Impact of Judicial Elections on Judicial Decisions

Literature Cited

1. Alozie NO. 1988. Black representation on state judiciaries. Soc. Sci. Q. 69:979–86 [Google Scholar]
2. Alozie NO. 1990. Distribution of women and minority judges: the effects of judicial selection methods. Soc. Sci. Q. 71:315–25 [Google Scholar]
3. Alozie NO. 1996. Selection methods and the recruitment of women to state courts of last resort. Soc. Sci. Q. 77:110–26 [Google Scholar]
4. Atkins BM, Glick HR. 1974. Formal judicial recruitment and state supreme court decisions. Am. Polit. Q. 2:427–49 [Google Scholar]
5. Bartels LM. 1991. Instrumental and “quasi-instrumental” variables. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 35:777–800 [Google Scholar]
6. Baum L. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
7. Baumgartner FR, Leech BL. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
8. Berdejó C, Yuchtman N. 2013. Crime, punishment, and politics: an analysis of political cycles in criminal sentencing. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95:741–56 [Google Scholar]
9. Black RC, Owens RJ. 2016. Courting the president: how circuit court judges alter their behavior for promotion to the Supreme Court. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 60:30–43 [Google Scholar]
10. Bonneau CW. 2006. Vacancies on the bench: open-seat elections for state supreme courts. Justice Syst. J. 27:143–59 [Google Scholar]
11. Bonneau CW. 2007. The effects of campaign spending in state supreme court elections. Polit. Res. Q. 60:489–99 [Google Scholar]
12. Bonneau CW, Cann DM. 2009. The Effect of Campaign Contributions on Judicial Decisions. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1337668 [Google Scholar]
13. Bonneau CW, Cann DM. 2011. Campaign spending, diminishing marginal returns, and campaign finance restrictions in judicial elections. J. Polit. 73:1267–80 [Google Scholar]
14. Brace P, Boyea BD. 2007. Judicial selection methods and capital punishment in the American states. Running for Judge: The Rising Political Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections MJ Streb 186–203 New York: N.Y. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
15. Brace P, Boyea BD. 2008. State public opinion, the death penalty, and the practice of electing judges. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 52:360–72 [Google Scholar]
16. Brace P, Hall MG. 2001. State Supreme Court Data Project Houston: Rice Univ.
17. Brace P, Yates J, Boyea BD. 2012. Judges, litigants, and the design of courts. Law Soc. Rev. 46:497–522 [Google Scholar]
18. Bratton KA, Spill RL. 2002. Existing diversity and judicial selection: the role of the appointment method in establishing gender diversity in state supreme courts. Soc. Sci. Q. 83:504–18 [Google Scholar]
19. Budziak J. 2013. Blind justice or blind ambition? The influence of promotion on decision making in the U.S. courts of appeals. Justice Syst. J. 34:295–320 [Google Scholar]
20. Burnside FB. 1999. Dying to get elected: a challenge to the jury override. Wis. Law Rev. 1999:1017–49 [Google Scholar]
21. Caldarone RP, Canes-Wrone B, Clark TS. 2009. Partisan labels and democratic accountability: an analysis of state supreme court abortion decisions. J. Polit. 71:560–73 [Google Scholar]
22. Canes-Wrone B, Clark TS, Kelly JP. 2014. Judicial selection and death penalty decisions. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 108:23–39 [Google Scholar]
23. Canes-Wrone B, Clark TS, Park J-K. 2012. Judicial independence and retention elections. J. Law Econ. Organ. 28:211–34 [Google Scholar]
24. Cann DM. 2002. Campaign contributions and judicial behavior. Am. Rev. Polit. 23:261–74 [Google Scholar]
25. Cann DM. 2007. Justice for sale? Campaign contributions and judicial decisionmaking. State Polit. Policy Q. 7:281–97 [Google Scholar]
26. Cann DM, Bonneau CW, Boyea BD. 2012. Campaign contributions and judicial decisions in partisan and nonpartisan elections. New Directions in Judicial Politics KT McGuire 38–52 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
27. Canon BC. 1972. The impact of formal selection processes on the characteristics of judges—reconsidered. Law Soc. Rev. 6:579–93 [Google Scholar]
28. Cauthen JNG, Peters CS. 2003. Courting constituents: district elections and judicial behavior on the Louisiana Supreme Court. Justice Syst. J. 24:265–82 [Google Scholar]
29. Cohen A, Alon K, Neeman Z. 2015. Judicial decision making: a dynamic reputation approach. J. Leg. Stud. 44:S133–S59 [Google Scholar]
30. Cook BB. 1984. Women on the state bench: correlates of access. Political Women: Current Roles in State and Local Government JA Flammang 191–218. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
