Authoritarian Legality and State Capitalism in China

Literature Cited

1. Alchian A, Demsetz H. 1973. The property right paradigm. J. Econ. Hist. 33:116–27
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aubié H, Wang X. 2016. (Un)doing constitutionalism: the cases of Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong. Asian Stud. Rev. 40:3377–93
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brechenmacher S. 2017. Civil Society under Assault: Repression and Responses in Russia, Egypt, and Ethiopia Washington, DC: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
4. Chan KW. 2010. The household registration system and migrant labor in China: notes on a debate. Popul. Dev. Rev. 36:2357–64
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chan KW. 2012. Crossing the 50 percent population Rubicon: Can China urbanize to prosperity?. Eurasian Geogr. Econ. 53:163–86
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chan KW 2019. China's hukou system at 60: continuity and reform. Handbook on Urban Development in China R Yep, J Wang, T Johnson 59–79. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chan KW. 2021. What the 2020 Chinese census tells us about progress in hukou reform. China Brief 21:1511–17
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cheesman N. 2014. Law and order as asymmetrical opposite to the rule of law. Hague J. Rule Law 6:96–114
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cheesman N. 2022. Law and order. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 18:263–81
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chen W, Fu H, eds. 2020. Authoritarian Legality in Asia: Formation, Development and Transition New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
11. Chen Y, Zhao L, Fan Y, Xie B. 2021. Does the new rural pension scheme improve residents’ livelihood? Empirical evidence from Northwestern China. PLOS ONE 16:4e0250130
    [Google Scholar]
12. Clarke D. 2022a. Is China a dual state? Res. Pap. 2022–74 Legal Stud., George Washington Univ. Washington, DC:
13. Clarke D. 2022b. Order and law in China. Univ. Ill. Law Rev. 2022:2541–96
    [Google Scholar]
14. Clarke D, Murrell P, Whiting S. 2008. The role of law in China's economic development. China's Great Economic Transformation L Brandt, T Rawski 375–428. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
15. Coase R. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
16. de Sa e Silva F. 2022. Law and illiberalism: a sociological review and research road map. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 18:193–209
    [Google Scholar]
17. Diamant N, Lubman S, O'Brien K, eds. 2005. Engaging the Law in China Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
18. Dong Y, Goodburn C. 2020. Residence permits and point systems: new forms of educational and social stratification in urban China. J. Contemp. China 29:125647–66
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dowdle M 2012. Popular constitutionalism and the constitutional meaning of Charter 08. Liu Xiaobo, Charter 08 and the Challenges of Political Reform in China J Beja, H Fu, E Pils 205–28. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
20. Epp C. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
21. Epstein E. 1994. Law and legitimation. Domestic Law Reforms in Post-Mao China P Potter 19–55. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fraenkel E. 2017 (1941). The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship transl. EA Shils New York: Oxford Univ. Press
23. Friedman E. 2022. The Urbanization of People: The Politics of Development, Labor Markets, and Schooling in the Chinese City New York: Columbia Univ. Press
24. Fu H. 2018. The July 9th (709) Crackdown on human rights lawyers: legal advocacy in an authoritarian state. J. Contemp. China 27:112554–68
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fu H. 2019. Duality and China's struggle for legal autonomy. China Perspect 1:1163–10
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fu H, Cullen R. 2008. Weiquan (rights protection) lawyering in an authoritarian state: building a culture of public-interest lawyering. China J 59:111–27
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fu H, Cullen R. 2011. Climbing the Weiquan ladder: a radicalizing process for rights-protection lawyers. China Q 205:40–59
    [Google Scholar]
28. Fu H, Dowdle M. 2020. The concept of authoritarian legality: the Chinese case. See Chen & Fu 2020 63–89
29. Gallagher M. 2017. Authoritarian Legality: Law, Workers, and the State Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
30. Hand K. 2006. Using law for a righteous purpose: the Sun Zhigang incident and evolving forms of citizen action in the People's Republic of China. Columbia J. Transnatl. Law 45:1114–95
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hand K. 2011. Resolving constitutional disputes in contemporary China. Univ. Pa. East Asia Law Rev. 7:51–159
    [Google Scholar]
32. Harvey D. 2003. The New Imperialism New York: Oxford Univ. Press
33. Hendley K. 2022. Legal dualism as a framework for analyzing the role of law under authoritarianism. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 18:211–26
    [Google Scholar]
34. Huang J, Otsuka K, Rozelle S 2008. Agriculture in China's development: past disappointments, recent successes, and future challenges. China's Great Economic Transformation L Brandt, T Rawski 467–505. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
35. Jensen E, Heller T. 2003. Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
36. Kellogg T. 2020. The foreign NGO law and the closing of China. See Chen & Fu 2020 114–42
37. Krygier M. 2020. Polish lessons: backsliding, sabotage, and the rule of law. Constitutionalism under Stress: Essays in Honour of Wojciech Sadurski U Belavusau, A Gliszczynska-Grabias 79–94. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
38. Krygier M 2021. Illiberalism and the rule of law. Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism A Sajó, R Uitz, S Holmes 533–53. New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
39. Laurent P, Scheppele K. 2017. Illiberalism within: rule of law backsliding in the EU. Cambridge Yearb. Eur. Legal Stud. 19:3–47
