1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 47, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 47, 2021

The Influence of Simmel on American Sociology Since 1975

Abstract

Recent decades have seen Georg Simmel's canonical status in American sociology solidify and his impact on research expand. A broad understanding of his influence, however, remains elusive. This review remedies this situation by evaluating Simmel's legacy in American sociology since 1975. We articulate Simmel's sociological orientation by elaborating the concepts of form, interaction, and dualism. Employing a network analysis of references to Simmel since 1975, we examine how Simmelian concepts have been adopted in research. We find Simmel became an anchor for change in urban and conflict studies, where scholars moved from his earlier functionalist reception toward a formalist interpretation. This formalist reception consolidated Simmel's status as a classic in network research and symbolic interactionism during the 1980s. Recent work in economic sociology and the sociology of culture, however, builds on Simmel's growing reception within relational sociology. We conclude with several ways to further articulate Simmel's ideas in the discipline.

Keyword(s): American sociology, formalism, influence, relationalism, Simmel, sociological theory
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-033647
2021-07-31
2024-05-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/47/1/annurev-soc-090320-033647.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-033647&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ahmed S. 2000. Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality London: Routledge
  2. Arditi G. 1987. Role as a cultural concept. Theory Soc 16:4565–91
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arditi G. 1996. Simmel's theory of alienation and the decline of the nonrational. Soc. Theory 14:293–108
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aronowitz S. 1994. The Simmel revival: a challenge to American social science. Sociol. Q. 35:3397–414
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Aspers P, Godart F 2013. Sociology of fashion: order and change. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 39:171–92
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Axelrod CD. 1977. Toward an appreciation of Simmel's fragmentary style. Sociol. Q. 18:2185–96
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Axelrod R. 1997. The dissemination of culture: a model with local convergence and global polarization. J. Confl. Resolut. 41:2203–26
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Baldassarri D. 2011. Partisan joiners: associational membership and political polarization in the United States (1974–2004). Soc. Sci. Q. 92:3631–55
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Baldassarri D, Gelman A. 2008. Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in American public opinion. Am. J. Sociol. 114:2408–46
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Balser DB. 1997. The impact of environmental factors on factionalism and schism in social movement organizations. Soc. Forces 76:1199–228
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Barbalet J. 2009. A characterization of trust, and its consequences. Theory Soc 38:4367–82
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bell MM. 1992. The fruit of difference: the rural-urban continuum as a system of identity. Rural Sociol 57:165–82
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bernau JA. 2018. Text analysis with JSTOR archives. Socius 4: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118809264
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Blau PM. 1977a. A macrosociological theory of social structure. Am. J. Sociol. 83:126–54
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Blau PM. 1977b. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure New York: Free
  16. Blumer H. 1969. Fashion: from class differentiation to collective selection. Sociol. Q. 10:275–91
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bonacich E. 1973. A theory of middleman minorities. Am. Sociol. Rev. 38:5583–94
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bourdieu P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  19. Bratton J., Denham D. 2014. Capitalism and Classical Social Theory Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press. , 2nd ed..
  20. Bruch EE. 2014. How population structure shapes neighborhood segregation. Am. J. Sociol. 119:51221–78
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Breiger RL. 1974. The duality of persons and groups. Soc. Forces 53:2181–90
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Breiger RL 1990. Social control and social networks: a model from Georg Simmel. Structures of Power and Constraint: Papers in Honor of Peter M. Blau C Calhoun, MW Meyer, WR Scott 453–76 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Broćić M, Silver D 2020. Simmel's American legacy revisited. The Routledge International Handbook of Simmel Studies G Fitzi 353–71 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Burt RS. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  25. Camic C. 1992. Reputation and predecessor selection: Parsons and the institutionalists. Am. Sociol. Rev. 57:4421–45
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Capetillo-Ponce J. 2005. Deciphering the labyrinth: the influence of Georg Simmel on the sociology of Octavio Paz. Theory Cult. Soc 22:695–121
