1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Psychology
  4. Volume 75, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Psychology

Volume 75, 2024

Psychological Flexibility, Chronic Pain, and Health

Abstract

Psychological flexibility is a model of human performance and well-being. It essentially entails an approach to life circumstances that includes openness, awareness, and engagement. It has roots in behavior analysis, and it is linked to a philosophy of science called functional contextualism and to a specific therapy approach called Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. One of the earliest and most developed research areas in which this model and therapy have been applied is chronic pain. This review describes psychological flexibility and its facets in more detail, sets them in a context of relevant psychological models, and examines related assessment and treatment methods. It also examines evidence, current challenges, and future directions. It is proposed that psychological flexibility, or an expanded model very much like it, could provide a basis for integrating current research and treatment approaches in chronic pain and health generally. This, in turn, could produce improved treatments for people with chronic pain and other conditions.

Keyword(s): chronic pain, health, process-based therapy, psychological flexibility, psychological inflexibility, psychological models, well-being
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020223-124335
2024-01-18
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/75/1/annurev-psych-020223-124335.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020223-124335&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Åkerblom S, Perrin S, Rivano Fischer M, McCracken LM. 2015. The mediating role of acceptance in multidisciplinary cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. J. Pain 16:7606–15
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkins PWB, Ciarrochi J, Gaudiano BA, Bricker JB, Donald J et al. 2017. Departing from the essential features of a high quality systematic review of psychotherapy: a response to Öst 2014 and recommendations for improvement. Behav. Res. Ther. 97:259–72
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N et al. 2011. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav. Ther. 42:4676–88
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Carvalho S, Pinto-Gouveia J, Gillanders D, Lapa T, Valentim A et al. 2020. Above and beyond emotional suffering: the unique contribution of compassionate and uncompassionate self-responding in chronic pain. Scand. J. Pain 20:4853–57
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cherry KM, Hoeven EV, Patterson TS, Lumley MN. 2021. Defining and measuring “psychological flexibility”: a narrative scoping review of diverse flexibility and rigidity constructs and perspectives. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 84:101973
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Chisari C, McCracken LM, Cruciani F, Moss-Morris R, Scott W. 2022. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for women living with vulvodynia: a single-case experimental design study of a treatment delivered online. J. Context. Behav. Sci. 23:15–30
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dahl JC, Wilson KG, Nilsson A. 2004. Acceptance and commitment therapy and the treatment for persons at risk for long-term disability resulting from stress and pain symptoms: a preliminary randomized trial. Behav. Ther. 35:785–801
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Davey A, Chilcot J, Driscoll E, McCracken LM. 2020. Psychological flexibility, self-compassion and daily functioning in chronic pain. J. Context. Behav. Sci. 17:79–85
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dawson DL, Golijani-Moghaddam N. 2020. COVID-19: psychological flexibility, coping, mental health, and wellbeing in the UK during the pandemic. J. Context. Behav. Sci. 17::126–34
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Ding D, Zheng M. 2022. Associations between six core processes of psychological flexibility and functioning for chronic pain patients: a three-level meta-analysis. Front. Psychiatry 13:893150
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fang S, Ding D. 2022. Which outcome variables are associated with psychological inflexibility/flexibility for chronic pain patients? A three level meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 13:1069748
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fish RA, McGuire B, Hogan M, Morrison TG, Stewart I. 2010. Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in an Internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8. Pain 149:3435–43
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fisher AJ, Medaglia JD, Jeronimus BF. 2018. Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. PNAS 115:27E6106–15
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fordyce WE. 1976. Behavioral Methods for Chronic Pain and Illness St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby
  15. Francis AW, Dawson DL, Golijani-Moghaddam N. 2016. The development and validation of the Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT). J. Context. Behav. Sci. 5:134–45
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilbert P, Procter S. 2006. Compassionate mind training for people with high shame and self-criticism: overview and pilot study of a group therapy approach. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 13:6353–79
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gillanders DT, Bolderston H, Bond FW, Dempster M, Flaxman PE et al. 2014. The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire. Behav. Ther. 45:183–101
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D, Wilson KG. 2012a. Contextual behavioral science: creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition. J Context. Behav. Sci. 1:1–16
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hayes SC, Ciarrochi J, Hofmann SG, Chin F, Sahdra B. 2022. Evolving an idionomic approach to processes of change: towards a unified personalized science of human improvement. Behav. Res. Ther. 156:104155
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hayes SC, Follette M, Linehan M, eds. 2004a. Mindfulness and Acceptance: Expanding the Cognitive-Behavioral Tradition New York: Guilford
  21. Hayes SC, Hofmann SG, Stanton CE, Carpenter JK, Sanford BT et al. 2019. The role of the individual in the coming era of process-based therapy. Behav. Res. Ther. 117:40–53
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hayes SC, Levin ME, Plumb-Vilardaga J, Villatte JL, Pistorello J. 2013. Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behav. Ther. 44:2180–98
