1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 45, 2016
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 45, 2016

Reproductive Tourism: Through the Anthropological “Reproscope”

Abstract

This review analyzes the emerging literature on reproductive tourism through a metaphorical “reproscope,” focusing largely on cross-border egg donation and surrogacy as the prime areas of contemporary anthropological investigation. While acknowledging that reproductive travel is not new, this article recognizes that there has been an increased volume of such travel over the past couple of decades. It provides an overview of the major areas of anthropological investigation into these transnational phenomena, globalization, stratification, exploitation, race, nationalism, religion, biopower, and bioethics. I propose that these areas of investigation may provide key indications about the preoccupations of anthropology today. Namely, what kind of discipline does anthropology imagine itself to be?

Keyword(s): egg donation, exploitation, globalization, reproductive tourism, reproscope, surrogacy
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030459
2016-10-21
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/45/1/annurev-anthro-102313-030459.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030459&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abu-Lughod L. 1993. Writing Women's Worlds: Bedouin Stories Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  2. Adamson GD, Zegers-Hochschild F, Ishihara O, Sullivan E, Mansour R. et al. 2012. ICMART world report: preliminary 2008 data. Hum. Reprod. 27:Suppl. 2ii38–39 [Google Scholar]
  3. Almeling R. 2011. Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  4. Appadurai A. 1996. Global ethnoscapes: notes and queries for a transnational anthropology. Modernity at Large48–65 Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  5. Balcom K. 2006. Constructing families, creating mothers: gender, family, state and nation in the history of child adoption. J. Women's Hist. 18:1219–32 [Google Scholar]
  6. Balcom K. 2007. “Phony mothers" and border-crossing adoptions: the Montreal-to-New York black market in babies in the 1950s. J. Women's Hist. 19:1107–16 [Google Scholar]
  7. Banerjee A. 2014. Race and a transnational reproductive caste system: Indian transnational surrogacy. Hypatia 29:1113–28 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bear L. 2015. Beyond economization: state debt and labor. Fieldsights: Theorizing the Contemporary. Cult. Anthropol. Online. March 30. http://culanth.org/fieldsights/659-beyond-economization-state-debt-and-labor
  9. Bear L, Ho K, Tsing A, Yanagisako S. 2015. Gens: a feminist manifesto for the study of capitalism. Fieldsights: Theorizing the Contemporary Cult. Anthropol. Online March 30: http://culanth.org/fieldsights/652-gens-a-feminist-manifesto-for-the-study-of-capitalism
  10. Beck S, Knecht M, Klotz M. 2012. Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters 19 Frankfurt, Ger.: Campus Verlag
  11. Bergmann S. 2011. Reproductive agency and projects: Germans searching for egg donation in Spain and the Czech Republic. Reprod. BioMed. Online 23:5600–8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bergmann S. 2014. Fertility tourism: circumventive routes that enable access to reproductive technologies and substances. Signs 40:1280–88 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bharadwaj A. 2008. Biosociality to bio-crossings: encounters with assisted conception and embryonic stem cells in India. Genetics, Biosociality and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities S Gibbon, C Novas 98–116 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  14. Birch K, Tyfield D. 2013. Theorizing the bioeconomy, biovalue, biocapital, bioeconomics or…what?. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 38:3299–327 [Google Scholar]
  15. Boswell J. 1988. The Kindness of Strangers: The Abandonment of Children in Western Europe from Late Antiquity to the Renaissance Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  16. Briggs L. 2003. Mother, child, race and nation: the visual iconography of rescue and the politics of transnational and transracial adoption. Gender Hist. 15:179–200 [Google Scholar]
  17. Campbell B. 2007. Racialization, genes and the reinventions of nation in Europe. See Wade 2007 95–124
  18. Cannell F. 1990. Concepts of parenthood: the Warnock report, the Gillick debate and modern myths. Am. Ethnol. 17:667–86 [Google Scholar]
  19. Carsten J. 2000. Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  20. Cohen L. 2005. Operability, bioavailability and exception. See Ong & Collier 2005 79–90
  21. Cooper M, Waldby C. 2014. Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  22. Davis-Floyd R. 1991. Ritual in the hospital: giving birth the American Way. Anthropology: Contemporary Perspectives P Whitten, DE Hunter 275–85 Boston: Little, Brown, 6th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  23. Deomampo D. 2013. Transnational surrogacy in India: interrogating power and women's agency. Front. J. Women Stud. 34:3167–88 [Google Scholar]
  24. Deomampo D. 2016. Transnational Reproduction: Race, Kinship, and Commercial Surrogacy in India New York: N. Y. Univ. Press
  25. Dickenson D. 2007. Property in the Body: Feminist Perspectives Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  26. Dubinsky K. 2007. Babies without borders: rescue, kidnap and the symbolic child. J. Women's Hist. 19:1142–50 [Google Scholar]
  27. Edwards J. 2000. Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  28. Elie SD. 2015. Anthropology as an emerging global discipline: a new research ethic. Glob. J. Anthropol. Res. 2:7–29 [Google Scholar]