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Coleman JS. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94:Suppl.S95–120
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Collins PH. 1986. Learning from the outsider within: the sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Soc. Prob. 33:6S14–S32
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Coser LA. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict London: Routledge
  30. Davis F. 1991. Herbert Blumer and the study of fashion: a reminiscence and a critique. Symb. Interact. 14:11–21
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Davis MS. 1997. Georg Simmel and Erving Goffman: legitimators of the sociological investigation of human experience. Qual. Sociol. 20:3369–88
     [Google Scholar]
  32. de la Fuente E. 2008. The art of social forms and the social forms of art: the sociology-aesthetics nexus in Georg Simmel's thought. Soc. Theory 26:4344–62
     [Google Scholar]
  33. DellaPosta D. 2020. Pluralistic collapse: the “oil spill” model of mass opinion polarization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 85:3507–36
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Diekema DA. 1992. Aloneness and social form. Symb. Interact. 15:4481–500
     [Google Scholar]
  35. DiMaggio P, Evans J, Bryson B. 1996. Have American's social attitudes become more polarized?. Am. J. Sociol. 102:3690–755
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Dodd N. 2014. The Social Life of Money Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  37. Donati P 2006. Building a relational theory of society: a sociological journey. Sociologists in a Global Age: Biographical Perspectives M Deflem 159–74 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Emirbayer M. 1997. Manifesto for a relational sociology. Am. J. Sociol. 103:2281–317
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Erickson B. 1996. Culture, class, and connections. Am. J. Sociol. 102:1217–51
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Erikson E. 2013. Formalist and relationalist theory in social network analysis. Soc. Theory 31:3219–42
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Felski R. 1995. The Gender of Modernity Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  42. Fletcher R. 2009. The emperor's new adventure: public secrecy and the paradox of adventure tourism. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 39:16–33
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Fourcade M. 2011. Cents and sensibility: economic valuation and the nature of ‘nature.’. Am. J. Sociol. 116:61721–77
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Friedman S, Reeves A. 2020. From aristocratic to ordinary: shifting modes of elite distinction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 85:2323–50
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Frisby D. 1981. Sociological Impressionism: A Reassessment of Georg Simmel's Social Theory London: Routledge
  46. Frisby D. 1986. Fragments of Modernity: Theories of Modernity in the Work of Simmel, Kracauer, and Benjamin Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  47. Garrido MZ. 2019. The Patchwork City: Class, Space, and Politics in Metro Manila Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  48. Goffman E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life New York: Doubleday
  49. Goodstein ES. 2017. Georg Simmel and the Disciplinary Imaginary Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  50. Gould RV. 1999. Collective violence and group solidarity: evidence from a feuding society. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64:3356–80
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Granovetter MS. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78:61360–80
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Granovetter MS. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91:3481–510
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Gross M. 2003. Sociologists of the unexpected: Edward A. Ross and Georg Simmel on the unintended consequences of modernity. Am. Sociol. 34:440–58
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Gurevitch ZD. 1989. Distance and conversation. Symb. Interact. 12:2251–63
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Guzman C, Silver D. 2018. The institution of sociological theory in Canada. Can. Rev. Sociol. 55:19–39
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Hannan MT, Freeman J. 1989. Organizational Ecology Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  57. Harrington A, Kemple TM. 2012. Introduction: Georg Simmel's ‘sociological metaphysics’: money, sociality, and precarious life. Theory Cult. Soc. 29:7–87–25
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Haveman HA., Wetts R. 2019. Organizational theory: from classical sociology to the 1970s. Sociol. Compass 13:31–14
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hipp JR, Perrin AJ. 2009. The simultaneous effect of social distance and physical distance on the formation of neighborhood ties. City Community 8:15–25
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Hirsch EL. 1990. Sacrifice for the cause: group processes, recruitment, and commitment in a student social movement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 55:2243–54
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Holyfield L, Fine GA. 1997. Adventure as character work: the collective taming of fear. Symb. Interact. 20:4343–63
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Ingham G. 2004. The Nature of Money Cambridge, UK: Polity. , 1st ed..
