Semantics of Gesture

Literature Cited

1. Ahn D. 2017. Definite and demonstrative descriptions: a micro-typology. Proceedings of GLOW in Asia XI MY Erlewine 33–48. Cambridge, MA: MIT Work. Pap. Linguist.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahn D. 2019. THAT thesis: a competition mechanism for anaphoric expressions PhD Thesis Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
3. Anderbois S, Brasoveanu A, Henderson R. 2013. At-issue proposals and appositive impositions in discourse. J. Semant. 32:193–138
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barnes K, Ebert C 2023. The information status of iconic enrichments: modelling gradient at-issueness. Theor. Linguist 49:3–4167–223
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bergmann K, Damm O, Freigang F, Fröhlich C, Hahn F et al. 2014. Documentation – Sagaland Documentation Manual Bielefeld Univ. Bielefeld, Ger.:
6. Davidson K. 2015. Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguist. Philos. 38:477–520
   [Google Scholar]
7. de Ruiter JP. 2000. The production of gesture and speech. Language and Gesture D McNeill 284–311. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
8. Diessel H. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cogn. Linguist. 17:463–89
   [Google Scholar]
9. Donnellan KS. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philos. Rev. 75:3281–304
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ebert C. 2017. Handling information from different dimensions (with special attention on gesture versus speech) Handout of a talk given at the Institut für Linguistik Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Ger.: Jan. 10
11. Ebert C, Ebert C. 2014. Gestures, demonstratives, and the attributive/referential distinction Handout of a talk given at Semantics and Philosophy in Europe (SPE 7) Berlin, Ger.: June 25–28
12. Ebert C, Ebert C, Hörnig R 2020. Demonstratives as dimension shifters. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 24 M Franke, N Kompa, M Liu, J Mueller, J Schwab 161–78. Osnabrück/Berlin, Ger.: Osnabrück Univ./Humboldt Univ.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ebert C, Evert S, Wilmes K. 2011. Focus marking via gestures. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15 I Reich, E Horch, D Pauly 193–208. Saarbrücken, Ger.: Univ. Saarlandes
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ebert C, Hinterwimmer S. 2022. Free indirect discourse meets character viewpoint gestures. Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2020: Linguistic Theory Enriched by Experimental Data333–49. Tübingen, Ger.: Univ. Tübingen
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ebert C, Konietzko A, Weskott T 2021. Recovering gestured and spoken material in VP ellipsis and pro-forms. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25 P Grosz, L Martí, H Pearson, Y Sudo, S Zobel 256–66. London, UK: Univ. Coll. London/Queen Mary Univ. London
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ebert C, Pirillo G, Walter S. 2022. The role of gesture-speech alignment for gesture interpretation. Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2020 R Hörnig, S von Wietersheim, A Konietzko, S Featherston 65–77. Tübingen, Ger.: Univ. Tübingen
    [Google Scholar]
17. Emonds JE. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax New York, NY: Academic
18. Esipova M. 2018. Focus on what's not at issue: gestures, presuppositions, appositives under contrastive focus. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, Vol. 1 U Sauerland, S Solt 385–402. Berlin, Ger.: Leibniz Cent. Gen. Linguist.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Esipova M. 2019a. Composition and projection in speech and gesture PhD Thesis N.Y. Univ. New York, NY:
20. Esipova M 2019b. Towards a uniform super-linguistic theory of projection. Proceedings of the 22nd Amsterdam Colloquium JJ Schlöder, D McHugh, F Roelofsen 553–62. Amsterdam, Neth.: ILLC
    [Google Scholar]
21. Farkas DF, Bruce KB. 2010. On reacting to assertions and polar questions. J. Semant. 27:181–118
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fiengo R, May R. 1994. Indices and Identity Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
