1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  4. Volume 41, 2016
  5. Article

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volume 41, 2016

Valuing Cultural Ecosystem Services

Abstract

The ecosystem services (ES) framework was developed to articulate and measure the benefits humans receive from ecosystems. Cultural ecosystem services (CES), usually defined as the intangible and nonmaterial benefits ecosystems provide, have been relatively neglected by researchers and policy-makers compared to provisioning, supporting, and regulating services. Although valuing CES poses several conceptual and methodological difficulties, it is of huge interest and importance because of the linkages between cultural values, valuation methods, and the individual and collective decision-making that influence ecosystems and human wellbeing. This review is not a how-to guide, but rather examines key conceptual issues and maps critical areas of debate. There is a range of potential approaches to assessing CES; however, choices regarding valuation methods and their role in decision-making are shaped by cultural and political dynamics. CES are at a crossroads. They can potentially act as a fruitful conceptual container for a broad range of interdisciplinary research into human-environment relations and transform how decisions regarding the environment are made, but they can also be used to legitimize and entrench modes of decision-making that marginalize and undermine the very values they are intended to protect.

Keyword(s): cultural ecosystem services, culture, environmental politics, valuation, value, wellbeing
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085831
2016-10-17
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/41/1/annurev-environ-110615-085831.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085831&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Daily G.1.  1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems Washington, DC: Island Press
  2. Gómez-Baggethun E, De Groot R, Lomas PL, Montes C. 2.  2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ. 69:1209–18 [Google Scholar]
  3. Westman WE.3.  1977. How much are nature's services worth?. Science 197:960–64 [Google Scholar]
  4. Costanza R, Daly HE. 4.  1992. Natural capital and sustainable development. Conserv. Biol. 6:37–46 [Google Scholar]
  5. Reid WV, Mooney HA, Cropper A, Capistrano D, Carpenter SR. 5.  et al. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being Washington, DC: Island Press
  6. Raymond CM, Singh GG, Benessaiah K, Bernhardt JR, Levine J. 6.  et al. 2013. Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. BioScience 63:536–46 [Google Scholar]
  7. Peterson MJ, Hall DM, Feldpausch-Parker AM, Peterson TR. 7.  2010. Obscuring ecosystem function with application of the ecosystem services concept. Conserv. Biol. 24:113–19 [Google Scholar]
  8. Redford KH, Adams WM. 8.  2009. Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conserv. Biol. 23:785–87 [Google Scholar]
  9. Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW. 9.  et al. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109:8812–19 [Google Scholar]
  10. Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C. 10.  2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33:118–29 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hernández-Morcillo M, Plieninger T, Bieling C. 11.  2013. An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecol. Indic. 29:434–44 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS. 12.  et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106:1305–12 [Google Scholar]
  13. Guo Z, Zhang L, Li Y. 13.  2010. Increased dependence of humans on ecosystem services and biodiversity. PLoS ONE 5:e13113 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown J, MacLeod N. 14.  2011. A site-based approach to delivering rangeland ecosystem services. Rangeland J. 33:99–108 [Google Scholar]
  15. Voora V, Barg S. 15.  2008. Pimachiowin Aki World Heritage Project Area Ecosystem Services Valuation Assessment Winnipeg, Can.: Int. Inst. Sustain. Dev.
