1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Entomology
  4. Volume 67, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Entomology

Volume 67, 2022

: A Model Insect for Fundamental and Applied Research

Abstract

has a long history as a model species in many distinct subject areas, but improved connections among the genetics, genomics, behavioral, ecological, and pest management fields are needed to fully realize this species’ potential as a model. was the first beetle whose genome was sequenced, and a new genome assembly and enhanced annotation, combined with readily available genomic research tools, have facilitated its increased use in a wide range of functional genomics research. Research into ’s sensory systems, response to pheromones and kairomones, and patterns of movement and landscape utilization has improved our understanding of behavioral and ecological processes. has also been a model in the development of pest monitoring and management tactics, including evaluation of insecticide resistance mechanisms. Application of functional genomics approaches to behavioral, ecological, and pest management research is in its infancy but offers a powerful tool that can link mechanism with function and facilitate exploitation of these relationships to better manage this important food pest.

Keyword(s): dispersal, genetics, genomics, insecticide resistance, landscape ecology, olfaction
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ento-080921-075157
2022-01-07
2024-05-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ento/67/1/annurev-ento-080921-075157.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ento-080921-075157&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Abdullahi G, Muhamad R, Dzolkhifli O, Sinniah UR 2018. Damage potential of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on cocoa beans: effect of initial adult population density and post infestation storage time. J. Stored Prod. Res. 75:1–9
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. 
    Abdullahi G, Muhamad R, Sule H 2019. Biology, host range and management of red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): a review. Taraba J. Agric. Res. 7:48–64
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. 
    Adamski Z, Bufo SA, Chowanski S, Falabella P, Lubawy J et al. 2019. Beetles as model organisms in physiological, biomedical and environmental studies: a review. Front. Physiol. 10:319
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    Adrianos S, Lorenzen M, Oppert B. 2018. Metabolic pathway interruption: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase in Tribolium castaneum. J. Insect Physiol 107:104–9Describes the application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to create a more defined mutation in T. castaneum.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Agrafioti P, Sotiroudas V, Kaloudis S, Bantas S, Bochtis D, Athanassiou CG. 2020. Real time monitoring of phosphine and insect mortality in different storage facilities. J. Stored Prod. Res. 89:101726
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. 
    Aitken AD. 1975. Insect travelers. Volume I. Coleoptera. A survey of the beetles recorded from imported cargoes by the insect inspectorate of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food with a special analysis for the years 1957 to 1969 Tech. Bull. 31 HMSO London:
  7. 7. 
    Alabi T, Michaud JP, Arnaud L, Haubruge E 2008. A comparative study of cannibalism and predation in seven species of flour beetle. Ecol. Entomol. 33:716–26
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. 
    Altincicek B, Knorr E, Vilcinskas A. 2008. Beetle immunity: identification of immune-inducible genes from the model insect Tribolium castaneum. Dev. Comp. Immun. 32:585–95
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Arakane Y, Muthukrishnan S, Kramer KJ, Specht CA, Tomoyasu Y et al. 2005. The Tribolium chitin synthase genes TcCHS1 and TcCHS2 are specialized for synthesis of epidermal cuticle and midgut peritrophic matrix. Insect Mol. Biol. 14:453–463
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. 
    Arthur FH. 2013. Dosage rate, temperature, and food source provisioning affect susceptibility of Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum to chlorfenapyr. J. Pest Sci. 86:507–13
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. 
    Athanassiou CG, Buchelos CT. 2001. Detection of stored-wheat beetle species and estimation of population density using unbaited probe traps and grain trier samples. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 98:67–78
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Brabec DL, Oppert B, Guedes RNC, Campbell JF. 2019. From immobilization to recovery: towards the development of a rapid diagnostic indicator for phosphine resistance. J. Stored Prod. Res. 80:28–33
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Bai H, Zhu F, Shah K, Palli SR. 2011. Large-scale RNAi screen of G protein-coupled receptors involved in larval growth, molting and metamorphosis in the red flour beetle. BMC Genom 12:388
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. 
