COVID-19 and the Data Governance Gap

Literature Cited

1. Abraham R, Schneider J, vom Brocke J. 2019. Data governance: a conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 49:424–38
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ada Lovelace Inst 2020. Exit through the app store: a rapid evidence review on the technical considerations and societal implications of using technology to transition from the COVID-19 crisis Rev. Ada Lovelace Inst. London: https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Ada-Lovelace-Institute-Rapid-Evidence-Review-Exit-through-the-App-Store-April-2020-2.pdf
3. Alhassan I, Sammon D, Daly M. 2016. Data governance activities: an analysis of the literature. J. Decis. Syst. 25:64–75
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alhassan I, Sammon D, Daly M. 2018. Data governance activities: a comparison between scientific and practice-oriented literature. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 31:2300–16
   [Google Scholar]
5. Artyushina A. 2020. Is civic data governance the key to democratic smart cities? The role of the urban data trust in Sidewalk Toronto. Telematics Inform. 55:101456
   [Google Scholar]
6. Austin L. 2022. From privacy to social legibility. Surveill. Soc. 20:3 https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v20i3.15762
   [Google Scholar]
7. Austin L, Lie D. 2019. Safe sharing sites. N.Y. Univ. Law Rev. 94:4581–623
   [Google Scholar]
8. Austin L, Lie D. 2021. Data trusts and the governance of smart environments: lessons from the failure of Sidewalk Labs’ Urban Data Trust. Surveill. Soc. 19:2 https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v19i2.14409
   [Google Scholar]
9. Austin L, Slane A. 2023. Digitally rethinking Hunter v Southam. . Osgoode Hall Law J. 60: In press
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bacharach M, Gambetta D. 2001. Trust in signs. Trust in Society K Cook 148–84. New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bagchi K, Bannan C, Franklin SB, Hurlburt H, Sarkesian L et al. 2020. Digital tools for COVID-19 contact tracing: identifying and mitigating the equity, privacy, and civil liberties concerns White Pap. 22 Edmond Lily Safra Cent. Ethics, Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA: https://ethics.harvard.edu/digital-tools-for-contact-tracing
12. Balkin J. 2016. Information fiduciaries and the first amendment. U.C. Davis Law Rev. 49:1183–234
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bay J. 2020. Automated contact tracing is not a coronavirus panacea. Government Digital Services Singapore April 10. https://medium.com/singapore-gds/automated-contact-tracing-is-not-a-coronavirus-panacea-57fb3ce61d98
    [Google Scholar]
14. Benfeldt O, Persson JS, Madsen S. 2020. Data governance as a collective action problem. Inf. Syst. Front. 22:2299–313
    [Google Scholar]
15. Benn C, Lazar S. 2022. What's wrong with automated influence. Can. J. Philos. 52:1125–48
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bhatt A. 2021. Data sovereignty: the quintessential model for the new world order. Indian Law Inst. Law Rev. 2021:285–302
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch T, eds. 2012. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Anniv. ed .