  29. ESHRE (Eur. Soc. Hum. Reprod. Embryol.) 2014. ART factsheet July, ESHRE, Grimbergen, Belg.
  30. Fasin D. 2013. Why ethnography matters: on anthropology and its publics. Cult. Anthropol. 28:4621–46 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fonseca C, Marre D, San Román B. 2015. Child circulation in a globalized era: anthropological reflections. The Intercountry Adoption Debate: Dialogues Across Disciplines Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Sch. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Franklin S. 1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception London: Routledge
  33. Franklin S. 2003. Rethinking nature-culture: anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropol. Theory 3:165–85 [Google Scholar]
  34. Franklin S. 2005. Stem cells R us: emergent life forms and the global biological. See Ong & Collier 2005 59–78
  35. Franklin S. 2011. Not a flat world: the future of cross-border reproductive care. Reprod. BioMed. Online 23:7814–16 [Google Scholar]
  36. Franklin S. 2013. Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  37. Ginsburg F, Rapp R. 1995. Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
  38. Gudeman S. 1971. The compadrazgo as a reflection of the natural and spiritual person. Proc. R. Anthropol. Inst. G. B. Irel. 1971:45–48+4+49–71 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gunnarsson Payne J. 2015. Reproduction in transition: cross-border egg donation, biodesirability and new reproductive subjectivities on the European fertility market. Gender Place Cult.: J. Fem. Geogr. 2:1107–22 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gupta JA. 2006. Towards transnational feminisms: some reflections and concerns in relation to the globalization of reproductive technologies. Eur. J. Women's Stud. 13:23–38 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gupta JA. 2012. Reproductive biocrossings: Indian egg donors and surrogates in the globalized fertility market. IJFAB: Int. J. Fem. Approaches Bioethics 5:125–51 [Google Scholar]
  42. Gürtin Z. 2011. Banning reproductive travel? Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction. Reprod. BioMed. Online 23:555–64 [Google Scholar]
  43. Gürtin Z, Inhorn M. 2011. Introduction: travelling for conception and the global assisted reproduction market. Reprod. BioMed. Online 23:5535–37 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hampshire K, Simpson B. 2015. Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Third Phase: Global Encounters and Emerging Moral Worlds London: Berghahn Books
  45. Haraway DJ. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge
  46. Howell S. 2006. The Kinning of Foreigners: Transnational Adoption in a Global Perspective London: Berghahn Books
  47. Hudson N, Culley L, Blyth E, Norton W, Rapport F, Pacey A. 2011. Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature. Reprod. BioMed. Online 22:673–85 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ikemoto LC. 2009. Reproductive tourism: equality concerns in the global market for fertility services. Law Inequal.: J. Theory Pract. 27:277–309 [Google Scholar]
  49. Inhorn MC. 1994. Quest for Conception: Gender, Infertility and Egyptian Medical Traditions Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  50. Inhorn MC. 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and In Vitro Fertilization in Egypt New York: Routledge
  51. Inhorn MC. 2011. Diasporic dreaming: return reproductive tourism to the Middle East. Reprod. BioMed. Online 23:582–92 [Google Scholar]
  52. Inhorn MC. 2012. The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies, and Islam in the Middle East Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  53. Inhorn MC. 2015. Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  54. Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D. 2008. Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change. Annu. Rev. Anthropol 37:177–96 [Google Scholar]