    Beeman RW, Arakane Y, Phillips TW, Muthukrishnan S 2010. Implications of the Tribolium genome project for pest biology. Proceedings of the 10th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection MO Carvalho, PG Fields, CS Adler, FH Arthur, CG Athanassiou et al.63–71 Berlin: Julius Kühn Inst.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. 
    Beeman RW, Friesen KS, Denell RE. 1992. Maternal-effect selfish genes in flour beetles. Science 256:89–92Illustrates the Medea genes in T. castaneum in relation to progeny production capacity.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    Behrens S, Peuß R, Milutinović B, Eggert H, Esser D et al. 2014. Infection routes matter in population-specific responses of the red flour beetle to the entomopathogen Bacillus thuringiensis. BMC Genom 15:445
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    Bell AE. 1982. The Tribolium model in animal breeding research. Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Genetics and Applications to Livestock Production, Madrid, Spain 5:26–42 N.p. WCGALP
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. 
    Benton MA, Pavlopoulos A. 2014. Tribolium embryo morphogenesis: May the force be with you. Bioarchitecture 4:16–21
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. 
    Brajković J, Pezer Ž, Bruvo-Mađarić B, Sermek A, Feliciello I, Ugarković Đ. 2018. Dispersion profiles and gene associations of repetitive DNAs in the euchromatin of the beetle Tribolium castaneum. G3 8:875–86
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. 
    Broehan G, Arakane Y, Beeman RW, Kramer KJ, Muthukrishnan S et al. 2010. Chymotrypsin-like peptidases from Tribolium castaneum: a role in molting revealed by RNA interference. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 40:274–83
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Brown SJ, Shippy TD, Miller S, Bolognesi R, Beeman RW et al. 2009. The red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera): a model for studies of development and pest biology. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 8:pdb.emo126
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. 
    Buckman KA, Campbell JF. 2013. How varying pest and trap densities affect Tribolium castaneum capture in pheromone traps. Entomol. Exp. App. 146:404–12
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23. 
    Campbell JF. 2012. Attraction of walking Tribolium castaneum adults to traps. J. Stored Prod. Res. 51:11–22
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Campbell JF, Buckman KA, Fields PG, Subramanyam B. 2015. Evaluation of structural treatment efficacy against Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum using meta-analysis of multiple studies conducted in food facilities. J. Econ. Entomol. 108:2125–40
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Campbell JF, Hagstrum DW. 2002. Patch exploitation by Tribolium castaneum: movement patterns, distribution and oviposition. J. Stored Prod. Res. 38:55–68
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. 
    Campbell JF, Runnion C. 2003. Patch exploitation by female red flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum. J. Insect Sci. 3:20
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. 
    Campbell JF, Toews MD, Arthur FH, Arbogast RT 2010. Long-term monitoring of Tribolium castaneum populations in two flour mills: seasonal patterns and impact of fumigation. J. Econ. Entomol. 103:991–1001
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Campbell JF, Toews MD, Arthur FH, Arbogast RT 2010. Long-term monitoring of Tribolium castaneum populations in two flour mills: rebound after fumigation. J. Econ. Entomol. 103:1002–11
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    Cao M, Gatehouse JA, Fitches EC. 2018. A systematic study of RNAi effects and dsRNA stability in Tribolium castaneum and Acyrthosiphon pisum, following injection and ingestion of analogous dsRNAs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:1079
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. 
    Cash SA, Lorenzen MD, Gould F. 2019. The distribution and spread of naturally occurring Medea selfish genetic elements in the United States. Ecol. Evol. 9:14407–16
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. 
    Chandrasekar R, Palli SR 2011. Reproductive biology of Tribolium castaneum. Entomology, Ecology & Biodiversity BK Tyagi, V Veer 197–215 Jodhpur, India: Sci. Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. 
    Collins PJ, Schlipalius DI 2018. Insecticide resistance. Recent Advances in Stored Product Protection CG Athanassiou, FH Arthur 169–82 Berlin: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    Costantino RF, Desharnais RA. 2012. Population Dynamics and the Tribolium Model: Genetics and Demography Berlin: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    de Miguel C, Linsler F, Casanova J, Franch-Marro X. 2016. Genetic basis for the evolution of organ morphogenesis: the case of spalt and cut in the development of insect trachea. Development 143:3615–22
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35. 