18. Birnhack M, Zar M. 2020. Privacy in crisis: privacy guidelines for the design of contact tracing technologies Work. Pap. Tel Aviv Univ., Tel Aviv Israel: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3683166
19. Bourdeaux M, Gray ML, Crosz B. 2020. How human-centered tech can beat COVID-19 through contact tracing. The Hill April 21. https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/493648-how-human-centered-technology-can-beat-covid-19-through-contact-tracing/
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bradford L, Aboy M, Liddell K. 2020. COVID-19 contact tracing apps: a stress test for privacy, the GDPR, and data protection regimes. J. Law Biosci. 7:1lsaa034
    [Google Scholar]
21. Bragazzi NL, Dai H, Damiani G, Behzadifar M, Martini M, Wu J. 2020. How big data and artificial intelligence can help better manage the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:93176
    [Google Scholar]
22. Brous P. 2020. Trusted decision-making: data governance for creating trust in data science decision outcomes. Adm. Sci. 10:481
    [Google Scholar]
23. Brownsword R. 2021. Law 3.0: Rules, Regulation, and Technology New York: Routledge
24. Butler A, Zhou E. 2021. Disease and data in society: how the pandemic expanded data collection and surveillance systems. Am. Univ. Law Rev. 70:51577–628
    [Google Scholar]
25. Cavoukian A. 2009. Privacy by Design: the 7 foundational principles Resour., Inf. Priv. Comm. Ont., Tor. Ont., Can: https://iapp.org/resources/article/privacy-by-design-the-7-foundational-principles/
26. CDC (Cent. Dis. Control Prev.) 2020. Digital contact tracing tools https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/contact-tracing/contact-tracing-plan/digital-contact-tracing-tools.html
27. Chakravorti B. 2022. Why AI failed to live up to its potential during the pandemic. Harvard Business Review March 17. https://hbr.org/2022/03/why-ai-failed-to-live-up-to-its-potential-during-the-pandemic
    [Google Scholar]
28. Churches G, Zalnieriute M. 2020. The instrumentality of metadata access regime for suppressing political protests in Australia. Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law Aug. 4. http://www.iconnectblog.com/2020/08/the-instrumentality-of-metadata-access-regime-for-suppressing-political-protests-in-australia
    [Google Scholar]
29. Cofone I. 2019. Algorithmic discrimination is an information problem. Hastings Law J. 70:61389–443
    [Google Scholar]
30. Cofone I. 2021a. Beyond data ownership. Cardozo Law Rev. 43:2501–72
    [Google Scholar]
31. Cofone I. 2021b. Immunity passports and contact tracing surveillance. Stanford Technol. Law Rev. 24:2176–236
    [Google Scholar]
32. Cohen JE. 2019. Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism New York: Oxford Univ. Press
33. Daly M. 2003. Governance and social policy. J. Soc. Policy 32:1113–28
    [Google Scholar]
34. Daskal J. 2020. Good health and good privacy go hand-in-hand (originally published by JNSLP). Joint PIJIP/TLS Res. Pap. Ser. 60. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/research/60
35. Data Gov. Inst 2022. Definitions of data governance https://datagovernance.com/the-data-governance-basics/definitions-of-data-governance/
36. Delacroix S, Lawrence ND. 2019. Bottom-up data trusts: disturbing the “one size fits all” approach to data governance. Int. Data Priv. Law 9:4236–52
    [Google Scholar]
37. Elouazizi N. 2014. Critical factors in data governance for learning analytics. J. Learn. Anal. 1:3211–22
    [Google Scholar]
38. Enriquez-Sarano L. 2020. Data-rich and knowledge-poor: how privacy law privatized medical data and what to do about it. Columbia Law Rev. 120:82319–58
    [Google Scholar]
39. ETHI (Stand. Comm. Access Inf. Priv. Ethics) 2022. Collection and use of mobility data by the government and related issues Rep. ETHI Ottawa, Can.: https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/ETHI/report-4/
40. Eur. Data Prot. Board 2019. Guidelines 4/2019 on article 25 data protection by design and by default, Version 2.0 Guidel., Eur. Data Prot. Board, Brussels https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/guidelines/guidelines-42019-article-25-data-protection-design-and_en
41. Eur. Data Prot. Board 2020. Guidelines 04/2020 on the use of location data and contact tracing tools in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak Guidel., Eur. Data Prot. Board, Brussels https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/guidelines/guidelines-042020-use-location-data-and-contact-tracing_en
42. Ferreti L, Wymant C, Kendall M, Zhao L, Nurtay A et al. 2020. Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing. Science 368:6491619
    [Google Scholar]
43. Findlay M, Remolina N. 2020. Regulating personal data usage in COVID-19 control conditions Res. Pap. 2020/04 SMU Cent. AI Data Gov. Dallas, TX: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3607706 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3607706
