United in Diversity: Mechanosensitive Ion Channels in Plants

Literature Cited

1. Alexandre J, Lassalles JP. 1.  1991. Hydrostatic and osmotic pressure activated channel in plant vacuole. Biophys. J. 60:1326–36 [Google Scholar]
2. Anishkin A, Kung C. 2.  2013. Stiffened lipid platforms at molecular force foci. PNAS 110:4886–92 [Google Scholar]
3. Appel HM, Cocroft RB. 3.  2014. Plants respond to leaf vibrations caused by insect herbivore chewing. Oecologia 175:1257–66 [Google Scholar]
4. Arnadottir J, Chalfie M. 4.  2010. Eukaryotic mechanosensitive channels. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 39:111–37 [Google Scholar]
5. Badot P-M, Ding JP, Pickard BG. 5.  1992. Mechanically activated ion channels occur in vacuoles of onion bulb scale parenchyma. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 315:437–43 [Google Scholar]
6. Balleza D, Gómez-Lagunas F. 6.  2009. Conserved motifs in mechanosensitive channels MscL and MscS. Eur. Biophys. J. 38:1013–27 [Google Scholar]
7. Bass RB, Strop P, Barclay M, Rees DC. 7.  2002. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli MscS, a voltage-modulated and mechanosensitive channel. Science 298:1582–87 [Google Scholar]
8. Berrier C, Pozza A, de Lacroix de Lavalette A, Chardonnet S, Mesneau A. 8.  et al. 2013. The purified mechanosensitive channel TREK-1 is directly sensitive to membrane tension. J. Biol. Chem. 288:27307–14 [Google Scholar]
9. Bezanilla F. 9.  2005. Voltage-gated ion channels. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 4:34–48 [Google Scholar]
10. Booth IR. 10.  2014. Bacterial mechanosensitive channels: progress towards an understanding of their roles in cell physiology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 18:16–22 [Google Scholar]
11. Booth IR, Blount P. 11.  2012. The MscS and MscL families of mechanosensitive channels act as microbial emergency release valves. J. Bacteriol. 194:4802–9 [Google Scholar]
12. Boscari A, Clément M, Volkov V, Golldack D, Hybiak J. 12.  et al. 2009. Potassium channels in barley: cloning, functional characterization and expression analyses in relation to leaf growth and development. Plant Cell Environ. 32:1761–77 [Google Scholar]
13. Bounoutas A, Chalfie M. 13.  2007. Touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Pflügers Arch. 454:691–702 [Google Scholar]
14. Braam J, Davis RW. 14.  1990. Rain-, wind-, and touch-induced expression of calmodulin and calmodulin-related genes in Arabidopsis. Cell 60:357–64 [Google Scholar]
15. Caldwell DB, Malcolm HR, Elmore DE, Maurer JA. 15.  2010. Identification and experimental verification of a novel family of bacterial cyclic nucleotide-gated (bCNG) ion channels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1798:1750–56 [Google Scholar]
16. Chehab EW, Eich E, Braam J. 16.  2009. Thigmomorphogenesis: a complex plant response to mechano-stimulation. J. Exp. Bot. 60:43–56 [Google Scholar]
17. Chemin J, Patel AJ, Duprat F, Lauritzen I, Lazdunski M, Honoré E. 17.  2005. A phospholipid sensor controls mechanogating of the K⁺ channel TREK-1. EMBO J. 24:44–53 [Google Scholar]
18. Christensen AP, Corey DP. 18.  2007. TRP channels in mechanosensation: direct or indirect activation?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8:510–21 [Google Scholar]
19. Clapham DE. 19.  2007. Calcium signaling. Cell 131:1047–58 [Google Scholar]
20. Cosgrove D, Hedrich R. 20.  1991. Stretch-activated chloride, potassium, and calcium channels coexisting in plasma membranes of guard cells of Vicia faba L. Planta 186:143–53 [Google Scholar]
21. Coutand C. 21.  2010. Mechanosensing and thigmomorphogenesis, a physiological and biomechanical point of view. Plant Sci. 179:168–82 [Google Scholar]
22. Cox CD, Nakayama Y, Nomura T, Martinac B. 22.  2015. The evolutionary “tinkering” of MscS-like channels: generation of structural and functional diversity. Pflügers Arch. 4673–13
23. Del Val C, Royuela-Flor J, Milenkovic S, Bondar A-N. 23.  2014. Channelrhodopsins: a bioinformatics perspective. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1837:643–55 [Google Scholar]
