1932

Abstract

Understanding what aspects of evolution are predictable, and repeatable, is a central goal of biology. Studying phenotypic convergence (the independent evolution of similar traits in different organisms) provides an opportunity to address evolutionary predictability at different hierarchical levels. Here we focus on recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of convergence. Understanding when, and why, similar molecular solutions are used repeatedly provides insight into the constraints that shape biological diversity. We first distinguish between convergence as a phenotypic pattern and parallelism as a shared molecular basis for convergence. We then address the overarching question: What factors influence when parallel molecular mechanisms will underlie phenotypic convergence? We present four core determinants of convergence (natural selection, phylogenetic history, population demography, and genetic constraints) and explore specific factors that influence the probability of molecular parallelism. Finally, we address frontiers for future study, including integration across different systems, subfields, and hierarchical levels.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091851
2014-11-23
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ecolsys/45/1/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091851.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091851&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Arbuckle K, Bennett CM, Speed MP. 2014. A simple measure of the strength of convergence?. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5:7685–93 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt J, Reznick D. 2008. Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: What have we learned about the genetics of adaptation?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:126–32 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrett RDH, Schluter D. 2008. Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:138–44 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beisel CJ, Rokyta DR, Wichman HA, Joyce P. 2007. Testing the extreme value domain of attraction for distributions of beneficial fitness effects. Genetics 176:42441–49 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bollback JP, Huelsenbeck JP. 2009. Parallel genetic evolution within and between bacteriophage species of varying degrees of divergence. Genetics 181:1225–34 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bricelj VM, Connell L, Konoki K, MacQuarrie SP, Scheuer T. et al. 2005. Sodium channel mutation leading to saxitoxin resistance in clams increases risk of PSP. Nature 434:7034763–67 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bull JJ, Badgett MR, Wichman HA, Huelsenbeck JP, Hillis DM. et al. 1997. Exceptional convergent evolution in a virus. Genetics 147:41497–507 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carroll SB. 2008. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134:125–36 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carvalho LS, Cowing JA, Wilkie SE, Bowmaker JK, Hunt DM. 2007. The molecular evolution of avian ultraviolet- and violet-sensitive visual pigments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:81843–52 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091851
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091851
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error