1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
  4. Volume 5, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Developmental Psychology

Volume 5, 2023

Social Identities and Intersectionality: A Conversation About the What and the How of Development

Abstract

Research on the development of social identities in early and middle childhood has largely focused on gender; increasingly, however, theory and research have addressed the development of ethnic/racial, social class, sexual, and immigrant identities. Moreover, it is assumed that individuals’ thinking about and articulating of the intersectionality between their social identities emerge in adolescence and young adulthood, but a growing body of work has shown that minoritized children conceptualize their intersectional identities by middle childhood. This article reviews that work and addresses how interdisciplinary scholarship and quantitative and qualitative methodologies can deepen our understanding of the development of social identities and intersectionality. We take a contextual approach to investigate how relational and cultural contexts contour the socialization of social and intersectional identities. Most of our review focuses on theory and research in the United States; however, because we aim to consider immigrant identity, we also include theory and research on how immigrant families and communities help minoritized children and youth navigate their identities in schools and communities and cope with discrimination.

Keyword(s): critical race theory, identity development, interdisciplinarity, intersectionality, mixed methods, youth
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120321-022756
2023-12-11
2024-05-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/devpsych/5/1/annurev-devpsych-120321-022756.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120321-022756&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abo-Zena MM, Jones K, Mattis J. 2022. Dismantling the master's house: decolonizing “rigor” in psychological scholarship. J. Soc. Issues 78:2298–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12519
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams G, Dobles I, Gómez LH, Kurtiş T, Molina LE. 2015. Decolonizing psychological science: introduction to the special thematic section. J. Soc. Political Psychol. 3:1213–38. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.1766
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ajayi AA, Mitchell LL, Nelson SC, Fish J, Peissig LHM et al. 2021. Person–environment fit and retention of racially minoritized college students: recommendations for faculty, support staff, and administrators. Educ. Sci. 11:6271 https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060271
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Almeida RV, Woods R, Messineo T. 1998. Child development: intersectionality of race, gender, class, and culture. J. Fem. Fam. Ther. 10:123–47. https://doi.org/10.1300/J086v10n01_02
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alper M, Katz VS, Clark LS. 2016. Researching children, intersectionality, and diversity in the digital age. J. Child. Media 10:1107–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1121886
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Anzaldúa G. 1987. Borderlands, la Frontera: The New Meztiza San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute Press
  7. Arnett JJ, Mitra D. 2020. Are the features of emerging adulthood developmentally distinctive? A comparison of ages 18–60 in the United States. Emerg. Adulthood 8:5412–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818810073
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Artiles AJ. 2013. Untangling the racialization of disabilities: an intersectionality critique across disability models. Du Bois Rev. 10:2329–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000271
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Artiles AJ. 2022. Interdisciplinary inequality research in the E/BD field: animating intersectionality, reflexivity, and equity. J. Emot. Behav. Disord. 30:2154–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266221083922
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ayers E, Torrez E. 2022. Exploring cultural wealth with Latinx youth: interweaving testimonios as a youth participatory action research practice. J. Lat. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2022.2107520
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Azmitia M, Garcia Peraza PD, Thomas V, Ajayi AA, Syed M 2023. The promises and challenges of using an intersectional framework to study identity development during adolescence and early adulthood. APA Handbook of Adolescent and Young Adult Development LJ Crockett, G Carlo, JE Schulenberg 391–405. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc https://doi.org/10.1037/0000298-024
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Azmitia M, Mansfield KC. 2021. Editorial: intersectionality and identity development: How do we conceptualize and research identity intersectionalities in youth meaningfully?. Front. Psychol. 12:625765 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625765
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Baca Zinn M, Zambrana RE. 2019. Chicanas/Latinas advance intersectional thought and practice. Gender Soc. 33:5677–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219853753