  16. Sagie H, Morris A, Rofè Y, Orenstein DE, Groner E. 16.  2013. Cross-cultural perceptions of ecosystem services: a social inquiry on both sides of the Israeli–Jordanian border of the Southern Arava Valley Desert. J. Arid Environ. 97:38–48 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kenter JO, Hyde T, Christie M, Fazey I. 17.  2011. The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob. Environ. Change 21:505–21 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC, Fry G. 18.  2007. The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology?. Landsc. Ecol. 22:959–72 [Google Scholar]
  19. Orenstein D.19.  2013. More than language is needed in valuing ecosystem services. BioScience 63:913 [Google Scholar]
  20. Stynes D, Daniel J. 20.  Natl. Park Service, US Dep. Interior 2005. Economic significance of recreational uses of national parks and other public lands. Gov. Doc. 423, All U.S. Gov. Doc. (Utah Reg. Dep.), Utah State Univ. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs/423
  21. Kirchhoff T.21.  2012. Pivotal cultural values of nature cannot be integrated into the ecosystem services framework. Agenda 109:8812–19 [Google Scholar]
  22. Winthrop RH.22.  2014. The strange case of cultural services: limits of the ecosystem services paradigm. Ecol. Econ. 108:208–14 [Google Scholar]
  23. Milcu AI, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J. 23.  2013. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Soc. 18:44 [Google Scholar]
  24. Coscieme L.24.  2015. Cultural ecosystem services: the inspirational value of ecosystems in popular music. Ecosyst. Serv. 16:121–24 [Google Scholar]
  25. van Berkel DB, Verburg PH. 25.  2014. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol. Indic. 37:Part A163–74 [Google Scholar]
  26. Chan KM, Ruckelshaus M. 26.  2010. Characterizing changes in marine ecosystem services. F1000 Biol. Rep. 2:54 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kumar P.27.  2012. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations London, New York: Routledge
  28. Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, Lomas PL, Montes C. 28.  2009. Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. J. Environ. Manag. 90:1050–59 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kumar M, Kumar P. 29.  2008. Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol. Econ. 64:808–19 [Google Scholar]
  30. Chan KM, Goldstein J, Satterfield T, Hannahs N, Kikiloi K. 30.  et al. 2011. Cultural services and non-use values. Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services P Kareiva, H Tallis, TH Ricketts, GC Daily, S Polasky 206–28 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Chan KM, Guerry AD, Balvanera P, Klain S, Satterfield T. 31.  et al. 2012. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 62:744–56 [Google Scholar]
  32. de Groot RP, Ramkrishnan PS, van de Berg A, Kulenthran T, Muller S. 32.  et al. 2005. Cultural and amenity services. Millennium Ecosystem Services Assessment455–76 Washington, DC: Island Press [Google Scholar]
  33. Grove-White R.33.  1997. The environmental “valuation” controversy. Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics and Environment J Foster 21–31 Abingdon, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  34. Scott JC.34.  1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  35. Power M.35.  1999. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  36. Flint CG, Kunze I, Muhar A, Yoshida Y, Penker M. 36.  2013. Exploring empirical typologies of human–nature relationships and linkages to the ecosystem services concept. Landsc. Urban Plan. 120:208–17 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jax K, Barton DN, Chan KMA, de Groot R, Doyle U. 37.  et al. 2013. Ecosystem services and ethics. Ecol. Econ. 93:260–68 [Google Scholar]
  38. Norgaard RB.38.  2010. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol. Econ. 69:1219–27 [Google Scholar]
  39. Scholte SSK, van Teeffelen AJA, Verburg PH. 39.  2015. Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods. Ecol. Econ. 114:67–78 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pröpper M, Haupts F. 40.  2014. The culturality of ecosystem services. Emphasizing process and transformation. Ecol. Econ. 108:28–35 [Google Scholar]