  63. Jameson F. 1999. The theoretical hesitation: Benjamin's sociological predecessor. Crit. Inq. 25:2267–88
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Jaworski GD. 1990. Robert K. Merton's extension of Simmel's übersehbar. Soc. Theory 8:199–105
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Jaworski GD. 1997. Georg Simmel and the American Prospect Albany, NY: SUNY Press
  66. Kasarda JD, Janowitz M. 1974. Community attachment in mass-society. Am. Sociol. Rev. 39:3328–39
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Kemple TM. 2012. A chronology of Simmel's works in English. Theory Cult. Soc. 29:317–23
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Krackhardt D. 1999. The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16:1183–210
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Lash S. 2005. Lebenssoziologie: Georg Simmel in the information age. Theory Cult. Soc. 22:31–23
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Lechner FJ. 1991. Simmel on social space. Theory Cult. Soc. 8:3195–201
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Leck RM. 2000. Georg Simmel and Avant-Garde Sociology: The Birth of Modernity, 1880–1920 New York: Humanity
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Lee M, Silver D. 2012. Simmel's law of the individual and the ethics of the relational self. Theory Cult. Soc. 29:7–8124–45
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Levine DN. 1989. Simmel as a resource for sociological metatheory. Soc. Theory 7:2161–74
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Levine DN. 1991. Simmel and Parsons reconsidered. Am. J. Sociol. 96:51097–116
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Levine DN, Carter E, Gorman EM. 1976a. Simmel's influence on American sociology. I. Am. J. Sociol. 81:4813–45
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Levine DN, Carter E, Gorman EM. 1976b. Simmel's influence on American sociology. II. Am. J. Sociol. 81:51112–32
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Lewis JD, Weigert AJ. 1985. Social atomism, holism, and trust. Sociol. Q. 26:4455–71
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Liu S. 2020. Between social spaces. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 24:1123–39
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Lizardo O. 2016. Why ‘cultural matters’ matter: culture talk as the mobilization of cultural capital in interaction. Poetics 58:October1–17
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Lizardo O. 2019. Simmel's dialectic of form and content in recent work in cultural sociology. Ger. Rev. 94:293–100
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Logan JR. 2012. Making a place for space: spatial thinking in social science. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38:507–24
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Low J. 2008. Structure, agency, and social reality in Blumerian symbolic interactionism: the influence of Georg Simmel. Symb. Interact. 31:3325–43
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Luhmann N, Burns T, Poggi G. 1979. Trust and Power New York: Wiley
  84. Marin A, Wellman B 2014. Social network analysis: an introduction. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis J Scott, PJ Carrington11–25 London: SAGE
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Mayhew BH, Levinger RL. 1976. Size and the density of interaction in human aggregates. Am. J. Sociol. 82:186–110
     [Google Scholar]
  86. McAdam D. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  87. McLean P. 2016. Culture in Networks Cambridge, UK: Polity
  88. McPherson JM. 1983. An ecology of affiliation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:4519–32
     [Google Scholar]
  89. McPherson JM, Rotolo T. 1996. Testing a dynamic model of social composition: diversity and change in voluntary groups. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61:2179–202
     [Google Scholar]
  90. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:415–44
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Mead GH. 1963. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  92. Möllering G. 2001. The nature of trust: from Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology 35:2403–20
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Ng KH, He X. 2017. The institutional and cultural logics of legal commensuration: blood money and negotiated justice in China. Am. J. Sociol. 112:41104–43
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Oakes G. 1980. Introduction. Essays on Interpretation in Social Science G Simmel 3–96 Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Olzak S, West E. 1991. Ethnic conflict and the rise and fall of ethnic newspapers. Am. Sociol. Rev. 56:4458–74
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Owens TJ, Robinson DT, Smith-Lovin L. 2010. Three faces of identity. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:477–99
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Parigi P, Henson W. 2014. Social isolation in America. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40:153–71
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Pescosolido BA, Rubin BA. 2000. The web of group affiliations revisited: social life, postmodernism, and sociology. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65:152–76
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Pietilä K. 2011. Reason of Sociology: George Simmel and Beyond London: SAGE
  100. Poggi G. 1993. Money and the Modern Mind: George Simmel's Philosophy of Money Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  101. Polillo S. 2011. Money, moral authority, and the politics of creditworthiness. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:3437–64
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Popielarz PA, Neal ZP. 2007. The niche as a theoretical tool. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:65–84
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Pyyhtinen O. 2010. Simmel and “The Social London: Palgrave Macmillan
  104. Ritzer G, Stepnisky J. 2017. Modern Sociological Theory London: SAGE
  105. Rock P. 1979. Making of Symbolic Interactionism London: Palgrave Macmillan
  106. Schermer H, Jary D. 2013. Form and Dialectic in Georg Simmel's Sociology: A New Interpretation London: Palgrave Macmillan
  107. Schultz J, Breiger RL. 2010. The strength of weak culture. Poetics 38:6610–24
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Scott J, Carrington PJ 2011. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis London: SAGE:
  109. Silver D. 2008. Social type (Simmel). The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology G Ritzer New York: Wiley https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss320
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  110. Silver D. 2019. Alienation in a four factor world. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 49:184–105
