1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 43, 2014
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 43, 2014

Primate Taxonomy: Inflation or Real?*

Abstract

This article reviews changes in primate taxonomy, especially those pertaining to the meaning of the term species, since its inception two and a half centuries ago. Despite continuing discoveries and the involvement of competent practitioners, the adoption of the polytypic species concept, especially underpinned by the biological species concept, ensured that primate taxonomy was in a sorry state by the middle of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, a gradual rethinking of the nature of species took place, and many different species concepts were proposed. The phylogenetic species concept has been widely adopted over the past ∼20 years, sustained by a gradual realization that species are evolutionary lineages. This review provides examples of how the old way of thinking about species hampered our understanding of primate biodiversity and of how the phylogenetic species concept (or the diagnosability criterion under the general lineage concept) has clarified matters, opening them up for discussion. The adoption of this evolutionary view of species has implications for conservation, particularly because it increases recognition of biodiversity.

Keyword(s): diagnosability, evolutionary lineage, species concept
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030232
2014-10-21
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/43/1/annurev-anthro-102313-030232.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030232&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Carr SM, Ballinger SW, Derr JN, Blankenship LH, Bickham JW. 1986. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of hybridization between sympatric white-tailed deer and mule deer in West Texas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:9576–80 [Google Scholar]
  2. Cuvier G. 1812. Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles de quadrupèdes: où l'on rétablit les caractères de plusieurs espèces d'animaux que les révolutions du globe paroissent avoir détruites Paris: Deterville
  3. Darwin C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life London: John Murray
  4. De Vivo M. 1991. Taxonomia de Callithrix Erxleben, 1777 (Callitrichidae, Primates) Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Fund. Biodivers. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellerman JR, Morrison-Scott TCS. 1951. Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals, 1758 to 1946 London: Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.)
  6. Elliot DG. 1913. A Review of the Primates New York: Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.
  7. Gentry A, Clutton-Brock J, Groves CP. 2004. The naming of wild animal species and their domestic derivatives. J. Archaeol. Sci. 31:645–51 [Google Scholar]
  8. Groves C. 2001. Primate Taxonomy Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. Press
  9. Groves C, Grubb P. 2011. Ungulate Taxonomy Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  10. Groves CP. 2007. The endemic Uganda mangabey, Lophocebus ugandae, and other members of the albigena-group (Lophocebus). Primate Conserv. 22:123–28 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gutiérrez EE, Helgen KM. 2013. Mammology: outdated taxonomy blocks conservation. Nature 495:314 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hershkovitz P. 1963. A systematic and zoogeographic account of the monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae) of the Amazonas and Orinoco River basins. Mammalia 27:1–80 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hershkovitz P. 1990. Titis, New World monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): a preliminary taxonomic review. Fieldiana Zool. 55:i–v, 1109 [Google Scholar]
  14. Isaac NJB, Mallet J, Mace GM. 2004. Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:464–69 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jolly CJ. 2014. A Darwinian species definition and its implications. Evol. Anthropol. 23:36–38 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jordan K. 1905. Der Gegensatz zwischen geographischer und nichtgeographischer variation. Zeits. Wiss. Zool. 83:151–210 [Google Scholar]
  17. Linnaeus C. 1736. Fundamenta Botanica: Quae Majorum Operum Prodromi instar Theoriam Scientiae Botanices per breves Aphorismos tradunt Amsterdam: Schouten
  18. Louis EE Jr, Lei R. 2014. Defining species in an advanced technological landscape. Evol. Anthropol. 23:18–20 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lydekker R. 1913. Catalogue of the Ungulate Mammals in the British Museum (Natural History) I London: Br. Mus. Trustees [Google Scholar]
  20. Mayden RL. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. Species: The Units of Biodiversity MF Claridge, HA Dawah, MR Wilson 381–424 London: Chapman and Hall [Google Scholar]
  21. Mayor MI, Sommer JA, Houck ML, Zaonarivelo JR, Wright PC. et al. 2004. Specific status of Propithecus spp. Int. J. Primat. 25:875–900 [Google Scholar]
  22. Mayr E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  23. Mayr E. 1969. Principles of Systematic Zoology New York: McGraw-Hill
  24. Morrison WR, Lohr JL, Duchen P, Wilches R, Trujillo D. et al. 2009. The impact of taxonomic change on conservation: Does it kill, can it save, or is it just irrelevant?. Biol. Conserv. 142:3201–6 [Google Scholar]
  25. Napier JR, Napier PH. 1967. Handbook of Living Primates New York: Academic
  26. Ohwaki K, Hungate RE, Lotter L, Hofmann RR, Maloiy G. 1974. Stomach fermentation in the East African colobus monkeys in their natural state. Appl. Microbiol. 27:713–23 [Google Scholar]
  27. Popper K. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  28. Poulton EB. 1904. What is a species?. Proc. Ent. Soc. Lond. 1903:lxxvii–cxvi [Google Scholar]
  29. Rosenberger AL. 2012. New World Monkey nightmares: science, art, use, and abuse (?) in platyrrhine taxonomic nomenclature. Am. J. Primatol. 74:692–95 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rosenberger AL. 2014. Species: beasts of burden. Evol. Anthropol. 23:27–29 [Google Scholar]
  31. Rylands AB, Mittermeier RA. 2014. Primate taxonomy: species and conservation. Evol. Anthropol. 23:8–10 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rothschild W, Hartert E, Jordan K. 1903. Note of the editors. Novit. Zool. 1:i [Google Scholar]
  33. Schwarz E. 1928a. Bemerkungen über dei roten Stummelaffen. Zeits Säugetierk. 3:92–97 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schwarz E. 1928b. Notes on the classification of the African monkeys of the genus Cercopithecus, erxleben. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1:10649–63 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schwarz E. 1928c. The species of the genus Cercocebus. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1:10664–70 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schwarz E. 1929. On the local races and distribution of the Black and White Colobus monkeys. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1929:585–98 [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwarz E. 1931a. On the African long-tailed lemurs or galagos. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 7:1041–66 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schwarz E. 1931b. On the African short-tailed lemurs or pottos. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 8:10249–56 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schwarz E. 1931c. A revision of the genera and species of Madagascan Lemuridae. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1931:399–428 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schwarz E. 1934. On the local races of the chimpanzee. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 13:10576–83 [Google Scholar]
  41. Simpson GG. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  42. Ssebuyira M. 2013. Rare monkey specie is tourism's new kid on the block. Daily Monit.Dec. 18
  43. Wiley EO. 1978. The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst. Zool. 27:17–26 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wilson DE, Reeder DM. 2005. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 3rd ed..
  45. Woodley MA. 2010. Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications. Med. Hypotheses 74:195–201 [Google Scholar]
  46. Zachos FE, Apollonio M, Bärmann EV, Festa-Bianchet M, Göhlich U. et al. 2013a. Species inflation and taxonomic artefacts—a critical comment on recent trends in mammalian classification. Mamm. Biol. 78:1–6 [Google Scholar]
  47. Zachos FE, Clutton-Brock TH, Festa-Bianchet M, Lovari S, Macdonald DW, Schaller GB. 2013b. Taxonomy: Species splitting puts conservation at risk. Nature 494:35 [Google Scholar]
  48. Zinner D, Roos C. 2014. So what is a species anyway? A primatological perspective. Evol. Anthropol. 23:21–23 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030232
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error