1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 12, 2016
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 12, 2016

Theorizing Transnational Legal Ordering

Abstract

This article categorizes three approaches to theorizing transnational legal ordering that respectively address private legal ordering; provide a framework for the study of the interaction of lawmaking and practice at the transnational, national, and local levels; and reconfigure the concept of law. The first approach develops theories of private legal ordering, involving lawmaking, adjudication, and enforcement through nonstate actors and institutions. The second approach provides a theoretical framework for sociolegal study of the transnational processes through which legal norms are constructed, flow, and settle across national borders. The third develops theory to critique and reformulate the concept of law in transnational terms that include nonstate processes.

Keyword(s): legal pluralism, private legal ordering, soft law, transnational concept of law, transnational law, transnational legal order
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085128
2016-10-27
2024-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/12/1/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085128.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085128&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott K, Genschel P, Snidal D, Zangl B. 2015. Orchestration: global governance through intermediaries. International Organizations as Orchestrators KW Abbott, P Genschel, D Snidal, B Zangl 3–36 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbott K, Snidal D. 2009. The governance triangle: regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. The Politics of Global Regulation W Mattli, N Woods 44–88 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  3. Alter K, Helfer L, Madsen M. 2016. How context shapes the authority of international courts. Law Contemp. Probl 79:11–36 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anghie A. 2007. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  5. Avi-Yonah R. 2016. Hanging together: a multilateral approach to taxing multinationals. Global Tax Fairness T Pogge, K Mehta 113–28 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Backer LC. 2005. Multinational corporations, transnational law: the United Nations' norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations as a harbinger of corporate social responsibility in international law. Columbia Hum. Rights Law Rev. 37:2287–390 [Google Scholar]
  7. Backer LC. 2007. Economic globalization and the rise of efficient systems of global private law making: Wal-Mart as global legislator. Conn. Law Rev. 39:41738–84 [Google Scholar]
  8. Backer LC. 2016. The collapsing structures of regulatory factories: Rana Plaza and the transnational legal order. UC Irvine J. Int. Transnatl. Comp. Law. In press
  9. Barnett M, Duvall R. 2005. Power in global governance. Power in Global Governance M Barnett, R Duvall 1–32 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Bartley T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am. J. Sociol. 113:2297–351 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartley T. 2011. Transnational governance as the layering of rules: intersections of public and private standards. Theor. Inq. Law 12:2517–42 [Google Scholar]
  12. Baxi U. 2012. The Future of Human Rights New Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press India, 3rd ed..
  13. Benton L. 2002. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History 1400–1900 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  14. Berger KP. 2010. The Creeping Codification of the New Lex Mercatoria Alphen aan den Rijn, Neth.: Kluwer, 2nd ed..
  15. Berman P. 2014. Global Legal Pluralism Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  16. Black J. 2001. Decentring regulation: understanding the role of regulation and self regulation in a “post-regulatory” world. Curr. Legal Probl. 54:1103–46 [Google Scholar]
  17. Black J. 2008. Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regul. Gov. 2:2137–64 [Google Scholar]
  18. Black J, Rouch D. 2008. The development of the global markets as rule-makers: engagement and legitimacy. Law Financ. Mark. Rev. 2:3218–33 [Google Scholar]
  19. Block-Lieb S, Halliday T. 2015. Settling and concordance: two cases in global commercial law. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 75–113
  20. Botzem S, Quack S. 2006. Contested rules and shifting boundaries: international standard-setting in accounting. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation M Djelic, K Sahlin-Andersson 266–86 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Braithwaite J, Drahos P. 2000. Global Business Regulation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  22. Brown W. 2015. Undoing the Demos Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  23. Büthe T. 2015. Institutionalization and its consequences: the TLO(s) for food safety. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 258–86
  24. Büthe T, Mattli W. 2011. The New Global Rules: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  25. Cafaggi F. 2011. New foundations of transnational private regulation. J. Law Soc. 38:120–49 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cafaggi F. 2013. The regulatory functions of transnational commercial contracts: new architectures. Fordham Int. Law J. 36:61557–618 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cafaggi F. 2014. A comparative analysis of transnational private regulation: legitimacy, quality, effectiveness and enforcement Res. Pap. No. 2014/145, Dep. Law, Eur. Univ. Inst., San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy
  28. Cafaggi F. 2015. The many features of transnational private rulemaking: unexplored relationships between custom, jura mercatorum and global private regulation. Univ. Pa. J. Int. Law 36:4101–59 [Google Scholar]
  29. Cafaggi F, Pistor K. 2014. Regulatory capabilities: a normative framework for assessing the distributional effects of regulation. Regul. Gov. 9:295–107 [Google Scholar]
  30. Calliess G-P. 2004. Transnationales verbrauchervertragsrecht. Rabel J. Comp. Int. Priv. Law 68:2244–87 [Google Scholar]
  31. Calliess G-P, Zumbansen P. 2010. Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law Oxford: Hart
  32. Campbell J. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  33. Carbonneau T. 1998. Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration: A Discussion of the New Law Merchant Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer. Rev. ed.
