Interjections at the Heart of Language

Literature Cited

1. Agawu VK. 1995. African Rhythm: A Northern Ewe Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
2. Allwood J 2008. Multimodal corpora. Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook A Lüdeling, M Kytö 207–25 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allwood J, Nivre J, Ahlsén E. 1990. Speech management—on the non-written life of speech. Nord. J. Linguist. 13:13–48
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ameka FK. 1991. Ewe: its grammatical constructions and illocutionary devices PhD Diss. Aust. Natl. Univ. Canberra:
5. Ameka FK. 1992. Interjections: the universal yet neglected part of speech. J. Pragmat. 18:2–3101–18
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ameka FK, Terkourafi M. 2019. What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice. J. Pragmat. 145:72–82
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ameka FK, Wilkins DP. 2006. Interjections. Handbook of Pragmatics: 2006 Installment J Verschueren, J-O Östman Amsterdam: John Benjamins
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bateson G. 1955. A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatr. Res. Rep. 2:3939–51
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bateson MC. 1975. Mother-infant exchanges: the epigenesis of conversational interaction. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 263:1101–13
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bavelas JB, Coates L, Johnson T. 2000. Listeners as co-narrators. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79:6941–52
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bavelas JB, De Jong P, Korman H, Jordan SS. 2012. Beyond back-channels: a three-step model of grounding in face-to-face dialogue. Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Feedback Behaviors in Dialog5–6 El Paso: Univ. Tex
    [Google Scholar]
12. Betz E, Deppermann A, Mondada L, Sorjonen M-L 2021. OKAY Across Languages: Toward a Comparative Approach to Its Use in Talk-in-Interaction Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
13. Birabi AK, Nawangwe B. 2011. Mitigating threats to local knowledge embedded in earthen architecture: the case of preserving African architectural semiotics. Terra 2008: The 10th International Conference on the Study and Conservation of Earthen Architectural Heritage104–8 Los Angeles: Getty Publ
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bloomfield L. 1914. An Introduction to the Study of Language New York: Holt
15. Bodur K, Nikolaus M, Prévot L, Fourtassi A. 2023. Using video calls to study children's conversational development: the case of backchannel signaling. Front. Comput. Sci. 5: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1088752
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
16. Bourgeois J-L. 1987. The history of the Great Mosques of Djenné. African Arts 20:354–92
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bybee JL. 2010. Language, Usage, and Cognition Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
18. Canavan A, Zipperlen G. 1996. CALLHOME Japanese speech. Linguistic Data Consortium LDC Catalog No. LDC96S37
    [Google Scholar]
19. Canavan A, Zipperlen G, Graff D. 1997. CALLHOME Egyptian Arabic speech. Linguistic Data Consortium LDC Catalog No. LDC97S45
    [Google Scholar]
20. Caron B. 2016. OLAC resources in and about the Hausa language. COllections de COrpus Oraux Numeriques (CoCoON ex-CRDO) http://www.language-archives.org/language/hau
    [Google Scholar]
21. Casillas M. 2023. Learning language in vivo. Child Dev. Perspect. 17:110–17
    [Google Scholar]
22. Chomsky N. 1959. Review of verbal behavior. Lang. Linguist. Soc. Am. 35:126–58
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chomsky N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
24. Clark EV. 2020. Conversational repair and the acquisition of language. Discourse Process 57:5–6441–59
    [Google Scholar]
25. Clark HH. 1996. Using Language Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
26. Comrie B, Smith N. 1977. Lingua descriptive studies: questionnaire. Lingua 42:11
    [Google Scholar]
27. Corrin J 2010a. Maternal repair initiation at MLU Stage I: the developmental power of ‘hm?’. First Lang. 30:3–4312–28
    [Google Scholar]
28. Corrin J 2010b. Hm? What? Maternal repair and early child talk. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: Insights from Conversation Analysis H Gardner, M Forrester 23–41 London: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