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bailey J, Steeves V, Burkell J, Shade LR, Ruparelia R, Regan P. 2019. Getting at equality: research methods informed by the lessons of intersectionality. Int. J. Qual. Methods 18: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919846753
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Basile V. 2020. Standin’ tall: criminalization and acts of resistance among elementary school boys of color. Race Ethn. Educ. 23:194–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2018.1497964
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Berger MT, Guidroz K, eds. 2009. The Intersectional Approach: Transforming the Academy Through Race, Class, and Gender Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. N.C. Press
  17. Blackwell M, Boj Lopez F, Urrieta L. 2017. Special issue: critical Latinx indigeneities. Lat. Stud. 15:2126–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-017-0064-0
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bounds DT, Posey PD. 2022. A resistance framework for racially minoritized youth behaviors during the transition to adulthood. J. Res. Adolesc. 32:3959–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12792
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bowleg L. 2017. Intersectionality: an underutilized but essential theoretical framework for social psychology. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology B Gough 507–29. London: Palgrave Macmillan https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_25
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bowleg L, Bauer G. 2016. Invited reflection: quantifying intersectionality. Psychol. Women Q. 40:3337–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316654282
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bronfenbrenner U. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  22. Buchanan NT, Wiklund LO. 2020. Why clinical science must change or die: integrating intersectionality and social justice. Women Ther. 43:3–4309–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729470
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Burns EC, Lowe K, Leonard A, Tsiamis J. 2023. Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students’ motivation to continue in senior science: an expectancy value theory and intersectional identity approach. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 72:102125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102125
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Burton LM, Bonilla-Silva E, Ray V, Buckelew R, Hordge Freeman E. 2010. Critical race theories, colorism, and the decade's research on families of color. J. Marriage Fam. 72:3440–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00712.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cabrera NL. 2019. Critical race theory v. deficit models. Equity Excell. Educ. 52:147–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2019.1630342
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cadenas GA, Kiehne E. 2021. The undocumented advantage: intersectional predictors of critical consciousness and academic performance among U.S. Latinxs. J. Lat. Psychol. 9:4326–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000163
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cammarota J, Fine M, eds. 2008. Revolutionizing Education: Youth Participatory Action Research in Motion New York: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932100
    [Crossref]
  28. Casanova S. 2019. Aprendiendo y sobresaliendo: resilient indigeneity & Yucatec-Maya youth. Assoc. Mexican Am. Educ. J. 13:242–65. https://doi.org/10.24974/amae.13.2.428
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. Casanova S. 2022. The “other” Mexicans: indigenous Yucatec-Maya students’ experiences with perceived discrimination. J. Latinos Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2022.2102496
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Casanova S, Mesinas M, Martinez-Ortega S. 2021. Cultural knowledge as opportunities for empowerment: learning and development for Mexican Indigenous youth. Diaspora Indig. Minor. Educ. 15:3193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2021.1910940
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cho S, Crenshaw KW, McCall L. 2013. Toward a field of intersectionality studies: theory, applications, and praxis. Signs J. Women Cult. Soc. 38:4785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Clark N. 2016. Red intersectionality and violence-informed witnessing praxis with Indigenous girls. Girlhood Stud. 9:246–64. https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2016.090205
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Cole ER. 2009. Intersectionality and research in psychology. Am. Psychol. 64:3170–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cole ER. 2020. Demarginalizing women of color in intersectionality scholarship in psychology: a Black feminist critique. J. Soc. Issues 76:41036–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12413
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Collins PH. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment New York: Routledge. , 2nd ed..
