Response to “Procedural Justice and Policing: A Rush to Judgment?”

Literature Cited

1. Braga AA, Papachristos AV, Hureau DM. 2014a. The effects of hot spots policing on crime: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Q 31:633–63 [Google Scholar]
2. Braga AA, Welsh BC, Papachristos AV, Schnell C, Grossman L. 2014b. The growth of randomized experiments in policing: the vital few and the salience of mentoring. J. Exp. Criminol. 10:1–28 [Google Scholar]
3. Chalfin A, McCrary J. 2017. Criminal deterrence: a review of the literature. J. Econ. Lit. 55:5–48 [Google Scholar]
4. Lum C, Nagin DS. 2017. Reinventing American policing: a seven-point blueprint for the 21st century. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research 46 M Tonry, 339–93. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
5. Nagin DS. 2013. Deterrence in the 21^st century: a review of the evidence. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research 42 M Tonry 199–263 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
6. Nagin DS, Telep CW. 2017. Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 13:5–28 [Google Scholar]
7. Telep CW. 2016. Expanding the scope of evidence-based policing. Criminol. Public Policy 15:243–52 [Google Scholar]
8. Tyler T. 2017. Procedural justice and policing: A rush to judgment?. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 13:29–53 [Google Scholar]