJ, Graves GR. 1990. Body size and the occurrence of avian species on land-bridge islands.. J. Biogeorgr. 17:315–25 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gould SJ. 1996. Full House. New York: Harmony 243 pp. [Google Scholar]
  35. Greuter W. 1995. Extinctions in Mediterranean areas.. See Ref. 61A 88–97
  36. Hanski I, Kouki J, Halkka A. 1993. Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities, ed. RE Ricklefs, D Schluter 108–116 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  37. Harrison S. 1994. Metapopulations and conservation. In Large-scale Ecology and Conservation Biology, ed. PJ Edwards, RM May, N Webb 111–128 New York: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  38. Harrison S, Hastings A. 1996. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of metapopulation structure.. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:180–85 [Google Scholar]
  39. Harrison S, Quinn JF. 1989. Correlated environments and the persistence of metapopulations.. Oikos 56:293–98 [Google Scholar]
  40. Harvey PH. 1996. Phylogenies for ecologists.. J. Anim. Ecol. 65:255–63 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hedrick PW, Lacy RC, Allendorf FW, Soule ME. 1996. Directions in conservation biology: comments on Caughley.. Conserv. Biol. 10:1312–20 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hernandez HM, Barcenas RT. 1996. Endangered cacti in the Chihuahuan Desert.. Conserv. Biol. 10:1200–9 [Google Scholar]
  43. Horowitz AS, Pachut JF. 1994. Lyellian bryozoan percentages and the fossil record of the recent Bryozoan fauna.. Palaios 9:500–5 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hulbert RC. 1993. Taxonomic evolution in North American Neogene horses: the rise and fall of an adaptive radiation.. Paleobiology 19:216–34 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hunter ML. 1996. Fundamentals of Conservation Biology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell 482 pp. [Google Scholar]
  46. IUCN. 1996 1996. IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN 368 pp. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jablonski D. 1987. Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of Cretaceous mollusks.. Science 238:360–63 [Google Scholar]
  48. Jablonski D. 1991. Extinctions: a paleontological perspective.. Science 253:754–57 [Google Scholar]
  49. Jablonski D. 1995. Extinctions in the fossil record.. See Ref. 61A 25–44
  50. Jablonski D. 1996. Body size and macroevolution.. See Ref. 51A 256–289
  51. Jablonski D. 1996. Mass extinctions: persistent problems and new directions.. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 307:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  52. Jablonski D, Erwin DH, Lipps JH. eds 1996. Evolutionary Paleobiology. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Jablonski D, Flessa KW. 1986. The taxonomic structure of shallow-water marine faunas: implications for Phanerozoic extinctions.. Malacologia 27:43–66 [Google Scholar]
  54. Jackson JBC. 1995. Constancy and change of life in the sea.. See Ref. 61A 45–54
  55. Karr JR. 1990. Avian survival rates and the extinction process on Barro Colorado Island, Panama.. Conserv. Biol. 4:391–97 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kattan GH. 1992. Rarity and vulnerability: the birds of the Cordillera Central of Colombia.. Conserv. Biol. 6:64–70 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kattan GH, Alvarez-Lopez H, Giraldo M. 1994. Forest fragmentation and bird extinctions: San Antonio eighty years later.. Conserv. Biol. 8:138–46 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kauffman EG, Fagerstrom JA. 1993. The Phanerozoic evolution of reef diversity. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities, ed. RE Ricklefs, D Schluter 315–329 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  59. Kunin WE, Gaston KJ. ed 1997. The Biology of Rarity. London: Chapman & Hall 280 pp. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lande R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation.. Science 241:1455–60 [Google Scholar]
  61. Laurance WF. 1994. Rainforest fragmentation and the structure of small mammal communities in tropical Queensland.. Biol. Conserv. 69:23–32 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lawton JH. 1995. Population dynamic principles.. See Ref. 61A 147–163
  63. Lawton JH, May RM. eds 1995. Extinction Rates. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Lawton JH, Nee S, Letcher A, Harvey P. 1994. Animal distributions: patterns and processes. In Large-Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology, ed. PJ Edwards, RM May, N Webb 41–58 New York: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  65. Lyell C. 1832. Principles of Geology. London: Murray.
  66. Mace GM. 1994. Classifying threatened species: means and ends.. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 344:91–97 [Google Scholar]
  67. Mace GM, Kershaw M. 1997. Extinction risk and rarity on an ecological timescale. In The Biology of Rarity, ed. WE Kunin, K. Gaston 130–149 London: Chapman & Hall [Google Scholar]
  68. Martin PS. 1984. Prehistoric over kill: the global model. In Quaternary Extinctions, ed. PS Martin, R Klein 354–403 Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press [Google Scholar]
  69. Martin RD. 1993. Primate origins: plugging the gaps.. Nature 363:223–34 [Google Scholar]
  70. Maurer BA. 1991. Concluding remarks: birds, body size and evolution.. Acta XX Congr. Int. Ornith. 85:835–37 [Google Scholar]
  71. Maurer BA. 1994. Geographical Population Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell 130pp. [Google Scholar]
  72. Maurer BA, Nott MP. 1997. Geographic range fragmentation and the evolution of biological diversity. In Biodiversity Dynamics: Turnover of Populations, Taxa, and Communities, ed. M McKinney xx–xx New York: Columbia Univ. Press. In press [Google Scholar]
  73. May RM, Lawton JH, Stork NE. 1995. Assessing extinction rates.. See Ref. 61A 1–24
  74. McGhee GR. 1996. The Late Devonian Mass Extinction. New York: Columbia Univ. Press 302 pp. [Google Scholar]
  75. McKinney ML. 1990. Trends in body size evolution. In Evolutionary Trends, ed. KJ McNamara 75–118 Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press [Google Scholar]
  76. McKinney ML. 1995. Extinction selectivity among lower taxa: gradational patterns and rarefaction error in extinction estimates.. Paleobiology 21:300–13 [Google Scholar]
  77. McKinney ML. 1997. How do rare species avoid extinction? A paleontological view. In The Biology of Rarity, ed. KJ Kunin, WE Gaston 110–129 London: Chapman & Hall [Google Scholar]
  78. McKinney ML. 1997. Is marine biodiversity at less risk?. Biodiversity Letters. In press [Google Scholar]
  79. McKinney ML, Allmon WD. 1995. Metapopulations and disturbance: from patch dynamics to biodiversity dynamics. In New Approaches to Speciation in the Fossil Record, ed. D Erwin, R Anstey 123–183 New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  80. Meffe GK, Carroll CR. 1994. Principles of Conservation Biology.. Sunderland, MA Sinauer 600 pp.