  41. Haines-Young R, Potschin M. 41.  2013. CICES V4. 3-Revised report prepared following consultation on CICES Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framew. Contract No. EEA/IEA/09/003, Cent. Environ. Manag., Univ. Nottm., Nottm., UK [Google Scholar]
  42. Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N, Ndumbaro F, Khamis M. 42.  2012. Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments—mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecol. Indic. 18:421–33 [Google Scholar]
  43. Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. 43.  2012. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 74:8–18 [Google Scholar]
  44. Schaich H, Bieling C, Plieninger T. 44.  2010. Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. GAIA Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 19:269–77 [Google Scholar]
  45. García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, López-Santiago CA, Aguilera PA, Montes C. 45.  2012. The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: an ecosystem service approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 19–20:136–46 [Google Scholar]
  46. Suckall N, Fraser ED, Cooper T, Quinn C. 46.  2009. Visitor perceptions of rural landscapes: a case study in the Peak District National Park, England. J. Environ. Manag. 90:1195–203 [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. UK Natl. Ecosyst. Assess 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Cambridge, UK: UN Environ. Progr.-World Conserv. Monit. Cent http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/Resources/tabid/82/Default.aspx
  48. Alkire S.48.  2007. Choosing dimensions: the capability approach and multidimensional poverty. The Many Dimensions of Poverty N Kakwani, J Silber 89–119 Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  49. Russell R, Guerry AD, Balvanera P, Gould RK, Basurto X. 49.  et al. 2013. Humans and nature: how knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38:473–502 [Google Scholar]
  50. Jenkins W, Chapple CK. 50.  2011. Religion and environment. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36:441–63 [Google Scholar]
  51. Weaver DB.51.  2008. Ecotourism Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
  52. Hulme M.52.  2011. Meet the humanities. Nat. Clim. Change 1:177–79 [Google Scholar]
  53. Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M. 53.  et al. 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework—connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14:1–16 [Google Scholar]
  54. Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Liquete C, Braat L. 54.  et al. 2013. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and Their Services—an analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Tech. Rep. 2013-067, Eur. Union, Luxembourg
  55. Fankhauser S, Dietz S, Gradwell P. 55.  2014. Non-economic losses in the context of the UNFCCC work programme on loss and damage Tech. Pap. FCCC/TP/2013/2, UNFCCC
  56. Church A, Burgess J, Ravenscroft N, Bird W, Blackstock K. 56.  et al. 2011. Cultural services. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report co-chairs R Watson, S Albon 633–92 Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/resources/tabid/82/default.aspx [Google Scholar]
  57. Plieninger T, van der Horst D, Schleyer C, Bieling C. 57.  2014. Sustaining ecosystem services in cultural landscapes. Ecol. Soc. 19:59 [Google Scholar]
  58. Bieling C.58.  2004. Non-industrial private-forest owners: possibilities for increasing adoption of close-to-nature forest management. Eur. J. Forest Res. 123:293–303 [Google Scholar]
  59. Plieninger T, Ferranto S, Huntsinger L, Kelly M, Getz C. 59.  2012. Appreciation, use, and management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in California's working landscapes. Environ. Manag. 50:427–40 [Google Scholar]
  60. Bhagwat SA, Rutte C. 60.  2006. Sacred groves: potential for biodiversity management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 4:519–24 [Google Scholar]
  61. Khan M, Khumbongmayum AD, Tripathi R. 61.  2008. The sacred groves and their significance in conserving biodiversity: an overview. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 34:277–91 [Google Scholar]
  62. Kenter JO, O'Brien L, Hockley N, Ravenscroft N, Fazey I. 62.  et al. 2015. What are shared and social values of ecosystems?. Ecol. Econ. 111:86–99 [Google Scholar]