  36. Collins PH, Bilge S. 2020. Intersectionality Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. , 2nd ed..
  37. Combahee River Collect 1977. The Combahee River Collective Statement. Boston: Combahee River Collect.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Covarrubias A. 2011. Quantitative intersectionality: a critical race analysis of the Chicana/o educational pipeline. J. Lat. Educ. 10:286–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2011.556519
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Crenshaw K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ. Chic. Leg. Forum 1:139–67
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Cross WE Jr. 1994. Nigrescence theory: historical and explanatory notes. J. Vocat. Behav. 44:2119–23. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1008
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Davis AY. 1981. Women, Race & Class New York: Random House
  42. Diemer MA. 2020. Pushing the envelope: the who, what, when, and why of critical consciousness. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 70:101192 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101192
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Diemer MA, Li C-H. 2011. Critical consciousness development and political participation among marginalized youth. Child Dev. 82:61815–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01650.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Diemer MA, Pinedo A, Bañales J, Mathews CJ, Frisby MB et al. 2021. Recentering action in critical consciousness. Child Dev. Perspect. 15:112–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12393
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. Dunlop WL, Westberg DW. 2022. On stories, conceptual space, and physical place: considering the function and features of stories throughout the narrative ecology. Pers. Sci. 3: https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.7337
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. Duran A, Jones SR. 2019. Using intersectionality in qualitative research on college student identity development: considerations, tensions, and possibilities. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 60:4455–71. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0040
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. Eagly AH, Riger S. 2014. Feminism and psychology: critiques of methods and epistemology. Am. Psychol. 69:7685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ellison ER, Langhout RD. 2020. Embodied relational praxis in intersectional organizing: developing intersectional solidarity. J. Soc. Issues 76:4949–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12402
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS. 2016a. Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research: I. Theoretical and epistemological issues. Psychol. Women Q. 40:2155–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316629797
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS. 2016b. Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research: II. Methods and techniques. Psychol. Women Q. 40:3319–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316647953
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Erikson EH. 1968. Identity: Youth and Crisis New York: W.W. Norton
  52. Esteban-Guitart M, Moll LC. 2014. Funds of identity: a new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach. Cult. Psychol. 20:131–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13515934
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Fernández JS 2022. Decolonising participatory action research in community psychology. Decolonial Enactments in Community Psychology S Kessi, S Suffla, M Seedat 29–51. Cham, Switz: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75201-9_3
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ferrer-Wreder L, Kroger J. 2020. Identity in Adolescence: The Balance Between Self and Other London: Routledge. , 4th ed..
  55. Fine M. 2018. Just Research in Contentious Times: Widening the Methodological Imagination New York: Teach. Coll. Press
  56. Fine M, Torre ME, Oswald AG, Avory S. 2021. Critical participatory action research: methods and praxis for intersectional knowledge production. J. Couns. Psychol. 68:3344–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000445
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Fish J, Counts PK. 2021.. “ Justice for Native people, justice for Native me”: using digital storytelling methodologies to change the master narrative of Native American peoples. Cultural Methods in Psychology KC McLean 237–72. New York: Oxford Univ. Press https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095949.003.0008
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. Fish J, Syed M. 2021. Digital storytelling methodologies: recommendations for a participatory approach to engaging underrepresented communities in counseling psychology research. J. Couns. Psychol. 68:3271–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000532
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Freire P. 1973. Education for Critical Consciousness New York: Seabury Press
  60. Galliher RV, McLean KC, Syed M. 2017. An integrated developmental model for studying identity content in context. Dev. Psychol. 53:112011–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000299
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. García Coll C, Crnic K, Lamberty G, Wasik BH, Jenkins R et al. 1996. An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Dev. 67:51891–914. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131600
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ghavami N, Katsiaficas D, Rogers LO. 2016. Toward an intersectional approach in developmental science: the role of race, gender, sexual orientation, and immigrant status. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 50:31–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.12.001
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ghavami N, Kogachi K, Graham S 2020. How racial/ethnic diversity in urban schools shapes intergroup relations and well-being: unpacking intersectionality and multiple identities perspectives. Front. Psychol. 11:503846 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.503846
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  64. Gillen-O'Neel C, Huynh VW, Hazelbaker T, Harrison A. 2022. From kindness and diversity to justice and action: White parents’ ethnic–racial socialization goals. J. Fam. Issues 43:4944–73
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Godfrey EB, Burson E. 2018. Interrogating the intersections: how intersectional perspectives can inform developmental scholarship on critical consciousness. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 2018:16117–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20246