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. 1999. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change New York: Guilford
  24. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. 2012b. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change New York: Guilford. , 2nd ed..
  25. Hayes SC, Strosahl K, Wilson KG, Bissett RT, Pistorello J et al. 2004b. Measuring experiential avoidance: a preliminary test of a working model. Psychol. Record 54:553–78
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hayes SC, Villatte M, Levin M, Hildebrandt M. 2011. Open, aware, and active: contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 7:141–68
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hedman-Lagerlöf M, Andersson E, Hedman-Lagerlöf E, Wicksell RK, Flink I, Ljótsson B. 2019. Approach as a key for success: Reduced avoidance behaviour mediates the effect of exposure therapy for fibromyalgia. Behav. Res. Ther. 122:103478
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hofmann SG, Curtiss JE, Hayes SC. 2020. Beyond linear mediation: toward a dynamic network approach to study treatment processes. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 76:101824
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hofmann SG, Hayes SC. 2019. The future of intervention science: process-based therapy. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 7:137–50
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hughes LS, Clark J, Colclough JA, Dale E, McMillan D. 2017. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin. J. Pain 33:552–68
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kabat-Zinn J, Lipworth L, Burney R. 1985. The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain. J. Behav. Med. 8:2163–90
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kazdin AE. 2007. Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 3:1–27
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lai L, Liu Y, McCracken LM, Li Y, Ren Z. 2023. The efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a three-level meta-analysis and a trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Behav. Res. Ther. 165:104308
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Levin ME, Hildebrandt MJ, Lillis J, Hayes SC. 2012. The impact of treatment components suggested by the psychological flexibility model: a meta-analysis of laboratory-based component studies. Behav Ther. 43:4741–56
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Li Z, Shang W, Wang C, Yang K, Guo J. 2022. Characteristics and trends in acceptance and commitment therapy research: a bibliometric analysis. Front. Psychol. 13:980848
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Luciano MC, Visdómine JC, Gutiérrez O, Montesinos F. 2001. Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso (ACT) y dolor crónico. Anal. Modif. Conducta 27:113473–501
     [Google Scholar]
  37. McAndrews Z, Richardson J, Stopa L. 2019. Psychometric properties of acceptance measures: a systematic review. J. Context. Behav. Sci. 12:261–77
     [Google Scholar]
  38. McCracken LM. 1998. Learning to live with the pain: Acceptance of pain predicts adjustment in persons with chronic pain. Pain 74:121–27
     [Google Scholar]
  39. McCracken LM. 2010. Toward understanding acceptance and psychological flexibility in chronic pain. Pain 149::420–21
     [Google Scholar]
  40. McCracken LM. 2013. Committed action: an application of the psychological flexibility model to activity patterns in chronic pain. J. Pain 14:8828–35
     [Google Scholar]
  41. McCracken LM 2022. Committed action. The Oxford Handbook of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy MP Twohig, ME Levin, JM Petersen New York: Oxford Univ. Press https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197550076.013.13
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. McCracken LM 2023. Personalized pain management: Is it time for process-based therapy for particular people with chronic pain?. Eur. J. Pain 27:91044–55
     [Google Scholar]
  43. McCracken LM, Buhrman M, Badinlou F, Brocki KC. 2022b. Health, well-being, and persisting symptoms in the pandemic: What is the role of psychological flexibility?. J. Context. Behav. Sci. 26:187–92
     [Google Scholar]
  44. McCracken LM, Buhrman M, Brocki K. 2023. COVID-19 and processes of adjustment in people with persistent pain: the role of psychological flexibility. Scand. J. Pain 23:3539–45
     [Google Scholar]
  45. McCracken LM, Chilcot J, Norton S. 2015. Further development in the assessment of psychological flexibility: a shortened Committed Action Questionnaire (CAQ-8). Eur. J. Pain 19:5677–85
     [Google Scholar]
  46. McCracken LM, DaSilva P, Skillicorn B, Doherty R. 2014. The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire: a preliminary study of psychometric properties and prediction of functioning in chronic pain. Clin. J. Pain 30:10894–901
     [Google Scholar]
  47. McCracken LM, Morley S. 2014. The psychological flexibility model: a basis for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management. J. Pain 15:3221–34
     [Google Scholar]
  48. McCracken LM, Scott W. 2023. Potential misfortunes in “making sense”: a cross-sectional study in people with chronic pain. J. Pain 24:1157–66
     [Google Scholar]
  49. McCracken LM, Velleman SC. 2010. Psychological flexibility in adults with chronic pain: a study of acceptance, mindfulness, and values-based action in primary care. Pain 148:1141–47
     [Google Scholar]
  50. McCracken LM, Vowles KE, Eccleston C. 2004. Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain 107:1–2159–66
     [Google Scholar]
  51. McCracken LM, Vowles KE, Eccleston C. 2005. Acceptance-based treatment for persons with complex, long standing chronic pain: a preliminary analysis of treatment outcome in comparison to a waiting phase. . Behav. Res. Ther. 43:101335–46
     [Google Scholar]
  52. McCracken LM, Yang SY. 2006. The role of values in a contextual cognitive-behavioral approach to chronic pain. Pain 123:1–2137–45
     [Google Scholar]
  53. McCracken LM, Yu L, Vowles KE. 2022a. New generation psychological treatments in chronic pain. BMJ 376:e057212
     [Google Scholar]
  54. McEwan D, Harden SM, Zumbo BD, Sylvester BD, Kaulius M et al. 2016. The effectiveness of multi-component goal setting interventions for changing physical activity behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol. Rev. 10:167–88
     [Google Scholar]
  55. McHugh L, Stewart I. 2012. The Self and Perspective Taking: Contributions and Applications from Modern Behavioral Science Oakland, CA: New Harbinger
  56. Mills SEE, Nicolson KP, Smith BH. 2019. Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Br. J. Anaesth. 123:2e273–83
