1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Criminology
  4. Volume 7, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Criminology

Volume 7, 2024

Joan Petersilia: A Life and Legacy of Academic and Practical Impact

Abstract

This review focuses on the life and career of Joan Petersilia, one of the most important corrections scholars of the past fifty years. The article discusses her formative years, her career spanning from college through her final appointment at Stanford Law School, her major research projects, and her impact on policy, practice, and the academic field of criminology. For more than forty years, Joan chose to do research that affected the real world, treating policymakers and practitioners as equal partners in efforts to improve the implementation of justice, especially that occurring postconviction. Her unique style allowed her to easily communicate the ideas and research from academe to a wide range of audiences, including the general public, policymakers, and practitioners. By doing so, Joan made a significant impact on the criminal justice system and was recognized for her body of work by receiving the 2014 Stockholm Prize, arguably the most prestigious recognition in criminology.

Keyword(s): biography, community corrections, crime policy, criminal careers, Joan Petersilia, lessons learned, parole and reentry
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-022422-122054
2024-01-26
2024-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/criminol/7/1/annurev-criminol-022422-122054.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-022422-122054&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acad. Exp. Criminol 2023. Joan McCord Award. Academy of Experimental Criminology http://expcrim.org/aec-dec-awards/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Am. Soc. Criminol 2023. ASC General Society Awards. 2023 August Vollmer Award. American Society of Criminology. https://asc41.com/about-asc/awards/#toggle-id-13
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blumstein A, Wallman J, eds. 2000. The Crime Drop in America New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  4. Brown v. Plata, 131 S.Ct. 1910 2011.)
  5. Calif. Dep. Correct. Rehabil 2013. 2011 public safety realignment. Fact Sheet, Calif. Dep. Correct. Rehabil. Sacramento: https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/recidivism/realignment-factsheet.pdf
  6. Cent. Evid.-Based Crime Policy 2023. Distinguished achievement award. Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy https://cebcp.org/distinguished-achievement-award/
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chaiken JM, Chaiken MR. 1982. Varieties of Criminal Behavior Santa Monica, CA: RAND
  8. Cohn EG, Farrington DP. 1994. Who are the most-cited scholars in major American criminology and criminal justice journals?. J. Crim. Justice 22:6517–34
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohn EG, Farrington DP. 1998. Changes in the most-cited scholars in major American criminology and criminal justice journals between 1986–1990 and 1991–1995. J. Crim. Justice 26:299–116
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohn EG, Farrington DP. 1999. Changes in the most-cited scholars in twenty criminology and criminal justice journals between 1990 and 1995. J. Crim. Justice 27:4345–59
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Criminologist 2019. Obituaries: Joan Petersilia. The Criminologist Novemb. 43
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cullen FT. 2005. The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: how the science of criminology made a difference. Criminology 43:11–42
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Deschenes EP, Turner S, Petersilia J. 1995. A dual experiment in intensive community supervision: Minnesota's prison diversion and enhanced supervised release programs. Prison J. 75:3330–56
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Grattet R, Lin J, Petersilia J. 2011. Supervision regimes, risk, and official reactions to parole deviance. Criminology 49:2371–99
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Grattet R, Petersilia J, Lin J. 2008. Parole violations and revocations in California Natl. Inst. Justice Rep. NCJ 224521 US Dep. Justice Washington, DC: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/224521.pdf
  16. Grattet R, Petersilia J, Lin J, Beckman M. 2009. Parole violations and revocations in California: analysis and suggestions for action. Fed. Probat. 73:12–11
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hipp JR, Petersilia J, Turner S. 2010. Parolee recidivism in California: the effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology 48:4947–80
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lane J. 2006. Joan Petersilia: a life of policy-relevant corrections research. Women Crim. Justice 17:41–17
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lane J. 2012. Joan Petersilia interviewed by Jodi Lane, November 2012. American Society of Criminology Oral History Project https://asc41.com/oral-history/joan-petersilia-interviewed-by-jodi-lane-november-2012/
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lane J. 2020a. Dedication. Handbook on Moving Corrections and Sentencing Forward: Building on the Record PK Lattimore, BM Huebner, FS Taxman ix–xi. New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Lane J. 2020b. Successful research-practitioner partnerships: empirical research in honor of Joan Petersilia. Justice Q. 37:71173–75
