1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Resource Economics
  4. Volume 14, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volume 14, 2022

Economics of the US National Park System: Values, Funding, and Resource Management Challenges

Abstract

The US national park system includes 423 sites covering more than 85 million acres of land and some of the most iconic landscapes in the country. The parks host approximately 320 million visitors a year. In this review, I survey the economics literature on national parks, focusing on four main topics: values and economic impacts of the parks, funding challenges, congestion and overcrowding, and resource management issues related mainly to climate change. In each area, I discuss gaps in the literature, new data and methods that could be applied to national parks, and important topics for future research. The most pressing needs are for more empirical research on use values, using new data sources and modern econometric methods, and relatedly, studies of the responsiveness of demand to pricing, which would be helpful for addressing both congestion and funding challenges.

Keyword(s): climate change, congestion, funding, JEL H4, JEL Q2, JEL Q5, national parks, recreation demand, valuation
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-021401
2022-10-05
2024-06-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/14/1/annurev-resource-111920-021401.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-021401&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson FJ, Bonsor MC. 1974. Allocation, congestion, and the valuation of recreational resources. Land Econ 50:151–57
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bajari P, Freuhwirth JC, Kim KI, Timmins C. 2012. A rational expectations approach to hedonic price regressions with time-varying unobserved product attributes: the price of pollution. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:51898–1926
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Banzhaf HS. 2021. Differences-in-differences hedonics. J. Political Econ. 129:82385–2414
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Banzhaf HS, Smith VK. 2022. Bundling private complements to finance public goods. Land Econ 98:3440–60
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayer P, Timmins C. 2007. Estimating equilibrium models of sorting across locations. Econ. J. 117:518353–74
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bilecki MS. 2020. Fire Island National Seashore: a breach in the barrier island at the Otis Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness. Parks Stewardship Forum Jan. 6. https://parks.berkeley.edu/psf/?p=1645
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowker JM, Cordell KH, Johnson CY. 1999. User fees for recreation services on public lands: a national assessment. J. Park Recreat. Adm. 7:31–14
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Boxall P, Rollins K, Englin J. 2003. Heterogeneous preferences for congestion during a wilderness experience. Resour. Energy Econ. 25:2177–95
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyle KJ, Paterson R, Carson R, Leggett C, Kanninen B et al. 2016. Valuing shifts in the distribution of visibility in national parks and wilderness areas in the United States. J. Environ. Manag. 173:10–22
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bradt J. 2021. Spatial sorting, agglomeration economies, and travel cost endogeneity in recreation demand models Presented at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference, virtual, June 2–4
  11. Chakraborty K, Keith JE 2000. Estimating the recreation demand and economic value of mountain biking in Moab, Utah: an application of count data models. J. Environ. Plan. Manag 43:461–69
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chan NW, Kotchen MJ. 2022. Funding public goods through dedicated taxes on private goods. Land Econ 98:3428–39
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chan NW, Wichman CJ. 2020. Climate change and recreation: evidence from North American cycling. Environ. Resour. Econ. 76:119–51
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen Y, Lewis DJ, Weber B. 2016. Conservation land amenities and regional economies: a postmatching difference-in-difference analysis of the Northwest Forest Plan. J. Reg. Sci. 56:373–94
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Christensen NS, Wood AW, Voisin N, Lettenmaier DP, Palmer RN. 2004. The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin. Clim. Change 62:337–63
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cicchetti C, Smith VK. 1973. Congestion, quality deterioration, and optimal use: wilderness recreation in the Spanish Peaks Primitive Area. Soc. Sci. Res. 2:115–30
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Covich A. 2009. Emerging climate change impacts on freshwater resources: a perspective on transformed watersheds. Rep., Resour. Fut., Washington, DC:
  18. Dayer AA, Redford KH, Campbell KJ, Dickman CR, Epanchin-Niell RS et al. 2020. The unaddressed threat of invasive animals in U.S. National Parks. Biol. Invasions 22:178–88
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Douglas AJ, Harpman DA. 2004. Lake Powell management alternatives and values: CVM estimates of recreation benefits. Water Int. 29:3375–83