23. Fricke E. 2012. Grammatik multimodal: wie wörter und gesten zusammenwirken Berlin, Ger.: De Gruyter
24. Giorgolo G. 2010. Space and time in our hands PhD Thesis Univ. Utrecht Utrecht, Neth.:
25. Goldin-Meadow S, Brentari D. 2017. Gesture, sign, and language: the coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behav. Brain Sci. 40:e46
    [Google Scholar]
26. Grice HP 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3 Speech Acts P Cole, JL Morgan 43–58. New York, NY: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gutzmann D. 2015. Use-Conditional Meaning: Studies in Multidimensional Semantics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
28. Harris JA, Potts C. 2009. Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives. Linguist. Philos. 32:6523–52
    [Google Scholar]
29. Harrison S. 2018. The Impulse to Gesture: Where Language, Minds, and Bodies Intersect Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
30. Heim I. 1983. On the projection problem for presuppositions. Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics114–25. Stanford, CA: CSLI
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hunter J. 2019. Relating gesture to speech: reflections on the role of conditional presuppositions. Linguist. Philos. 42:4317–32
    [Google Scholar]
32. Jannedy S, Mendoza-Denton N. 2005. Structuring information through gesture and intonation. Interdiscip. Stud. Inform. Struct. 3:199–244
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kaplan D. 1989. Demonstratives: an essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. Themes from Kaplan J Almog, J Perry, H Wettstein 481–563. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
34. Keevallik L. 2013. The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 46:11–21
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kendon A. 1980. Gesticulation and speech: two aspects of the process of utterance. The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication MR Key 207–27. The Hague, Neth.: Mouton
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kendon A. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
37. Kita S. 2009. Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: a review. Lang. Cogn. Process. 24:2145–67
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kita S, Özyürek A. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. J. Mem. Lang. 48:116–32
    [Google Scholar]
39. Koev T. 2013. Apposition and the structure of discourse PhD Thesis Rutgers Univ. New Brunswick, NJ:
40. Kopp S, Tepper P, Cassell J. 2004. Towards integrated microplanning of language and iconic gesture for multimodal output. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI'04)97–104. New York, NY: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Krifka M. 2001. Non-Novel Indefinites in Adverbial Quantification Stanford, CA: CSLI
42. Kripke S. 1977. Speaker's reference and semantic reference. Midwest Stud. Philos. 13:255–76
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ladewig SH. 2014. Recurrent gestures. See Müeller et al. 2014 1558–74
44. Ladewig SH. 2020. Integrating Gestures: The Dimension of Multimodality in Cognitive Grammar Berlin, Ger.: De Gruyter Mouton
45. Lascarides A, Stone M. 2009. A formal semantic analysis of gesture. J. Semant. 26:4393–449
    [Google Scholar]
46. Liddell SK. 2003. Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
47. Loehr D. 2004. Gesture and intonation PhD Thesis Georgetown Univ. Washington, DC:
48. Lücking A. 2013. Ikonische gesten: grundzüge einer linguistischen theorie Berlin, Ger: De Gruyter
49. Lücking A, Bergmann K, Hahn F, Kopp S, Rieser H. 2013. Data-based analysis of speech and gesture: the Bielefeld Speech and Gesture Alignment corpus (SaGA) and its applications. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 7:1–25–18
    [Google Scholar]
50. Lücking A, Pfeiffer T, Rieser H. 2015. Pointing and reference reconsidered. J. Pragmat. 77:56–79
    [Google Scholar]
51. McCawley JD. 1998. The Syntactic Phenomena of English Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press. , 2nd ed..