  34. Carruthers BG, Halliday TC. 2006. Negotiating globalization: global scripts and intermediation in the construction of Asian insolvency regimes. Law Soc. Inq. 31:3512–84 [Google Scholar]
  35. Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D. 2004. Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  36. Cerny PG. 1997. Paradoxes of the competition state: the dynamics of political globalization. Gov. Oppos. 32:2251–74 [Google Scholar]
  37. Chalmers D. 2003. Food for thought: reconciling European risks and traditional ways of life. Mod. Law Rev. 66:4523–62 [Google Scholar]
  38. Chernilo D. 2007. A Social Theory of the Nation State: The Political Forms of Methodological Nationalism London: Routledge
  39. Chimni B. 2004. International institutions today: an imperial global state in the making. Eur. J. Int. Law 15:11–37 [Google Scholar]
  40. Clark I. 1999. Globalization and International Relations Theory Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  41. Cooter R. 1994. Structural adjudication and the new law merchant: a model of decentralized law. Int. Rev. Law Econ. 14:2215–31 [Google Scholar]
  42. Cooter R. 1996. Decentralized law for a complex economy: the structural approach to adjudicating the new law merchant. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 144:51643–96 [Google Scholar]
  43. Cotterrell R. 2008. Transnational communities and the concept of law. Ratio Juris 21:11–18 [Google Scholar]
  44. Cutler C. 2003. Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  45. Cutler C, Dietz T. 2016. The Politics of Private Transnational Governance by Contract London: Routledge. In press
  46. Dalhuisen J. 2013. Dalhuisen on Transnational Comparative, Commercial, Financial and Trade Law, Vol. 1: Introduction—The New Lex Mercatoria and Its Sources Oxford: Hart, 5th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  47. Darian-Smith E. 2013. Laws and societies in global contexts: contemporary approaches. Law Soc. Rev. 48:2479–81 [Google Scholar]
  48. De Burca G, Keohane R, Sabel C. 2013. New modes of pluralist global governance. N.Y. Univ. J. Int. Law 45:1722–86 [Google Scholar]
  49. de Sousa Santos B. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  50. de Sousa Santos B. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide Boulder, CO: Paradigm
  51. Dezalay Y, Garth B. 1996. Dealing in Virtue Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  52. Dezalay Y, Garth B. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  53. Dezalay Y, Madsen M. 2012. The force of law and lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the reflexive sociology of law. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:433–52 [Google Scholar]
  54. Djelic M-L. 2006. Marketization: from intellectual agenda to global policy-making. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation M-L Djelic, K Sahlin-Andersson 53–73 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  55. Djelic M-L, Quack S. 2010. Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  56. Djelic M-L, Sahlin-Andersson K. 2006. Introduction: a world of governance: the rise of national regulation. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation M-L Djelic, K Sahlin-Andersson 1–30 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Drori GS, Meyer JW. 2006. Scientization: making a world safe for organizing. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation M-L Djelic, K Sahlin-Andersson 31–52 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  58. Ehrlich E. 2001 (1913). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
  59. Escobar A. 2011. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  60. Fischer-Lescano A, Teubner G. 2004. Regime-collisions: the vain search for legal unity in the fragmentation of global law. Mich. J. Int. Law 25:4999–1046 [Google Scholar]
  61. Frank DJ, Bayliss JC, Boutcher SA. 2010. Worldwide trends in the criminal regulation of sex, 1945 to 2005. Am. Sociol. Rev. 75:6867–93 [Google Scholar]
  62. Fraser N, Nash K. 2014. Transnationalizing the Public Sphere Malden, MA: Polity
  63. Friedman LM. 1996. Borders: on the emerging sociology of transnational law. Stanford J. Int. Law 32:65–90 [Google Scholar]