24. Denness L, McKenna J, Segonzac C. 24.  2011. Cell wall damage-induced lignin biosynthesis is regulated by a reactive oxygen species- and jasmonic acid-dependent process in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 156:1364–74 [Google Scholar]
25. Ding JP, Pickard BG. 25.  1993a. Mechanosensory calcium-selective cation channels in epidermal cells. Plant J. 3:83–110 [Google Scholar]
26. Ding JP, Pickard BG. 26.  1993b. Modulation of mechanosensitive calcium-selective cation channels by temperature. Plant J. 3:713–20 [Google Scholar]
27. Dutta R, Robinson KR. 27.  2004. Identification and characterization of stretch-activated ion channels in pollen protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 135:1398–1406 [Google Scholar]
28. Edwards MD, Black S, Rasmussen T, Rasmussen A, Stokes NR. 28.  et al. 2012. Characterization of three novel mechanosensitive channel activities in Escherichia coli. Channels 6:272–81 [Google Scholar]
29. Eijkelkamp N, Quick K, Wood JN. 29.  2013. Transient receptor potential channels and mechanosensation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36:519–46 [Google Scholar]
30. Enyedi P, Czirják G. 30.  2010. Molecular background of leak K⁺ currents: two-pore domain potassium channels. Physiol. Rev. 90:559–605 [Google Scholar]
31. Ermakov YA, Kamaraju K, Sengupta K, Sukharev S. 31.  2010. Gadolinium ions block mechanosensitive channels by altering the packing and lateral pressure of anionic lipids. Biophys. J. 98:1018–27 [Google Scholar]
32. Eyckmans J, Boudou T, Yu X, Chen CS. 32.  2011. A hitchhiker's guide to mechanobiology. Dev. Cell 21:35–47 [Google Scholar]
33. Falke LC, Edwards KL, Pickard BG, Misler S. 33.  1988. A stretch-activated anion channel in tobacco protoplasts. FEBS Lett. 237:141–44 [Google Scholar]
34. Fasano JM, Massa GD, Gilroy S. 34.  2002. Ionic signaling in plant responses to gravity and touch. J. Plant Growth Regul. 21:71–88 [Google Scholar]
35. Felsenstein J. 35.  1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–91 [Google Scholar]
36. Furuichi T, Iida H, Sokabe M, Tatsumi H. 36.  2012. Expression of Arabidopsis MCA1 enhanced mechanosensitive channel activity in the Xenopus laevis oocyte plasma membrane. Plant Signal. Behav. 7:1022–26 [Google Scholar]
37. Furuichi T, Tatsumi H, Sokabe M. 37.  2008. Mechano-sensitive channels regulate the stomatal aperture in Vicia faba. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 366:758–62 [Google Scholar]
38. Garrill A, Tyerman SD, Findlay GP. 38.  1994. Ion channels in the plasma membrane of protoplasts from the halophytic angiosperm Zostera muelleri. J. Membr. Biol. 142:381–93 [Google Scholar]
39. Gobert A, Isayenkov S, Voelker C, Czempinski K, Maathuis FJM. 39.  2007. The two-pore channel TPK1 gene encodes the vacuolar K⁺ conductance and plays a role in K+ homeostasis. PNAS 104:10726–31 [Google Scholar]
40. Guharay F, Sachs F. 40.  1984. Stretch-activated single ion channel currents in tissue-cultured embryonic chick skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 352:685–701 [Google Scholar]
41. Hamann T. 41.  2012. Plant cell wall integrity maintenance as an essential component of biotic stress response mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 3:77 [Google Scholar]
42. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ. 42.  1981. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch. 391:85–100 [Google Scholar]
43. Haswell ES. 43.  2007. MscS-like proteins in plants. Curr. Top. Membr. 58:329–59 [Google Scholar]
44. Haswell ES, Meyerowitz EM. 44.  2006. MscS-like proteins control plastid size and shape in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 16:1–11 [Google Scholar]
45. Haswell ES, Peyronnet R, Barbier-Brygoo H, Meyerowitz EM, Frachisse J-M. 45.  2008. Two MscS homologs provide mechanosensitive channel activities in the Arabidopsis root. Curr. Biol. 18:730–34 [Google Scholar]
46. Haswell ES, Phillips R, Rees DC. 46.  2011. Mechanosensitive channels: What can they do and how do they do it?. Structure 19:1356–69 [Google Scholar]