  63. Martin B.63.  2001. Nonviolence versus Capitalism. London: War Resist. Int.
  64. Chan KM, Satterfield T. 64.  2016. Managing cultural ecosystem services for sustainability. Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services M Potschin, R Haines-Young, R Fish, K Turner 343–56 Abingdon, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  65. Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I. 65.  et al. 2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PloS ONE 7:e38970 [Google Scholar]
  66. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Tengö M, Bennett EM, Holland T. 66.  et al. 2010. Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: Why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade?. BioScience 60:576–89 [Google Scholar]
  67. Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, Pomeroy R. 67.  2011. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ. Conserv. 38:370–79 [Google Scholar]
  68. MacDonald F.68.  1998. Viewing Highland Scotland: ideology, representation and the “natural heritage.”. Area 30:237–44 [Google Scholar]
  69. Corbera E, Brown K, Adger WN. 69.  2007. The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services. Dev. Change 38:587–613 [Google Scholar]
  70. McDermott M, Mahanty S, Schreckenberg K. 70.  2013. Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environ. Sci. Policy 33:416–27 [Google Scholar]
  71. Layard R.71.  2006. Happiness and public policy: a challenge to the profession. Econ. J. 116:C24–C33 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wilkinson R, Pickett K. 72.  2010. The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone London: Penguin
  73. Steindl-Rast D.73.  1984. Gratefulness, the Heart of Prayer: An Approach to Life in Fullness Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press
  74. Roberts JA, Tsang J-A, Manolis C. 74.  2015. Looking for happiness in all the wrong places: the moderating role of gratitude and affect in the materialism-life satisfaction relationship. J. Positive Psychol. 10:61–10 [Google Scholar]
  75. Escobar A.75.  1996. Construction nature: elements for a post-structuralist political ecology. Futures 28:325–43 [Google Scholar]
  76. Robbins P.76.  2012. Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction Oxford, UK: Wiley- Blackwell
  77. Lyytimäki J, Sipilä M. 77.  2009. Hopping on one leg—the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For. Urban Green. 8:309–15 [Google Scholar]
  78. Jorgensen A, Anthopoulou A. 78.  2007. Enjoyment and fear in urban woodlands—does age make a difference?. Urban For. Urban Green. 6:267–78 [Google Scholar]
  79. Doherty TJ, Clayton S. 79.  2011. The psychological impacts of global climate change. Am. Psychol. 66:265–76 [Google Scholar]
  80. Tschakert P, Tutu R, Alcaro A. 80.  2013. Embodied experiences of environmental and climatic changes in landscapes of everyday life in Ghana. Emot. Space Soc. 7:13–25 [Google Scholar]
  81. Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN. 81.  2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86:235–45 [Google Scholar]
  82. Platt J.82.  1973. Social traps. Am. Psychol. 28:641 [Google Scholar]
  83. Costanza R.83.  1987. Social traps and environmental policy. BioScience 37:407–12 [Google Scholar]
  84. Roy J, Pal S. 84.  2009. Lifestyles and climate change: link awaiting activation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 1:192–200 [Google Scholar]
  85. Lintott J.85.  1998. Beyond the economics of more: the place of consumption in ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 25:239–48 [Google Scholar]
  86. Frank RH.86.  2001. Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess New York: Simon & Schuster
  87. Jackson T.87.  2011. Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  88. Williams R.88.  1985. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  89. Patterson O.89.  2014. Making sense of culture. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40:1–30 [Google Scholar]
  90. Satterfield T, Gregory R, Klain S, Roberts M, Chan KM. 90.  2013. Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. J. Environ. Manag. 117:103–14 [Google Scholar]
  91. Scott WR.91.  2001. Organisations and Institutions London: Sage
  92. Ostrom E.92.  2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  93. Newell P, Pattberg P, Schroeder H. 93.  2012. Multiactor governance and the environment. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37:365–87 [Google Scholar]
  94. Sum N-L, Jessop B. 94.  2013. Towards a Cultural Political Economy: Putting Culture in Its Place in Political Economy Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ
  95. Berkes F.95.  2012. Sacred Ecology Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  96. Pilgrim S, Pretty J. 96.  2010. Nature and culture: an introduction. See Ref. 170 1–22
  97. Comberti C, Thornton TF, Wyllie de Echeverria V, Patterson T. 97.  2015. Ecosystem services or services to ecosystems? Valuing cultivation and reciprocal relationships between humans and ecosystems. Glob. Environ. Change 34:247–62 [Google Scholar]
  98. Stephan V.98.  2010. Singing to the Plants: A Guide to Mestizo Shamanism in the Upper Amazon Albuquerque, NM: UNM Press
  99. Shanley P, Galvão J. 99.  1999. Invisible income: the ecology and economics of non-timber forest resources in Amazonian forests. Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity D Posey 364–66 Nairobi, Kenya: Pract. Action [Google Scholar]
  100. Hitlin S, Piliavin JA. 100.  2004. Values: reviving a dormant concept. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30:359–93 [Google Scholar]
  101. Dietz T, Fitzgerald A, Shwom R. 101.  2005. Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30:335–72 [Google Scholar]
  102. Hechter M.102.  1993. Values research in the social and behavioral sciences. The Origin of Values M Hechter, L Nadel, RE Michod 1–30 New York: Aldine Trans. [Google Scholar]
  103. O'Neill J, Spash CL. 103.  2000. Conceptions of value in environmental decision-making. Environ. Values 9:521–36 [Google Scholar]
  104. O'Neill J.104.  1997. Value pluralism, incommensurability and institutions. Valuing Nat.75–88
  105. Beery TH, Wolf-Watz D. 105.  2014. Nature to place: rethinking the environmental connectedness perspective. J. Environ. Psychol. 40:198–205 [Google Scholar]
  106. Kallis G, Gómez-Baggethun E, Zografos C. 106.  2015. The limits of monetization in valuing the environment: a reply to Gsottbauer et al.. Ecol. Econ. 112:170–73 [Google Scholar]
  107. Justus J, Colyvan M, Regan H, Maguire L. 107.  2009. Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:187–91 [Google Scholar]
  108. Sagoff M.108.  2009. Intrinsic value: a reply to Justus et al.. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:643 [Google Scholar]
  109. Sagoff M.109.  1998. Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: a look beyond contingent pricing. Ecol. Econ. 24:213–30 [Google Scholar]
  110. Chan KM, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, Chapman M, Díaz S. 110.  et al. 2016. Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. PNAS 113:1462–65 [Google Scholar]
  111. Becker C.111.  2006. The human actor in ecological economics: philosophical approach and research perspectives. Ecol. Econ. 60:17–23 [Google Scholar]
  112. O'Neill J, Holland A, Light A. 112.  2008. Environmental Values Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  113. Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M, Montes C. 113.  2014. Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol. Indic. 37:Part A220–28 [Google Scholar]
  114. Raymond CM, Kenter JO, Plieninger T, Turner NJ, Alexander KA. 114.  2014. Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 107:145–56 [Google Scholar]
  115. Wegner G, Pascual U. 115.  2011. Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: a multidisciplinary critique. Glob. Environ. Change 21:492–504 [Google Scholar]
  116. Knights P, Admiraal J, Wossink A, Banerjee P, O'Neill J, Scott M. 116.  2013. Economic environmental valuation: an analysis of limitations and alternatives (BIOMOT Project Deliverable 1.1). BIOMOT Rep. 282625, BIOMOT Proj., Leiden Univ., Leiden, Neth. [Google Scholar]
  117. Wilkinson N, Klaes M. 117.  2012. An Introduction to Behavioral Economics. Basingstoke, Hampshire UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  118. Pilgrim S, Samson C, Pretty J. 118.  2010. Ecocultural revitalization: replenishing community connections to the land. See Ref. 170 235–56
  119. Kelemen E, Barton D, Jacobs S, Martín-López B, Saarikoski H. 119.  et al. 2015. Preliminary guidelines for integrated assessment and valuation of ecosystem services in specific policy contexts EU FP7 OpenNESS Proj. Deliv. 4.3., Eur. Comm. FP7 Contract 603416, OpenNESS Proj., Finn. Environ. Inst., Helsinki, Finl. http://www.openness-project.eu/
  120. Harrison PA, Dunford RW. 120.  2015. Preliminary guidelines describing the set of methods for mapping and modelling ecosystem service supply and their application in the WP5 case studies EU FP7 OpenNESS Proj. Deliv. 3.2., Eur. Comm. FP7 Contract 308428., OpenNESS Proj., Finn. Environ. Inst., Helsinki, Finl. http://www.openness-project.eu/