  55. Inhorn MC, Gürtin ZB. 2011. Cross-border reproductive care: a future research agenda. Reprod. BioMed. Online 23:5665–76 [Google Scholar]
  56. Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. 2009. Rethinking reproductive ‘tourism’ as reproductive ‘exile.’. Fertil. Steril. 92:904–6 [Google Scholar]
  57. Inhorn MC, Shrivastav P, Patrizio P. 2012. Assisted reproductive technologies and fertility “tourism”: examples from global Dubai and the Ivy League. Med. Anthropol. 31:3249–65 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kahn SM. 2000. Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  59. Kearney M. 1995. The local and the global: the anthropology of globalization and transnationalism. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 24:547–65 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kligman G. 1992. Abortion and international adoption in Ceausescu's Romania. Fem. Stud. 18:2405–19 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kroløkke C. 2014a. Eggs and euros: a feminist perspective on reproductive travel from Denmark to Spain. Int. J. Fem. Approaches Bioethics 7:2144–63 [Google Scholar]
  62. Kroløkke C. 2015. Have eggs, will travel: the experiences and ethics of global egg donation. Somatechnics 5:112–31 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kroløkke C, Foss KA, Pant S. 2012. Fertility travel: the commodification of human reproduction: Charlotte Kroløkke, Karen A. Foss, and Saumya Pant, Guest Editors. Cult. Polit. 8:2273–82 [Google Scholar]
  64. Kroløkke CH. 2014b. West is best: affective assemblages and Spanish oöcytes. Eur. J. Women's Stud. 21:157–71 [Google Scholar]
  65. Landau R. 1998. The management of genetic origins: secrecy and openness in donor assisted conception in Israel and elsewhere. Hum. Reprod. 13:113268–73 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lavie S. 2011a. Mizrahi feminism and the question of Palestine. J. Middle East Women's Stud. 7:256–88 [Google Scholar]
  67. Lavie S. 2011b. Staying put: crossing the Israel-Palestine border with Gloria Anzaldua. Anthropol. Humanism 36:1101–21 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lavie S. 2012. Writing against identity politics: an essay on gender, race, and bureaucratic pain. Am. Ethnol. 39:4779–803 [Google Scholar]
  69. Lavie S. 2014. Wrapped in the Flag of Israel: Mizrahi Single Mothers and Bureaucratic Torture Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books
  70. Lewis S. 2016. Gestational labours: care politics and surrogates' struggle. In Intimate Economies: Bodies, Emotions, and Sexualities on the Global Market, ed. S Hoffman, A Moreno. London: Palgrave Macmillan. In press [Google Scholar]
  71. Lock M. 1995. Encounters with Aging Mythologies of Menopause in Japan and North America Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  72. Marre D. 2007. “I want her to learn her language and maintain her culture”: transnational adoptive families' views of “cultural origins.”. See Wade 2007 73–93
  73. Matorras R. 2005. Reproductive exile versus reproductive tourism. Hum. Reprod. 20:3571 [Google Scholar]
  74. Mintz S. 1998. The localization of anthropological practice. From area studies to transnationalism. Crit. Anthropol. 18:2117–33 [Google Scholar]
  75. Mintz S, Wolf E. 1950. An analysis of ritual co-parenthood (compadrazgo). Southwest. J. Anthropol. 6:4341–68 [Google Scholar]
  76. Mitra S. 2015. Forces and flows of the market of commercial surrogacy: Expansion of market in and around India Presented at Indiscip. Workshop: The ART of Reproducing Difference: Discussing (In)Equality in the Context of Reproductive Travel, Oct. 29–30, Inst. Soc. Anthropol., Univ. Bern, Switz.