    Demuth JP, Wade MJ. 2007. Population differentiation in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. I. Genetic architecture. Evolution 61:494–509
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    Denell R. 2008. Establishment of Tribolium as a genetic model system and its early contributions to evo-devo. Genetics 180:1779–86
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Dippel S, Kollmann M, Oberhofer G, Montino A, Knoll C et al. 2016. Morphological and transcriptomic analysis of a beetle chemosensory system reveals a gnathal olfactory center. BMC Biol 14:90
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. 
    Dippel S, Oberhofer G, Kahnt J, Gerischer L, Opitz L et al. 2014. Tissue-specific transcriptomics, chromosomal localization, and phylogeny of chemosensory and odorant binding proteins from the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum reveal subgroup specificities for olfaction or more general functions. BMC Genom. 15:1141
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    Dönitz J, Schmitt-Engel C, Grossmann D, Gerischer L, Tech M 2015. iBeetle-Base: a database for RNAi phenotypes in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D720–25
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Dreyer D, Vitt H, Dippel S, Goetz B, Jundi B et al. 2010. 3D standard brain of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum: a tool to study metamorphic development and adult plasticity. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4:3
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Dyte CE, Blackman DG. 1970. The spread of insecticide resistance in Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 6:255–61
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42. 
    Edelsparre AH, Fitzpatrick MJ, Rodriquez MB, Greenspan RJ. 2020. Tracking dispersal across a patchy landscape reveals a dynamic interaction between genotype and habitat structure. Oikos 130:79–94
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    Endriss SB, Vahsen ML, Bitume EV, Monroe JG, Turner KG et al. 2019. The importance of growing up: Juvenile environment influences dispersal of individuals and their neighbours. Ecol. Lett. 22:45–55
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Engsontia P, Sanderson AP, Cobb M, Walden KKO, Robertson HM, Brown S. 2008. The red flour beetle's large nose: an expanded odorant receptor gene family in Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38:387–97
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    Farnworth MS, Eckermann KN, Ahmed HMM, Mühlen DS, He B, Bucher G. 2020. The red flour beetle as model for comparative neural development: genome editing to mark neural cells in Tribolium brain development. Methods Mol. Biol. 2047:191–217
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. 
    Fedina TY. 2007. Cryptic female choice during spermatophone transfer in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Insect Physiol. 53:93–98
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    Fedina TY, Lewis SM. 2008. Effect of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) nutritional environment, sex and mating status on response to commercial pheromone traps. J. Econ. Entomol. 100:1924–27
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. 
    Fedina TY, Lewis SM. 2008. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles. Biol. Rev. 83:151–71
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Feliciello I, Akrap I, Brajković J, Zlatar I, Ugarković Đ. 2014. Satellite DNA as a driver of population divergence in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Genome Biol. Evol. 7:228–39
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50. 
    Flinn PW, Campbell JF, Throne JE, Subramanyam B 2010. Simulation model of the red flour beetle in flour mills. Proceedings of the 10th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, ed. MO Carvalho, PG Fields, CS Adler, FH Arthur, CG Athanassiou et al.953–55 Berlin: Julius Kühn Inst.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Focken U. 2007. Effect of different ratios of wheat to corn flour in the diet on the development and isotopic composition (δ13C, δ15N) of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 43:143–54
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    Gerken AR, Campbell JF. 2020. Oviposition and development of Tribolium castaneum Herbst (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on different types of flour. Agronomy 10:1593
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 53. 
    Gerken AR, Scully ED, Campbell JF. 2018. Red flour beetle (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) response to volatile cues varies with strain and behavioral assay. Environ. Entomol. 47:1252–65
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Gilles AF, Schinko JB, Averof M. 2015. Efficient CRISPR-mediated gene targeting and transgene replacement in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Development 142:2832–39
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Good NE. 1936. Flour beetles of the genus Tribolium Tech. Bull. 498 U. S. Dep. Agric. Washington, DC:
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. 