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Goff PA, Kahn KB. 2013. How psychological science impedes intersectional thinking. Du Bois Rev. 10:2365–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000313
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Goff PA, Thomas MA, Jackson MC. 2008.. “ Ain't I a woman?”: towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles 59:5–6392–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9505-4
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Golden RL, Oransky M. 2019. An intersectional approach to therapy with transgender adolescents and their families. Arch. Sex. Behav. 48:2011–25
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Gone JP. 2017.. “ It felt like violence”: Indigenous knowledge traditions and the postcolonial ethics of academic inquiry and community engagement. Am. J. Community Psychol. 60:3–4353–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12183
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Gopalan M, Nelson AA. 2019. Understanding the racial discipline gap in schools. AERA Open 5:2 https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419844613
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Grabe S. 2020. Research methods in the study of intersectionality in psychology: examples informed by a decade of collaborative work with majority world women's grassroots activism. Front Psychol. 11:494309 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.494309
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  72. Grzanka PR, Flores MJ, VanDaalen RA, Velez G. 2020. Intersectionality in psychology: translational science for social justice. Transl. Issues Psychol. Sci. 6:4304–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000276
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Grzanka PR, Santos CE, Moradi B. 2017. Intersectionality research in counseling psychology. J. Couns. Psychol. 64:5453–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000237
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hammack PL, Hughes SD, Atwood JM, Cohen EM, Clark RC. 2022. Gender and sexual identity in adolescence: a mixed-methods study of labeling in diverse community settings. J. Adolesc. Res. 37:2167–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211000315
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Hancock A-M. 2016. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  76. Harris A, Bartlow S. 2015. Intersectionality: race, gender, sexuality, and class. Handbook of the Sociology of Sexualities J DeLamater, RF Plante 261–71. Cham, Switz.: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Harris A, Leonardo Z. 2018. Intersectionality, race-gender subordination, and education. Rev. Res. Educ. 42:11–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759071
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Harter S. 2015. The Construction of the Self: Developmental and Sociocultural Foundations New York: Guilford Press
  79. Hassan N, Casanova S, McGuire KM 2021. “I am not your victim”: intersectional religious marginalization and resistance among Black Muslim immigrant and refugee college students. Why They Hate Us: How Racist Rhetoric Impacts Education L Pérez Huber, SM Muñoz 162–86. New York: Teach. Coll. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Hazelbaker T, Brown CS, Nenadal L, Mistry RS. 2022. Fostering anti-racism in White children and youth: development within contexts. Am. Psychol. 77:4497–509
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Heberle AE, Rapa LJ, Farago F. 2020. Critical consciousness in children and adolescents: a systematic review, critical assessment, and recommendations for future research. Psychol. Bull. 146:6525–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000230
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Hines-Datiri D, Carter Andrews DJ. 2020. The effects of zero tolerance policies on Black girls: using critical race feminism and figured worlds to examine school discipline. Urban Educ. 55:101419–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917690204
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. Hodge JD, Cunningham M. 2022. Academic self-esteem as a buffer between negative youth experiences and academic achievement in African American adolescents. Youth Soc. 55:5824–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211063919
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  84. Hollander JA, Einwohner RL. 2004. Conceptualizing resistance. Sociol. Forum 19:4533–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-004-0694-5
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  85. Holloway K, Varner F. 2021. Parenting despite discrimination: Does racial identity matter?. Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 27:4781–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000452
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  86. hooks b. 1981. Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism Boston: South End Press
  87. Hurtado A. 1997. Understanding multiple group identities: inserting women into cultural transformations. J. Soc. Issues 53:2299–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02445.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  88. Hurtado A. 2018. Intersectional understandings of inequality. The Oxford Handbook of Social Psychology and Social Justice, Vol. 1 PL Hammack 157–72. New York: Oxford Univ. Press https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199938735.013.12
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Hurtado A, Cervantez K 2009. A view from within and from without: the development of Latina feminist psychology. The Handbook of US Latino Psychology: Developmental and Community-Based Perspectives FA Villarruel, G Carlo, J Grau, M Azmitia, N Cabrera, TJ Chahin 171–90. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Hurtado A, Sinha M. 2008. More than men: Latino feminist masculinities and intersectionality. Sex Roles 59:5–6337–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9405-7
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  91. Jemal A. 2017. Critical consciousness: a critique and critical analysis of the literature. Urban Rev. 49:4602–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-017-0411-3
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Johnson DJ. 2022. Critical themes in parental socialization: the state of racial-ethnic and gender socialization. Res. Hum. Dev. 19:1–25–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2022.2106757
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  93. Joseph NM, Haynes C, Patton LD. 2021. The politics of publishing: a national conversation with scholars who use their research about Black women to address intersectionality. Educ. Res. 50:2115–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20985460
