Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Overview

Literature Cited

1. Andrews A. 1990. Case structures and control in modern Icelandic. Modern Icelandic Syntax J Maling, A Zaenen, 165–85 San Diego, CA: Academic
   [Google Scholar]
2. Asudeh A. 2006. Direct compositionality and the architecture of LFG. Intelligent Linguistic Architectures: Variations on Themes by Ronald M. Kaplan M Butt, M Dalrymple, TH King 363–87 Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Asudeh A. 2012. The Logic of Pronominal Resumption Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
4. Asudeh A, Dalrymple M, Toivonen I 2013. Constructions with lexical integrity. J. Lang. Model. 1:1–54
   [Google Scholar]
5. Asudeh A, Toivonen I. 2009. Lexical-Functional Grammar. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis B Heine, H Narrog 373–406 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bögel T, Butt M, Kaplan RM, King TH, Maxwell JT III 2009. Prosodic phonology in LFG: a new proposal. Proceedings of the LFG09 Conference M Butt, TH King 146–66 Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Börjars K, Chisarik E, Payne J 1999. On the justification for functional categories in LFG. Proceedings of the LFG99 Conference M Butt, TH King. Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Börjars K, Harries P, Vincent N 2016. Growing syntax: the development of a DP in North Germanic. Language 92:e1–37
   [Google Scholar]
9. Börjars K, Nordlinger R, Sadler L 2019. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
10. Börjars K, Vincent N. 2017. Lexical-Functional Grammar. The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax A Ledgeway, I Roberts 642–63 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bresnan J. 1978. A realistic transformational grammar. Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality M Halle, J Bresnan, GA Miller 1–59 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bresnan J 1982a. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
13. Bresnan J. 1982b. Control and complementation. Linguist. Inq. 13:343–92
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bresnan J. 1998. Morphology competes with syntax: explaining typological variation in weak crossover effects. Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax P Barbosa, D Fox, P Hagstrom, M McGinnis, D Pesetsky 59–92 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bresnan J, Asudeh A, Toivonen I, Wechsler S 2016. Lexical-Functional Syntax Malden, MA/Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd ed..
16. Bresnan J, Kanerva JM. 1989. Locative inversion in Chicheŵa: a case study in the factorization of grammar. Linguist. Inq. 20:1–50
    [Google Scholar]
17. Butt M, Dyvik H, King TH, Masuichi H, Rohrer C 2002. The Parallel Grammar Project. Proceedings of COLING-2002 Workshop on Grammar Engineering and Evaluation1–7 Stroudsburg, PA: Assoc. Comput. Linguist.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Butt M, King TH. 1998. Interfacing phonology with LFG. Proceedings of the LFG98 Conference M Butt, TH King Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Butt M, King TH, Niño ME, Segond F 1999. A Grammar Writer's Cookbook Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
20. Butt M, Niño ME, Segond F 1996. Multilingual processing of auxiliaries in LFG. Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology: Results of the 3rd KONVENS Conference D Gibbon 111–22 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
21. Camilleri M, Sadler L. 2017. Posture verbs and aspect: a view from Vernacular Arabic. Proceedings of the LFG17 Conference M Butt, TH King 167–87 Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Crouch R, Dalrymple M, Kaplan RM, King TH, Maxwell J, Newman P 2011. XLE Documentation Palo Alto, CA: Palo Alto Res. Cent https://ling.sprachwiss.uni-konstanz.de/pages/xle/doc/xle_toc.html
23. Dalrymple M 1999. Semantics and Syntax in Lexical Functional Grammar: The Resource Logic Approach Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
24. Dalrymple M. 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar San Diego, CA/London: Academic
25. Dalrymple M. 2015. Morphology in the LFG architecture. Proceedings of the LFG15 Conference M Butt, TH King 43–62 Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dalrymple M, Kaplan RM, King TH 2015. Economy of Expression as a principle of syntax. J. Lang. Model. 3:377–412
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dalrymple M, Nikolaeva I. 2011. Objects and Information Structure Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
28. Frank A, Zaenen A. 2002. Tense in LFG: syntax and morphology. How We Say WHEN It Happens: Contributions to the Theory of Temporal Reference in Natural Language H Kamp, U Reyle 17–52 Tbingen, Ger: Niemeyer
    [Google Scholar]
29. Haug D. 2013. Partial control and anaphoric control in LFG. Proceedings of the LFG13 Conference M Butt, TH King 274–94 Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Jackendoff R. 1977. X-Bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
31. Jøhndal M. 2012. Non-finiteness in Latin PhD Thesis, Univ. Cambridge Cambridge, UK:
32. Kaplan RM, Bresnan J. 1982. Lexical-Functional Grammar: a formal system for grammatical representation. See Bresnan 1982a 173–281
33. Kaplan RM, Zaenen A. 1989. Long-distance dependencies, constituent structure, and functional uncertainty. Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure M Baltin, A Kroch 17–42 Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kibort A. 2014. Mapping out a construction inventory with (Lexical) Mapping Theory. Proceedings of the LFG14 Conference M Butt, TH King 262–82 Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kibort A, Maling J. 2015. Modelling the syntactic ambiguity of the active versus passive impersonal in LFG. Proceedings of the LFG15 Conference M Butt, TH King 145–65 Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
    [Google Scholar]
36. King TH. 1997. Focus domains and information-structure. Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference M Butt, TH King Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
    [Google Scholar]
37. King TH, Dalrymple M. 2004. Determiner agreement and noun conjunction. J. Linguist. 40:69–104
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kroeger P. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
39. Mycock L. 2007. Constituent question formation and focus: a new typological perspective. Trans. Philol. Soc. 105:192–251
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nichols J. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62:56–119
    [Google Scholar]
41. Nordlinger R. 1998. Constructive Case: Evidence from Australian Languages Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
42. Nordlinger R, Sadler L. 2004. Tense beyond the verb: encoding clausal tense/aspect/mood on nominal dependents. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 22:597–641
    [Google Scholar]
43. O'Connor R. 2006. Information structure in Lexical-Functional Grammar: the discourse-prosody correspondence PhD Thesis, Univ. Manchester Manchester, UK:
44. Sadler L. 2016. Agreement in Archi: an LFG perspective. Archi: Complexities of Agreement in Cross-Theoretical Perspective O Bond, GC Corbett, M Chumakina, D Brown 150–83 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Sadler L, Spencer A. 2004. Projecting Morphology Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
46. Simpson J. 1991. Warlpiri Morpho-Syntax: A Lexicalist Approach Dordrecht, Neth: Kluwer Acad.