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Lane J, Garcia CA. 2014. Joan Petersilia. Encyclopedia of Theoretical Criminology JM Miller 609–12. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin J, Grattet R, Petersilia J. 2010.. “ Back-end sentencing” and reimprisonment: individual, organizational, and community predictors of parole sanctioning decisions. Criminology 48:3759–95
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Natl. Res. Counc 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Natl. Res. Counc 2008. Parole, Desistance from Crime, and Community Integration Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Petersilia J. 1980a. Criminal career research: a review of recent evidence. Crime Justice 2:321–80
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Petersilia J. 1980b. Which prison inmates participate in prison treatment programs?. J. Offender Couns. Serv. Rehabil. 4:2121–35
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Petersilia J. 1987a. Expanding options for criminal sentencing Rep. RAND Santa Monica, CA: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3544.html
  29. Petersilia J. 1987b. The influence of criminal justice research Rep. RAND Santa Monica, CA: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3516.html
  30. Petersilia J. 1989. Implementing randomized experiments: lessons from BJA's intensive supervision project. Eval. Rev. 13:2435–58
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Petersilia J. 1990a. Conditions that permit intensive supervision programs to survive. Crime Delinquency 36:1126–45
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Petersilia J. 1990b. When probation becomes more dreaded than prison. Fed. Probat. 54:123–27
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Petersilia J. 1991. Policy relevance and the future of criminology—the American Society of Criminology 1990 presidential address. Criminology 29:11–15
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Petersilia J. 1993. Defending the practical value of criminological research. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 30:4497–505
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Petersilia J. 1995. A crime control rationale for reinvesting in community corrections. Prison J. 75:4479–96
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Petersilia J. 1997. Justice for all? Offenders with mental retardation and the California corrections system. Prison J. 77:4358–80
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Petersilia J. 1999. Parole and prisoner reentry in the United States. Crime Justice 26:479–530
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Petersilia J. 2000. When prisoners return to the community: political, economic, and social consequences Natl. Inst. Justice Res. Brief NCJ 184253 US Dep. Justice Washington, DC: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/184253.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Petersilia J. 2001a. Crime victims with developmental disabilities: a review essay. Crim. Justice Behav. 28:6655–94
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Petersilia J. 2001b. Prisoner reentry: public safety and reintegration challenges. Prison J. 81:3360–75
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Petersilia J. 2001c. When prisoners return to communities: political, economic, and social consequences. Fed. Probat. 65:13–8
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Petersilia J. 2002. Reforming Probation and Parole in the 21stCentury Lanham, MD: Am. Correct. Assoc.
  43. Petersilia J. 2003. When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Petersilia J. 2004. What works in prisoner reentry? Reviewing and questioning the evidence. Fed. Probat. 68:24–9
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Petersilia J. 2005. Hard time: ex-offenders returning home after prison. Correct. Today 67:266–71, 155
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Petersilia J. 2007. Employ behavioral contracting for “earned discharge” parole. Criminol. Public Policy 6:4807–14
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Petersilia J. 2008a. California's correctional paradox of excess and deprivation. Crime Justice 37:207–78
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Petersilia J. 2008b. Influencing public policy: an embedded criminologist reflects on California prison reform. J. Exp. Criminol. 4:335–56
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Petersilia J. 2010. A retrospective view of corrections reform in the Schwarzenegger administration. Fed. Sentencing Rep. 22:3148–53
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Petersilia J. 2014. California prison downsizing and its impact on local criminal justice systems. Harv. Law Policy Rev. 8:2327–58
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Petersilia J, Cullen FT. 2015. Liberal but not stupid: meeting the promise of downsizing prisons. Stanf. J. Crim. Law Policy 2:1–44
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Petersilia J, Deschenes EP. 1994a. Perceptions of punishment: inmates and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. Prison J. 74:3306–28
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Petersilia J, Deschenes EP. 1994b. What punishes—inmates rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. Fed. Probat. 58:13–8
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Petersilia J, Greenwood PW, Lavin M. 1977. Criminal Careers of Habitual Felons Santa Monica, CA: RAND
  55. Petersilia J, Honig P, Hubay C Jr. 1980. The Prison Experience of Career Criminals Santa Monica, CA: RAND
  56. Petersilia J, Snyder JG. 2013. Looking past the hype: 10 questions everyone should ask about California's realignment. Calif. J. Politics Policy 5:2266–306