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kaskazi A, Kitzie V. 2023. Engagement at the margins: investigating how marginalized teens use digital media for political participation. New Media Soc. 25:172–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211009460
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  95. Katsiaficas D, Volpe V, Raza SS, Garcia Y. 2019. The role of campus support, undocumented identity, and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals on civic engagement for Latinx undocumented undergraduates. Child Dev. 90:3790–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12933
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  96. Keller J. 2020. A politics of snap: Teen Vogue’s public feminism. Signs J. Women Culture Soc. 45:4817–43. https://doi.org/10.1086/707797
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  97. Kidd SA. 2002. The role of qualitative research in psychological journals. Psychol. Methods 7:1126–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.126
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  98. Kumar R, DeCuir-Gunby J. 2023. What is the role of race in educational psychology? A review of research in Educational Psychologist. Educ. Psychol. 58:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2137804
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  99. Langhout RD. 2005. Acts of resistance: student (in)visibility. Cult. Psychol. 11:2123–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X05052348
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  100. Langhout RD. 2019. Photovoice as a methodology. Migration and Health: A Research Methods Handbook MB Schenker, X Castañeda, A Rodriguez-Lainz 327–42. Oakland, CA: Univ. Calif. Press https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520958494-018
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  101. Lei RF, Leshin RA, Rhodes M. 2020. The development of intersectional social prototypes. Psychol. Sci. 31:8911–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620920360
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  102. Lei RF, Rhodes M. 2021. Why developmental research on social categorization needs intersectionality. Child Dev. Perspect. 15:3143–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12421
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  103. Lewis JA, Grzanka PR 2016. Applying intersectionality theory to research on perceived racism. The Cost of Racism for People of Color: Contextualizing Experiences of Discrimination, ed. AN Alvarez, CTH Liang, HA Neville 31–54. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc https://doi.org/10.1037/14852-003
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  104. López FA. 2017. Altering the trajectory of the self-fulfilling prophecy: asset-based pedagogy and classroom dynamics. J. Teach. Educ. 68:2193–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116685751
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  105. Lopez-Leon G, Casanova S. 2023.. “ Those are the spaces where I feel seen and fully understood”: digital counterspaces fostering community, resistance and intersectional identities among Latinx LGBTQ+ emerging adults. J. Adolesc. Res. In press. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584231165993
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  106. Manago AM, Santer ND, Barsigian LL, Walsh AS. 2021. Social media as tools for cultural change in the transition to adulthood. Cultural Methods in Psychology: Describing and Transforming Cultures KC McLean 146–73. New York: Oxford Univ. Press https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095949.003.0005
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  107. Manago AM, Ward LM, Aldana A. 2015. The sexual experience of Latino young adults in college and their perceptions of values about sex communicated by their parents and friends. Emerg. Adulthood 3:114–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696814536165
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  108. Marcucci O. 2020. Implicit bias in the era of social desirability: understanding antiblackness in rehabilitative and punitive school discipline. Urban Rev 52:147–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00512-7
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  109. Marks AK, Calzada E, Kiang L, Pabón Gautier MC, Martinez-Fuentes S et al. 2020. Applying the lifespan model of ethnic-racial identity: exploring affect, behavior, and cognition to promote well-being. Res. Hum. Dev. 17:2–3154–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2020.1854607
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  110. Matthews JS, López F. 2019. Speaking their language: the role of cultural content integration and heritage language for academic achievement among Latino children. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 57:72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.005
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  111. McLean KC, ed. 2022. Cultural Methods in Psychology: Describing and Transforming Cultures New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  112. Mechaca M. 1997. Early racist discourses: the roots of deficit thinking. The Evolution of Deficit Thinking: Educational Thought and Practice RR Valencia 13–40. London: Routledge. , 1st ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Meléndez Guevara AM, White RMB, Lindstrom Johnson S, Nair RL, Roche KM 2022. School racial-ethnic discrimination, rule-breaking behaviors and the mediating role of trauma among Latinx adolescents: considerations for school mental health practice. Psychol. Sch. 59:102005–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22562
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  114. Miller ET. 2015. Discourses of whiteness and blackness: an ethnographic study of three young children learning to be white. Ethnogr. Educ. 10:2137–53
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Misra J, Curington CV, Green VM. 2021. Methods of intersectional research. Sociol. Spectr. 41:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2020.1791772
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  116. Mitchell LL, Adler JM, Carlsson J, Eriksson PL, Syed M. 2021. A conceptual review of identity integration across adulthood. Dev. Psychol. 57:111981–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001246
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  117. Moll LC, Amanti C, Neff D, Gonzalez N. 1992. Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Pract. 31:2132–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  118. Moradi B, Grzanka PR. 2017. Using intersectionality responsibly: toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism. J. Couns. Psychol. 64:5500–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000203
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  119. Moraga C, Anzaldúa G eds. 1981. This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color Watertown, MA: Persephone Press. , 1st ed..