44. Fisher A, Streinz T. 2022. Confronting data inequality. Columbia J. Transnatl. Law 60:3829–956
    [Google Scholar]
45. Flood CM, Thomas B, Wilson K 2020. Civil liberties versus public health. Vulnerable: The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19 CM Flood, V MacDonnell, J Philpott, S Thériault, S Venkatapuram, chapter C-1 Ottawa: Univ. Ott. Press
    [Google Scholar]
46. Frischmann B, Selinger E. 2018. Re-Engineering Humanity New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
47. Ghose A, Li B, Macha M, Sun C, Foutz NZ. 2020. Trading privacy for the greater social good: How did America react during COVID-19? IDEAS Work. Pap. Ser. Res. Pap. Econ. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3624069
48. Gil ED. 2021. Digital contact tracing has failed: Can it be fixed with better legal design? Va. . J. Law Technol. 25:11–37
    [Google Scholar]
49. Glob. Priv. Assem 2020. Adopted resolution on the privacy and data protection challenges arising in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic Resolut., 42nd Closed Sess Glob. Priv. Assem., Oct. Mexico City:
50. Griffin J. 2005. Data governance: a strategy for success. DM Rev. 15:649
    [Google Scholar]
51. Guo S, Lumineau F, Lewicki R. 2017. Revisiting the foundations of organizational distrust. Found. Trends Manag. 1:1–88
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hadfield G. 2017. Rules for a Flat World: Why Humans Invented Law and How to Reinvent It for a Complex Global Economy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
53. Hartzog W. 2018. Privacy's Blueprint: The Battle to Control the Design of New Technologies Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
54. Herzog L. 2021. Privatizing private data. The Cambridge Handbook of Privatization A Dorfman, A Harel 230–44. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
55. Hildebrandt M. 2015. Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
56. Hildebrandt M, Tielemans L. 2013. Data protection by design and technology neutral law. Comput. Law Secur. Rep. 29:5509–21
    [Google Scholar]
57. Hinch R, Probert W, Nurtay A, Kendall M, Wymant C et al. 2020. Effective configurations of a digital contact tracing app: a report to NHSX. Rep. Conversation Waltham, MA: https://cdn.theconversation.com/static_files/files/1009/Report_-_Effective_App_Configurations.pdf
58. Hoffman D. 2020. Increasing access to care: telehealth during COVID-19. J. Law Biosci. 7:1lsaa043
    [Google Scholar]
59. Hoffman D, Podgurski A. 2020. Artificial intelligence and discrimination in health care. Yale J. Health Policy Law Ethics 19:33–49
    [Google Scholar]
60. Houser KA, Bagby JM. 2022. The data trust solution to data sharing problems. Vanderbilt J. Entertain. Technol. Law. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4050593
    [Google Scholar]
61. Howell BE, Potgieter PH. 2021. A tale of two contact-tracing apps—comparing Australia's COVIDSafe and New Zealand's NZ COVID Tracer. Info 23:5509–28
    [Google Scholar]
62. Hubbard D. 2020. Data governance 101: IR's critical role in data governance. New Dir. Inst. Res. 2020:51–65
    [Google Scholar]
63. Huq AZ. 2021. The public trust in data. Georgetown Law J. 110:2333–402
    [Google Scholar]
64. Iliadis A, Russo F. 2016. Critical data studies: an introduction. Big Data Soc. 3:2 https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674238
    [Google Scholar]
65. Jalali MS, Landman A, Gordon W. 2021. Telemedicine, privacy, and information security in the age of COVID-19. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 28:3671–72
    [Google Scholar]
66. Janssen M. 2020. Data governance: organizing data for trustworthy artificial intelligence. Gov. Info. Q. 37:3101493
    [Google Scholar]
67. Kampmark B. 2020. The pandemic surveillance state: an enduring legacy of COVID-19. J. Glob. Faultlines 7:159–70
    [Google Scholar]
68. Kaplan B. 2020. Revisiting health information technology ethical, legal, and social issues and evaluation: telehealth/telemedicine and COVID-19. Int. J. Med. Inform. 143:104239
    [Google Scholar]
69. Karmakar S, Das S. 2021. Understanding the rise of Twitter-based cyberbullying due to COVID-19 through comprehensive statistical evaluation. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii (Virtual). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3768839
    [Google Scholar]
70. Kingsbury B, Maisley N. 2021. Infrastructures and laws: publics and publicness. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 17:353–73
    [Google Scholar]
71. Knoppers BM, Beauvais MJS, Joly Y, Zawati MH, Rousseau S et al. 2020. Modeling consent in the time of COVID-19. J. Law Biosci. 7:1lsaa020
    [Google Scholar]
