1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Resource Economics
  4. Volume 15, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volume 15, 2023

Advances in Causal Inference at the Intersection of Air Pollution and Health Outcomes

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the recent economics literature analyzing the effect of air pollution on health outcomes. We review the common approaches to measuring and modeling air pollution exposures and the epidemiological and biological literature on health outcomes that undergird federal air regulations in the United States. The article contrasts the methods used in the epidemiology literature with the causal inference framework used in economics. In particular, we review the common sources of estimation bias in epidemiological approaches that the economics literature has sought to overcome with research designs that take advantage of natural experiments. We review new promising research designs for estimating concentration-response functions and identify areas for further research.

Keyword(s): air pollution, causal inference, epidemiology, health, integrated science assessments, JEL I18, JEL Q53, natural experiments
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101722-081026
2023-10-05
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/15/1/annurev-resource-101722-081026.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101722-081026&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Agarwal N, Banternghansa C, Bui L. 2010. Toxic exposure in America: estimating fetal and infant health outcomes from 14 years of TRI reporting. J. Health Econ. 29:4557–74
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander D, Schwandt H 2022. The impact of car pollution on infant and child health: evidence from emissions cheating. Rev. Econ. Stud. 89:2872–910
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson M. 2020. As the wind blows: The effects of long-term exposure to air pollution on mortality. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 18:41886–1927
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Austin W, Heutel G, Kreisman D. 2019. School bus emissions, student health and academic performance. Econ. Educ. Rev. 70:109–26
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Banzhaf S, Walsh R. 2008. Do people vote with their feet? An empirical test of Tiebout. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:3843–63
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Beatty T, Shimshack J. 2011. School buses, diesel emissions, and respiratory health. J. Health Econ. 30:5987–99
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chay K, Greenstone M. 2003. The impact of air pollution on infant mortality: evidence from geographic variation in pollution shocks induced by a recession. Q. J. Econ. 118:31121–67
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen S, Guo C, Huang X. 2018. Air pollution, student health, and school absences: evidence from China. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 92:465–97
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Christensen P, Sarmiento-Barbieri I, Timmins C. 2022. Housing discrimination and the toxics exposure gap in the United States: evidence from the rental market. Rev. Econ. Stat. 104:4807–18
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Christensen P, Timmins C. 2022. Sorting or steering: the effects of housing discrimination on neighborhood choice. J. Political Econ. 130:82110–63
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Clay K, Portnykh M, Severnini E. 2021. Toxic truth: lead and fertility. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 8:5975–1012
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Currie J, Graff Zivin J, Mullins J, Niedell M. 2014. What do we know about short-and long-term effects of early-life exposure to pollution?. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 6:217–47
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Currie J, Hanushek E, Kahn M, Neidell M, Rivkin S. 2009a. Does pollution increase school absences?. Rev. Econ. Stat. 91:4682–94
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Currie J, Neidell M. 2005. Air pollution and infant health: What can we learn from California's recent experience?. Q. J. Econ. 120:31003–30
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Currie J, Neidell M, Schmieder JF. 2009b. Air pollution and infant health: lessons from New Jersey. J. Health Econ. 28:3688–703
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Currie J, Walker R. 2011. Traffic congestion and infant health: evidence from E-ZPass. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 3:65–90
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Deryugina T, Heutel G, Miller N, Molitor D, Reif J. 2019. The mortality and medical costs of air pollution: evidence from changes in wind direction. Am. Econ. Rev. 109:124178–219
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Di Q, Dai L, Wang Y, Zanobetti A, Choirat C, Schwartz J, Dominici F. 2017. Association of short-term exposure to air pollution with mortality in older adults. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 318:2446–56
     [Google Scholar]
  19. EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2010. Integrated science assessment for carbon monoxide Rep. EPA/600/R-09/019F US Environ. Prot. Agency Research Triangle Park, NC: https://ordspub.epa.gov/ords/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=494432
  20. EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2011. The benefits and costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020 Final Rep. – Rev. A, Off. Air Radiat., Environ. Prot. Agency Washington, DC: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/fullreport_rev_a.pdf
  21. EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2015. Preamble to the Integrated Science Assessments (ISA) Rep. EPA/600/R-15/067 US Environ. Prot. Agency Washington, DC:
  22. EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2016. Integrated science assessment for oxides of nitrogen – health criteria Rep. EPA/600/R-15/068 US Environ. Prot. Agency Research Triangle Park, NC: https://ordspub.epa.gov/ords/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=526855
  23. EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2017. Integrated science assessment for sulfur oxides – health criteria Rep. EPA/600/R-17/451 US Environ. Prot. Agency Research Triangle Park, NC: https://ordspub.epa.gov/ords/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=533653