  77. Mohanty CT. 1988. Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Fem. Rev. 30:61–88 [Google Scholar]
  78. Mol A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice London: Duke Univ. Press
  79. Nahman M. 2006. Materialising Israeliness: difference and mixture in transnational ova donation. Sci. Cult. 15:3199–213 [Google Scholar]
  80. Nahman M. 2007. Synecdochic ricochets: biosocialities in a Jerusalem IVF clinic. Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities S Gibbon, C Novas 117–35 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  81. Nahman M. 2008. Nodes of desire: transnational egg sellers as theorists of reproduction in a neo-liberal age. Eur. J. Women's Stud. 15:65–82 [Google Scholar]
  82. Nahman M. 2011. Reverse traffic: intersecting inequalities in human egg donation. Reprod. Biomed. Online 23:626–33 [Google Scholar]
  83. Nahman M. 2012. Making interferences: the cultural politics of egg ‘donation.’. Reproductive Technologies as Global Form. Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters M Knecht, M Klotz, S Beck 305–30 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  84. Nahman M. 2013. Extractions: An Ethnography of Reproductive Tourism Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan
  85. Nahman MR. 2005. Israeli extraction: an ethnographic study of egg donation and national imaginaries PhD Diss. Univ. Lancaster
  86. Ong A, Collier SJ. 2005. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems London: Blackwell
  87. Pande A. 2009. ‘It may be her eggs but it's my blood’: surrogates and everyday forms of kinship in India. Qual. Sociol. 32:379–97 [Google Scholar]
  88. Pande A. 2010. Commercial surrogacy in India: manufacturing a perfect ‘mother-worker’. Signs: J. Women Cult. Soc. 35:969–94 [Google Scholar]
  89. Pande A. 2011. Transnational commercial surrogacy in India: gifts for global sisters?. Reprod. Biomed. Online 23:618–25 [Google Scholar]
  90. Pande A. 2014a. This birth and that: surrogacy and stratified motherhood in India. PhiloSOPHIA: J. Cont. Fem. 4.1:50–64 [Google Scholar]
  91. Pande A. 2014b. Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  92. Pavone V. 2015. IVF as a looking glass: kinship, biology, technology and society through the lens of assisted reproductive technologies. BioSocieties 10:1111–15 [Google Scholar]
  93. Petryna A. 2013. Life Exposed: Biological Citizens After Chernobyl Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  94. Pfeffer N. 2011. Eggs-ploiting women: a critical feminist analysis of the different principles in transplant and fertility tourism. Reprod. Biomed. Online 23:634–41 [Google Scholar]
  95. Pollock A. 2003. Complicating power in high-tech reproduction: narratives of anonymous paid egg donors. J. Med. Humanit. 24:3–4241–63 [Google Scholar]
  96. Rabinow P. 1995. Artificiality and enlightenment: from sociobiology to biosociality. Essays in the Anthropology of Reason91–111 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  97. Rabinow P. 1999. French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  98. Ragoné H. 1994. Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart Boulder, CO: Westview Press
  99. Ragoné H. 2005. Surrogate motherhood: rethinking biological models, kinship, and family. Cross-Cultural Perspective CB Brettell, CF Sargent 471–80 Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  100. Rapp R. 1999. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America New York: Routledge
  101. Robbins J. 2013. Beyond the suffering subject: toward an anthropology of the good. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 19:3447–62 [Google Scholar]
