Law, Innovation, and Collaboration in Networked Economy and Society

Literature Cited

1. Aghion P, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P, Prantl S. 2009. The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. Rev. Econ. Stat. 91:120–32 [Google Scholar]
2. Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Stein JC. 2008. Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. RAND J. Econ. 39:3617–35 [Google Scholar]
3. Aghion P, Howitt P, Prantl S. 2015. Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation. J. Econ. Growth 20:3223–62 [Google Scholar]
4. Allen RC. 1983. Collective invention. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 4:11–24 [Google Scholar]
5. Allen RC. 2009. The Industrial Revolution in miniature: the spinning jenny in Britain, France and India. J. Econ. Hist. 69:4901–27 [Google Scholar]
6. Antin J, Cheshire C. 2010. Readers are not free-riders. Proc. 2010 ACM Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work, Savannah, GA127–30 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach. [Google Scholar]
7. Antin J, Cheshire C, Nov O. 2012. Technology-mediated contributions: editing behaviors among new Wikipedians. Proc. 2012 ACM Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work, Seattle373–82 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach. [Google Scholar]
8. Arrow K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Comm. Econ. Grown Soc. Sci. Res. Counc. 609–26 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
9. Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Sampat BN. 2011. The diffusion of scientific knowledge across time and space: evidence from professional transitions for the superstars of medicine Work. Pap. 16683, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. Cambridge, MA:
10. Baldwin CY, von Hippel EA. 2010. Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation Work. Pap. 10‐038 Harvard Bus. School Financ. Cambridge, MA:
11. Belenzon S, Schankerman M. 2013. Spreading the word: geography, policy, and university knowledge diffusion. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95:1066–77 [Google Scholar]
12. Benkler Y. 1998. Overcoming agoraphobia: building the commons of the digitally networked environment. Harvard J. Law Technol. 11:287–400 [Google Scholar]
13. Benkler Y. 2000. From consumers to users: shifting the deeper structures of regulation toward sustainable commons and user access. Fed. Commun. Law J 52:3561–79 [Google Scholar]
14. Benkler Y. 2002a. Coase's penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law J 112:3369–446 [Google Scholar]
15. Benkler Y. 2002b. Intellectual property and the organization of information production. Int. Rev. Law Econ. 22:81–107 [Google Scholar]
16. Benkler Y. 2017. Open access and information commons. Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics: Private and Commercial Law 2 F Parisi 256–79 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
17. Benkler Y, Nissenbaum H. 2006. Commons-based peer production and virtue. J. Political Philos. 14:4304–419 [Google Scholar]
18. Benkler Y, Shaw A, Hill BM. 2015. Peer production: a form of collective intelligence. Handbook of Collective Intelligence T Malone, M Bernstein 175–204 Cambridge: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
19. Bessen J, Nuvolari A. 2016. Knowledge sharing among inventors: some historical perspectives. See Harhoff & Lakhani 2016 135–55
20. Boldrin M, Levine DK. 2013. The case against patents. J. Econ. Perspect. 27:13–22 [Google Scholar]
21. Bowles S. 2016. The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
22. Boyle J. 1996. Shamans, Software, and Spleens Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
23. Boyle J. 2008. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
24. Bozovic I, Hadfield G. 2015. Scaffolding: using formal contracts to build informal relations in support of innovation Res. Pap. No. 12–6 Legal Stud., Univ. South. Calif. Law Los Angeles, CA:
25. Breschi S, Lenzi C. 2016. Co-invention networks and inventive productivity in US cities. J. Urban Econ. 92:66–75 [Google Scholar]
26. Bush V. 1945. Science: the endless frontier. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 48:3231–64 [Google Scholar]
27. Carlsson B. 2007. Innovation systems: a survey of the literature from a Schumpterian perspective. Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics H Hanusch, A Pyka 857–71 Elgar Orig. Ref Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
28. Chesbrough H. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology Boston: Harvard Bus. School Press