72. Koch R, Corban T. 2020. Data governance in digital transformation. Strateg. Finance 102:360–61
    [Google Scholar]
73. Koops B, Leenes RE. 2014. Privacy regulation cannot be hardcoded: a critical comment on the ‘Privacy by Design’ provision in data-protection law. Int. Rev. Law Comput. Technol. 28:159–71
    [Google Scholar]
74. Kostka G, Habich-Sobiegalla S. 2022. In times of crisis: public perceptions toward COVID-19 contact tracing apps in China, Germany, and the United States. New Media Soc. In press
    [Google Scholar]
75. Landau S. 2021. People Count: Contact-Tracing Apps and Public Health Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
76. Lazar S. 2022. Legitimacy, authority, and the political value of explanations. arXiv 08628. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2208.08628
77. Leith D, Farrell S. 2020a. GAEN due diligence: verifying the Google/Apple COVID exposure notification API https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Doug.Leith/pubs/gaen_verification.pdf
78. Leith D, Farrell S. 2020b. Contact tracing app privacy: What data is shared by Europe's GAEN contact tracing apps. 2021 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications1–10. Vancouver, BC: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
79. Leslie D. 2020. Tackling COVID-19 through responsible AI innovation: five steps in the right direction. Harvard Data Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2008.06755
    [Google Scholar]
80. Levin A. 2018. Privacy by design by regulation: the case study of Ontario. Can. J. Contemp. Comp. Law 1:116–59
    [Google Scholar]
81. Lewicki J, McAllister DJ, Bies RJ. 1998. Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23:438–58
    [Google Scholar]
82. Li T. 2021. Privacy in pandemic: law, technology, and public health in the COVID-19 crisis. Loyola Univ. Chicago Law J. 52:3767–865
    [Google Scholar]
83. Liakh O. 2021. Accountability through sustainability data governance: reconfiguring reporting to better account for the digital acceleration. Sustainability 13:2413814
    [Google Scholar]
84. Mann M, Mitchell P, Foth M. 2022. Between surveillance and technological solutionism: a critique of privacy-preserving apps for COVID-19 contact-tracing. New Media Soc. In press
    [Google Scholar]
85. Marková I, Grossen M, Linell P, Salazar OA. 2007. Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge London: Equinox
86. Marks M. 2021. Emergent medical data: health information inferred by artificial intelligence. UC Irvine Law Rev. 11:995–1066
    [Google Scholar]
87. Marx G. 2015. Surveillance studies. Int. Encycl. Soc. Behav. Sci. 23:733–41
    [Google Scholar]
88. McCall MK, Skutsch MM, Honey-Roses J. 2021. Surveillance in the COVID-19 normal: tracking, tracing, and snooping—trade-offs in safety and autonomy in the e-city. Int. J. E-Plann. Res. 10:227–44
    [Google Scholar]
89. Micheli M, Ponti M, Craglia M, Suman AB. 2020. Emerging models of data governance in the age of datafication. Big Data Soc. 7:2 https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720948087
    [Google Scholar]
90. Mittelstadt BD, Allo P, Taddeo M, Wachter S, Floridi L. 2016. The ethics of algorithms: mapping the debate. Big Data Soc. 3:2 https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
    [Google Scholar]
91. Morley J, Cowls J, Taddeo M, Floridi L. 2020. Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps. Nature 582:781029–31
    [Google Scholar]
92. Moses LB, Zalnieriute M. 2020. Law and technology in the dimension of time. Time, Law and Change: An Interdisciplinary Study S Ranchordas, Y Roznai 303–26. Oxford, UK: Hart Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Naudé W. 2020. Artificial intelligence against COVID-19: an early review. AI Soc. 35:761–65
    [Google Scholar]
94. OMDDAC 2021. Mapping the data-driven landscape. OMDDAC News Jan. 25. https://www.omddac.org.uk/news/mapping-the-data-driven-landscape/
    [Google Scholar]
95. O'Connell J, O'Keefe D. 2021. Contact tracing for COVID-19—a digital inoculation against future pandemics. N. Engl. J. Med. 385:484–87
    [Google Scholar]
96. O'Neil C. 2017. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy New York: Broadway Books
97. Oswald M, Grace J. 2021. The COVID-19 contact tracing app in England and “experimental proportionality. .” Public Law 2021:27–37
    [Google Scholar]
98. Otto B. 2011. Organizing data governance: findings from the telecommunications industry and consequences for large service providers. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 29:3
    [Google Scholar]
99. Pagallo U. 2012. On the principle of privacy by design and its limits: technology, ethics and the rule of law. European Data Protection: In Good Health? S Gutwirth, R Leenes, P De Hert, Y Poullet 331–46. Dordrecht: Springer Neth.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Parker MJ, Fraser C, Abeler-Dörner L, Bonsall D. 2020. Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. . J. Med. Ethics 46:7427–31