  102. Roberts EFS. 2012. God's Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press, 1st ed..
  103. Roberts EFS, Scheper-Hughes N. 2011. Introduction: medical migrations. Body Soc. 17:1–30 [Google Scholar]
  104. Rudrappa S. 2012. India's reproductive assembly line. Contexts 11:222–27 [Google Scholar]
  105. Rudrappa S. 2015. Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India New York: N. Y. Univ. Press
  106. Scheper-Hughes N. 2002. The ends of the body: commodity fetishism and the global traffic in organs. SAIS Rev.: J. Int. Aff. 22:161–80 [Google Scholar]
  107. Scheper-Hughes N. 2009. Making anthropology public. Anthropol. Today 25:41–3 [Google Scholar]
  108. Schurr C. 2016. From biopolitics to bioeconomies: the ART of (re-)producing white futures in Mexico's surrogacy market. Environ. Plann. D: Soc. Space doi: 10.1177/0263775816638851
  109. Shenfield F, de Mouzon J, Pennings G, Ferraretti AP, Nyboe Andersen A. et al. 2010. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum. Reprod. 25:61361–68 [Google Scholar]
  110. Sobo EJ. 2009. Medical travel, what it means, why it matters. Med. Anthropol. 28:4326–35 [Google Scholar]
  111. Spar DL. 2006. The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce for Conception Cambridge, MA: Harvard Bus. Sch. Press
  112. Speier A. 2011. Brokers, consumers and the internet: how North American consumers navigate their infertility journeys. Reprod. BioMed. Online 23:5592–99 [Google Scholar]
  113. Speier A. 2016. Fertility Holidays: IVF Tourism and the Reproduction of Whiteness New York: N. Y. Univ. Press
  114. Storrow RF. 2005. Quests for conception: fertility tourists, globalization and feminist legal theory. Hastings Law J. 57:295 [Google Scholar]
  115. Strathern M. 1992a. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  116. Strathern M. 1992b. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies New York: Routledge
  117. Strathern M. 1995. Displacing knowledge: technology and the consequences for kinship. See Ginsburg & Rapp 1995 346–68
  118. Tanderup M, Reddy S, Patel T, Nielsen BB. 2015. Informed consent in medical decision-making in commercial gestational surrogacy: a mixed methods study in New Delhi, India. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 94:465–72 [Google Scholar]
  119. Teman E. 2010. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  120. Thompson C. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  121. Thompson C. 2007. Why we should, in fact, pay for egg donation. Regen. Med. 2:2203–9 [Google Scholar]
  122. Tober DM. 2001. Semen as gift, semen as goods: reproductive workers and the market in altruism. Body Soc. 7:2–3137–60 [Google Scholar]
  123. Trouillot MR. 2003. Global Transformations: Anthropology and the Modern World New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  124. Twine FW. 2011. Outsourcing the Womb: Race, Class, and Gestational Surrogacy in a Global Market New York: Routledge
  125. Vertommen S. 2016. Towards a political economy of egg donations: doing it the Israel way. Critical Kinship Studies: Kinship (Trans)formed C Kroløkke, L Myong, SW Adrian, T Tjørnhøj-Thomsen 169–84 London: Rowman and Littlefield Int. [Google Scholar]
  126. Vora K. 2013. Potential, risk and return in transnational Indian gestational surrogacy. Curr. Anthropol. 54:Suppl. 7S97–106 [Google Scholar]
  127. Vora K. 2014. Experimental sociality and gestational surrogacy in the Indian ART clinic. Ethnos: J. Anthropol. 79:163–83 [Google Scholar]
  128. Vora K. 2015a. Life Support: Biocapital and the New History of Outsourced Labor Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  129. Vora K. 2015b. Re-imagining reproduction: unsettling metaphors in the history of imperial science and commercial surrogacy in India. Somatechnics 5:188–103 [Google Scholar]
  130. Wade P. 2007. Race, Ethnicity and Nation: Perspectives from Kinship and Genetics New York/Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books
  131. Weston K. 2013 (1991). Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  132. Whittaker A. 2009. Global technologies and transnational reproduction in Thailand. Asian Stud. Rev. 33:319–32 [Google Scholar]
  133. Whittaker A. 2010. Medical travel and global health governance: challenges posed by medical travel in Asia-Pacific. Glob. Soc. Policy 10:396–415 [Google Scholar]
  134. Whittaker A. 2011. Reproduction opportunists in the new global sex trade: PGD and non-medical sex selection. Reprod. BioMed. Online 23:5609–17 [Google Scholar]
  135. Whittaker A. 2015. Thai in Vitro: Gender, Culture and Assisted Reproduction. 30 Berghahn Books
  136. Whittaker A, Speier A. 2010. ‘Cycling overseas’: critical perspectives on cross-border travel for medically assisted reproductive technologies. Med. Anthropol. 9:363–83 [Google Scholar]
  137. Widdows H. 2009. Border disputes across bodies: exploitation in trafficking for prostitution and egg sale for stem cell research. J. Fem. Approaches Bioethics 2:15–24 [Google Scholar]
  138. Wimmer A, Glick-Schiller N. 2002. Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Glob. Netw. 2:4301–34 [Google Scholar]
  139. Yanagisako SJ, Delaney C. 1995. Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis New York: Routledge
  140. Zanini G. 2011. Abandoned by the state, betrayed by the church: Italian experiences of cross-border reproductive care. Reprod. BioMed. Online 23:5565–72 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030459
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error