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Silver D, Broćić M. 2019. Three concepts of form in Simmel's sociology. Ger. Rev. 94:2114–24
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Silver D, Lee M. 2012. Self-relations in social relations. Soc. Theory 30:4207–37
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Silver D, Lee M, Moore R. 2007. The view of life: a Simmelian reading of Simmel's ‘testament.’. Simmel Stud 17:2265–90
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Silver D, O'Neill K 2014. The significance of religious imagery in the philosophy of money. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 17:4389–406
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Simmel G. 1949. The sociology of sociability. Am. J. Sociol. 55:3254–61
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Simmel G. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel, transl. K Wolff New York: Free
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Simmel G. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations,transl K Wolff, R Bendix New York: Free
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Simmel G. 1957. Fashion. Am. J. Sociol 62:6541–58
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Simmel G 1971. Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms DN Levine Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  120. Simmel G. 1978. 1900. The Philosophy of Money,transl T Bottomore, D Frisby London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Simmel G. 1997. Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings D Frisby, M Featherstone London: Sage
  122. Simmel G. 2009. 1908. Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms, transl AJ Blasi, AK Jacobs, M Kanjiranthinkal Boston: Brill
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Simmel G. 2010. 1918. The View of Life: Four Metaphysical Chapters with Journal Aphorisms, transl. AY Andrews, DN Levine Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Small ML. 2017. Someone to Talk To Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  125. Small ML, Adler L. 2019. The role of space in the formation of social ties. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 45:111–32
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Smelser NJ, Swedberg R 2005. The Handbook of Economic Sociology Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
  127. Smith GWH. 1989. A Simmelian reading of Goffman. PhD Thesis Univ. Salford Salford, UK: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/14705/
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Smith JA, McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L. 2014. Social distance in the United States: sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985 to 2004. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:3432–56
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Snow DA, Morrill C, Anderson L 2003. Elaborating analytic ethnography: linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography 4:2181–200
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Stets JE, Carter MJ. 2011. The moral self: applying identity theory. Soc. Psychol. Q. 74:2192–215
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Stoetzler M. 2016. Intersectional individuality: Georg Simmel's concept of ‘the intersection of social circles’ and the emancipation of women. Sociol. Inq. 86:2216–40
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Stryker S. 2008. From Mead to a structural symbolic interactionism and beyond. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 34:15–31
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Stryker S, Burke PJ. 2000. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Soc. Psychol. Q. 63:4284–97
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Swedberg R. 2005. Auguste Rodin's The Burghers of Calais: the career of a sculpture and its appeal to civic heroism. Theory Cult. Soc 22:245–67
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Thomas JE., Kukulan A. 2004.. “ Why don't I know about these women?”: The integration of early women sociologists in classical theory courses. Teach. Soc. 32:3252–63
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Turner JH. 1975. Marx and Simmel revisited: reassessing the foundations of conflict theory. Soc. Forces 53:4618–27
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Veblen T. 2007. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class New York: Cosimo
  138. Vedres B, Stark D. 2010. Structural folds: generative disruption in overlapping groups. Am. J. Sociol. 115:41150–90
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Wanderer JJ. 1987. Simmel's forms of experiencing: the adventure as symbolic work. Symb. Interact. 10:121–28
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Weber M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  141. Weinstein D, Weinstein M. 1991. Georg Simmel: sociological flâneur bricoleur. Theory Cult. Soc. 8:3151–68
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Weinstein D, Weinstein M. 2012. Postmodernized Simmel London: Routledge. , 1st ed..
  143. Welch K. 1983. Community development and metropolitan religious commitment: a test of two competing models. J. Sci. Stud. Relig. 22:2167–81
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Wellman B. 1979. The community question: the intimate networks of East Yorkers. Am. J. Sociol. 84:51201–31
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Wellman B 1988. Structural analysis: from method and metaphor to theory and substance. Social Structures: A Network Approach B Wellman, SD Berkowitz 19–61 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Wellman B, Wortley S. 1990. Different strokes from different folks: community ties and social support. Am. J. Sociol. 96:3558–88
     [Google Scholar]
  147. White HC, Boorman SA, Breiger RL. 1976. Social-structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Am. J. Sociol. 81:4730–80
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Wirth L. 1938. Urbanism as a way of life. Am. J. Sociol. 44:11–24
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Woodward I, Emmison M. 2001. From aesthetic principles to collective sentiments: the logics of everyday judgements of taste. Poetics 29:6295–316
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Zelizer VAR. 1994. The Social Meaning of Money New York: Basic
  151. Zerubavel E. 1980. If Simmel were a fieldworker: on formal sociological theory and analytical field research. Symb. Interact. 3:225–34
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-033647
Loading
The Influence of Simmel on American Sociology Since 1975
Annual Review of Sociology 47, 87 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-033647
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-033647
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-033647
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error