  121. Richmond A, Kaufmann RK, Myneni RB. 121.  2007. Valuing ecosystem services: a shadow price for net primary production. Ecol. Econ. 64:454–62 [Google Scholar]
  122. Sander HA, Haight RG. 122.  2012. Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. J. Environ. Manag. 113:194–205 [Google Scholar]
  123. Costanza R, Farber SC, Maxwell J. 123.  1989. Valuation and management of wetland ecosystems. Ecol. Econ. 1:335–61 [Google Scholar]
  124. Termansen M, McClean CJ, Jensen FS. 124.  2013. Modelling and mapping spatial heterogeneity in forest recreation services. Ecol. Econ. 92:48–57 [Google Scholar]
  125. Barrena J, Nahuelhual L, Báez A, Schiappacasse I, Cerda C. 125.  2014. Valuing cultural ecosystem services: agricultural heritage in Chiloé Island, southern Chile. Ecosyst. Serv. 7:66–75 [Google Scholar]
  126. Johnston RJ, Rolfe J, Rosenberger R, Brouwer R. 126.  2015. Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners Dordrecht, Neth: Springer
  127. Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F. 127.  2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Indic. 21:17–29 [Google Scholar]
  128. Kopperoinen L, Itkonen P, Niemelä J. 128.  2014. Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology. Landsc. Ecol. 29:1361–75 [Google Scholar]
  129. Pastur GM, Peri PL, Lencinas MV, García-Llorente M, Martín-López B. 129.  2016. Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia. Landsc. Ecol. 31:383–99 [Google Scholar]
  130. Barton D, Saloranta T, Moe S, Eggestad H, Kuikka S. 130.  2008. Bayesian belief networks as a meta-modelling tool in integrated river basin management—pros and cons in evaluating nutrient abatement decisions under uncertainty in a Norwegian river basin. Ecol. Econ. 66:91–104 [Google Scholar]
  131. Haines-Young R.131.  2011. Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian Belief Networks. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35:681–99 [Google Scholar]
  132. Satterfield T.132.  2001. In search of value literacy: suggestions for the elicitation of environmental values. Environ. Values 10:331–59 [Google Scholar]
  133. Plieninger T, Bieling C, Ohnesorge B, Schaich H, Schleyer C, Wolff F. 133.  2013. Exploring futures of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes through participatory scenario development in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Ecol. Soc. 18:39 [Google Scholar]
  134. Calvet-Mir L, Gómez-Baggethun E, Reyes-García V. 134.  2012. Beyond food production: Ecosystem services provided by home gardens. A case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Northeastern Spain. Ecol. Econ. 74:153–60 [Google Scholar]
  135. McCall MK.135.  2003. Seeking good governance in participatory-GIS: a review of processes and governance dimensions in applying GIS to participatory spatial planning. Habitat Int. 27:549–73 [Google Scholar]
  136. Étienne M. 136.  2013. Companion Modelling. A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable Development. Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer
  137. Dunford RW, Smith AC, Harrison PA, Hanganu D. 137.  2015. Ecosystem service provision in a changing Europe: adapting to the impacts of combined climate and socio-economic change. Landsc. Ecol. 30:443–61 [Google Scholar]
  138. Hattam C, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Börger T, Burdon D, Hadjimichael M. 138.  et al. 2015. Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: Mixed methods or mixed messages?. Ecol. Econ. 120:126–38 [Google Scholar]
  139. Latour B, Woolgar S. 139.  1979. The Social Construction of Scientific Facts Beverley Hills, CA: Sage
  140. Hirons M.140.  2015. Trees for development? Articulating the ambiguities of power, authority and legitimacy in governing Ghana's mineral rich forests. Extr. Industries Soc. 2:491–99 [Google Scholar]
  141. Bebbington AJ, Bury JT. 141.  2009. Institutional challenges for mining and sustainability in Peru. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106:17296–301 [Google Scholar]
  142. Lemos MC, Agrawal A. 142.  2006. Environmental governance. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 31:297–325 [Google Scholar]
  143. Muradian R, Corbera E, Pascual U, Kosoy N, May PH. 143.  2010. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 69:1202–8 [Google Scholar]
  144. Vatn A.144.  2010. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 69:1245–52 [Google Scholar]
  145. Pascual U, Muradian R, Rodríguez LC, Duraiappah A. 145.  2010. Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach. Ecol. Econ. 69:1237–44 [Google Scholar]
  146. Coralie C, Guillaume O, Claude N. 146.  2015. Tracking the origins and development of biodiversity offsetting in academic research and its implications for conservation: a review. Biol. Conserv. 192:492–503 [Google Scholar]