29. Chesbrough H. 2012. Open innovation: where we've been and where we're going. Res. Technol. Manag. 55:420–27 [Google Scholar]
30. Cohen JE. 1998. Lochner in cyberspace: the new economic orthodoxy of “rights management.”. Mich. Law Rev 97:2462–563 [Google Scholar]
31. Cohen WM. 2010. Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activities and performance. Handb. Econ. Innov. 1:129–213 [Google Scholar]
32. Cohen WM, Leventhal DA. 1989. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Econ. J. 99:569–96 [Google Scholar]
33. Colman EG, Hill B. 2005. The social production of ethics in Debian and free software communities: anthropological lessons for vocational ethics. Free/Open Source Software Development S Koch 273–95 Hershey, PA: Idea Group https://mako.cc/academic/coleman_hill-social_production.pdf [Google Scholar]
34. Contreras JL. 2017. Leviathan in the commons: biomedical data and the state. Governing Medical Knowledge Commons K Strandburg, B Frischmann, M Madison New York: Cambridge Univ. Press In press [Google Scholar]
35. Crowston K, Wei K, Howison J, Wiggins A. 2012. Free/Libre open-source software development: what we know and what we do not know. ACM Comput. Surv. 44:27 [Google Scholar]
36. Dahlander L, Gann DM. 2010. How open is innovation?. Res. Policy 39:6699–709 [Google Scholar]
37. David PA, Shapiro JS. 2008. Community-based production of open source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?. Inf. Econ. Policy 20:4364–98 [Google Scholar]
38. Davids K. 2008. The Rise and Decline of Dutch Technological Leadership Technol. Econ. Cult. Neth. 1350–1900 Leiden, Neth.: Brill
39. de Jong JPJ, von Hippel EA. 2009. Measuring user innovation in Dutch high tech SMEs: frequency, nature and transfer to producers Work. Pap Sloan School Manag., Mass. Inst. Technol. Cambridge, MA:
40. Drahos P, Braithwaite J. 2001. Intellectual property, corporate strategy, globalisation: TRIPS in context. Wis. Int. Law J. 20:451–80 [Google Scholar]
41. Du J, Leten B, Vanhaverbeke W. 2014. Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Res. Policy 43:5828–40 [Google Scholar]
42. Eisenberg RS. 1987. Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research. Yale Law J 97:2177–231 [Google Scholar]
43. Fauchart E, von Hippel EA. 2008. Norms-based intellectual property systems: the case of French chefs. Organ. Sci. 19:2187–201 [Google Scholar]
44. Fisher W. 1999. The growth of intellectual property: a history of ownership of ideas in the United States. Eigentumskulturen im Vergleich H Siegrist Gottingen, Ger.: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht [Google Scholar]
45. Frischmann BM. 2005. An economic theory of infrastructure and commons management. Minn. Law Rev. 89:917–1030 [Google Scholar]
46. Frischmann BM, Madison MJ, Strandburg KJ. 2014. Governing Knowledge Commons Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
47. Fuster Morrell M. 2014. Governance of online creation communities for the building of digital commons: viewed through the framework of institutional analysis and development. Governing Knowledge Commons B Frischmann, MJ Madison, KJ Strandburg Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
48. Gault F, von Hippel EA. 2009. The prevalence of user innovation and free innovation transfers: Implications for statistical indicators and innovation policy Work. Pap. Sloan School Manag., Mass. Inst. Technol. Cambridge, MA:
49. Ghosh RA. 1998. Cooking pot markets: an economic model for the trade in free goods and services on the net. First Monday33 [Google Scholar]
50. Gilson RJ. 1999. The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete. NYU Law Rev 74:3575–629 [Google Scholar]
51. Gilson RJ, Sabel CF, Scott RE. 2011. Contract, uncertainty and innovation Law Econ. Res. Pap. Ser. No. 385 Columbia Univ. Law School New York:
52. Gilson RJ, Sabel CF, Scott RE. 2013. Contract and innovation: the limited role of generalist courts in the evolution of novel contractual forms. NYU Law Rev 88:170–215 [Google Scholar]
53. Granovetter MS. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78:61360–80 [Google Scholar]
54. Greenstein S, Nagle F. 2014. Digital dark matter and the economic contribution of Apache. Res. Policy 43:4623–31 [Google Scholar]
55. Halfaker A, Keyes O, Taraborelli D. 2013. Making peripheral participation legitimate: reader engagement experiments in Wikipedia. Proc. 2013 ACM Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work849–60 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach. [Google Scholar]