    Guo SH, Yu L, Liu YM, Wang F-F, Chen Y-C et al. 2019. Digital gene expression profiling in larvae of Tribolium castaneum at different periods post UV-B exposure. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 174:514–23
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Gurdasani K, Rafter MA, Daglish GJ, Walter GH. 2018. Characterising the variables associated with Tribolium castaneum adults that initiate flight in laboratory tests: generating predictions for the field. J. Stored Prod. Res. 79:123–31
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    Hagstrum DW, Flinn PW. 1990. Simulations comparing insect species differences in response to wheat storage conditions and management practices. J. Econ. Entomol. 83:2469–75
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    Hagstrum DW, Gilbert EE. 1976. Emigration rate and age structure dynamics of Tribolium castaneum populations during growth phase of a colonizing episode. Environ. Entomol. 5:445–48
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Hagstrum DW, Subramanyam B. 2009. Stored-Product Insect Resource St. Paul, MN: AACC Int.
  61. 61. 
    Halliday WD, Blouin-Demers G. 2016. Male aggregation pheromones inhibit ideal free habitat selection in red flour beetles (Tribolium castaneum). J. Insect Behav. 29:355–67
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Hawkin KJ, Stanbridge DM, Fields PG. 2011. Sampling Tribolium confusum and Tribolium castaneum in mill and laboratory settings: differences between strains and species. Can. Entomol. 143:504–17
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. 
    Herndon N, Shelton J, Gerischer L, Ioannidis P, Ninova M et al. 2020. Enhanced genome assembly and a new official gene set for Tribolium castaneum. BMC Genom 21:47
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. 
    Hertlein MB, Thompson GD, Subramanyam B, Athanassiou CG. 2011. Spinosad: a new natural product for stored grain protection. J. Stored Prod. Res. 47:131–46
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    Hodges RJ, Smith M, Madden A, Russell D, Gudrups I, Halid H 1997. Development of a decision support system for the fumigation of milled-rice bag-stacks in the tropics. Proceedings of the International Conference on Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in Stored Products EJ Donahaye, S Navarro, A Varnava 425–34 Nicosia, Cyprus: Printco Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. 
    Hufbauer RA, Szűcs M, Kasyon E, Youngberg C, Koontz MJ et al. 2015. Three types of rescue can avert extinction in a changing environment. PNAS 112:10557–62
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. 
    Jacobs CG, Spaink HP, van der Zee M. 2014. The extraembryonic serosa is a frontier epithelium providing the insect egg with a full-range innate immune response. eLife 3:e04111
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Jagadeesan R, Collins PJ, Daglish GJ, Ebert PR, Schlipalius DI. 2012. Phosphine resistance in the rust red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): inheritance, gene interactions and fitness costs. PLOS ONE 7:e31582Examines fitness cost of populations of T. castaneum that are resistant to phosphine.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69. 
    Jagadeesan R, Fotheringham A, Ebert PR, Schlipalius DI. 2013. Rapid genome wide mapping of phosphine resistance loci by a simple regional averaging analysis in the red flour beetle. Tribolium castaneum. BMC Genom. 14:650
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 70. 
    Jung J-M, Byeon D-H, Kim S-H, Sunghoon-Jung Lee W-H 2020. Estimating economic damage to cocoa bean production with changes in the spatial distribution of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in response to climate change. J. Stored Prod. Res. 89:101681
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    Kalsi M, Palli SR. 2017. Cap n collar transcription factor regulates multiple genes coding for proteins involved in insecticide detoxification in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. . Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 90:43–52
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72. 
    Kavallieratos NG, Athanassiou CG, Arthur FH. 2017. Effectiveness of insecticide-incorporated bags to control stored-product beetles. J. Stored Prod. Res. 70:18–24
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73. 
    Kharel K, Arthur FA, Zhu KY, Campbell JF, Subramanyam B. 2014. Evaluation of synergized pyrethrin aerosol for control of Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 107:462–68
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. 
    Kim HG, Margolies D, Park Y 2015. The roles of thermal transient receptor potential channels in thermotactic behavior and in thermal acclimation in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. J. Insect Physiol. 76:47–55
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75. 