  120. Núñez A-M. 2014. Employing multilevel intersectionality in educational research: Latino identities, contexts, and college access. Educ. Res. 43:285–92. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14522320
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  121. Overstreet NM, Rosenthal L, Case KA. 2020. Intersectionality as a radical framework for transforming our disciplines, social issues, and the world. J. Soc. Issues 76:4779–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12414
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  122. Ozer EJ. 2017. Youth-led participatory action research: overview and potential for enhancing adolescent development. Child Dev. Perspect. 11:3173–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12228
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  123. Pérez Huber L. 2010. Using Latina/o critical race theory (LatCrit) and racist nativism to explore intersectionality in the educational experiences of undocumented Chicana college students. Educ. Found. 24:277–96
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Perszyk DR, Lei RF, Bodenhausen GV, Richeson JA, Waxman SR. 2019. Bias at the intersection of race and gender: evidence from preschool-aged children. Dev. Sci. 22:3e12788 https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12788
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  125. Purdie-Vaughns V, Eibach RP. 2008. Intersectional invisibility: the distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles 59:5–6377–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  126. Rapa LJ, Diemer MA, Bañales J. 2018. Critical action as a pathway to social mobility among marginalized youth. Dev. Psychol. 54:1127–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000414
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  127. Richter J, Faragó F, Swadener BB, Roca-Servat D, Eversman KA. 2020. Tempered radicalism and intersectionality: scholar-activism in the neoliberal university. J. Soc. Issues 76:41014–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12401
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  128. Rivas-Drake D, Seaton EK, Markstrom C, Quintana S, Syed M et al. 2014. Ethnic and racial identity in adolescence: implications for psychosocial, academic, and health outcomes. Child Dev. 85:140–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12200
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  129. Rivenbark JG, Copeland WE, Davisson EK, Gassman-Pines A, Hoyle RH et al. 2019. Perceived social status and mental health among young adolescents: evidence from census data to cellphones. Dev. Psychol. 55:3574–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000551
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  130. Robinson BA. 2021.. “ They peed on my shoes”: foregrounding intersectional minority stress in understanding LGBTQ youth homelessness. J. LGBT Youth 20:783–99 https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2021.1925196
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  131. Rogers LO, Butler Barnes S, Sahaguian L, Padilla D, Minor I. 2021a. #BlackGirlMagic: using multiple data sources to learn about Black adolescent girls’ identities, intersectionality, and media socialization. J. Soc. Issues 77:41282–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12483
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  132. Rogers LO, Meltzoff AN. 2017. Is gender more important and meaningful than race? An analysis of racial and gender identity among Black, White, and mixed-race children. Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 23:3323–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000125
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  133. Rogers LO, Niwa EY, Chung K, Yip T, Chae D 2021b. M(ai)cro: centering the macrosystem in human development. Hum. Dev. 65:5–6270–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000519630
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  134. Rosales C, Langhout RD. 2020. Just because we don't see it, doesn't mean it's not there: everyday resistance in psychology. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 14:1e12508 https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12508
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  135. Rosario RJ, Minor I, Rogers LO. 2021.. “ Oh, you're pretty for a dark-skinned girl”: Black adolescent girls’ identities and resistance to colorism. J. Adolesc. Res. 36:5501–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211028218
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  136. Rosenthal L. 2016. Incorporating intersectionality into psychology: an opportunity to promote social justice and equity. Am. Psychol. 71:6474–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040323
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  137. Rosenthal L, Overstreet NM, Khukhlovich A, Brown BE, Godfrey C, Albritton T. 2020. Content of, sources of, and responses to sexual stereotypes of Black and Latinx women and men in the United States: a qualitative intersectional exploration. J. Soc. Issues 76:4921–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12411
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  138. Samuel CA, Ortiz DL. 2021.. “ Method and meaning”: storytelling as decolonial praxis in the psychology of racialized peoples. New Ideas Psychol. 62:100868 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100868
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  139. Sánchez B, Garcia-Murillo Y, Monjaras-Gaytan LY, Thursby K, Ulerio G et al. 2022. Everyday acts of resistance: Mexican, undocumented immigrant children and adolescents navigating oppression with mentor support. J. Res. Adolesc. 32:2398–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12755
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  140. Santos CE, Toomey RB. 2018. Integrating an intersectionality lens in theory and research in developmental science. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 2018:1617–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20245
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  141. Settles IH, Warner LR, Buchanan NT, Jones MK. 2020. Understanding psychology's resistance to intersectionality theory using a framework of epistemic exclusion and invisibility. J. Soc. Issues 76:4796–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12403
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  142. Sirin SR, Fine M. 2007. Hyphenated selves: Muslim American youth negotiating identities on the fault lines of global conflict. Appl. Dev. Sci. 11:3151–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888690701454658
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  143. Smith LT. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples London: Zed Books. , 2nd ed..