56. Harhoff D, Lakhani KR. 2016. Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities, and Open Innovation Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
57. Healy K, Schussman A. 2003. The ecology of open-source software development. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2c89/092af57b5c4508dd65863df5602c90d7bbb6.pdf
58. Heller MA, Eisenberg RS. 1998. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280:5364698–701 [Google Scholar]
59. Henkel J, Schöberl S, Alexy O. 2014. The emergence of openness: how and why firms adopt selective revealing in open innovation. Res. Policy 43:5879–90 [Google Scholar]
60. Hess C. 2008. Mapping the new commons Presented at Twelfth Biennial Conf. Int. Assoc. Study Commons Cheltenham, UK: July 14–18. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1356835
61. Hyde A. 1998. The wealth of shared information: Silicon Valley's high-velocity labor market, endogenous economic growth, and the law of trade secrets. http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/∼hyde/WEALTH.htm#N_1
62. Hyde A. 2003. Working in Silicon Valley: Economic and Legal Analysis of a High-Velocity Labor Market Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe
63. International News Service v. Associated Press 248 U.S. 215, 250 1918.
64. Jaffe AB. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms' patents, profits and market value Work. Pap., Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. Cambridge, MA: http://www.nber.org/papers/w1815
65. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q. J. Econ. 108:577–98 [Google Scholar]
66. Jennejohn M. 2016. The private order of innovation networks. Stanford Law Rev 68:281–366 [Google Scholar]
67. Kapczynski A. 2008. The access to knowledge mobilization and the new politics of intellectual property. Yale Law J 117:804–86 [Google Scholar]
68. Kapczynski A. 2011. Contagion: between property and the commons in the WHO's global influenza surveillance network Draft Pap., Commons Conf. NYU Law School New York: http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/ECM_PRO_069673.pdf
69. Katz ML, Shapiro C. 1999. Antitrust in software markets. Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace JA Eisenach, TM Lenard 29–81 Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer [Google Scholar]
70. Keegan B, Gergle D. 2010. Egalitarians at the gate: one-sided gatekeeping practices in social media. Proc. 2010 ACM Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work131–34 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mech. [Google Scholar]
71. Kelty C. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
72. Kollock P. 1999. The economies of online cooperation: gifts and public goods in cyberspace. Communities in Cyberspace M Smith, P Kollock 219–40 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
73. Kostakis V, Latoufis K, Liarokapis M, Bauwens M. 2016. The convergence of digital commons with local manufacturing from a degrowth perspective: two illustrative cases. J. Clean. Prod. In press
74. Kostakis V, Niaros V, Giotitsas C. 2014. Production and governance in hackerspaces: A manifestation of commons-based peer production in the physical realm?. Int. J. Cult. Stud. 18:555–73 [Google Scholar]
75. Lakhani KR, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Tushman M. 2013. Open innovation and firm boundaries: task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. Handbook of Economic Organization: Integrating Economic and Organization Theory A Grandori 355–82 Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
76. Lakhani KR, Wolf RG. 2005. Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Free and Open Source Software J Feller, B Fitzgerald, SA Hissam, KR Lakhani 3–22 Cambridge: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
77. Laursen K, Salter A. 2014. The paradox of openness: appropriability, external search and collaboration. Res. Policy 43:5867–78 [Google Scholar]
78. Lee P. 2017. Centralization, fragmentation, and replication in the genomic data commons. Governing Medical Research Commons KJ Strandburg, BM Frischmann, MJ Madison New York: Cambridge Univ. Press In press [Google Scholar]
79. Lemley MA. 1997. The economics of improvement in intellectual property law. Tex. Law Rev. 75:989–1835 [Google Scholar]
80. Lemley M. 2012. The myth of the sole inventor. Mich. Law Rev. 10:5709–60 [Google Scholar]
81. Lemley M. 2015. Faith-based intellectual property. UCLA Law Rev 62:1328–46 [Google Scholar]