52. McNeill D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
53. McNeill D. 2005. Gesture and Thought Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
54. Müller C. 2004. The palm-up-open-hand. A case of a gesture family?. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures: Proceedings of the Berlin Conference April 1998 C Müller, R Posner 233–56. Berlin, Ger.: Weidler
    [Google Scholar]
55. Müller C, Cienki A, Fricke E, Ladewig S, McNeill D, Bressem J, eds. 2014. Body-Language-Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, Vol. 2 Berlin, Ger.: De Gruyter Mouton
56. Müller C, Tag S. 2010. The dynamics of metaphor: foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cogn. Semiot. 6:85–120
    [Google Scholar]
57. Nouwen R 2014. A note on the projection of appositives. Formal Approaches to Semantics and Pragmatics: Japanese and Beyond E McCready, K Yabushita, K Yoshimoto 205–22. Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
58. Nunberg G. 1993. Indexicality and deixis. Linguist. Philos. 16:1–43
    [Google Scholar]
59. Özçaliskan Ş, Goldin-Meadow S. 2005. Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development. Cognition 96:B101–13
    [Google Scholar]
60. Pearson H. 2010. A modification of the ``Hey, Wait a Minute'' test. Snippets 22:7–8
    [Google Scholar]
61. Pfau R 2011. A point well taken. Deaf Around the World: The Impact of Language G Mathur, DJ Napoli 144–63. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
62. Pittenger RE, Hockett CF, Danehy JJ. 1960. The First Five Minutes: A Sample of Microscopic Interview Ithaca, NY: P. Martineau
63. Potts C. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
64. Potts C 2012. Conventional implicature and expressive content. Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 3 C Maienborn, K von Heusinger, P Portner 2516–36. Berlin, Ger.: De Gruyter Mouton
    [Google Scholar]
65. Potts C, Alonso-Ovalle L, Asudeh A, Bhatt R, Cable S et al. 2009. Expressives and identity conditions. Linguist. Inq. 40:2356–66
    [Google Scholar]
66. Rieser H 2009. On factoring out a gesture typology from the Bielefeld Speech-and-Gesture-Alignment Corpus (SAGA). Gesture in Embodied Communication and Human-Computer Interaction S Kopp, I Wachsmuth 47–60. Berlin/Heidelberg, Ger.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
67. Rieser H, Lawler I. 2020. Multi-modal meaning: an empirically-founded process algebra approach. Semant. Pragmat. 13:8
    [Google Scholar]
68. Sæbø KJ. 2011. Appositives in modal contexts. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15 I Reich, E Horch, D Pauly 79–100. Saarbrücken, Ger.: Univ. Saarlandes
    [Google Scholar]
69. Sailor C, Colasanti V. 2020. Co-speech gestures under ellipsis: a first look Handout from the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America New Orleans, LA: Jan. 2–5
70. Salem M, Kopp S, Wachsmuth I, Rohlfing K, Joublin F. 2012. Generation and evaluation of communicative robot gesture. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 4:201–17
    [Google Scholar]
71. Schlenker P. 2014. Iconic features. Nat. Lang. Semant. 22:4299–356
    [Google Scholar]
72. Schlenker P. 2015. Gestural cosuppositions within the transparency theory. Linguist. Inq. 50:4873–84
    [Google Scholar]
73. Schlenker P. 2018. Gesture projection and cosuppositions. Linguist. Philos. 41:3295–365
    [Google Scholar]
74. Schlenker P. 2019a. Gestural semantics. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 37:735–84
    [Google Scholar]
75. Schlenker P. 2019b. What is super semantics?. Philos. Perspect. 32:365–453
    [Google Scholar]
76. Schlenker P. 2020. Gestural grammar. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 38:3887–936
    [Google Scholar]
77. Schlenker P, Chemla E. 2018. Gestural agreement. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 36:2587–625
    [Google Scholar]
78. Shanon B. 1976. On the two kinds of presupposition in natural language. Found. Lang. 14:2247–49
    [Google Scholar]
79. Stalnaker R. 2002. Common ground. Linguist. Philos. 25:701–21
    [Google Scholar]
80. Syrett K, Koev T. 2014. Experimental evidence for the truth conditional contribution and shifting information status of appositives. J. Semant. 32:3525–77
    [Google Scholar]
81. Tieu L, Pasternak R, Schlenker P, Chemla E. 2017. Co-speech gesture projection: evidence from truth-value judgment and picture selection tasks. Glossa 2:1102
    [Google Scholar]
82. Tieu L, Pasternak R, Schlenker P, Chemla E. 2018. Co-speech gesture projection: evidence from inferential judgments. Glossa 3:1109
    [Google Scholar]
83. Tomasello M. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
84. Tonhauser J 2012. Diagnosing (not-)at-issue content. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on the Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas (SULA 6) E Bogal-Allbritten 239–54. Amherst, MA: Grad. Linguist. Stud. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Umbach C, Gust H. 2014. Similarity demonstratives. Lingua 149:74–93
    [Google Scholar]
86. von Fintel K. 2004. Would you believe it? The King of France is back! Presuppositions and truth-value intuitions. Descriptions and Beyond M Reimer, A Bezuidenhout 315–41. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]