  144. Stein GL, Cheah CSL, Oh W, Witherspoon DP 2023. Developmental science in the twenty-first century: eschewing segregated science and integrating cultural and racial processes into research. Diversity and Developmental Science DP Witherspoon, GL Stein 1–18. Cham, Switz.: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23163-6_1
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  145. Suárez-Orozco C, Motti-Stefanidi F, Marks A, Katsiaficas D. 2018. An integrative risk and resilience model for understanding the adaptation of immigrant-origin children and youth. Am. Psychol. 73:6781–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000265
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  146. Syed M. 2010. Disciplinarity and methodology in intersectionality theory and research. Am. Psychol. 65:161–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017495
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  147. Syed M, Azmitia M. 2008. A narrative approach to ethnic identity in emerging adulthood: bringing life to the identity status model. Dev. Psychol. 44:41012–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1012
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  148. Tajfel H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  149. Tajfel H, Turner JC 2004. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Political Psychology: Key Readings JT Jost, J Sidanius 276–93. New York: Psychol. Press https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  150. Terriquez V, Brenes T, Lopez A. 2018. Intersectionality as a multipurpose collective action frame: the case of the undocumented youth movement. Ethnicities 18:2260–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817752558
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  151. Toomey RB, Huynh VW, Jones SK, Lee S, Revels-Macalinao M. 2017. Sexual minority youth of color: a content analysis and critical review of the literature. J. Gay Lesbian Ment. Health 21:13–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2016.1217499
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  152. Urrieta L. 2019. Indigenous reflections on identity, trauma, and healing: navigating belonging and power. Genealogy 3:226 https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy3020026
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  153. Velez G, Spencer MB. 2018. Phenomenology and intersectionality: using PVEST as a frame for adolescent identity formation amid intersecting ecological systems of inequality. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 2018:16175–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20247
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  154. Warner LR. 2008. A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles 59:5–6454–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  155. Watson-Singleton NN, Lewis JA, Dworkin ER. 2023. Toward a socially just diversity science: using intersectional mixed methods research to center multiply marginalized Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC). Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 29:134–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000477
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  156. Watts RJ, Abdul-Adil JK. 1998. Promoting critical consciousness in young, African-American men. J. Prev. Interv. Community 16:1–263–86. https://doi.org/10.1300/J005v16n01_04
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  157. Way N, Santos C, Niwa EY, Kim-Gervey C. 2008. To be or not to be: an exploration of ethnic identity development in context. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 2008:12061–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.216
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  158. Weis L, Fine M. 2012. Critical bifocality and circuits of privilege: expanding critical ethnographic theory and design. Harv. Educ. Rev. 82:2173–201. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.2.v1jx34n441532242
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  159. Wilson AR, Leaper C. 2016. Bridging multidimensional models of ethnic–racial and gender identity among ethnically diverse emerging adults. J. Youth Adolesc. 45:81614–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0323-z
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  160. Witherspoon DP, Smalls Glover C, Wei W, Hughes DL 2022. Neighborhood-level predictors of African American and Latinx parents’ ethnic-racial socialization. Am. J. Community Psychol. 69:1–2183–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12555
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  161. Wray-Lake L, Halgunseth L, Witherspoon DP. 2022. Good trouble, necessary trouble: expanding thinking and research on youth of color's resistance to oppression. J. Res. Adolesc. 32:3949–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12789
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  162. Yosso TJ. 2005. Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethn. Educ. 8:169–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120321-022756
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error