1932

Abstract

During the past 100 years, studies spanning thousands of taxa across almost all biomes have demonstrated that competition has powerful negative effects on the performance of individuals and can affect the composition of plant communities, the evolution of traits, and the functioning of whole ecosystems. In this review, we highlight new and important developments that have the potential to greatly improve our understanding of how plants compete and the consequences of competition from individuals to communities in the following major areas of research: () mechanisms of competition, () competitive effect and response, () direct and indirect effects of competition, () population-level effects of competition, () biogeographical differences in competition, and () conditionality of competition. Ecologists have discovered much about competition, but the mechanisms of competition and how competition affects the organization of communities in nature still require both theoretical and empirical exploration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032123
2016-11-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ecolsys/47/1/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032123.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032123&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM. 2012. Plasticity and trait-mediated indirect interactions among plants. Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives T Ohgushi, O Schmitz, RD Holt 489–507 Cambridge: UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM. 2014. Morphological variability in tree root architecture indirectly affects coexistence among competitors in the understory. Ecology 95:71731–36 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM. 2015. Diversity increases indirect interactions, attenuates the intensity of competition, and promotes coexistence. Am. Nat. 186:452–59 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM, Newcombe G, Tharayil N, Chen S. 2014. Fungal endophytes increase the allelopathic effects of an invasive plant. Oecologia 175:285–91 [Google Scholar]
  5. Aschehoug ET, Metlen KL, Callaway RM, Newcombe G. 2012. Fungal endophytes directly increase the competitive effects of an invasive forb. Ecology 93:3–8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Atwater D. 2012. Interplay between competition and evolution in invaded and native plant communities PhD Thesis Univ. Montana Missoula:
  7. Barto EK, Hilker M, Müller F, Mohney BK, Weidenhamer JD, Rillig MC. 2011. The fungal fast lane: Common mycorrhizal networks extend bioactive zones of allelochemicals in soils. PLOS ONE 6:11e27195 [Google Scholar]
  8. Besaw L, Thelen G, Sutherland S, Metlen K, Callaway RM. 2011. Disturbance, resource pulses, and invasion: Short-term shifts in competitive effects, not growth responses, favor exotic annuals. J. Appl. Ecol. 48:998–1006 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bever JD. 1994. Feedback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology 75:1965–77 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brady KU, Kruckeberg AR, Bradshaw HD Jr. 2005. Evolutionary ecology of plant adaptation to serpentine soils. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:243–66 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brooker R, Kikvidze Z, Pugnaire FI, Callaway RM, Choler P. et al. 2005. The importance of importance. Oikos 109:63–70 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cahill JF Jr. 1999. Fertilization effects on interactions between above- and belowground competition in an old field. Ecology 80:466–80 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cahill JF Jr, Kembel SW, Gustafson DJ. 2005. Differential genetic influences on competitive effect and response in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Ecol. 93:958–67 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cahill JF Jr., McNickle GG. 2011. The behavioral ecology of nutrient foraging by plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42:289–311 [Google Scholar]
  15. Caldwell MM, Manwaring JH, Jackson RB. 1991. Exploitation of phosphate from fertile soil microsites by three Great Basin perennials when in competition. Funct. Ecol. 5:757–64 [Google Scholar]