  24. EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2019. Integrated science assessment for particulate matter Rep. EPA/600/R-19/188 US Environ. Prot. Agency Research Triangle Park, NC: https://ordspub.epa.gov/ords/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=539935
  25. EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2020. Integrated science assessment for ozone and related photochemical oxidants Rep. EPA/600/R-20/012 US Environ. Prot. Agency Research Triangle Park, NC: https://ordspub.epa.gov/ords/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=540022
  26. Evans MF, Taylor LO. 2020. Using revealed preference methods to estimate the value of reduced mortality risk: best practice recommendations for the hedonic wage model. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 14:2282–301
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gov. UK 2021. Air quality appraisal: damage cost guidance Dep. Environ. Food Rural Aff., Gov UK, London: Updated March 2, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/assess-the-impact-of-air-quality/air-quality-appraisal-damage-cost-guidance#contents
  28. Hanna R, Oliva P. 2015. The effect of pollution on labor supply: evidence from a natural experiment in Mexico City. J. Public Econ. 122:68–79
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Health Eff. Inst 2022. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Selected Health Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution Boston, MA: Health Eff. Inst.
  30. Holland M. 2014. Cost-benefit analysis of final policy scenarios for the EU Clean Air Package Rep., Eur. Marit. Saf. Agency Lisbon, Port: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1955087/cost-benefit-analysis-of-final-policy-scenarios-for-the-eu-clean-air-package/2706855/
  31. Hollingsworth A, Rudik I. 2021. The effect of leaded gasoline on elderly mortality: evidence from regulatory exemptions. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 13:3345–73
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Imbens G, Rubin D. 2015. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press
  33. Jacqz I. 2022. Toxic test scores: the impact of chemical releases on standardized test performance within U.S. schools. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 115:102628
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jans J, Johansson P, Nilsson JP. 2018. Economic status, air quality, and child health: evidence from inversion episodes. J. Health Econ. 61:220–32
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Karner A, Eisinger D, Niemeier D. 2010. Near-roadway air quality: synthesizing the findings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44:145334–44
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Knittel CR, Miller DL, Sanders NJ. 2016. Caution, drivers! Children present: traffic, pollution, and infant health. Rev. Econ. Stat. 98:2350–66
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu Y-M, Ao C-K. 2021. Effect of air pollution on health care expenditure: evidence from respiratory diseases. Health Econ. 30:4858–75
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Luechinger S. 2014. Air pollution and infant mortality: a natural experiment from power plant desulfurization. J. Health Econ. 37:219–31
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Mogstad M, Torgovitsky A. 2018. Identification and extrapolation of causal effects with instrumental variables. Annu. Rev. Econ. 10:577–613
     [Google Scholar]
  40. OECD (Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev.) 2016. The Economic Consequences of Outdoor Air Pollution Paris: OECD
  41. OECD (Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev.) 2019. The economic cost of air pollution: evidence from Europe Econ. Dep. Work. Pap. 1584 OECD Paris:
  42. Rangel M, Vogl T. 2019. Agricultural fires and health at birth. Rev. Econ. Stat. 101:4616–30
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Roth J, Sant'Anna PHC, Bilinski A, Poe J. 2022. What's trending in difference-in-differences?. A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. arXiv:2201.01194 [econ.EM] https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01194
  44. Schlenker W, Walker R. 2016. Airports, air pollution, and contemporaneous health. Rev. Econ. Stud. 83:2768–809
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Shi L, Zanobetti A, Kloog I, Coull B, Koutrakis P, Melly S, Schwartz J. 2015. Low-concentration PM2.5 and mortality: estimating acute and chronic effects in a population-based study. Environ. Health Perspect. 124:246–52
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Ueda K, Nitta H, Ono M, Takeuchi A. 2009. Estimating mortality effects of fine particulate matter in Japan: a comparison of time-series and case-crossover analyses. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 59:101212–18
     [Google Scholar]
  47. WHO (World Health Organ.) 2021a. Ambient (outdoor) air pollution Fact Sheet WHO Geneva: Updated Dec. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health
  48. WHO (World Health Organ.) 2021b. WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Oxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide Geneva: WHO
  49. Yang M, Chou S-Y. 2018. The impact of environmental regulation on fetal health: evidence from the shutdown of a coal-fired power plant located upwind of New Jersey. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 90:269–93
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Young SS, Smith RL, Lopiano KK. 2017. Air quality and acute deaths in California, 2000–2012. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 88:173–84
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang J, Mu Q. 2018. Air pollution and defensive expenditures: evidence from particulate-filtering facemasks. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 92:517–36
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhong N, Cao J, Wang Y. 2017. Traffic congestion, ambient air pollution, and health: evidence from driving restrictions in Beijing. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4:3821–56
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101722-081026
Loading
Advances in Causal Inference at the Intersection of Air Pollution and Health Outcomes
Annual Review of Resource Economics 15, 455 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101722-081026
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101722-081026
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101722-081026
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error