  147. Duke G.147.  2013. Making natural capital and ecosystem services operational in Europe through biodiversity offsetting and habitat banking. Ecosystem Services SJD Keune 325–30 Boston: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  148. Pirard R.148.  2012. Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: a lexicon. Environ. Sci. Policy 19:59–68 [Google Scholar]
  149. Auld G, Gulbrandsen LH, McDermott CL. 149.  2008. Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 33:187–211 [Google Scholar]
  150. Whitelaw PA, King BE, Tolkach D. 150.  2014. Protected areas, conservation and tourism—financing the sustainable dream. J. Sustain. Tourism 22:584–603 [Google Scholar]
  151. Jennings S, Nussbaum R, Judd N, Evans T, Iacobelli T. 151.  et al. 2003. The High Conservation Value Forest Toolkit Oxford, UK: ProForest
  152. Harvey D.152.  2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  153. Gsottbauer E, Logar I, van den Bergh J. 153.  2015. Towards a fair, constructive and consistent criticism of all valuation languages: comment on Kallis et al. 2013. Ecol. Econ. 112:164–69 [Google Scholar]
  154. Kallis G, Gómez-Baggethun E, Zografos C. 154.  2013. To value or not to value? That is not the question. Ecol. Econ. 94:97–105 [Google Scholar]
  155. Klein N.155.  2014. This Changes Everything: Capitalism versus the Climate New York: Simon & Schuster
  156. Turner RK, Paavola J, Cooper P, Farber S, Jessamy V, Georgiou S. 156.  2003. Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol. Econ. 46:493–510 [Google Scholar]
  157. Bateman I, Mace G, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, Turner K. 157.  2011. Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environ. Resour. Econ. 48:177–218 [Google Scholar]
  158. Turner RK, Daily GC. 158.  2008. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 39:25–35 [Google Scholar]
  159. Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA. 159.  et al. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7:21–28 [Google Scholar]
  160. Gómez-Baggethun E, Ruiz-Pérez M. 160.  2011. Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35:613–28 [Google Scholar]
  161. Hahn T, McDermott C, Ituarte-Lima C, Schultz M, Green T, Tuvendal M. 161.  2015. Purposes and degrees of commodification: Economic instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services need not rely on markets or monetary valuation. Ecosyst. Serv. 16:74–82 [Google Scholar]
  162. Muradian R, Rival L. 162.  2012. Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 1:93–100 [Google Scholar]
  163. Castree N.163.  2003. Commodifying what nature?. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 27:273–97 [Google Scholar]
  164. Klain SC, Chan KMA. 164.  2012. Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecol. Econ. 82:104–13 [Google Scholar]
  165. Frey BS, Oberholzer-Gee F. 165.  1997. The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Am. Econ. Rev. 87:746–55 [Google Scholar]
  166. Martínez-Alier J.166.  2003. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ
  167. Polanyi K.167.  1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time Boston: Beacon Press
  168. Lazos E, Zinda J, Negra C, Bennett-Curry A, Bloomfield G. 168.  et al. 2016. Challenges of tradeoffs and synergies in different reforestation scenarios. A case study at the Chamela-Cuitzmala Reserve, Jalisco, Mexico. Biotropica In press
  169. Gómez-Baggethun E, Muradian R. 169.  2015. In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of market-based instruments in ecosystem services governance. Ecol. Econ. 117:217–24 [Google Scholar]
  170. Pilgrim S, Pretty J. 170.  2010. Nature and Culture: Rebuilding Lost Connections London: Earthscan
  171. 171. Ethiopian Economics Association (EEA) 2015. Report on the Ethiopian Economy. Addis Ababa, Ethiop.: EEA
  172. Hulme D, Shepherd A. 172.  2003. Conceptualizing chronic poverty. World Dev. 31:403–23 [Google Scholar]
  173. Martínez-Alier J.173.  1995. The environment as a luxury good or “too poor to be green”?. Ecol. Econ. 13:1–10 [Google Scholar]
  174. O'Neill J.174.  2007. Markets, Deliberation and Environment London: Routledge
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085831
Loading
Valuing Cultural Ecosystem Services
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41, 545 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085831
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085831
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085831
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error