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Englin JE, Holmes TP, Sills EO 2003. Estimating forest recreation demand using count data models. Forests in a Market Economy, Vol. 72 EO Sills, K Abt 341–59 Dordrecht, Neth: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Factor S. 2007. Effects of per-vehicle entrance fees on U.S. National Park visitation rates Master's Thesis, Duke Univ. Durham, NC:
  22. Ferris AE, Frank EG. 2021. Labor market impacts of land protection: the Northern Spotted Owl. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 109:102480
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Fisher AC, Krutilla JV. 1972. Determination of optimal capacity of resource-based recreation facilities. Nat. Resour. J. 12:3417–44
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Fisichelli NA, Schuurman GW, Monahan WB, Ziesler PS. 2015. Protected Area tourism in a changing climate: Will visitation at US national parks warm up or overheat?. PLOS ONE 10:6e0128226
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gellman J, Walls M, Wibbenmeyer M. 2021. Wildfire smoke exposure and outdoor recreation on public lands: using big data in a travel cost valuation framework. Presented at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference, virtual, June 2–4
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gellman J, Walls M, Wibbenmeyer M 2022. Wildfire, smoke, and outdoor recreation in the western United States. For. Policy Econ 134:102619
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Godby R, Coupal R, Haggerty M. 2019. The overlooked importance of federal public land fiscal policy Headwaters Econ. People Public Lands Forum, June. https://headwaterseconomics.org/wp-content/uploads/PAPL_Godby_Coupal_Haggerty_Essay_2019.pdf
  28. Gude P. 2018. Methods for county-wide trail & pathway activity: estimates using Strava data Rep., April, Headwaters Econ Bozeman, MT:
  29. Haefele M, Loomis J, Blimes L 2020. Total economic valuation of the National Park Service lands and programs: results of a survey of the American public. Valuing U.S. National Parks and Programs: America's Best Investment LJ Bilmes, JB Loomis 16–44 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hanley N, Czajkowski M. 2019. The role of stated preference valuation methods in understanding choices and informing policy. . Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 13:2248–66
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hansen AJ, Piekielek N, Davis C, Haas J, Theobald DM et al. 2014. Exposure of U.S. National Parks to land use and climate change 1900–2100. Ecol. Appl. 24:3484–502
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Heberling MT, Templeton JJ. 2009. Estimating the economic value of national parks with count data models using on-site, secondary data: the case of the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve. Environ. Manag. 43:619–27
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoover K. 2020. Federal wildfire management: ten-year funding trends and issues (FY2011–FY2020) Rep. R46583, Oct 28 Congr. Res. Serv Washington, DC: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R46583.pdf
  34. Hoover K, Hanson L. 2020. Wildfire statistics Rep. IF10244, updated Nov. 3 Congr. Res. Serv Washington, DC: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10244/45
  35. Jakus PM, Akhundjanov S. 2019. The Antiquities Act, national monuments, and the regional economy. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 95:102–17
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Jakus PM, Shaw WD. 1997. Congestion at recreation areas: empirical evidence on perceptions, mitigating behaviour and management preferences. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 50:4389–401
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ji Y, Keiser DA, Kling CL, Phaneuf DJ. 2022. Revenue and distributional consequences of alternative outdoor recreation pricing mechanisms: evidence from a micropanel data set. Land Econ 98:3478–94
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson L, Spanbauer M, Button P. 2019. How valuable are national parks? Evidence from a proposed national park expansion in Alaska. J. Park Recreat. Adm. 37:2 https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2019-8968
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnston RJ, Boyle KJ, Adamowicz W, Bennett J, Brouwer R et al. 2017. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4:20319–405
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Johnston RJ, Boyle KJ, Loureiro ML, Navrud S, Rolfe J 2021. Guidance to enhance the validity and credibility of environmental benefit transfers. Environ. Resour. Econ. 79:575–624
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Johnston RJ, Rolfe J, Rosenberger RS, Brouwer R, eds. 2015. Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners Dordrecht, Neth: Springer
  42. Keeler BE, Wood SA, Polasky S, Kling C, Filstrup CT, Downing JA. 2015. Recreational demand for clean water: evidence from geotagged photographs by visitors to lakes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13:276–81
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim M-K, Jakus P. 2019. Wildfire, national park visitation, and changes in regional economic activity. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tourism 26:24–42
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Kotchen M, Wagner K. 2019. Crowding in with impure altruism: theory and evidence from volunteerism in national parks NBER Work. Pap 26445
  45. Krutilla J. 1967. Conservation reconsidered. Am. Econ. Rev. 57:4777–86