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lee CK. 2007. Against the Law: Labor Protests in China's Rustbelt and Sunbelt Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
41. Lee CK. 2016. Precarization or empowerment? reflections on recent labor unrest in China. J. Asian Stud. 75:2317–33
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lee CK, Zhang Y. 2013. The power of instability: unraveling the microfoundations of bargained authoritarianism. Am. J. Sociol. 118:61475–508
    [Google Scholar]
43. Li S, Sicular T, Tarp F 2021. China: structural change, transition, rent-seeking and corruption, and government policy. Inequality in the Developing World C Gradin, M Leibbrandt, F Tarp 133–56. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
44. Liebman B. 2014. Legal reform. Daedalus 143:96–109
    [Google Scholar]
45. Liebman B, Roberts M, Stern R, Wang A. 2020. Mass digitization of Chinese court decisions: how to use text as data in the field of Chinese law. J. Law Courts 8:177–201
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lin LY-H, Milhaupt CJ. 2021a. China's corporate social credit system: The dawn of surveillance state capitalism? Law Work. Pap. 610/2021 Eur. Corp. Gov. Inst. Brussels:
47. Lin LY-H, Milhaupt CJ. 2021b. Party building or noisy signaling? The contours of political conformity in Chinese corporate governance. J. Legal Stud. 50:1187–217
    [Google Scholar]
48. Ma X, Whiting S, Zhang T, Zhao T. 2022. Vote buying as rent seeking: land sales in China's village elections. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 57:3337–60
    [Google Scholar]
49. Manion M. 2000. Chinese democratization in perspective. China Q. 163:764–82
    [Google Scholar]
50. Mao W, Qiao S. 2021. Legal doctrine and judicial review of eminent domain in China. Law Soc. Inq. 46:3826–59
    [Google Scholar]
51. McCann M, Kahraman K. 2021. On the interdependence of liberal and illiberal/authoritarian legal forms in racial capitalist regimes: the case of the United States. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 17:483–503
    [Google Scholar]
52. Meierhenrich J. 2018. The Remnants of the Rachtsstaat: An Ethnography of Nazi Law New York: Oxford Univ. Press
53. Minzner C. 2011. China's turn against law. Am. J. Comp. Law 59:935–84
    [Google Scholar]
54. Minzner C. 2020. The End of an Era: How China's Authoritarian Revival Is Undermining Its Rise New York: Oxford Univ. Press
55. Moustafa T, Ginsburg T. 2008. The functions of courts in authoritarian politics. Rule by Law T Ginsburg, T Moustafa 1–22. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
56. Nicholson P, Biddulph S. 2008. Examining Practice, Interrogating Theory: Comparative Legal Studies in Asia Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publ.
57. North DC. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
58. O'Brien K, Li L. 2006. Rightful Resistance in Rural China New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
59. Peerenboom R. 2002. China's Long March Toward Rule of Law New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
60. Peng C. 2018. Rural Land Takings in Modern China New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
61. Pils E. 2005. Land disputes, rights assertion, and social unrest in China: a case from Sichuan. Columbia J. Asian Law 19:1235–92
    [Google Scholar]
62. Pils E. 2015. China's Human Rights Lawyers: Advocacy and Resistance New York: Routledge
63. Pils E. 2016. Resisting dignity takings in China. Law Soc. Inq. 41:4888–916
    [Google Scholar]
64. Pils E. 2017. From independent lawyer groups to civil opposition: the case of China's New Citizen Movement. Asian-Pac. Law Policy J 19:1110–52
    [Google Scholar]
65. Pils E. 2020. Rule-of-law reform and the rise of rule by fear in China. See Chen & Fu 2020 90–113
66. Pils E. 2022. China's dual state revival under Xi Jinping. Fordham Int. Law J. 46:339–76
    [Google Scholar]
67. Qiao S. 2017. Chinese Small Property: The Co-Evolution of Law and Social Norms New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
68. Rozelle S, Hell N. 2020. Invisible China: How the Urban-Rural Divide Threatens China's Rise Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
69. Sapio F. 2010. Sovereign Power and the Law in China Leiden, Neth.: Brill
70. Stockmann D, Gallagher M. 2011. How the media sustain authoritarian rule in China. Comp. Political Stud. 44:436–67
    [Google Scholar]
71. Su F, Tao R. 2017. The China model withering?. Urban Stud 54:1230–50
    [Google Scholar]
72. Teng B. 2013. The Sun Zhigang incident and the future of constitutionalism: Does the Chinese constitution have a future? Occas. Pap., Cent. Rights Justice, Fac. Law Chin. Univ. Hong Kong:
73. Teng B 2019. Rights defense and new citizen's movement. Handbook on Human Rights in China S Biddulph, J Rosenzweig 605–30. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Thompson E. 1975. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act London: Allen Lane
75. Trubek D. 1996. Law and development: then and now. Proc. Annu. Meet. 90:223–26
    [Google Scholar]
76. Upham F. 2018. The Great Property Fallacy: Theory, Reality, and Growth in Developing Countries New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
77. Whiting S. 2017. Authoritarian ‘rule of law’ and regime legitimacy. Comp. Political Stud. 50:141907–40
    [Google Scholar]
78. Whiting S. 2022. Land rights, industrialization, and urbanization: China in comparative context. J. Chin. Political Sci. 27:399–414
    [Google Scholar]
79. Whiting S. 2023. Illiberal Law and Development: Property Rights and Conflict over Land in China New York: Cambridge Univ. Press under contract
80. World Bank 1996. World Development Report: From Plan to Market Washington, DC: World Bank
81. World Bank 2015. East Asia's Changing Urban Landscape: Measuring a Decade of Growth Washington, DC: World Bank
82. World Bank 2021. World Development Report: Data for Better Lives Washington, DC: World Bank
83. Zang D. 2022. Revolt against the U.S. hegemony: judicial divergence in cyberspace. Wis. Int. Law J. 39:1–70
    [Google Scholar]
84. Zhang T, Ginsburg T. 2019. China's turn toward law. Va. J. Int. Law 59:2306–89
    [Google Scholar]
85. Zhu L. 2003. The hukou system of the People's Republic of China: a critical appraisal under international standards of internal movement and residence. Chin. J. Int. Law 2:2519–65
    [Google Scholar]