  64. Fuller LL. 1964. The Morality of Law New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  65. Gaillard E. 2010. Legal Theory of International Arbitration Boston: Martinus Nijhoff
  66. Garth B, Dezalay Y. 2010. Marketing and selling transnational “judges” and global “experts”: building the credibility of (quasi) juridical regulation. Socio-Econ. Rev. 8:1113–30 [Google Scholar]
  67. Genschel P, Rixen T. 2015. Settling and unsettling the transnational legal order of international taxation. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 154–86
  68. Genschel P, Seelkopf L. 2015. The competition state: the modern state in a global economy. The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State S Leibfried, E Huber, M Lange, JD Levy, JD Stephens 237–54 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  69. Gereffi G, Lee J. 2012. Why the world suddenly cares about global supply chains. J. Supply Chain Manag. 48:324–32 [Google Scholar]
  70. Gilson RJ, Sabel CF, Scott RE. 2013. Contract and innovation: the limited role of generalist courts in the evolution of novel contractual forms. N.Y. Univ. Law Rev. 88:1170–215 [Google Scholar]
  71. Glenn P. 2005. A transnational concept of law. The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies M Tushnet, P Cane 839–64 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  72. Glenn P. 2013. The Cosmopolitan State Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  73. Hadfield GK. 2001. Privatizing commercial law. Regul. Mag. 24:240–45 [Google Scholar]
  74. Hadfield GK. 2009. The public and the private in the provision of law for global transactions. Contractual Certainty in International Trade: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Debates on Institutional Support for Global Economic Exchanges V Gessner 238–55 Oxford: Hart [Google Scholar]
  75. Hadfield GK, Weingast B. 2013. Law without the state: legal attributes and the coordination of decentralized collective punishment. J. Law Courts 1:13–34 [Google Scholar]
  76. Hadfield GK, Weingast B. 2014. Constitutions as coordinating devices. Institutions, Property Rights, and Economic Growth: The Legacy of Douglass North S Galiani, I Sened 121–50 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  77. Hale T. 2015. Between Interests and Law: The Politics of Transnational Commercial Disputes Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  78. Halliday T, Block-Lieb S, Carruthers BG. 2009. Rhetorical legitimation: global scripts as strategic devices of international organizations. Socio-Econ. Rev. 8:177–112 [Google Scholar]
  79. Halliday T, Carruthers BG. 2007. The recursivity of law: global norm making and national lawmaking in the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes. Am. J. Sociol. 112:41135–202 [Google Scholar]
  80. Halliday T, Carruthers B. 2009. Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  81. Halliday T, Osinsky P. 2006. Globalization of law. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32:447–70 [Google Scholar]
  82. Halliday T, Shaffer G. 2015a. Transnational Legal Orders Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  83. Halliday T, Shaffer G. 2015b. Transnational legal orders. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 3–74
  84. Halliday T, Shaffer G. 2015c. Researching transnational legal orders. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 475–528
  85. Hart HLA. 1961. The Concept of Law Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  86. Helfer L. 2015. Pharmaceutical patents and the human right to health: the contested evolution of the transnational legal order on access to medicines. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 311–39
  87. Helleiner E. 2015. Regulating the regulators: the emergence and limits of the transnational financial legal order. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 231–57
  88. Heyvaert V. 2016. The transnationalisation of law: rethinking law through transnational environmental regulation Work. Pap. No. 04/2016, Legal Pap. Ser., Lond School Econ., London: UK
  89. Jackson V. 2009. Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  90. Jessup PC. 1956. Transnational Law New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  91. Joerges C. 2011. The idea of a three-dimensional conflicts law as constitutional form. Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law C Joerges, E-U Petersmann 413–56 Oxford: Hart [Google Scholar]