31. Dubois PL. 1983. The influence of selection system and region on the characteristics of a trial court bench. Justice Syst. J. 8:59–87 [Google Scholar]
32. Dudley RL. 1997. Turnover and tenure on state high courts: Does method of selection make a difference?. Justice Syst. J. 19:1–16 [Google Scholar]
33. Emmert CF, Glick HR. 1988. The selection of state supreme court justices. Am. Polit. Q. 16:445–65 [Google Scholar]
34. Esterling KM, Andersen SS. 1999. Diversity and the judicial merit selection process: a statistical report. Research on Judicial Selection, 1999 KM Esterling Chicago: Am. Judic. Soc. [Google Scholar]
35. Finch S. 2008. Tulane Law School issues apology to Louisiana Supreme Court. Times-Picayune Sept. 16
36. Flango VE, Ducat CR. 1979. What difference does method of judicial selection make? Selection procedures in state courts of last resort. Justice Syst. J. 5:25–44 [Google Scholar]
37. Geyh CG. 2003. Why judicial elections stink. Ohio State Law J. 64:43–79 [Google Scholar]
38. Gibson JL. 2009. “New-style” judicial campaigns and the legitimacy of state high courts. J. Polit. 71:1285–304 [Google Scholar]
39. Gibson JL. 2012. Electing Judges: The Surprising Effects of Campaigning on Judicial Legitimacy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
40. Glick HR, Emmert CF. 1987. Selection systems and judicial characteristics: the recruitment of state supreme court judges. Judicature 70:3228–35 [Google Scholar]
41. Gordon SC, Huber GA. 2007. The effect of electoral competitiveness on incumbent behavior. Q. J. Polit. Sci. 2:107–38 [Google Scholar]
42. Graham BL. 1990. Do judicial selection systems matter? A study of black representation on state courts. Am. Polit. Q. 18:316–36 [Google Scholar]
43. Gray TR. 2015. Executive influence on state supreme courts: strategic deference in reappointment states. Presented at Conf. Empir. Legal Stud., Oct. 30–31, St. Louis, MO [Google Scholar]
44. Gryski GS, Main EC, Dixon WJ. 1986. Models of state high court decision making in sex discrimination cases. J. Polit. 48:143–55 [Google Scholar]
45. Hall KL. 1984. Progressive reform and the decline of democratic accountability: the popular election of state supreme court judges, 1850–1920. Am. Bar Found. Res. J. 1984:345–69 [Google Scholar]
46. Hall MG. 1992. Electoral politics and strategic voting in state supreme courts. J. Polit. 54:427–46 [Google Scholar]
47. Hall MG. 1995. Justices as representatives: elections and judicial politics in the American states. Am. Polit. Q. 23:485–503 [Google Scholar]
48. Hall MG. 2014. Representation in state supreme courts: evidence from the terminal term. Polit. Res. Q. 67:335–46 [Google Scholar]
49. Harris v. Alabama 513 U.S. 504 1995.
50. Helland E, Tabarrok A. 2002. The effect of electoral institutions on tort awards. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 4:341–70 [Google Scholar]
51. Howell WG. 2003. Power without Persuasion: A Theory of Presidential Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
52. Huber GA, Gordon SC. 2004. Accountability and coercion: Is justice blind when it runs for office?. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 48:247–63 [Google Scholar]
53. Hurwitz MS, Lanier DN. 2003. Explaining judicial diversity: the differential ability of women and minorities to attain seats on state supreme and appellate courts. State Polit. Policy Q. 3:329–52 [Google Scholar]
54. Jacob H. 1964. The effect of institutional differences in the recruitment process, case of state judges. J. Public Law 13:104–19 [Google Scholar]
55. Jamieson KH, Hennessy M. 2007. Public understanding of and support for the courts. Georgetown Law J. 95:899–902 [Google Scholar]
56. Johnson G. 2015. Executive power and judicial deference: judicial decision making on executive power challenges in the American states. Polit. Res. Q. 68:128–41 [Google Scholar]
57. Kang MS, Shepherd JM. 2011. The partisan price of justice: an empirical analysis of campaign contributions and judicial decisions. NYU Law Rev 86:69–130 [Google Scholar]
58. Kang MS, Shepherd JM. 2013. The partisan foundation of judicial campaign finance. South. Calif. Law Rev. 86:1239–308 [Google Scholar]
59. Kang MS, Shepherd JM. 2015. Partisanship in state supreme courts: the empirical relationship between party campaign contributions and judicial decision making. J. Leg. Stud. 44:S161–S85 [Google Scholar]
60. Kritzer HM. 2015. Justices on the Ballot: Continuity and Change in State Supreme Court Elections. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