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kuminoff N, Parmeter C, Pope J. 2010. Which hedonic models can we trust to recover the marginal willingness to pay for environmental amenities?. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 60:3145–60
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kuminoff N, Pope J. 2014. Do “capitalization effects” for public goods reveal the public's willingness to pay?. Int. Econ. Rev. 55:41227–50
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Kupfer JA, Li Z, Ning H, Huang X 2021. Using mobile device data to track the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on spatiotemporal patterns of national park visitation. Sustainability 13:9366
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lawson M. 2021. Innovative new ways to count outdoor recreation: using data from cell phones, fitness trackers, social media, and other novel data sources. Rep., March, Headwaters Econ Bozeman, MT: https://headwaterseconomics.org/wp-content/uploads/HE_CountingRecreationReport_2021.pdf
  50. Lewis D, Hunt G, Plantinga A. 2003. Does public lands policy affect local wage growth?. Growth Change 34:164–86
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Liang Y, Yin J, Pan B, Lin M, Chi G 2021. Assessing the validity of SafeGraph data for visitor monitoring in Yellowstone National Park Rep., Travel Tourism Res. Assoc Lapeer, MI:
  52. Loomis J, Richardson L, Huber C, Skibins J, Sharp R. 2018. A method to value nature-related webcam viewing: the value of virtual use with application to brown bear webcam viewing. J. Environ. Econ. Policy 7:4452–62
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Lueck D, Parker DP. 2022. Federal funding and state wildlife conservation. Land Econ 98:3461–77
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Lupi F, Phaneuf DR, von Haefen R. 2020. Best practices for implementing recreation demand models. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 14:2302–23
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Lupi F, von Haefen R, Cheng L. 2022. Distributional effects of entry fees and taxation for financing public beaches. . Land Econ 98:3509–19
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Malcolm AH. 1989. Visitors stream back to Yellowstone after the fires of 1988. New York Times Sept. 3. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/09/03/us/visitors-stream-back-to-yellowstone-after-the-fires-of-1988.html
    [Google Scholar]
  57. McConnell KE. 1977. Congestion and willingness to pay: a study of beach use. Land Econ 53:2185–95
     [Google Scholar]
  58. McConnell V, Walls M. 2005. The value of open space: evidence from studies of nonmarket benefits. Rep., Resour. Fut. Washington, DC:
  59. Mendelsohn R, Markowski M. 1999. The impact of climate change on outdoor recreation. The Impact of Climate Change on the United States Economy R Mendelsohn, JE Neumann 267–88 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Moeltner K, von Haefen R. 2011. Microeconometric strategies for dealing with unobservables and endogenous variables in recreation demand models. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 3:375–96
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Mueller JM, Loomis JB, Richardson L, Fitch RA. 2021. Valuing impacts of proximity to Saguaro National Park on house prices. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy press. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13196
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Neher C, Duffield J, Patterson D. 2013. Valuation of national park system visitation: the efficient use of count data models, meta-analysis, and secondary visitor survey data. Environ. Manag. 52:683–98
     [Google Scholar]
  63. NPS (Natl. Park. Serv.) 2014. Recent climate change exposure of Fort Sumter National Monument Clim. Change Resour. Brief, Natl. Park Serv. Washington, DC: https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/DownloadFile/497306
  64. Parsons GR. 2017. Travel cost models. A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation P Champ, KJ Boyle, TC Brown 187–233 New York: Springer. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Parsons GR, Kang A, Leggett C, Boyle K. 2009. Valuing beach closures on the Padre Island National Seashore. Mar. Resour. Econ. 24:3213–35
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Parsons GR, Leggett CG, Herriges J, Boyle K, Bockstael N, Chen Z 2021. A site-portfolio model for multiple-destination recreation trips: valuing trips to national parks in the Southwestern United States. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 8:1 https://doi.org/10.1086/710714
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Phaneuf DJ, Carbone J, Herriges J. 2009. Non-price equilibria for non-marketed goods. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 57:45–64
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Phaneuf DJ, Requate T. 2016. A Course in Environmental Economics: Theory, Policy, and Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  69. Phaneuf DJ, Smith VK. 2005. Recreation demand models. Handbook of Environmental Economics, Vol. 2 K-G Mäler, J Vincent 671–761 Amsterdam: Elsevier
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Rasker R. 2006. An exploration into the economic impact of industrial development versus conservation on Western public lands. Soc. Nat. Resour. 19:191–207
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Richardson L, Lewis L. 2022. Getting to know you: individual animals, wildlife webcams, and willingness to pay for brown bear preservation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 104:2673–92