    Kim HS, Murphy T, Xia J, Caragea D, Park Y et al. 2010. BeetleBase in 2010: revisions to provide comprehensive genomic information for Tribolium castaneum. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D437–42
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76. 
    King CE, Dawson PS. 1972. Population biology and the Tribolium model. Evol. Biol. 5:133–227
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77. 
    Klann M, Schacht MI, Benton MA, Stollewerk A 2021. Functional analysis of sense organ specification in the Tribolium castaneum larva reveals divergent mechanisms in insects. BMC Biol 19:22
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78. 
    Kljajic P, Andric G, Adamovic M, Bodroza-Solarov M, Markovic M et al. 2010. Laboratory assessment of insecticidal effectiveness of natural zeolite and diatomaceous earth formulations against three stored-product beetle pests. J. Stored Prod. Res. 46:1–6
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79. 
    Knorr E, Fishilevich E, Tenbusch L, Frey MLF, Rangasamy M et al. 2018. Gene silencing in Tribolium castaneum as a tool for the targeted identification of candidate RNAi targets in crop pests. Sci Rep. 8:2061
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80. 
    Konopova B, Akam M. 2014. The Hox genes Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A specify three different types of abdominal appendage in the springtail Orchesella cincta (Collembola). EvoDevo 5:2
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81. 
    Koontz MJ, Oldfather MF, Melbourne BA, Hufbauer RA. 2018. Parsing propagule pressure: Number, not size, of introductions drives colonization success in a novel environment. Ecol. Evol. 8:8043–54Application of microlandscape experiments and demographic simulations to evaluate how colonization success is impacted by patterns of introductions.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 82. 
    Kumar H, Panigrahi M, Chhotaray S, Bhanuprakash V, Shandilya R et al. 2018. Red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum): from population genetics to functional genomics. Vet. World 11:1043–46
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 83. 
    Legault G, Bitters ME, Hastings A, Melbourne BA. 2020. Interspecific competition slows range expansion and shapes range boundaries. PNAS 117:26854–60
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84. 
    Lewis DL, DeCamillis M, Bennett RL. 2000.. Distinct roles of the homeotic genes Ubx and abd-A in beetle embryonic abdominal appendage development. PNAS 97:4504–9
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85. 
    Linz DM, Tomoyasu Y. 2015. RNAi screening of developmental toolkit genes: a search for novel wing genes in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Dev. Genes Evol. 225:11–22
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86. 
    Linz DM, Tomoyasu Y. 2018. Dual evolutionary origin of insect wings supported by an investigation of the abdominal wing serial homologs in Tribolium. PNAS 115:E658–67
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87. 
    Lorenzen MD, Gnirke A, Margolis J, Garnes J, Campbell M et al. 2008. The maternal-effect, selfish genetic element Medea is associated with a composite Tc1 transposon. PNAS 105:10085–89
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88. 
    Lu Y, Beeman RW, Campbell JF, Park Y, Aikins MJ et al. 2011. Anatomical localization and stereoisomeric composition of Tribolium castaneum aggregation pheromones. Naturwissenschaften 98:755–61
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 89. 
    Lu Y, Park Y, Gao X, Zhang X, Yao J et al. 2012. Cholinergic and non-cholinergic functions of two acetylcholinesterase genes revealed by gene-silencing in Tribolium castaneum. Sci. Rep. 2:288
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 90. 
    Malekpour R, Rafter MA, Daglish GJ, Walter GH. 2016. Influence of phosphine resistance genes on flight propensity and resource location in Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): the landscape for selection. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 119:348–58
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91. 
    Matsumura K, Miyatake T. 2015. Differences in attack avoidance and mating success between strains artificially selected for dispersal distance in Tribolium castaneum. PLOS ONE 10:e0127042
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92. 
    Matsumura K, Miyatake T. 2019. Lines selected for different durations of tonic immobility have different leg lengths in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Behaviour 157:17–31
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93. 
    Matsumura K, Sasaki K, Miyatake T. 2016. Correlated responses in death-feigning behavior, activity, and brain biogenic amine expression in red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum strains selected for walking distance. J. Ethol. 34:97–105
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 94. 
    Mertz DB. 1972. Tribolium model and the mathematics of population growth. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:51–78
     [Google Scholar]
  95. 95. 