  92. Joerges C, Falke J. 2011. Karl Polanyi, Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets Oxford: Hart
  93. Kadens E. 2012. The myth of the customary law merchant. Tex. Law Rev. 90:1153–2016 [Google Scholar]
  94. Kadens E. 2015. The medieval law merchant: the tyranny of a construct. J. Legal Anal. 7:2251–89 [Google Scholar]
  95. Kapczynski A. 2009. Harmonization and its discontents: a case study of TRIPS implementation in India's pharmaceutical sector. Calif. Law Rev. 97:1571–649 [Google Scholar]
  96. Karton J. 2013. The Culture of International Arbitration and the Evolution of Contract Law Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  97. Karton J. 2016. Sectoral fragmentation of transnational commercial law. See Cutler & Dietz 2016. In press
  98. Kjaer P. 2014. Constitutionalism in the Global Realm: A Sociological Approach New York: Routledge
  99. Klug H. 2013. Access to medicines and the transformation of the South African state: exploring the interactions of legal and policy changes in health, intellectual property, trade, and competition law in the context of South Africa's HIV/AIDS pandemic. Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change G Shaffer 148–79 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  100. Koh HH. 1996. Transnational legal process. Neb. Law Rev. 75:181–207 [Google Scholar]
  101. Koh HH. 1998. The 1998 Frankel lecture: bringing international law home. Houst. Law Rev. 35:623–81 [Google Scholar]
  102. Koh HH. 2006. Why transnational law matters. Penn State Int. Law Rev. 24:745–53 [Google Scholar]
  103. Ladeur K-H. 2004. Globalization and public governance—a contradiction?. Public Governance in the Age of Globalization K-H Ladeur 1–24 Aldershot, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  104. Leibfried S, Zürn M. 2005. Reconfiguring the national constellation. Transformations of the State? S Leibfried, M Zürn 1–36 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Levit J. 2005. A bottom-up approach to international lawmaking: the tale of three trade finance instruments. Yale J. Int. Law 30:120125–209 [Google Scholar]
  106. Lloyd P, Simmons BA. 2015. Framing for a new transnational legal order: the case of human trafficking. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 400–38
  107. Luhmann N. 2004. Law as a Social System transl. KA Ziegert, ed. F Kaster, R Nobles, D Schiff, R Ziegert Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  108. Mattli W. 2015. Beyond the state? Are transnational regulatory institutions replacing the state?. The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State S Liebfried, E Huber, M Lange, JD Levy, F Nullmeier, JD Stephens 286–304 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  109. Meidinger E. 2009. Private import safety regulation and transnational new governance. Import Safety: Regulatory Governance in the Global Economy C Coglianese, AM Finkel, D Zaring 233–56 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  110. Menkel-Meadow C. 2011. Why and how to study “transnational” law. UC Irvine Law Rev 1:197–129 [Google Scholar]
  111. Merry SE. 1988. Legal pluralism. Law Soc. Rev. 22:5869–96 [Google Scholar]
  112. Merry SE. 1992. Anthropology, law and transnational processes. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 21:357–77 [Google Scholar]
  113. Merry SE. 2006a. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  114. Merry SE. 2006b. Transnational human rights and local activism: mapping the middle. Am. Anthropol. 108:138–51 [Google Scholar]
  115. Merry SE. 2015. Firming up soft law: the impact of indicators on transnational human rights legal orders. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 374–400
  116. Michaels R. 2007. The true lex mercatoria: law beyond the state. Indiana J. Global Legal Stud. 14:2447–68 [Google Scholar]
  117. Michaels R. 2014. Post-critical private international law: from politics to technique. Private International Law and Global Governance H Muir-Watt, DPF Arroyo 54–70 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  118. Michaels R, Jansen N. 2006. Private law beyond the state? Europeanization, globalization, privatization. Am. J. Comp. Law 54:843–90 [Google Scholar]