47. Hedrich R. 47.  2012. Ion channels in plants. Physiol. Rev. 92:1777–1811 [Google Scholar]
48. Hille B. 48.  2001. Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 3rd ed..
49. Honoré E. 49.  2007. The neuronal background K2P channels: focus on TREK1. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8:251–61 [Google Scholar]
50. Hou C, Tian W, Kleist T, He K, Garcia V. 50.  et al. 2014. DUF221 proteins are a family of osmosensitive calcium-permeable cation channels conserved across eukaryotes. Cell Res. 24:632–35 [Google Scholar]
51. Isayenkov S1, Isner JC, Maathuis FJ. 51.  2011. Rice two-pore K+ channels are expressed in different types of vacuoles. Plant Cell 23:756–68 [Google Scholar]
52. Isayenkov S1, Maathuis FJ. 52.  2013. Arabidopsis thaliana vacuolar TPK channels form functional K⁺ uptake pathways in Escherichia coli. Plant Signal. Behav. 8:e24665 [Google Scholar]
53. Jaffe MJ, Leopold AC, Staples RC. 53.  2002. Thigmo responses in plants and fungi. Am. J. Bot. 89:375–82 [Google Scholar]
54. Jayaraman D, Gilroy S, Ané J-M. 54.  2014. Staying in touch: mechanical signals in plant-microbe interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 20:104–9 [Google Scholar]
55. Jensen GS, Haswell ES. 55.  2012. Functional analysis of conserved motifs in the mechanosensitive channel homolog MscS-Like2 from Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS ONE 7:e40336 [Google Scholar]
56. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 56.  1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:275–82 [Google Scholar]
57. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W. 57.  et al. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–40 [Google Scholar]
58. Kanzaki M, Nagasawa M, Kojima I, Sato C, Naruse K. 58.  et al. 1999. Molecular identification of a eukaryotic, stretch-activated nonselective cation channel. Science 285:882–86 [Google Scholar]
59. Keramidas A, Moorhouse AJ, Schofield PR, Barry PH. 59.  2004. Ligand-gated ion channels: mechanisms underlying ion selectivity. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 86:161–204 [Google Scholar]
60. Kloda A, Martinac B. 60.  2001. Structural and functional differences between two homologous mechanosensitive channels of Methanococcus jannaschii. EMBO J. 20:1888–96 [Google Scholar]
61. Kloda A, Martinac B. 61.  2002. Common evolutionary origins of mechanosensitive ion channels in Archaea, Bacteria and cell-walled Eukarya. Archaea 1:35–44 [Google Scholar]
62. Koprowski P, Kubalski A. 62.  2003. C termini of the Escherichia coli mechanosensitive ion channel (MscS) move apart upon the channel opening. J. Biol. Chem. 278:11237–45 [Google Scholar]
63. Kung C, Martinac B, Sukharev S. 63.  2010. Mechanosensitive channels in microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64:313–29 [Google Scholar]
64. Kurusu T, Kuchitsu K, Nakano M. 64.  2013. Plant mechanosensing and Ca²⁺ transport. Trends Plant Sci. 18:227–33 [Google Scholar]
65. Kurusu T, Nishikawa D, Yamazaki Y, Gotoh M, Nakano M. 65.  et al. 2012. Plasma membrane protein OsMCA1 is involved in regulation of hypo-osmotic shock-induced Ca²⁺ influx and modulates generation of reactive oxygen species in cultured rice cells. BMC Plant Biol. 12:11 [Google Scholar]