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Petersilia J, Turner S. 1990a. Comparing intensive and regular supervision for high-risk probationers: early results from an experiment in California. Crime Delinquency 36:187–111
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Petersilia J, Turner S. 1990b. Diverting Prisoners to Intensive Probation: Results of an Experiment in Oregon Santa Monica, CA: RAND
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Petersilia J, Turner S. 1990c. Intensive Supervision for High-Risk Probationers: Findings from Three California Experiments Santa Monica, CA: RAND
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Petersilia J, Turner S. 1993a. Evaluating intensive supervision probation/parole: results of a nationwide experiment Natl. Inst. Justice Res. Brief NCJ 141637 US Dep. Justice Washington, DC: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/evaluating-intensive-supervision-probationparole-results-nationwide
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Petersilia J, Turner S. 1993b. Intensive probation and parole. Crime Justice 17:281–335
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Petersilia J, Turner S, Kahan J, Peterson J. 1985a. Executive summary of RAND's study “Granting Felons Probation: Public Risks and Alternatives. .” Crime Delinquency 31:3379–92
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Petersilia J, Turner S, Kahan J, Peterson J. 1985b. Granting Felons Probation: Public Risks and Alternatives Santa Monica, CA: RAND
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Petersilia J, Turner S, Peterson J. 1986. Prison versus Probation in California: Implications for Crime and Offender Recidivism Santa Monica, CA: RAND
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Rhine EE. 2020. A tribute in fond remembrance of Joan Petersilia, 1951–2019. Fed. Sentencing Rep. 32:4253–55
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Rhine EE, Petersilia J, Reitz K. 2017. The future of parole release. Crime Justice 46:279–338
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Rosenfeld R, Petersilia J, Visher C. 2008. The first days after release can make a difference. Correct. Today 70:386–87
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Stanf. Law Sch 2019. Remembering award-winning criminologist Joan Petersilia, who inspired students, advised governors, and made a difference to many. Stanford Law School. https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-lawyer/articles/remembering-award-winning-criminologist-joan-petersilia-who-inspired-students-advised-governors-and-made-a-difference-to-many/
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Stockholm Univ 2023. The Stockholm Prize in Criminology. Stockholm University. https://www.su.se/english/about-the-university/prizes-and-academic-ceremonies/the-stockholm-prize-in-criminology
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Travis J. 2005. But They All Come Back: Facing the Challenges of Reentry Washington, DC: Urban Inst. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Travis J. 2020. Reflections on the legacy of Joan Petersilia. Fed. Sentencing Rep. 32:4251–52
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Travis J, Petersilia J. 2001. Reentry reconsidered: a new look at an old question. Crime Delinquency 47:3291–313
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Travis J, Solomon AL, Waul M. 2001. From Prison to Home: The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Reentry Washington, DC: Urban Inst. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Turner S. 2020. Joan Petersilia: her legacy in criminal justice research and policy. Fed. Sentencing Rep. 32:4246–50
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Turner S, Petersilia J, Deschenes E. 1992. Evaluating intensive supervision probation/parole (ISP) for drug offenders. Crime Delinquency 38:4539–56
     [Google Scholar]
  76. West. Soc. Criminol 2023a. The June Morrison-Tom Gitchoff Founders Award. Western Society of Criminology https://westerncriminology.org/awards/the-june-morrison-tom-gitchoff-founders-award/
    [Google Scholar]
  77. West. Soc. Criminol 2023b. The Paul Tappan Award. Western Society of Criminology https://westerncriminology.org/awards/the-paul-tappan-award/
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Wilson JQ 1983. Crime and Public Policy San Francisco: ICS Press
  79. Wilson JQ, Petersilia J, eds. 1995. Crime San Francisco: ICS Press
  80. Wilson JQ, Petersilia J, eds. 2002. Crime: Public Policies for Crime Control Oakland: ICS Press
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Wilson JQ, Petersilia J, eds. 2011. Crime and Public Policy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  82. Wright RA. 1995. The most-cited scholars in criminology: a comparison of textbooks and journals. J. Crim. Justice 23:4303–11
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Wright RA. 2000. Recent changes in the most-cited scholars in criminology: a comparison of textbooks and journals. J. Crim. Justice 28:2117–28
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Wright RA. 2002. Recent changes in the most-cited scholars in criminal justice textbooks. J. Crim. Justice 30:3183–95
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Wright RA, Cohn EG. 1996. The most-cited scholars in criminal justice textbooks, 1989–1993. J. Crim. Justice 24:5459–67
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Wright RA, Miller JM. 1999. The most-cited scholars and works in corrections. Prison J. 79:15–22
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Zimring FE. 2007. The Great American Crime Decline New York: Oxford Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-022422-122054
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error