29. Couper-Kuhlen E 2009. A sequential approach to affect: the case of “disappointment. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions M Haakana, M Laakso, J Lindström 94–123 Helsinki: Finn. Lit. Soc
    [Google Scholar]
30. Couper-Kuhlen E, Selting M. 2017. Interactional Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in Social Interaction Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
31. Dingemanse M 2023. Interjections. The Oxford Handbook of Word Classes E van Lier 477–91 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
32. Dingemanse M, Torreira F, Enfield NJ. 2013. Is “Huh?” a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLOS ONE 8:11e78273
    [Google Scholar]
33. Dixon RMW. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory: Grammatical Topics 2 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
34. Du Bois JW. 2014. Towards a dialogic syntax. Cogn. Linguist. 25:3359–410
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ehlich K. 1986. Interjektionen Tübingen, Ger.: M. Niemeyer
36. Elffers E. 2007. Interjections: on the margins of language. Linguistische und epistemologische Konzepte—diachron S Matthaios, P Schmitter 114–38 Münster, Ger: Nodus
    [Google Scholar]
37. Elffers E. 2008. Interjections and the language functions debate. Newsl. Henry Sweet Soc. Hist. Linguist. Ideas 50:17–29
    [Google Scholar]
38. Endo T. 2018. The Japanese change-of-state tokens a and aa in responsive units. J. Pragmat. 123:151–66
    [Google Scholar]
39. Enfield NJ. 2008. Language as shaped by social interaction. Behav. Brain Sci. 31:5519–20
    [Google Scholar]
40. Enfield NJ. 2014. Natural Causes of Language: Frames, Biases and Cultural Transmission Berlin: Lang. Sci.
41. Enfield NJ. 2017. How We Talk: The Inner Workings of Conversation New York: Basic Books
42. Enfield NJ, Dingemanse M, Baranova J, Blythe J, Brown P et al. 2013. Huh? What?—a first survey in twenty-one languages. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding M Hayashi, G Raymond, J Sidnell 343–80 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
43. Evans N. 1992. Wanjh! bonj! nja!”: sequential organization and social deixis in Mayali interjections. J. Pragmat. 18:2–3225–44
    [Google Scholar]
44. Firth JR. 1935. The technique of semantics. Trans. Philol. Soc. 34:136–73
    [Google Scholar]
45. Fox BA. 2007. Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration. Discourse Stud. 9:3299–318
    [Google Scholar]
46. Fox BA, Thompson SA, Ford CE, Couper-Kuhlen E. 2013. Conversation analysis and linguistics. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis J Sidnell, T Stivers 726–40 West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
47. Fries CC. 1952. The Structure of English: An Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences New York: Harcourt, Brace
48. Gardner R. 2001. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance Amsterdam: John Benjamins
49. Garrido JM, Escudero D, Aguilar L, Cardeñoso V, Rodero E et al. 2013. Glissando: a corpus for multidisciplinary prosodic studies in Spanish and Catalan. Lang. Resour. Eval. 47:4945–71
    [Google Scholar]
50. Garvey C. 1977. The contingent query: a dependent act in conversation. Interaction, Conversation, and the Development of Language M Lewis, LA Rosenblum 63–94 New York: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
51. Ginzburg J. 2012. The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
52. Ginzburg J, Poesio M. 2016. Grammar is a system that characterizes talk in interaction. Front. Psychol. 7: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01938
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
53. Givón T. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
54. Goffman E. 1978. Response cries. Language 54:4787–815
    [Google Scholar]
55. Golinkoff RM. 1986. I beg your pardon?”: the preverbal negotiation of failed messages. J. Child Lang. 13:3455–76
    [Google Scholar]
56. Goodwin C. 1984. Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis JM Atkinson, J Heritage 225–46 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
57. Goodwin C. 1986. Between and within: alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Hum. Stud. 9:2/3205–17
    [Google Scholar]
58. Hakulinen A. 1993. The grammar of opening routines. Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland 6149–70 Turku: Linguist. Assoc. Finl.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Heath J. 1998. Dictionnaire Songhay-Anglais-Français [Songhay-English-French Dictionary] Paris: L'Harmattan