  16. Callaway RM, DeLucia EH, Moore D, Nowak R, Schlesinger WH. 1996. Competition and facilitation: contrasting effects on Artemisia tridentata on desert versus montane pines. Ecology 77:2130–41 [Google Scholar]
  17. Callaway RM, Pennings SC, Richards CL. 2003. Phenotypic plasticity and interactions among plants. Ecology 84:1115–28 [Google Scholar]
  18. Callaway RM, Schaffner U, Thelen GC, Khamraev A, Juginisov T, Maron JL. 2012. Impact of Acroptilon repens on co-occurring native plants is greater in the invader's non-native range. Biol. Invasions 14:1143–55 [Google Scholar]
  19. Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Barth S, Ramsey PW, Gannon JE. 2004. Soil fungi alter interactions between the invader Centaurea maculosa and North American natives. Ecology 85:1062–71 [Google Scholar]
  20. Callaway RM, Waller LP, Diaconu A, Pal R, Collins AR. et al. 2011. Escape from competition: Neighbors reduce Centaurea stoebe performance at home but not away. Ecology 92:2208–13 [Google Scholar]
  21. Casper BB, Castelli JP. 2007. Evaluating plant–soil feedback together with competition in a serpentine grassland. Ecol. Lett. 10:394–400 [Google Scholar]
  22. Casper BB, Jackson RB. 1997. Plant competition underground. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:545–70 [Google Scholar]
  23. Chamberlain SA, Bronstein JL, Rudgers JA. 2014. How context dependent are species interactions?. Ecol. Lett. 17:881–90 [Google Scholar]
  24. Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:343–66 [Google Scholar]
  25. Clay K, Holah J. 1999. Fungal endophyte symbiosis and plant diversity in successional fields. Science 285:1742–44 [Google Scholar]
  26. Connell JH. 1983. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am. Nat. 122:661–96 [Google Scholar]
  27. Craine JM, Dybzinski R. 2013. Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients, water and light. Funct. Ecol. 27:833–40 [Google Scholar]
  28. D'Antonio CM, Mahall BE. 1991. Root profiles and competition between the invasive, exotic perennial, Carpobrotus edulis, and two native shrub species in California coastal scrub. Am. J. Bot. 78:7885–94 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dayan FE, Rimando A, Pan Z, Baerson SR, Gimsing AL, Duke SO. 2010. Sorgoleone. Phytochemistry 71:1032–39 [Google Scholar]
  30. Dayan FE, Howell J, Weidenhamer D. 2009. Dynamic root exudation of sorgoleone and its in planta mechanism of action. J. Exp. Bot. 60:2107–17 [Google Scholar]
  31. de Kroon H, Huber H, Stuefer JF, van Groenendael JM. 2005. A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytol 166:73–82 [Google Scholar]
  32. DeLucia EH, Schlesinger WH, Billings WD. 1988. Water relations and the maintenance of Sierran conifers on hydrothermally altered rock. Ecology 69:303–11 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dormann CF, Roxburgh SH. 2005. Experimental evidence rejects pairwise modelling approach to coexistence in plant communities. Proc. R. Soc. B 272:1279–85 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ehleringer JR, Phillips SL, Schuster WSF, Sandquist DR. 1991. Differential utilization of summer rains by desert plants. Oecologia 88:430–34 [Google Scholar]
  35. Facelli JM, Temby AM. 2002. Multiple effects of shrubs on annual plant communities in arid lands of South Australia. Austral. Ecol. 27:422–32 [Google Scholar]
  36. Faeth SH, Helander ML, Saikkonen KT. 2004. Asexual Neotyphodium endophytes in a native grass reduce competitive abilities. Ecol. Lett. 7:304–13 [Google Scholar]
  37. Fowler N. 1986. The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:89–110 [Google Scholar]
  38. Fréville J, Silvertown J, Gréville H. 2005. Analysis of interspecific competition in perennial plants using life table response experiments. Plant Ecol 176:69–78 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gause GF. 1934. The Struggle for Existence Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins
  40. Gibson DJ, Connolly J, Hartnett DC, Weidenhamer JD. 1999. Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants. J. Ecol. 87:1–16 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gilbert B, Turkington R, Srivastava DS. 2009. Dominant species and diversity: linking relative abundance to controls of species establishment. Am. Nat. 174:850–62 [Google Scholar]
  42. Goldberg DE. 1990. Components of resource competition in plant communities. Perspectives on Plant Competition J Grace, D Tilman 27–49 San Diego: Academic [Google Scholar]
  43. Goldberg DE. 1996. Competitive ability: definitions, contingency and correlated traits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 351:1377–85 [Google Scholar]
  44. Goldberg DE, Barton AM. 1992. Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. Am. Nat. 139:771–801 [Google Scholar]
  45. Grace JB. 1991. A clarification of the debate between Grime and Tilman. Funct. Ecol. 5:583–87 [Google Scholar]
  46. Grace JB, Tilman D. 1990. Perspectives on Plant Competition San Diego: Academic
  47. Grime JP. 2001. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes and Ecosystem Properties Chichester, UK: Wiley
  48. Gurevitch J. 1986. Competition and the local distribution of the grass Stipa neomexicana. Ecology 67:46–57 [Google Scholar]
  49. Harnett DV, Hetrick BAD, Wilson GWT, Gibson DJ. 1993. Mycorrhizal influence of intra- and inter-specific interactions among co-occurring prairie grasses. J. Ecol. 81:787–95 [Google Scholar]
  50. Harper JL. 1977. Population Biology of Plants London: Academic
  51. Hautier Y, Niklaus PA, Hector A. 2009. Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication. Science 324:636–38 [Google Scholar]
  52. Hendriks M, Ravenek JM, Smit-Tiekstra JE, van der Paauw JW, de Caluwe H. et al. 2015. Spatial heterogeneity of plant–soil feedback affects root interactions and interspecific competition. New Phytol 207:830–40 [Google Scholar]
  53. Herron PM, Gage DJ, Gardon ZG. 2010. Micro-scale water potential gradients visualized in soil around plant root tips using microbiosensors. Plant Cell Environ. 33:199–201 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ho MD, Rosas JC, Brown KM, Lynch JP. 2005. Root architectural tradeoffs for water and phosphorus acquisition. Funct. Plant Biol. 32:737–48 [Google Scholar]
  55. Hodge A, Fitter AH. 2013. Microbial mediation of plant competition and community structure. Funct. Ecol. 27:865–75 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hodge A, Robinson D, Griffiths BS, Fitter AH. 1999. Why plants bother: Root proliferation results in increased nitrogen capture from an organic patch when two grasses compete. Plant Cell Environ. 22:811–20 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hutchinson GE. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals?. Am. Nat. 93:145–59 [Google Scholar]
  58. Huxman TE, Barron-Gafford G, Gerst KL, Angert AL, Tyler AP, Venable DL. 2008. Photosynthetic resource-use efficiency and demographic variability in desert winter annual plants. Ecology 89:1554–63 [Google Scholar]
  59. Johnson NC, Wilson GWT, Bowker MA, Wilson JA, Miller RM. 2010. Resource limitation is a driver of local adaptation in mycorrhizal symbioses. PNAS 107:2093–98 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kaur R, Gonzáles WL, Llambi LD, Soriano PJ, Callaway RM. et al. 2012. Community impacts of Prosopis juliflora invasion: biogeographic and congeneric comparisons. PLOS ONE 7:9e44966 [Google Scholar]
  61. Keddy PA, Shipley B. 1989. Competitive hierarchies in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 54:234–41 [Google Scholar]
  62. Kembel SW, Cahill JF. 2005. Plant phenotypic plasticity below-ground: a phylogenetic perspective on root foraging trade-offs. Am. Nat. 166:195–207 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kulmatiski A, Beard KH, Stevens JR, Cobbold SM. 2008. Plant–soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecol. Lett. 11:980–92 [Google Scholar]
  64. Laird RA, Schamp BS. 2006. Competitive intransitivity promotes species coexistence. Am. Nat. 168:182–93 [Google Scholar]
  65. Lankau RA, Wheeler E, Bennett AE, Strauss SY. 2011. Plant–soil feedbacks contribute to an intransitive competitive network that promotes both genetic and species diversity. J. Ecol. 99:176–85 [Google Scholar]
