1932

Abstract

Geoscientists have generally been at the leading edge of predicting the challenges society faces from hazards both natural and anthropomorphic. As geoscientists, we have been less successful in devising the solutions to those problems to ensure a habitable planet for ourselves and future generations because often the solutions lie in creating novel partnerships with other researchers, including engineers, biologists, and social scientists. These sorts of transdisciplinary partnerships have been leading to radical advances in human health, under the banner of convergence science. Application of these principles of convergence science offers significant promise for addressing challenges such as climate change mitigation and adaptation, environmental health, protecting ecosystem services, and advancing sustainability science. To apply this approach rigorously, however, will involve a culture change in the geosciences in terms of how students are educated, how researchers are rewarded, and how projects are funded.

  • ▪  Geoscientists need to work collaboratively with life, physical, and social scientists, as well as engineers, to solve the problems of our time.
  • ▪  Universities need to address financial, procedural, educational, and cultural impediments to the conduct of convergence research.
  • ▪  Adopting a solutions orientation to major environmental issues could help attract a more diverse geoscience workforce.
  • ▪  Climate change mitigation would benefit from partnerships between geoscientists and social scientists to make the right behavior easy.
  • ▪  The current course of Earth science education, research, and partnerships is inadequate to address sustainability.
  • ▪  Ensuring environmental health requires collaboration between experts in health, environment, infrastructure, and economics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-earth-033021-081125
2022-05-31
2024-05-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/earth/50/1/annurev-earth-033021-081125.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-earth-033021-081125&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Brulle RJ, Roberts JT. 2017. Climate misinformation campaigns and public sociology. Contexts 16:178–79
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cleves PA, Tinoco AI, Bradford J, Perrin D, Bay LK, Pringle JR 2020. Reduced thermal tolerance in a coral carrying CRISPR-induced mutations in the gene for a heat-shock transcription factor. PNAS 117:4628899–905
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Danovaro R, Bongiorni L, Corinaldesi C, Giovannelli D, Damiani E et al. 2008. Sunscreens cause coral bleaching by promoting viral infections. Environ. Health Persp. 116:4441–47
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Donovan M, Iglesias A, Wilf P, Labandeira CC, Cúneo NR. 2016. Rapid recovery of Patagonian plant–insect associations after the end-Cretaceous extinction. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1:0012
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lelieveld J, Pozzer A, Pöschl U, Fnais M, Haines A, Münzel T. 2020. Loss of life expectancy from air pollution compared to other risk factors: a worldwide perspective. Cardiovasc. Res. 116:111910–17
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lynch J, Pierrehumbert R. 2019. Climate impacts of cultured meat and beef cattle. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3:5
    [Google Scholar]
  7. NASEM (Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med.) 2014. Convergence: Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  8. NASEM (Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med.) 2020. Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Proceedings of a Workshop—in Brief Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  9. Osipova E, Emslie-Smith M, Osti M, Murai M, Åberg U, Shadie P. 2020. IUCN World Heritage Outlook 3: A Conservation Assessment of All Natural World Heritage Sites Gland, Switz: IUCN
  10. Otto IM, Donges JF, Cremades R, Bhowmik A, Hewitt RJ et al. 2020. Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth's climate by 2050. PNAS 117:52354–65
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Reijnders L 2012. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions. Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation WY Chen, J Seiner, T Suzuki, M Lackner 13–41 New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sharp P, Langer R. 2011. Promoting convergence in biomedical science. Science 333:6042527
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Stanford Earth 2020. Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources. Stanford University. https://earth.stanford.edu/eiper
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Statista Res. Dep 2016. Per capita cigarette consumption in the United States from 1900 to 2015. Statista Research Department. https://www.statista.com/statistics/261576/cigarette-consumption-per-adult-in-the-us/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. UN Gen. Assem. Resolut. A/RES/70/1 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Oct. 21. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
  16. Wang TW, Kenemer B, Tynan MA, Singh T, King B. 2016. Consumption of combustible and smokeless tobacco—United States, 2000–2015. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 65:48135763
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wood W. 2019. Good Habits, Bad Habits: The Science of Making Positive Changes That Stick London: MacMillan
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-earth-033021-081125
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-earth-033021-081125
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error