82. Lerner J. 2009. The empirical impact of intellectual property rights on innovation: puzzles and clues. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:2343–48 [Google Scholar]
83. Lerner J, Schankerman M. 2010. The Comingled Code: Open Source and Economic Development Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
84. Lerner J, Tirole J. 2002. Some simple economics of open source. J. Ind. Econ. 50:2197–234 [Google Scholar]
85. Lessig L. 2001. The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World New York: Random House
86. Lessig L. 2004. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity New York: Penguin
87. Litman J. 1990. The public domain. Emory Law J 39:965 [Google Scholar]
88. Lobel O. 2013. Talent Wants to Be Free: Why We Should Learn to Love Leaks, Raids, and Free Riding New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
89. Loubser M. 2010. Organisational mechanisms in peer production: the case of Wikipedia DPhil, Oxford Internet Inst., Oxford Univ. Oxford, UK:
90. Madison MJ. 2014. Commons at the intersection of peer production, citizen science, and big data: Galaxy Zoo. See Frischmann et al. 2014 209–54
91. Madison MJ, Frischmann BM, Strandburg KJ. 2010. Constructing commons in the cultural environment. Cornell Law Rev 95:657–710 [Google Scholar]
92. Marx M, Singh J, Fleming L. 2015. Regional disadvantage? Employee non-compete agreements and brain drain. Res. Policy 44:2394–404 [Google Scholar]
93. Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L. 2009. Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Manag. Sci. 55:875–79 [Google Scholar]
94. Meyer P. 2003. Episodes of collective invention Work. Pap. 368, US Bur. Labor Stat. Washington, DC:
95. Meyer P. 2013. Open sources in the invention of the airplane. Rev. Econ. 63:1115–32 [Google Scholar]
96. Meyer P. 2014. An inventive commons: shared sources of the airplane and its industry. See Frischmann et al. 2014 341–61
97. Moglen E. 1999. Anarchism triumphant: free software and the death of copyright. First Monday 4:8 [Google Scholar]
98. Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Sampat BN, Ziedonis AA. 2004. Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States Innov. Technol. World Econ Stanford, CA: Stanford Bus. Books [Google Scholar]
99. Murray FE. 2012. Evaluating the role of science philanthropy in American research universities Work. Pap. 18146, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. Cambridge, MA: http://www.nber.org/papers/w18146
100. Nelson RR. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econ. 67:297–306 [Google Scholar]
101. Nuvolari A. 2004. Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine. Cambridge J. Econ. 28:3347–63 [Google Scholar]
102. Nuvolari A, Verspagen B. 2007. Lean's engine reporter and the development of the Cornish engine: a reappraisal. Trans. Newcom. Soc. 77:2167–89 [Google Scholar]
103. Oliar D, Sprigman C. 2008. There's no free laugh (anymore): the emergence of intellectual property norms and the transformation of stand-up comedy. Va. Law Rev. 94:81787–867 [Google Scholar]
104. Olmstead AL, Rhode PW. 2008. Creating Abundance: Biological Innovation and American Agricultural Development New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
105. O'Reilly CA, Tushman ML. 2004. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82:474–81 https://hbr.org/2004/04/the-ambidextrous-organization [Google Scholar]
106. Osterloh M, Frost J, Frey BS. 2002. The dynamics of motivation in new organizational forms. Int. J. Econ. Bus. 9:161–77 [Google Scholar]
107. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
108. Ostrom E. 2011. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud. J. 39:17–27 [Google Scholar]
109. Owen-Smith J, Powell WW. 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15:15–21 [Google Scholar]
110. Padgett JF, Powell WW. 2012. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
111. Piore MJ, Sabel CF. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity New York: Basic Books
112. Png IPL, Samila S. 2013. Trade secrets law and engineer/scientist mobility: evidence from “inevitable disclosure.” Work. Pap. Natl. Univ. Singap. [Google Scholar]
113. Powell WW. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behav. 12:295–336 [Google Scholar]
114. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Adm. Sci. Q. 41:1116–45 [Google Scholar]
115. Rai AK. 1999. Regulating scientific research: intellectual property rights and the norms of science. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 94:77–152 [Google Scholar]