  66. Ledger KJ, Pal RW, Murphy P, Nagy DU, Filep R, Callaway RM. 2015. Impact of an invader on species diversity is stronger in the non-native range than in the native range. Plant Ecol 216:1285–95 [Google Scholar]
  67. Levine JM. 1999. Indirect facilitation: evidence and predictions from a riparian community. Ecology 80:1762–69 [Google Scholar]
  68. Louda SM, Keeler KH, Holt R. 1990. Herbivore influences on plant performance and competitive interactions. Perspectives on Plant Competition J Grace, D Tilman 413–44 San Diego: Academic [Google Scholar]
  69. Lyons KG, Schwartz MS. 2001. Rare species loss alters ecosystem function—invasion resistance. Ecol. Lett. 4:358–65 [Google Scholar]
  70. MacDougall AS, Turkington R. 2004. Relative importance of suppression-based and tolerance-based competition in an invaded oak savanna. J. Ecol. 92:422–34 [Google Scholar]
  71. Mariotte P. 2014. Do subordinate species punch above their weight? Evidence from above- and below-ground. New Phytol 203:16–21 [Google Scholar]
  72. Marler MJ, Zabinsky CA, Callaway RM. 1999. Mycorrhizae indirectly enhance competitive effects of an invasive forb on a native bunchgrass. Ecology 80:1180–86 [Google Scholar]
  73. Maron JL, Crone E. 2006. Herbivory: Effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proc. R. Soc. B 273:2575–84 [Google Scholar]
  74. Maron JL, Horvitz CC, Williams JL. 2010. Using experiments, demography and population models to estimate interaction strength based on transient and asymptotic dynamics. J. Ecol. 98:290–301 [Google Scholar]
  75. Maron JL, Marler M. 2008. Effects of native species diversity and resource additions on invader impact. Am. Nat. 172:S18–33 [Google Scholar]
  76. Maron JL, Pearson DE, Potter T, Ortega YK. 2012. Seed size and provenance mediate the joint effects of disturbance and seed predation on community assembly. J. Ecol. 100:1492–500 [Google Scholar]
  77. McIntyre BD, Riha SJ, Ong CK. 1997. Competition for water in a hedge-intercrop system. Field Crops Res. 52:151–60 [Google Scholar]
  78. Metlen KL, Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM. 2009. Plant behavioral ecology: dynamic plasticity in secondary metabolites. Plant Cell Environ. 32:641–53 [Google Scholar]
  79. Miller TE. 1994. Direct and indirect species interactions in an early old-field plant community. Am. Nat. 143:1007–25 [Google Scholar]
  80. Ni G, Schaffner U, Peng S, Callaway RM. 2010. Acroptilon repens, an Asian invader, has stronger competitive effects on species from America than species from its native range. Biol. Invasions 12:3653–63 [Google Scholar]
  81. Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI. 2007. Rooting depth and soil moisture control Mediterranean woody seedlings survival during drought. Funct. Ecol. 21:489–95 [Google Scholar]
  82. Pendergast TH, Burke DJ, Carson WP. 2013. Belowground biotic complexity drives aboveground dynamics: a test of the soil community feedback model. New Phytol 197:1300–10 [Google Scholar]
  83. Pennings SC, Grant M-B, Bertness MD. 2005. Plant zonation in low-latitude salt marshes: disentangling the roles of flooding, salinity and competition. J. Ecol. 93:159–67 [Google Scholar]
  84. Pierik R, Mommer L, Voesenek LACJ. 2013. Molecular mechanisms of plant competition: neighbour detection and response strategies. Funct. Ecol. 27:841–53 [Google Scholar]
  85. Pinto SM, Pearson DE, Maron JL. 2014. Seed dispersal is more limiting to native grassland diversity than competition or seed predation. J. Ecol. 102:1258–65 [Google Scholar]
  86. Price TD, Kirkpatrick M. 2009. Evolutionarily stable range limits set by interspecific competition. Proc. R. Soc. B 276:1429–34 [Google Scholar]
  87. Reader RJ, Wilson SD, Belcher JW, Wisheu I, Keddy PA. et al. 1994. Plant competition in relation to neighbor biomass: an intercontinental study with Poa pratensis. Ecology 75:1753–60 [Google Scholar]
  88. Rebele F. 2000. Competition and coexistence of rhizomatous perennial plants along a nutrient gradient. Plant Ecol. 147:77–94 [Google Scholar]
  89. Reigosa Roger MJ, Pedrol N, González L. 2006. Allelopathy: A Physiological Process with Ecological Implications Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer Sci.
