Science Talk and Scientific Reference

Literature Cited

1. Bazerman C. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science Madison: Univ. Wis. Press
2. Benveniste E. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics Vol. 3, transl. ME Meek Coral Gables, FL: Univ. Miami Press
3. Briggs CL. 1986. Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
4. Duranti A. 2010. Linguistic anthropology: language as a non-neutral medium. The Cambridge Handbook of Socio-Linguistics R Mesthrie 3 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
5. Eagleton T. 1991. Ideology: An Introduction 9 London: Verso
6. Franklin S. 1995. Science as culture, cultures of science. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 24:163–84 [Google Scholar]
7. Gilbert GN, Mulkay MJ. 1984. Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
8. Gillespie MA. 2008. The Theological Origins of Modernity Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
9. Goodwin C. 1994. Professional vision. Am. Anthropol. 96:3606–33 [Google Scholar]
10. Goodwin C. 1995. Seeing in depth. Soc. Stud. Sci. 25:2237–74 [Google Scholar]
11. Greiffenhagen C. 2014. The materiality of mathematics: presenting mathematics at the blackboard. Br. J. Sociol. 65:3502–28 [Google Scholar]
12. Greiffenhagen C, Mair M, Sharrock W. 2015. Methodological troubles as problems and phenomena: ethnomethodology and the question of “method” in the social sciences. Br. J. Sociol. 66:3460–85 [Google Scholar]
13. Halliday MAK, Martin JR. 2003. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power London: Taylor and Francis
14. Irvine JT, Gal S. 2009. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader A Duranti 402–34 Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell [Google Scholar]
15. Jakobson R. 1990. On Language LR Waugh, M Monville-Burston Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
16. Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Peterson JC, Pinch T. 2001. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
17. Keane W. 2003. Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Lang. Commun. 23:3409–25 [Google Scholar]
18. Kuipers J. 2013. Evidence and authority in ethnographic and linguistic perspective. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 42:399–413 [Google Scholar]
19. Kuipers JC. 1990. Power in Performance: The Creation of Textual Authority in Weyewa Ritual Speech Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
20. Latour B. 1986. Visualization and cognition: drawing things together. Knowledge Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present H Kulick, E Long 1–40 Greenwich, CT: Jai Press [Google Scholar]
21. Latour B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
22. Latour B. 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
23. Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
24. Latour B, Woolgar S. 1986. Laboratory of Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ.
25. Lemke JL. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Westport, CT: Ablex
26. Locke J. 1690. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding: In Four Books. London: Printed for Thomas Basset., 17th. ed.
27. Lynch M. 1985. Discipline and the material form of images: an analysis of scientific visibility. Soc. Stud. Sci. 15:137–66 [Google Scholar]
28. Lynch M. 1988. The externalized retina: selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. Hum. Stud. 11:2201–34 [Google Scholar]
29. Lynch M. 1991. Science in the age of mechanical reproduction: moral and epistemic relations between diagrams and photographs. Biol. Philos. 6:2205–26 [Google Scholar]
30. Lynch M. 2006. The production of scientific images: vision and re-vision in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science. Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication L Pauwels 26–41 Dartmouth, NH: Dartmouth Coll. Press [Google Scholar]
31. Lynch M, Woolgar S. 1990. Representation in Scientific Practice Cambridge, MA: MIT press
32. O'Halloran KL. 2005. Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images London: Bloomsbury
33. Ochs E, Gonzales P, Jacoby S. 1996. “When I come down I'm in the domain state”: grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. Interaction and Grammar E Ochs, EA Schegloff, SA Thompson 328–69 Stud. Int. Sociolinguist. No. 13. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
34. Ochs E, Jacoby S, Gonzales P. 1994. Interpretive journeys: how physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations 2:1151–71 [Google Scholar]
35. Oppenheim R. 2007. Actor-network theory and anthropology after science, technology, and society. Anthropol. Theory 7:4471–93 [Google Scholar]
36. Pinch T. 1985. Towards an analysis of scientific observation: the externality and evidential significance of observational reports in physics. Soc. Stud. Sci. 15:13–36 [Google Scholar]
37. Putnam H. 2010. Mind, Language and Reality 2 Philos. Pap. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
38. Roth W-M. 2003. Toward an Anthropology of Graphing Dordrecht, The Neth. Springer
39. Roth W-M. 2005. Talking Science: Language and Learning in Science Classrooms Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
40. Saussure F de. 1966. Course in General Linguistics C Bally, A Sechehaye, A Riedlinger, transl. W Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill
41. Sedley D. 2003. The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
42. Silverstein M, Urban G. 1996. Natural Histories of Discourse Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
43. Sormani P. 2014. Respecifying Lab Ethnography: An Ethnomethodological Study of Experimental Physics. Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis S Hester, D Francis New York: Springer
44. Stevens R, Hall R. 1998. Disciplined perception: learning to see in technoscience. Talking Mathematics in School: Studies of Teaching and Learning M Lampert, ML Blunk 107–49 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
45. Tambiah S. 1996. Relations of analogy and identity: toward multiple orientations to the world. Modes of Thought: Explorations in Culture and Cognition DR Olson, N Torrance 34–52 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
46. Traweek S. 2009. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
47. Vickers B. 1984. Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
48. Viechnicki GB. 2002. Evidentiality in Scientific Discourse Chicago: Univ. Chicago, Dep. Linguist.
49. Viechnicki GB, Kuipers J. 2006. “It's all human error!”: when a school science experiment fails.. Linguist. Educ. 17:2107–30 [Google Scholar]
50. Viechnicki GB. 2009. Grammatical processes of objectification in a middle school science classroom. Linguist. Educ. 19:3244–64 [Google Scholar]
51. Weber M. 1976. (1958). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: The Relationships Between Religion and the Economic and Social Life in Modern Culture transl. T Parsons. New York: Scribner [Google Scholar]
52. Wilce JM. 2009. Medical discourse. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 38:199–215 [Google Scholar]
53. Wolfgram M. 2010. Truth claims and disputes in Ayurveda medical science. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 20:1149–65 [Google Scholar]
54. Wolfgram M. 2012. The entextualization of Ayurveda as intellectual property. Int. J. Cult. Prop. 19:3313–43 [Google Scholar]
55. Wolfgram M. 2014. Gesture and the communication of mathematical ontologies in classrooms. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 24:2216–37 [Google Scholar]
56. Wolfgram MS. 2009. Ayurveda in the age of biomedicine: discursive asymmetries and counter-strategies. PhD Thesis, Univ. Mich. [Google Scholar]
57. Wright, Laura J. 2009. Learning by doing: the objectification of knowledge across semiotic modalities in middle school chemistry lab activities. Linguist. Educ. 19:3225–43 [Google Scholar]