  119. Michaels R, Jansen N. 2007. Private law and the state: comparative perceptions and historical observations. RabelsZ 71:345–97 [Google Scholar]
  120. Milgrom PR, North DC, Weingast BR. 1990. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Econ. Polit. 2:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  121. Miller G, Cafaggi F. 2013. The Governance and Regulation of International Finance Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
  122. Morgan G. 2008. Market formation and governance in international financial markets: the case of OTC derivatives. Hum. Relat. 61:5637–60 [Google Scholar]
  123. Muir-Watt H. 2011. Private international law as global governance: beyond the schize, from closet to planet. Transnatl. Legal Theory 2:3347–428 [Google Scholar]
  124. Muir-Watt H. 2015. The relevance of private international law to the global governance debate. Private International Law and Global Governance H Muir-Watt, DPF Arroyo 1–22 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  125. Newman A, Farrell H. 2014. Domestic institutions beyond the nation state: charting the new interdependence approach. World Polit 66:2331–63 [Google Scholar]
  126. Pahuja S. 2011. Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  127. Payne L. 2015. The justice paradox? Transnational legal orders and accountability for past human rights violations. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 439–74
  128. Perez O. 2011. Private environmental governance as ensemble regulations: a critical exploration of sustainability indexes and the new ensemble politics. Theor. Inq. Law 12:543–79 [Google Scholar]
  129. Perez O. 2015. Fuzzy law: a theory of quasi-legal systems. Can. J. Law Jurisprud. 28:2343–70 [Google Scholar]
  130. Rajagopal B. 2003. International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  131. Rajah J. 2015. “Rule of law” as transnational legal order. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a 340–73
  132. Resnik J. 2006. Law's migration: American exceptionalism, silent dialogues, and federalism's multiple ports of entry. Yale Law J. 115:1564–70 [Google Scholar]
  133. Roberts S. 2005. After government? On representing law without the state. Modern Law Rev. 68:1–24 [Google Scholar]
  134. Rocha Machado M. 2012. Similar in their differences: transnational legal processes addressing money laundering in Brazil and Argentina. Law Soc. Inq. 37:2330–66 [Google Scholar]
  135. Rodríguez-Garavito C. 2014. The future of human rights: from gatekeeping to symbiosis. SUR Int. J. Hum. Rights 11:20499–510 [Google Scholar]
  136. Rodríguez-Garavito C. 2015. Law and Society in Latin America: A New Map New York: Routledge
  137. Rodríguez-Garavito C, de Sousa Santos B. 2005. Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  138. Santos A. 2012. Carving out policy autonomy for developing countries in the World Trade Organization: the experience of Brazil and Mexico. Va. J. Int. Law 52:3551–632 [Google Scholar]
  139. Sassen S. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  140. Schepel H. 2005. The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets Oxford: Hart
  141. Schultz T. 2014. Transnational Legality: Stateless Law and International Arbitration Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  142. Scott C. 2009. “Transnational law” as proto-concept: three conceptions. Ger. Law J 107859–76 [Google Scholar]
  143. Shaffer G. 2009. How business shapes law: a socio-legal framework. Conn. Law Rev. 42:1147–83 [Google Scholar]
  144. Shaffer G. 2013. Transnational legal ordering and state change. Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change G Shaffer 1–22 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  145. Shaffer G. 2014. How the WTO shapes regulatory governance. Regul. Gov. 9:11–15 [Google Scholar]
  146. Shaffer G. 2015a. The new legal realist approach to international law. Leiden J. Int. Law 28:2189–210 [Google Scholar]
  147. Shaffer G. 2015b. Law, constitutionalism, and world society: Kjaer, Kratochwil and global (dis)order. Int. J. Const. Law 13:41063–77 [Google Scholar]
  148. Shaffer G, Ginsburg T. 2012. The empirical turn in international legal scholarship. Am. J. Int. Law 106:11–46 [Google Scholar]