    [Google Scholar]
60. Heinemann T, Koivisto A. 2016. Indicating a change-of-state in interaction: cross-linguistic explorations. J. Pragmat. 104:83–88
    [Google Scholar]
61. Henner J, Robinson O. 2023. Unsettling languages, unruly bodyminds: a Crip Linguistics manifesto. J. Crit. Study Commun. Disabil. 1:17–37
    [Google Scholar]
62. Heritage J. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis JM Atkinson, J Heritage 299–345 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
63. Heritage J, Raymond G. 2005. The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Soc. Psychol. Q. 68:115–38
    [Google Scholar]
64. Hofstede G. 1999. De Interjectie als illocutionaire Handeling. Toegep. Taalwet. Artik. 61:1127–35
    [Google Scholar]
65. Horne Tooke J. 1786. Epea Pteroenta, or the Diversions of Purley London: J. Johnson
    [Google Scholar]
66. Houtkoop-Steenstra H. 1990. Accounting for proposals. J. Pragmat. 14:1111–24
    [Google Scholar]
67. Howes C, Eshghi A. 2021. Feedback relevance spaces: interactional constraints on processing contexts in dynamic syntax. J. Logic Lang. Inform. 30:331–62
    [Google Scholar]
68. Huls HA. 1982. Taalgebruik in het gezin en sociale ongelijkheid: een interactioneel sociolinguïstisch onderzoek PhD Thesis Katholieke Univ. Nijmegen, Neth:
69. Hunyadi L, Váradi T, Kovács G, Szekrényes I, Kiss H, Takács K. 2018. Human-human, human-machine communication: on the HuComTech multimodal corpus. Selected Papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2018, Pisa, 8–10 October 201856–65 Linköping, Swed.: Linköping Univ. Electron. Press
    [Google Scholar]
70. Jakobson R. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. Style in Language TA Sebeok 350–77 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
71. Jefferson G. 1972. Side sequences. Studies in Social Interaction DN Sudnow 294–338 New York: MacMillan/Free Press
    [Google Scholar]
72. Jefferson G. 1978. Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction J Schenkein 219–48 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
73. Jefferson G. 1984. Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “Yeah” and “Mm Hm. Pap. Linguist. 17:2197–216
    [Google Scholar]
74. Jespersen O. 1922. Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin London: George Allen and Unwin
75. Keenan EL, Comrie B. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguist. Inq. 8:163–99
    [Google Scholar]
76. Keevallik L, Hofstetter E. 2023. Sounding for others: vocal resources for embodied togetherness. Lang. Commun. 90:33–40
    [Google Scholar]
77. Kita S, Ide S. 2007. Nodding, aizuchi, and final particles in Japanese conversation: how conversation reflects the ideology of communication and social relationships. J. Pragmat. 39:71242–54
    [Google Scholar]
78. Kockelman P. 2003. The meanings of interjections in Q'eqchi’ Maya: from emotive reaction to social and discursive action. Curr. Anthropol. 44:4467–97
    [Google Scholar]
79. Koivisto A. 2013. On the preference for remembering: acknowledging an answer with Finnish ai nii(n) (“oh that's right”). Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 46:3277–97
    [Google Scholar]
80. Lahaussois A 2016. Where have all the interjections gone? A look into the place of interjections in contemporary grammars of endangered languages. Tradition and Innovation in the History of Linguistics C Assunção, G Fernandes, R Kemmler 186–95 Münster, Ger.: Nodus
    [Google Scholar]
81. Le Guin UK 2019. The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction London: Ignota
82. Leavitt HJ, Müller RAH. 1951. Some effects of feedback on communication. Hum. Relat. 4:4401–10
    [Google Scholar]
83. Levinson SC. 2013. Recursion in pragmatics. Language 89:1149–62
    [Google Scholar]
84. Levinson SC. 2016. Turn-taking in human communication—origins and implications for language processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20:16–14
    [Google Scholar]
85. Levisen C. 2019. Laughter interjections. Scand. Stud. Lang. 10:1110–30
    [Google Scholar]
86. Liesenfeld A, Dingemanse M. 2022. Building and curating conversational corpora for diversity-aware language science and technology. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2022)1178–92 Paris: Eur. Lang. Res. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Lindström J. 2006. Grammar in the service of interaction: exploring turn organization in Swedish. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 39:181–117