116. Raustiala K, Sprigman CJ. 2012. The Knockoff Economy: How Imitation Sparks Innovation Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
117. Raustiala K, Sprigman CJ. 2016. When are IP rights necessary? Evidence from innovation in IP's negative space. Research Handbook on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law 1—Theory ed. P Menell, B Depoorter Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar In press [Google Scholar]
118. Reagle JM. 2010. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
119. Reichman JH, Dedeurwaerdere T, Uhlir PF. 2016. Governing Digitally Integrated Genetic Resources, Data, and Literature: Global Intellectual Property Strategies for a Redesigned Microbial Research Commons New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
120. Reichman JH, Uhlir PF. 2003. Contractually reconstructed research commons for scientific data in a highly protectionist intellectual property environment. Law Contemp. Probl. 66:315–462 [Google Scholar]
121. Romer P. 1990. Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econ. 98:5S71–S102 [Google Scholar]
122. Samila S, Sorenson O. 2011. Noncompete covenants: incentives to innovate or impediments to growth. Manag. Sci. 57:3425–38 [Google Scholar]
123. Samuelson P. 1990. Benson revisited: the case against patent protection for algorithms and other computer program-related inventions. Emory Law J 39:1025–154 [Google Scholar]
124. Saxenian A. 1996. Regional Advantage Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
125. Scherer FM. 1992. Schumpeter and plausible capitalism. J. Econ. Lit. 30:1416–33 [Google Scholar]
126. Schilling MA, Phelps CC. 2007. Interfirm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Manag. Sci. 53:1113–26 [Google Scholar]
127. Schweick CM, English RC. 2012. Internet Success: A Study of Open-Source Software Commons Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
128. Scotchmer S. 1991. Standing on the shoulders of giants: cumulative research and the patent law. J. Econ. Perspect. 5:29–41 [Google Scholar]
129. Shapiro C. 2001. Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. Innov. Policy Econ. 1:119–50 [Google Scholar]
130. Shaw A. 2012. Centralized and decentralized gatekeeping in an open online collective. Politics Soc 40:3349–88 [Google Scholar]
131. Shaw A, Hill BM. 2014. Laboratories of oligarchy? How the iron law extends to peer production. J. Commun. 64:2215–38 [Google Scholar]
132. Stallman R. 1985. The GNU Manifesto Boston: Free Softw. Found http://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto
133. von Hippel E. 1976. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Res. Policy 5:3212–39 [Google Scholar]
134. von Hippel E. 1987. Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading. Res. Policy 16:6291–302 [Google Scholar]
135. von Hippel E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
136. von Hippel E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
137. von Hippel E. 2016. Free Innovation Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
138. von Hippel E, de Jong JPJ, Flowers S. 2012. Comparing business and household sector innovation in consumer products: findings from a representative study in the UK. Manag. Sci. 58:1669–81 [Google Scholar]
139. von Hippel E, von Krogh G. 2003. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14:2209–23 [Google Scholar]
140. von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin MW. 2012. Carrots and rainbows: motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Q 36:2649–76 [Google Scholar]
141. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. 1998. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393:440–42 [Google Scholar]
142. Weber NM. 2015. A Framework for Analyzing the Sustainability of Peer Produced Science Commons Urbana: Univ. Ill. Urbana-Champaign
143. West J, Gallagher S. 2006. Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Manag 36:3319–31 [Google Scholar]
144. West J, Lakhani KR. 2008. Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Ind. Innov. 15:2223–61 [Google Scholar]
145. West J, Salter A, Vanhaverbeke W, Chesbrough H. 2014. Open innovation: the next decade. Res. Policy 43:5805–11 [Google Scholar]
146. Williams MR, Hall JC. 2015. Hackerspaces: a case study in the creation and management of a common pool resource. J. Inst. Econ. 11:4769–81 [Google Scholar]
147. Zobel A, Balsmeier B, Chesbrough H. 2016. Does patenting help or hinder open innovation? Evidence from new entrants in the solar industry. Ind. Corp. Change 25:2307–31 [Google Scholar]