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Molenaar PCM. 2004. A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement 2:4201–18
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Murillo C, Vo TT, Vansteelandt S, Harrison LE, Cagnie B et al. 2022. How do psychologically based interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain work? A systematic review and meta-analysis of specific moderators and mediators of treatment. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 94:102160
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Neff KD. 2003. Self-compassion: an alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self Identity 2:85–101
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Neff KD. 2023. Self-compassion: theory, method, research, and intervention. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 74:193–218
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Ong CW, Pierce BG, Petersen JM, Barney JL, Fruge JE, Levin ME, Twohig MP. 2020. A psychometric comparison of psychological inflexibility measures: discriminant validity and item performance. J. Context. Behav. Sci. 18:34–47
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Ost LG. 2014. The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav. Res. Ther. 61:105–21
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Plumb JC, Stewart I, Dahl J, Lundgren T. 2009. In search of meaning: values in modern clinical behavior analysis. Behav. Anal. 32:85–103
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Rogge RD, Daks JS, Dubler BA, Saint KJ. 2019. It's all about the process: examining the convergent validity, conceptual coverage, unique predictive validity, and clinical utility of ACT process measures. J. Context. Behav. Sci. 14:90–102
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Rolffs JL, Rogge RD, Wilson KG. 2018. Disentangling components of flexibility via the Hexaflex Model: development and validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). Assessment 25:458–82
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Sanabria-Mazo JP, Colomer-Carbonell A, Borràs X, Castaño-Asins JR, McCracken LM et al. 2023. Efficacy of videoconference group acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and behavioral activation therapy for depression (BATD) for chronic low back pain (CLBP) plus comorbid depressive symptoms: a randomized controlled trial (IMPACT study). J. Pain 24:81522–40
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Scott W, Hann KE, McCracken LM. 2016. A comprehensive examination of changes in psychological flexibility following acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain. J. Contemp. Psychother. 46:139–48
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Scott W, McCracken LM, Norton S. 2015. A confirmatory factor analysis of facets of psychological flexibility in a sample of people seeking treatment for chronic pain. Ann. Behav. Med. 50:2285–96
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Sundström FT, Lavefjord A, Buhrman M, McCracken LM. 2023. Assessing psychological flexibility and inflexibility in chronic pain using the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI). J. Pain 24:5770–81
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Trindade IA, Guiomar R, Carvalho SA, Duarte J, Lapa T et al. 2021. Efficacy of online-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . J. Pain 22:111328–42
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M. 1983. Pain and Behavioral Medicine: A Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective, Vol. 1 New York: Guilford
  72. Turner JA, Anderson ML, Balderson BH, Cook AJ, Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC. 2016. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic low back pain: similar effects on mindfulness, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and acceptance in a randomized controlled trial. Pain 157:112434–44
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Veehof MM, Trompetter HR, Bohlmeijer ET, Schreurs KM. 2016. Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 45:15–31
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. 2000. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 85:3317–32
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Vowles KE, Sowden G, Ashworth J. 2014. A comprehensive examination of the model underlying acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain. Behav. Ther. 45:390–401
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Wicksell RK, Renöfält J, Olsson GL, Bond FW, Melin L. 2008. Avoidance and cognitive fusion—central components in pain related disability? Development and preliminary validation of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS). Eur. J. Pain 12:4491–500
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Wideman TH, Asmundson GGJ, Smeets RJEM, Zautra AJ, Simmonds MJ et al. 2013. Rethinking the fear avoidance model: toward a multidimensional framework of pain-related disability. Pain 154:112262–65
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Wilson KG, Dufrene T. 2009. Mindfulness for Two: An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Approach to Mindfulness in Psychotherapy Oakland, CA: New Harbinger
  79. Yu L, Kioskli K, McCracken LM. 2021b. The psychological functioning in the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with psychological flexibility and broader functioning in people with chronic pain. J. Pain 22:8926–39
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Yu L, McCracken LM. 2016. Model and processes of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for chronic pain including a closer look at the self. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 20:212
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Yu L, McCracken LM, Norton S. 2016. The Self Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ): preliminary analyses for a measure of self in people with chronic pain. J. Context. Behav. Sci. 5:3127–33
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Yu L, Scott W, Goodman R, Driscoll L, McCracken LM. 2021a. Measuring “self”: preliminary validation of a short form of the Self Experiences Questionnaire in people with chronic pain. Br. J. Pain 15:4474–85
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020223-124335
Loading
Psychological Flexibility, Chronic Pain, and Health
Annual Review of Psychology 75, 601 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020223-124335
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020223-124335
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020223-124335
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error