    Michalczyk L, Millard AL, Martin OY, Lumley AJ, Emerson BC et al. 2011. Inbreeding promotes female promiscuity. Science 333:1739–42
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 96. 
    Milutinovic B, Peuss R, Ferro K, Kurtz J. 2016. Immune priming in arthropods: an update focusing on the red flour beetle. Zoology 119:254–61
     [Google Scholar]
  97. 97. 
    Miyatake T, Katayama K, Takeda Y, Nakashima A, Sugita A, Mizumoto M. 2004. Is death-feigning adaptive? Heritable variation in fitness difference of death-feigning behaviour. Proc. R. Soc. B 271:2293–96
     [Google Scholar]
  98. 98. 
    Morrison WR, Wilkins RV, Gerken AR, Scheff DS, Zhu KY et al. 2018. Mobility of adult Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) after exposure to long-lasting insecticide-incorporated netting. J. Econ. Entomol. 111:2443–53
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 99. 
    Nayak MK, Daglish GJ, Phillips TW, Ebert PR. 2020. Resistance to the fumigant phosphine and its management in insect pests of stored products: a global perspective. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 65:333–50
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 100. 
    Noh MY, Kramer KJ, Muthukrishnan S, Beeman RW, Kanost MR, Arakane Y. 2015. Loss of function of the yellow-e gene causes dehydration-induced mortality of adult Tribolium castaneum. Dev. Biol. 399:315–24
     [Google Scholar]
  101. 101. 
    Noh MY, Kramer KJ, Muthukrishnan S, Kanost MR, Beeman RW, Arakane Y. 2014. Two major cuticular proteins are required for assembly of horizontal laminae and vertical pore canals in rigid cuticle of Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 53:22–29
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 102. 
    Noh MY, Muthukrishnan S, Kramer KJ, Arakane Y. 2018. A chitinase with two catalytic domains is required for organization of the cuticular extracellular matrix of a beetle. PLOS Genet 14:e1007307
     [Google Scholar]
  103. 103. 
    Oppert B, Guedes RN, Aikins MJ, Perkin L, Chen Z et al. 2015. Genes related to mitochondrial functions are differentially expressed in phosphine-resistant and -susceptible Tribolium castaneum. BMC Genom 16:968
     [Google Scholar]
  104. 104. 
    Oppert B, Perkin L. 2019. RNAiSeq: how to see the big picture. Front. Microbiol. 10:2570
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 105. 
    Pai A, Bernasconi G. 2008. Polyandry and female control: the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum as a case study. J. Exp. Zool. B 310:148–59
     [Google Scholar]
  106. 106. 
    Pai A, Yan G. 2020. Long-term study of female multiple mating indicates direct benefits in Tribolium castaneum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 168:398–406
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 107. 
    Park T. 1962. Beetles, competition and populations: An intricate ecological phenomenon is brought into the laboratory and studied as an experimental model. Science 138:1369–75
     [Google Scholar]
  108. 108. 
    Park Y, Aikins J, Wang LJ, Beeman RW, Oppert B et al. 2008. Analysis of transcriptome data in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38:380–86
     [Google Scholar]
  109. 109. 
    Perkin LC, Oppert B. 2019. Gene expression in Tribolium castaneum life stages: identifying a species-specific target for pest control applications. PeerJ 7:e6946
     [Google Scholar]
  110. 110. 
    Pimentel MAG, Faroni LRDA, Tótola MR, Guedes RNC. 2007. Phosphine resistance, respiration rate and fitness consequences in stored-product insects. Pest Manag. Sci. 63:876–81
     [Google Scholar]
  111. 111. 
    Pointer MD, Gage MJG, Spurgin LG. 2021. Tribolium beetles as a model system in evolution and ecology. Heredity 126:869–83
     [Google Scholar]
  112. 112. 
    Prühs R, Beermann A, Schröder R. 2017. The roles of the Wnt-antagonists axin and Lrp4 during embryogenesis of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. J. Dev. Biol. 5:10
     [Google Scholar]
  113. 113. 