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Richardson L, Loomis J, Kroeger T, Casey F 2015. The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation. Ecol. Econ. 115:51–58
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Ronto P. 2021. Hiking in the US has never been more popular. RunRepeat Aug. 6. https://runrepeat.com/hiking-never-more-popular
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Rosen S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J. Political Econ. 82:34–55
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Rosenberger RS, Bell LA, Champ PA, White EM. 2013. Estimating the economic value of recreation losses in Rocky Mountain National Park due to a mountain pine beetle outbreak. Western Econ. Forum 12:131–39
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Rosenberger RS, Loomis JB. 2000. Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values: a technical document supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan (2000 revision) Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-72, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Rocky Mt. Res. Stn., Fort Collins, CO
  77. Schuhmann PW, Schwabe KA. 2004. An analysis of congestion measures and heterogeneous angler preferences in a random utility model of recreational fishing. Environ. Resour. Econ. 27:429–50
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Schultze WD, Brookshire DS, Walther EG, MacFarland KK 1983. The economic benefits of preserving visibility in the national parklands of the Southwest. Nat. Resour. J. 23:149–65
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Sessions C, Wood SA, Rabotyagov S, Fisher DM. 2016. Measuring recreational visitation at U.S. National Parks with crowdsourced photographs. J. Environ. Manag. 183:703–11
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Stevens T, More T, Markowski-Lindsay M. 2014. Declining national park visitation: an economic analysis. J. Leisure Res. 46:2153–64
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Szabó A, Ujhelyi G. 2020. Conservation and development: economic impacts of the US National Park System Work. Pap., Univ Houston:
  82. Tenkanen H, Di Minin E, Heikinheimo V, Hausman, Herbst M et al. 2017. Instagram, Flickr, or Twitter: assessing the usability of social media data for visitor monitoring in protected areas. Sci. Rep. 7:17615
     [Google Scholar]
  83. The Economist 2016. China tries to build a coherent system of national parks: The government looks to America for inspiration. The Economist Nov. 26. https://www.economist.com/china/2016/11/24/china-tries-to-build-a-coherent-system-of-national-parks
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Thomas CC, Koontz L. 2021. 2020 National park visitor spending effects economic contributions to local communities, states, and the nation Nat. Resour. Rep. NPS/NRSS/EQD/NRR—2021/2259, Natl Park Serv., US Dep. Inter. Washington, DC: https://www.nps.gov/nature/customcf/NPS_Data_Visualization/docs/NPS_2020_Visitor_Spending_Effects.pdf
  85. Tilt W. 2015. Paying to play in the great outdoors. PERC 33:2 https://www.perc.org/2015/01/20/paying-to-play-in-the-great-outdoors/
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Timmins C, Murdock J. 2007. A revealed preference approach to the measurement of congestion in travel cost models. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 53:2230–49
     [Google Scholar]
  87. US BEA (US Bur. Econ. Anal.) 2020. Outdoor recreation satellite account, U.S. and States, 2019 Rep. 20-56, Nov 10, US Bur. Econ. Anal. Washington, DC:
  88. US Geol. Surv 2002. Vulnerability of U.S. national parks to sea-level rise and coastal change Fact Sheet 095–02 US Geol. Surv. Washington, DC: https://doi.org/10.3133/fs09502
    [Crossref]
  89. Walls M. 2020. Public land conflicts and controversies: the designation of national monuments in the Western United States. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 14:2352–64
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Walls M, Ashenfarb M. 2022. Efficiency and equity of an outdoor recreation equipment tax to fund public lands. Land Econ 98:3520–36
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Walls M, Lee P, Ashenfarb M. 2020. National monuments and economic growth in the American West. Sci. Adv. 6:12eaay8523
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Watkins T. 2020. Fixing national park maintenance for the long haul. Policy Brief, November, Prop. Environ. Res. Cent. Bozeman, MT: https://www.perc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/fixing-national-park-maintenance.pdf
  93. Whitfield GP, Ussery EN, Riordan B, Wendel AM. 2016. Association between user-generated commuting data and population representative active commuting surveillance data—four cities, 2014–2015. Mor. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 65:36959–62
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Wibbenmeyer M, McDarris A. 2021. Wildfires in the United States 101: causes and consequences Explainer, Resour. Fut. Washington, DC: https://www.rff.org/publications/explainers/wildfires-in-the-united-states-101-context-and-consequences/
  95. Wood S, Winder SG, Lia EH, White EM, Crowley CSL, Milnor AA. 2020. Next-generation visitation models using social media to estimate recreation on public lands. Sci. Rep. 10:1549
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-021401
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error