     [Google Scholar]
101. Pila J. 2020. COVID-19 and contact tracing: a study in regulation by technology. Eur. J. Law Technol. 11:2 https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/782/1010
     [Google Scholar]
102. Postema GJ. 2022. Law's Rule: The Nature, Value, and Viability of the Rule of Law New York: Oxford Univ. Press
103. Prainsack B. 2019. Logged out: ownership, exclusion and public value in the digital data and information commons. Big Data Soc. 6:1 https://doi.org/10.1177/205395171982977
     [Google Scholar]
104. Ramjee D, Sanderson P, Malek I. 2021. COVID-19 and digital contact tracing: regulating the future of public health surveillance. Cardozo Law Rev. De Novo 2021:101–61
     [Google Scholar]
105. Regan P. 1995. Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Values, and Public Policy Chapel Hill: Univ. N.C. Press
106. Rhue L, Washington A. 2020. AIs wide open: premature artificial intelligence and public policy. Boston Univ. J. Sci. Technol. Law 26:2353–78
     [Google Scholar]
107. Richards N, Hartzog W. 2020. A duty of loyalty for privacy law. Washington Univ. Law Rev. 99:961–1021
     [Google Scholar]
108. Roberts H, Cowls J, Casolari F, Morley J, Taddeo M, Floridi L. 2021. Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: an analysis of statements and policies. Internet Policy Rev. 10:3 https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1575
     [Google Scholar]
109. Roberts M, Driggs D, Thorpe M, Gilbey J, Yeung M et al. 2021. Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans. Nat. Machine Intel. 3:199–217
     [Google Scholar]
110. Robin R, Dandis A. 2021. Business as usual through contact tracing app: What influences intention to download?. J. Mark. Manag. 37:17–181903–32
     [Google Scholar]
111. Rubinstein IS, Good N. 2020. The trouble with Article 25 (and how to fix it): the future of data protection design and default. Int. Data Priv. Law 10:137–56
     [Google Scholar]
112. Salathé M, Althaus C, Anderegg N, Antonioli D, Ballouz T et al. 2020. Early evidence of effectiveness of digital contact tracing for SARS-COV-2 in Switzerland. Swiss Med. Wkly. 150:w20457
     [Google Scholar]
113. Saunders MNK, Dietz G, Thornhill A. 2014. Trust and distrust: Polar opposites, or independent but co-existing?. Hum. Relat. 67:639–65
     [Google Scholar]
114. Savona M. 2020. The saga of the COVID-19 contact tracing apps: lessons for data governance Work. Pap. Ser. RePEc IDEAS http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3645073
115. Scassa T. 2020. Designing data governance for data sharing: lessons from Sidewalk Toronto. Technol. Regul. 2020:44–56
     [Google Scholar]
116. Scott M, Braun E, Delcker J, Manancourt V. 2020. How Google and Apple outflanked governments in the race to build coronavirus apps. Politico May 15. https://www.politico.eu/article/google-apple-coronavirus-app-privacy-uk-france-germany/
     [Google Scholar]
117. Sharon T. 2020. Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech's newfound role as global health policy makers. Ethics Inf. Technol. 23:Suppl. 145–57
     [Google Scholar]
118. Shaw J, James A, Nayha S, Cassel CK. 2020. Social license for the use of big data in the COVID-19 era. npj Digit. Med. 3:128
     [Google Scholar]
119. Sitkin SB, Roth NL. 1993. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. 4:367–92
     [Google Scholar]
120. Smichowski BC. 2019. Alternative data governance models: moving beyond one-size-fits-all solutions. Intereconomics 54:4222–27
     [Google Scholar]
121. Solove D. 2021. The myth of the privacy paradox. George Washington Law Rev. 89:1–51
     [Google Scholar]
122. Soltani A, Calo R, Bergstrom C. 2020. Contact-tracing apps are not a solution to the COVID-19 crisis. Brookings TechStream April 27. https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/inaccurate-and-insecure-why-contact-tracing-apps-could-be-a-disaster/
     [Google Scholar]
123. Susser D, Roessler B, Nissenbaum H. 2019. Online manipulation: hidden influences in a digital world. Georgetown Law Technol. Rev. 4:1–45
     [Google Scholar]
124. Syrowatka A, Kuznetsova M, Alsubai A, Beckman AL, Bain PA et al. 2021. Leveraging artificial intelligence for pandemic preparedness and response: a scoping review to identify key use cases. npj Digit. Med. 4:96
     [Google Scholar]
125. Taylor L. 2017. What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data Soc. 4:2 https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335
     [Google Scholar]
126. Taylor L, Floridi L, van der Sloot B, eds. 2017. Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technologies Cham, Switz: Springer Int. Publ.