  149. Shaffer G, Nedumprara J, Sinha A. 2015. State transformation and the role of lawyers: the WTO, India, and transnational legal ordering. Law Soc. Rev. 49:3595–629 [Google Scholar]
  150. Shaffer G, Pollack M. 2009. Hard versus soft law: alternatives, complements and antagonists in international governance. Minn. Law Rev. 94:706–99 [Google Scholar]
  151. Shaffer G, Ratton Sanchez Badin M, Rosenberg B. 2008. The trials of winning at the WTO: what lies behind Brazil's success. Cornell Int. Law J. 41:2383–501 [Google Scholar]
  152. Slaughter AM. 2004. A New World Order Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  153. Stone Sweet A. 2006. The new lex mercatoria and transnational governance. J. Eur. Public Policy 13:627–46 [Google Scholar]
  154. Tamanaha B. 2001. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  155. Tamanaha B. 2015. The third pillar of jurisprudence: social legal theory. William Mary Law Rev 56:62235–77 [Google Scholar]
  156. Teubner G. 1992. The two faces of Janus: rethinking legal pluralism. Cardozo Law Rev 13:51443–62 [Google Scholar]
  157. Teubner G. 1997. Global Bukowina: legal pluralism in the world society. Global Law Without a State G Teubner 3–28 Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth [Google Scholar]
  158. Teubner G. 2004. Global private regimes: neo-spontaneous law and dual constitution of autonomous sectors?. Public Governance in the Age of Globalization K-H Ladeur 71–87 Aldershot, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  159. Teubner G. 2013. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  160. Teubner G, Korth P. 2012. Two kinds of legal pluralism: collision of transnational regimes in the double fragmentation of world society. Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation M Young 23–54 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  161. Trubek D, Garcia HA, Coutinho D, Santos A. 2013. Law and the New Developmental State: The Brazilian Experience in Latin American Context Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  162. Twining W. 2009. General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  163. von Daniels D. 2010. The Concept of Law from a Transnational Perspective Burlington, VT: Ashgate
  164. Wai R. 2002. Transnational liftoff and juridical touchdown: the regulatory function of private international law in an era of globalization. Columbia J. Transnatl. Law 40:209–74 [Google Scholar]
  165. Wai R. 2005. Transnational private law and private ordering in a contested global society. Harvard Int. Law J. 46:2471–86 [Google Scholar]
  166. Wenar L. 2016. Blood Oil: Tyrants, Violence, and the Rules that Run the World Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  167. Whytock CA. 2009. Myth of mess? International choice of law in action. N.Y. Univ. Law Rev. 84:3719–90 [Google Scholar]
  168. Whytock CA. 2010. Private-public interaction in global governance: the case of transnational commercial arbitration. Bus. Polit. 12:31–25 [Google Scholar]
  169. Whytock CA. 2016. Conflict of laws, global governance, and transnational legal order. UC Irvine J. Int. Transnatl. Comp. Law. In press
  170. Wood S, Abbott KW, Black J, Eberlein B, Meidinger E. 2015. The interactive dynamics of transnational business governance: a challenge for transnational legal theory Res. Pap. 114, Osgoode Legal Stud. Res. Pap. Ser., York Univ., Toronto, Can.
  171. Zumbansen P. 2011. Neither “public” nor “private”, “national” nor “international”: transnational corporate governance from a legal pluralist perspective. J. Law Soc. 38:50–75 [Google Scholar]
  172. Zumbansen P. 2012a. Transnational law, evolving. Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law J Smits 898–925 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  173. Zumbansen P. 2012b. Defining the space of transnational law: legal theory, global governance, and legal pluralism. Transnatl. Law Contemp. Prob. 21:2305–36 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085128
Loading
Theorizing Transnational Legal Ordering
Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12, 231 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085128
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085128
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085128
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error