    [Google Scholar]
88. Lutzenberger H, de Wael L, Omardeen R, Dingemanse M. 2024. Interactional infrastructure across modalities: a comparison of repair initiators and continuers in British Sign Language and British English. Sign Lang. Stud. In press
    [Google Scholar]
89. Malinowski B. 1923. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. The Meaning of Meaning CK Ogden, IA Richards 296–336 London: Kegan Paul
    [Google Scholar]
90. Marmorstein M, Matalon N. 2022. Responses within activities: alignment via Egyptian Arabic ʔāh ‘yeah’ in extended turns. Interact. Linguist. 2:142–78
    [Google Scholar]
91. Meinard MEM. 2015. Distinguishing onomatopoeias from interjections. J. Pragmat. 76:150–68
    [Google Scholar]
92. Meinard MEM. 2023. The ground and the archetype: two situations from which to describe the conversion and derivation of interjections. SKASE J. Theor. Linguist. 20:1127–52
    [Google Scholar]
93. Mesch J. 2016. Manual backchannel responses in signers’ conversations in Swedish Sign Language. Lang. Commun. 50:22–41
    [Google Scholar]
94. Mondada L. 2018. Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: challenges for transcribing multimodality. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 51:185–106
    [Google Scholar]
95. Müller FE. 1996. Affiliating and disaffiliating with continuers: prosodic aspects of recipiency. Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies E Couper-Kuhlen, M Selting 131–76 Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
96. Müller M. 1861. Lectures on the Science of Language 1 London: Longmans, Green
97. Newport EL, Gleitman H, Gleitman LR 2020 (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. Sentence First, Arguments Afterward: Essays in Language and Learning L Gleitman, J Lidz 141–77 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
98. Ngué Um E. 2020. Had Ferdinand de Saussure spoken Wolof or Basaa…, the discipline of linguistics would have fared differently. Lang. Cult. Soc. 2:1107–15
    [Google Scholar]
99. Nikolaus M, Fourtassi A. 2023. Communicative feedback in language acquisition. New Ideas Psychol. 68:100985
    [Google Scholar]
100. Norrick NR. 2009. Interjections as pragmatic markers. J. Pragmat. 41:5866–91
     [Google Scholar]
101. O'Keeffe A, Adolphs S. 2008. Response tokens in British and Irish discourse: corpus, context and variational pragmatics. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 178 KP Schneider, A Barron 69–98 Amsterdam: John Benjamins
     [Google Scholar]
102. Park HW, Gelsomini M, Lee JJ, Breazeal C. 2017. Telling stories to robots: the effect of backchanneling on a child's storytelling. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’17)100–8 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach
     [Google Scholar]
103. Peterson C, Jesso B, McCabe A. 1999. Encouraging narratives in preschoolers: an intervention study. J. Child Lang. 26:149–67
     [Google Scholar]
104. Poggi I. 2009. The language of interjections. Multimodal Signals: Cognitive Algorithmic Issues A Esposito, A Hussain, M Marinaro, R Martone 170–86 Berlin: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
105. Ponsonnet M. 2023. Interjections. The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages C Bowern 564–72 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
106. Reber E. 2012. Affectivity in Interaction: Sound Objects in English Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
107. Reber E 2020. Interjektionen—an den Rändern der Sprache?. An den Rändern der Sprache M Elmentaler, O Niebuhr 39–65 Berlin: Peter Lang
     [Google Scholar]
108. Reber E, Couper-Kuhlen E. 2010. Interjektionen zwischen Lexikon und Vokalität: Lexem oder Lautobjekt?. Sprache intermedial: Stimme und Schrift, Bild und Ton A Deppermann, A Linke 69–96 Berlin/New York: De Gruyter
     [Google Scholar]
109. Rühlemann C. 2020. Turn structure and inserts. Int. J. Corpus Linguist. 25:2185–214
     [Google Scholar]
110. Sacks H. 1972. On the analyzability of stories by children. Directions in Sociolinguistics JJ Gumperz, DH Hymes 325–45 New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
     [Google Scholar]
111. Sacks H 1974. An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking R Bauman, J Sherzer 337–53 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
112. Sacks H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation London: Blackwell
113. Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:4696–735
     [Google Scholar]
114. Sapir E. 1921. Language New York: Harcourt, Brace
115. Schegloff EA. 1982. Discourse as interactional achievement: some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk D Tannen 71–93 Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
116. Schegloff EA. 1993. Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 26:199–128
     [Google Scholar]
117. Schegloff EA 1996. Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. Interaction and Grammar E Ochs, EA Schegloff, SA Thompson 52–133 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
118. Schegloff EA. 1997. Practices and actions: boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Process 23:3499–545
     [Google Scholar]
119. Schegloff EA, Jefferson G, Sacks H. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53:2361–82
     [Google Scholar]
120. Schegloff EA, Sacks H. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica 8:4289–327
     [Google Scholar]
121. Schiffrin D. 1987. Discourse Markers Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
122. Seuren LM, Huiskes M, Koole T. 2016. Remembering and understanding with oh-prefaced yes/no declaratives in Dutch. J. Pragmat. 104:180–92
     [Google Scholar]
123. Silverstein M. 1981. The Limits of Awareness Austin, TX: Southwest Educ. Dev. Lab
124. Silverstein M. 1986. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. Features and Projections P Muysken, H van Riemsdijk 163–232 Dordrecht, Neth: Foris
     [Google Scholar]
125. Skedsmo K. 2023. Repair receipts in Norwegian Sign Language multiperson conversation. J. Pragmat. 215:189–212
     [Google Scholar]
126. Skinner BF. 1957. Verbal Behavior New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
127. Sørensen SS. 2021. Affiliating in second position: response tokens with rising pitch in Danish. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 54:1101–25
     [Google Scholar]
128. Tao H. 2003. Turn initiators in spoken English: a corpus-based approach to interaction and grammar. Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use P Leistyna, CF Meyer 187–207 Amsterdam: Brill
     [Google Scholar]
129. Thompson SA, Fox BA, Couper-Kuhlen E. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
130. Tolins J, Namiranian N, Akhtar N, Fox Tree JE. 2017. The role of addressee backchannels and conversational grounding in vicarious word learning in four-year-olds. First Lang. 37:6648–71
     [Google Scholar]
131. Tomasello M. 2008. Origins of Human Communication Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
132. Unuabonah FO. 2020. So you know ehn … ” The use of bilingual interjections in Nigerian English. Intercult. Pragmat. 17:2151–76
     [Google Scholar]
133. Ward N. 2006. Non-lexical conversational sounds in American English. Pragmat. Cogn. 14:129–82
     [Google Scholar]
134. Wharton T. 2009. Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
135. Widlok T. 2016. Small words−big issues: the anthropological relevance of Khoesan interjections. Afr. Study Monogr. 52:Suppl.135–45
     [Google Scholar]
136. Wierzbicka A. 1991. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
137. Wierzbicka A. 1992. The semantics of interjection. J. Pragmat. 18:2–3159–92
     [Google Scholar]
138. Wilbur J. 2009. Pite Saami: documenting the language and culture. Endangered Languages Archive http://hdl.handle.net/2196/00-0000-0000-0003-1170-E
     [Google Scholar]
139. Williams N, Stenzel K, Fox B. 2020. Parsing particles in Wa'ikhana. Rev. Linguíʃtica 16:Esp.356–82
     [Google Scholar]
140. Wiltschko M. 2021. The Grammar of Interactional Language Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
141. Winter B, Pérez-Sobrino P, Brown L. 2019. The sound of soft alcohol: crossmodal associations between interjections and liquor. PLOS ONE 14:8e0220449
     [Google Scholar]
142. Yngve V. 1970. On getting a word in edgewise. Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society567–78 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Dep. Linguist
     [Google Scholar]
143. Zimmerman DH. 1999. Horizontal and vertical comparative research in language and social interaction. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 32:1–2195–203
     [Google Scholar]
144. Zuckerman CHP, Enfield NJ. 2023. The limits of thematization. J. Linguist. Anthropol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12399
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]