127. Thompson N. 2015. Government data does not mean data governance: lessons learned from a public sector application audit. Gov. Inf. Q. 32:3316–22
     [Google Scholar]
128. Troncoso C, Payer M, Hubaux J-P, Salathé M, Larus J et al. 2020. Decentralized privacy-preserving proximity tracing White Pap. EPFL Lausanne, Switz: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2005/2005.12273.pdf
129. Tsosie R. 2019. Tribal data governance and informational privacy: constructing “Indigenous data sovereignty. .” Mont. Law Rev. 80:2229–67
     [Google Scholar]
130. Vatanparast R. 2020. Data governance and the elasticity of sovereignty. Brooklyn J. Int. Law 46:11–38
     [Google Scholar]
131. Veale M 2020. Sovereignty, privacy, and contact tracing protocols. Data Justice and COVID-19: Global Perspectives L Taylor, G Sharma, AAK Martin, SM Jameson 34–39. Manchester, UK: Meatspace
     [Google Scholar]
132. Veale M, Binns R, Ausloos J. 2018. When data protection by design and data subject rights clash. Int. Data Priv. Law 8:2105–203
     [Google Scholar]
133. Viljoen S. 2021. A relational theory of data governance. Yale Law J. 131:2573–654
     [Google Scholar]
134. Wang C. 2019. An integrated data analytics process to optimize data governance of non-profit organization. Comput. Hum. Behav. 101:495–505
     [Google Scholar]
135. Wang M, Li S, Zheng T, Li N, Shi Q et al. 2022. Big data health care platform with multisource heterogeneous data integration and massive high-dimensional data governance for large hospitals: design, development, and application. JMIR Med. Inform. 10:4e36481
     [Google Scholar]
136. Wee A, Findlay MJ. 2021. Digital contact tracing—an examination of uptake in UK and Germany Res. Pap. 10 SMU Cent. AI Data Gov. Dallas, TX: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3915303
137. Were V, Moturi C. 2017. Toward a data governance model for the Kenya health professional regulatory authorities. TQM J. 29:4579–89
     [Google Scholar]
138. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJJ, Appleton G, Axton M et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3:160018
     [Google Scholar]
139. World Health Organ 2017. Contact tracing https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/contact-tracing
140. Wynants L, Van Calster B, Collins GS, Riley RD, Heinze G et al. 2020. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ 369:m1328
     [Google Scholar]
141. Yallop AC, Aliasghar O. 2020. No business as usual: a case for data ethics and data governance in the age of coronavirus. Online Inf. Rev. 44:61217–21
     [Google Scholar]
142. Zhang Q. 2022. Data matters: a strategic action framework for data governance. Inf. Manag. 59:4103642
     [Google Scholar]
143. Zhou Y, Jiang H, Wang Q, Yang M, Chen Y, Jiang Q. 2021. Use of contact tracing, isolation, and mass testing to control transmission of COVID-19 in China. BMJ 375:n2330
     [Google Scholar]
144. Zuboff S. 2020. Caveat usor: surveillance capitalism as epistemic inequality. After the Digital Tornado: Networks, Algorithms, Humanity K Werbach 174–214. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
145. Zwitter A, Gstrein OJ. 2020. Big data, privacy and COVID-19—learning from humanitarian expertise in data protection. J. Int. Humanit. Action 5:4
     [Google Scholar]