    Rafter MA, McCulloch GA, Daglish GJ, Walter GH. 2017. Progression of phosphine resistance in susceptible Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) populations under different immigration regimes and selection pressures. Evol. Appl. 10:907–18
     [Google Scholar]
  114. 114. 
    Rajendran S. 2000. Inhibition of hatching of Tribolium castaneum by phosphine. J. Stored Prod. Res. 36:101–6
     [Google Scholar]
  115. 115. 
    Richards S, Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Brown SJ, Denell R et al. 2008. The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum. Nature 452:949–55Describes the genome of T. castaneum and its utilization as a model species in genomics of economically important insect species.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 116. 
    Ridley AW, Hereward JP, Daglish GJ, Raghu S, Collins PJ, Walter GH 2011. The spatiotemporal dynamics of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst): adult flight and gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 20:1635–46
     [Google Scholar]
  117. 117. 
    Romero SA, Campbell JF, Nechols JR, With KA. 2009. Movement behavior in response to landscape structure: the role of functional grain. Landscape Ecol 24:39–51
     [Google Scholar]
  118. 118. 
    Romero SA, Campbell JF, Nechols JR, With KA. 2010. Movement behavior of red flour beetle: response to habitat cues and patch boundaries. Environ. Entomol. 39:919–29
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 119. 
    Rösner J, Wellmeyer B, Merzendorfer H. 2020. Tribolium castaneum: a model for investigating the mode of action of insecticides and mechanisms of resistance. Curr. Pharm. Des. 26:3554–68
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 120. 
    Ruckman SN, Blackmon H. 2020. The march of the beetles: Epistatic components dominate divergence in dispersal tendency in Tribolium castaneum. J. Hered. 111:498–505
     [Google Scholar]
  121. 121. 
    Sang M, Li C, Wu W, Li B. 2016. Identification and evolution of two insulin receptor genes involved in Tribolium castaneum development and reproduction. Gene 585:196–204
     [Google Scholar]
  122. 122. 
    Schlipalius DI, Valmas N, Tuck AG, Jagadeesan R, Ma L et al. 2012. A core metabolic enzyme mediates resistance to phosphine gas. Science 338:807–10Illustrates the loci that are related to DLD in phosphine resistance in T. castaneum.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. 123. 
    Schmitt-Engel C, Schultheis D, Schwirz J, Ströhlein N, Troelenerg N et al. 2015. The iBeetle large-scale RNAi screen reveals gene functions for insect development and physiology. Nat. Commun 6:7822
     [Google Scholar]
  124. 124. 
    Schultheis D, Weißkopf M, Schaub C, Ansari S, Dao VA et al. 2019. A large scale systemic RNAi screen in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum identifies novel genes involved in insect muscle development. G3 9:1009–26
     [Google Scholar]
  125. 125. 
    Semeao AA, Campbell JF, Whitworth RJ, Sloderbeck PE. 2013. Movement of Tribolium castaneum within a flour mill. J. Stored Prod. Res. 54:17–22
     [Google Scholar]
  126. 126. 
    Shukla JN, Palli SR. 2013. Tribolium castaneum Transformer-2 regulates sex determination and development in both males and females. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43:1125–32
     [Google Scholar]
  127. 127. 
    Smith FW, Jockusch EL. 2014. Hox genes require homothorax and extradenticle for body wall identity specification but not for appendage identity specification during metamorphosis of Tribolium castaneum. Dev. Biol. 395:182–97
     [Google Scholar]
  128. 128. 
    Sokoloff A. 1966. The Genetics of Tribolium and Related Species New York: Academic
  129. 129. 
    Sokoloff A. 1972–1977. The Biology of Tribolium with Special Emphasis on Genetic Aspects Vols 1–3 Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press/Oxford Univ. Press
  130. 130. 
    Soliman MH. 1987. Aging and parental age effects in Tribolium. . Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 6:43–60
     [Google Scholar]
  131. 131. 
    Stappert D, Frey N, von Levetzow C, Roth S. 2016. Genome-wide identification of Tribolium dorsoventral patterning genes. Development 143:2443–54
     [Google Scholar]
  132. 132. 