  81. Morris DW, Heidinga L. 1997. Balancing the books on biodiversity.. Conserv. Biol. 11:287–89 [Google Scholar]
  82. New TR. 1995. An Introduction to Invertebrate Conservation Biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press 194 pp. [Google Scholar]
  83. Norris RD. 1991. Biased extinction and evolutionary trends.. Paleobiology 17:388–99 [Google Scholar]
  84. Norse E. ed 1993. Global Marine Biological Diversity. Washington, DC: Island 308 pp. [Google Scholar]
  85. Peltonen A, Hanski I. 1991. Patterns of island occupancy explained by colonization and extinction rates in shrews.. Ecology 72:1698–708 [Google Scholar]
  86. Pimm SL. 1991. The Balance of Nature? Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press.. 434pp.
  87. Pimm SL, Moulton MP, Justice LJ. 1995. Bird extinctions in the Pacific.. See Ref. 61A 75–87
  88. Prothero DR. 1994. The Eocene-Oligocene Transition. New York: Columbia Univ. Press 291 pp. [Google Scholar]
  89. Rapoport EH. 1994. Remarks on marine and continental biogeography: an areographical viewpoint.. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 343:71–78 [Google Scholar]
  90. Raup DM. 1991. Extinction: Bad Genes or Bad Luck? New York: Norton 210pp. [Google Scholar]
  91. Raup DM. 1994. The role of extinction in evolution.. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 91:6758–63 [Google Scholar]
  92. Raup DM. 1996. Extinction models.. See Ref. 51A 419–36
  93. Raup DM, Boyajian GE. 1988. Patterns of generic extinction in the fossil record.. Paleobiology 14:109–25 [Google Scholar]
  94. Rosenzweig ML. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press 436 pp. [Google Scholar]
  95. Russell GJ, Brooks TM, McKinney ML, Anderson CG. 1997. Decreased taxonomic selectivity in the future extinction crisis.. Conserv. Biol. 11: In press [Google Scholar]
  96. Schwartz MW. 1993. The search for patterns among rare plants: Are primitive plants likely to be rare?. Biol. Conserv. 64:121–27 [Google Scholar]
  97. Sheehan PM, Coorough P, Fastovsky DE. 1996. Biotic selectivity during the K/T and Late Ordovician extinction events.. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 307:477–89 [Google Scholar]
  98. Simpson GG. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. New York: Columbia Univ. Press 289 pp. [Google Scholar]
  99. Stanley SM. 1973. An explanation for Cope's Rule.. Evolution 27:1–26 [Google Scholar]
  100. Stanley SM. 1979. Macroevolution. New York: WH Freeman 211 pp. [Google Scholar]
  101. Stanley SM. 1990. Delayed recovery and the spacing of major extinctions.. Paleobiology 16:401–14 [Google Scholar]
  102. Stanley SM. 1990. The general correlation between rate of speciation and rate of extinction. In Causes of Evolution, ed. RM Ross, WD Allmon 103–127 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  103. Stearns SC. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press 234 pp. [Google Scholar]
  104. Terborgh J. 1974. Preservation of natural diversity: the problem of extinction prone species.. BioScience 24:715–22 [Google Scholar]
  105. Turner IM, Chua KS, Ong JY, Soong BC, Tan HT. 1996. A century of plant species loss from an isolated fragment of lowland tropical rainforest.. Conserv. Biol. 10:1229–44 [Google Scholar]
  106. Valentine JW, Jablonski J. 1993. Fossil communities: compositional variation at many time scales. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities, ed. RE Ricklefs, D Schluter 341–49 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  107. Van Valen LM. 1994. Concepts and the nature of natural selection by extinction: Is generalization possible? In The Mass Extinction Debates, ed. W Glen,200–216 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  108. Van Valkenburgh B. 1994. Extinction and replacement among predatory mammals in the North American Late Eocene and Oligocene.. Hist. Biol. 8:129–50 [Google Scholar]
  109. Vermeij GJ. 1993. Biogeography of recently extinct marine species: implications for conservation.. Conserv. Biol. 7:391–97 [Google Scholar]
  110. Wilson EO, Willis EO. 1975. Applied biogeography. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities, ed. ML Cody, JM Diamond 522–34 Cambridge, MA: Belknap [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.495
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.495
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error