61. Levin MA. 1972. Urban politics and judicial behavior. J. Leg. Stud. 1:193–221 [Google Scholar]
62. Lim CSH. 2008. Turnover and Accountability of Appointed and Elected Judges Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
63. Liptak A. 2013. Alabama judges retain the right to override juries in capital sentencing. The New York Times Nov. 18
64. Liptak A, Roberts J. 2006. Campaign cash mirrors a high court's rulings. The New York Times Oct. 1
65. McCall M. 2003. The politics of judicial elections: the influence of campaign contributions on the voting patterns of Texas Supreme Court justices, 1994–1997. Polit. Policy 31:314–43 [Google Scholar]
66. McCall MM. 2001. Campaign contributions and judicial decisions: Can justice be bought?. Am. Rev. Polit. 22:349–73 [Google Scholar]
67. McCall MM, McCall MA. 2007. Campaign contributions, judicial decisions, and the Texas Supreme Court: assessing the appearance of impropriety. Judicature 90:214–25 [Google Scholar]
68. McLeod A. 2008. Bidding for justice: a case study about the effect of campaign contributions on judicial decision-making. Univ. Detroit Mercy Law Rev. 85:385–405 [Google Scholar]
69. Nagel SS. 1973. Comparing Elected and Appointed Judicial Systems Sage Prof. Pap. Am. Polit. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
70. Nelson MJ, Caulfield RP, Martin AD. 2013. OH, MI: a note on empirical examinations of judicial elections. State Polit. Policy Q. 13:495–511 [Google Scholar]
71. Palmer VV. 2010. The Recusal of American Judges in the Post-Caperton Era: An Empirical Assessment of the Risk of Actual Bias in Decisions Involving Campaign Contributors New Orleans: Tulane Law School
72. Palmer VV, Levendis J. 2008. The Louisiana Supreme Court in question: an empirical and statistical study of the effects of campaign money on the judicial function. Tulane Law Rev 82:1291–314 [Google Scholar]
73. Pinello DR. 1995. The Impact of Judicial Selection Method on State Supreme Court Policy Innovation, Reaction, and Atrophy Westport, CT: Greenwood Publ. Group
74. Radelet ML. 2011. Overriding jury sentencing recommendations in Florida capital cases: an update and possible half requiem. Mich. State Law Rev. 2011793–822
75. Romero FS, Romero DW, Ford V. 2002. The influence of selection method on racial discrimination cases: a longitudinal state supreme court analysis. Res. Judicial Sel. 1999 2:17–31 [Google Scholar]
76. Roscoe DD, Jenkins S. 2005. A meta-analysis of campaign contributions' impact on roll call voting. Soc. Sci. Q. 86:52–68 [Google Scholar]
77. Sample JJ, Hall C, Casey L. 2010. The new politics of judicial elections. Judicature 94:50–58 [Google Scholar]
78. Savchak EC, Barghothi AJ. 2007. The influence of appointment and retention constituencies: testing strategies of judicial decisionmaking. State Polit. Policy Q. 7:394–415 [Google Scholar]
79. Schlesinger J. 1966. Ambitions and Politics: Political Careers in the United States Chicago: Rand McNally
80. Shepherd J. 2013. Justice at Risk: An Empirical Analysis of Campaign Contributions and Judicial Decisions Washington, DC: Am. Const. Soc. Law Policy
81. Shepherd J, Kang MS. 2014. Skewed Justice: Citizens United, Television Advertising and State Supreme Court Justices' Decision in Criminal Cases Washington, DC: Am. Const. Soc. Law Policy. http://skewedjustice.org/ [Google Scholar]
82. Shepherd JM. 2009a. Are appointed judges strategic too?. Duke Law J. 58:1589–626 [Google Scholar]
83. Shepherd JM. 2009b. The influence of retention politics on judges' voting. J. Leg. Stud. 38:169–206 [Google Scholar]
84. Shepherd JM. 2009c. Money, politics, and impartial justice. Duke Law J. 58:623–85 [Google Scholar]
85. Shugerman JH. 2012. The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
86. Tokars KL. 1986. Women judges and merit selection under the Missouri plan. Wash. Univ. Law Q. 64:903–52 [Google Scholar]
87. Tully KR, Gay EP. 2010. Rebuttal of Vernon Palmer's Thesis, Take Two http://www.lasc.org/press_room/press_releases/2012/Rebuttal.pdf
88. US v. Windsor 570 U.S. ___ 2013.
89. Waltenburg EN, Lopeman CS. 2000. Tort decisions and campaign dollars. Southeast. Polit. Rev. 28:241–63 [Google Scholar]
90. Ware SJ. 1999. Money, politics and judicial decisions: a case study of arbitration law in Alabama. J. Law Polit. 15:645–86 [Google Scholar]
91. Williams MS, Dislear C. 2007. Bidding for justice: the influence of attorneys' contributions on state supreme courts. Justice Syst. J. 28:135–56 [Google Scholar]
92. Wright G, Erikson RS, McIver J. 1985. Measuring state partisanship and ideology with survey data. J. Polit. 47:469–89 [Google Scholar]