  90. Rowe CL, Leger EA. 2011. Competitive seedlings and inherited traits: a test of rapid evolution of Elymus multisetus (big squirreltail) in response to cheatgrass invasion. Evol. Appl. 4:485–98 [Google Scholar]
  91. Saari A, Faeth SH. 2012. Hybridization of Neotyphodium endophytes enhances competitive ability of the host grass. New Phytol 195:231–36 [Google Scholar]
  92. Saikkonen K, Faeth SH, Helander M, Sullivan TJ. 1998. Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29319–43
  93. Sánchez AM, Peco B. 2004. Interference between perennial grassland and Lavandula stoechas subsp. pedunculata seedlings: a case of spatial segregation cause by competition. Acta Oecol. 26:39–44 [Google Scholar]
  94. Schoener TW. 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat. 122:240–85 [Google Scholar]
  95. Schwinning S, Kelly CK. 2013. Plant competition, temporal niches and implications for productivity and adaptability to climate change in water-limited environments. Funct. Ecol. 27:886–97 [Google Scholar]
  96. Sexton JP, McIntyre PJ, Angert AL, Rice KJ. 2009. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:415–36 [Google Scholar]
  97. Soliveres S, Maestre FT, Ulrich W, Manning P, Boch S. et al. 2015. Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness. Ecol. Lett. 18:790–98 [Google Scholar]
  98. Stanton-Geddes J, Tiffin P, Shaw RG. 2012. Role of climate and competitors in limiting fitness across range edges of an annual plant. Ecology 93:1604–13 [Google Scholar]
  99. Stone L, Roberts A. 1991. Conditions for a species to gain advantage from the presence of competitors. Ecology 72:1964–72 [Google Scholar]
  100. Sun Y, Müller-Schärer H, Maron JL, Schaffner U. 2015. Origin matters: Diversity affects the performance of alien invasive species but not of native species. Am. Nat. 185:725–36 [Google Scholar]
  101. Sun Y, Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U. 2014. Plant neigbours rather than soil biota determine impact of an alien plant invader. Funct. Ecol. 28:1545–55 [Google Scholar]
  102. Tenhumberg B, Suwa T, Tyre AJ, Russell FL, Louda SM. 2015. Integral projection models show exotic thistle is more limited than native thistle by ambient competition and herbivory. Ecosphere 6:1–18 [Google Scholar]
  103. Theodose TA, Bowman WD. 1997. The influence of interspecific competition on the distribution of an alpine graminoid: evidence for the importance of plant competition in an extreme environment. Oikos 79:101–14 [Google Scholar]
  104. Thomson DM. 2005. Matrix models as a tool for understanding invasive plant and native plant interactions. Conserv. Biol. 19:917–28 [Google Scholar]
  105. Thorpe AS, Aschehoug ET, Atwater DZ, Callaway RM. 2011. Plant interactions and evolution. J. Ecol. 99:729–40 [Google Scholar]
  106. Tilman D. 1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  107. Tilman D, Isbell F, Cowles JM. 2014. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45:471–93 [Google Scholar]
  108. Tinker PB, Nye PH. 2000. Solute Movement in the Rhizosphere Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  109. Trinder CJ, Brooker RW, Robinson D. 2013. Plant ecology's guilty little secret: understanding the dynamics of plant competition. Funct. Ecol. 27:918–29 [Google Scholar]
  110. Twolan-Strutt L, Keddy PA. 1996. Above- and belowground competition intensity in two contrasting wetland plant communities. Ecology 77:259–70 [Google Scholar]
  111. Tylianakis JM, Didham RK, Bascompte J, Wardle DA. 2008. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11:1351–63 [Google Scholar]
  112. Van Vuuren MMI, Robinson D, Griffiths BS. 1996. Nutrient inflow and root proliferation during the exploitation of a temporally and spatially discrete source of nitrogen in soil. Plant Soil 178:185–92 [Google Scholar]
  113. Wang P, Stieglitz T, Zhou DW, Cahill JF Jr. 2010. Are competitive effect and response two sides of the same coin, or fundamentally different?. Funct. Ecol. 24:196–207 [Google Scholar]
  114. Weigelt A, Schumacher J, Walther T, Bartelheimer M, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W. 2007. Identifying mechanisms of competition in multi-species communities. J. Ecol. 95:53–64 [Google Scholar]
  115. Weiher E, Keddy PA. 1999. Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  116. Willis CG, Brock MT, Weinig C. 2010. Genetic variation in tolerance of competition and neighbour suppression in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Evol. Biol. 23:1412–24 [Google Scholar]
  117. Willis R. 2000. Juglans spp., juglone and allelopathy. Allelopathy J 7:1–55 [Google Scholar]
  118. Wootton JT. 1994. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25:443–66 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032123
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032123
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error