    Szűcs M, Vahsen ML, Melbourne BA, Hoover C, Weiss-Lehman C, Hufbauer RA. 2017. Rapid adaptive evolution in novel environments acts as an architect of population range expansion. PNAS 114:13501–6
     [Google Scholar]
  133. 133. 
    Thomson MS. 2014. A selfish gene chastened: Tribolium castaneum Medea M4 is silenced by a complementary gene. Genetica 142:161–67
     [Google Scholar]
  134. 134. 
    Toews MD, Arthur FH, Campbell JF 2009. Monitoring Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) in pilot-scale warehouses treated with b-cyfluthrin: Are residual insecticides and trapping compatible?. Bull. Entomol. Res. 99:121–29Demonstrates that there are asymmetries in correlating insecticidal applications with population rebounds in T. castaneum.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. 135. 
    Tomoyasu Y, Miller SC, Tomita S, Schoppmeier M, Grossmann D, Bucher G 2008. Exploring systemic RNA interference in insects: a genome-wide survey for RNAi genes in Tribolium. Genome Biol 9:R10
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 136. 
    Tong XL, Fu MY, Chen P, Chen L, Xiang ZH et al. 2017. Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A specify the abdominal appendage in a dosage-dependent manner in silkworm, Bombyx mori. Heredity 118:578–84
     [Google Scholar]
  137. 137. 
    Trebels B, Dippel S, Schaaf M, Balakrishnan K, Wimmer EA, Schachtner J. 2020. Adult neurogenesis in the mushroom bodies of red flour beetles (Tribolium castaneum, Herbst) is influenced by the olfactory environment. Sci. Rep. 10:1090Demonstrates that odor environment influences proliferation of Kenyon cells in the brain of T. castaneum.
     [Google Scholar]
  138. 138. 
    Ulrich J, Dao VA, Majumdar U, Schmitt-Engel C, Schwirz J et al. 2015. Large scale RNAi screen in Tribolium reveals novel target genes for pest control and the proteasome as prime target. BMC Genom 16: 674
    [Google Scholar]
  139. 139. 
    Vahsen ML, Shea K, Hovis CL, Teller BJ, Hufbauer RA. 2018. Prior adaptation, diversity, and introduction frequency mediate the positive relationship between propagule pressure and the initial success of founding populations. Biol. Invasions 20:2451–59
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 140. 
    Vilcinskas A. 2016. The role of epigenetics in host-parasite coevolution: lessons from the model host insects Galleria mellonella and Tribolium castaneum. Zoology 119:273–80
     [Google Scholar]
  141. 141. 
    Wang K, Liu M, Wang Y, Song W, Tang P. 2020. Identification and functional analysis of cytochrome P450 CYP346 family genes associated with phosphine resistance in Tribolium castaneum. . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 168:104622
     [Google Scholar]
  142. 142. 
    Wang L, Wang S, Li Y, Paradesi MS, Brown SJ. 2007. BeetleBase: the model organism database for Tribolium castaneum. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D476–79
     [Google Scholar]
  143. 143. 
    Weiss-Lehman C, Hufbauer RA, Melbourne BA. 2017. Rapid trait evolution drives increased speed and variance in experimental range expansions. Nat. Commun. 8:14303
     [Google Scholar]
  144. 144. 
    Wijayaratne LKW, Arthur FH, Whyard S 2018. Methoprene and control of stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 76:161–69
     [Google Scholar]
  145. 145. 
    Xiao D, Gao X, Xu J, Liang X, Li Q et al. 2015. Clathrin-dependent endocytosis plays a predominant role in cellular uptake of double-stranded RNA in the red flour beetle. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 60:68–77
     [Google Scholar]
  146. 146. 
    Zhu F, Parthasarathy R, Bai H, Woithe K, Kaussmann M et al. 2010. A brain-specific cytochrome P450 responsible for the majority of deltamethrin resistance in the QTC279 strain of Tribolium castaneum. PNAS 107:8557–62
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ento-080921-075157
Loading
Tribolium castaneum: A Model Insect for Fundamental and Applied Research
Annual Review of Entomology 67, 347 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-080921-075157
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ento-080921-075157
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ento-080921-075157
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error