66. Kurusu T, Yamanaka T, Nakano M, Takiguchi A, Ogasawara Y. 66.  et al. 2012. Involvement of the putative Ca²⁺-permeable mechanosensitive channels, NtMCA1 and NtMCA2, in Ca²⁺ uptake, Ca²⁺-dependent cell proliferation and mechanical stress-induced gene expression in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY-2 cells. J. Plant Res. 125:555–68 [Google Scholar]
67. Lai JY, Poon YS, Kaiser JT, Rees DC. 67.  2013. Open and shut: crystal structures of the dodecylmaltoside solubilized mechanosensitive channel of small conductance from Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori at 4.4 Å and 4.1 Å resolutions. Protein Sci. 22:502–9 [Google Scholar]
68. Lazzaro MD, Donohue JM, Soodavar FM. 68.  2003. Disruption of cellulose synthesis by isoxaben causes tip swelling and disorganizes cortical microtubules in elongating conifer pollen tubes. Protoplasma 220:201–7 [Google Scholar]
69. Legué V, Blancaflor E, Wymer C, Perbal G, Fantin D, Gilroy S. 69.  1997. Cytoplasmic free Ca²⁺ in Arabidopsis roots changes in response to touch but not gravity. Plant Physiol. 114:789–800 [Google Scholar]
70. Levina N, Totemeyer S, Stokes NR, Louis P, Jones MA, Booth IR. 70.  1999. Protection of Escherichia coli cells against extreme turgor by activation of MscS and MscL mechanosensitive channels: identification of genes required for MscS activity. EMBO J. 18:1730–37 [Google Scholar]
71. Lewis B, Spalding E. 71.  1998. Nonselective block by La³⁺ of Arabidopsis ion channels involved in signal transduction. J. Membr. Biol. 162:81–90 [Google Scholar]
72. Li Y, Moe PC, Chandrasekaran S, Booth IR, Blount P. 72.  2002. Ionic regulation of MscK, a mechanosensitive channel from Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 21:5323–30 [Google Scholar]
73. Liu K, Luan S. 73.  1998. Voltage-dependent K⁺ channels as targets of osmosensing in guard cells. Plant Cell 10:1957–70 [Google Scholar]
74. Lucas M, Kenobi K, von Wangenheim D, Voß U, Swarup K. 74.  et al. 2013. Lateral root morphogenesis is dependent on the mechanical properties of the overlaying tissues. PNAS 110:5229–34 [Google Scholar]
75. Maathuis FJM. 75.  2011. Vacuolar two-pore K⁺ channels act as vacuolar osmosensors. New Phytol. 191:84–91 [Google Scholar]
76. Maksaev G, Haswell ES. 76.  2011. Expression and characterization of the bacterial mechanosensitive channel MscS in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J. Gen. Physiol. 138:641–49 [Google Scholar]
77. Maksaev G, Haswell ES. 77.  2012. MscS-Like10 is a stretch-activated ion channel from Arabidopsis thaliana with a preference for anions. PNAS 109:19015–20 [Google Scholar]
78. Malcolm HR, Maurer JA. 78.  2012. The mechanosensitive channel of small conductance (MscS) superfamily: not just mechanosensitive channels anymore. ChemBioChem 13:2037–43 [Google Scholar]
79. Markin VS, Sachs F. 79.  2007. Thermodynamics of mechanosensitivity. Curr. Top. Membr. 58:87–119 [Google Scholar]
80. Martinac B. 80.  2012. Mechanosensitive ion channels: an evolutionary and scientific tour de force in mechanobiology. Channels 6:211–13 [Google Scholar]
81. Martinac B, Adler J, Kung C. 81.  1990. Mechanosensitive ion channels of E. coli activated by amphipaths. Nature 348:261–63 [Google Scholar]
82. Martinac B, Buechner M, Delcour A, Adler J, Kung C. 82.  1987. Pressure-sensitive ion channel in Escherichia coli. PNAS 84:2297–301 [Google Scholar]
83. Martinac B, Hamill OP. 83.  2002. Gramicidin A channels switch between stretch activation and stretch inactivation depending on bilayer thickness. PNAS 99:4308–12 [Google Scholar]
84. Martinac B, Nomura T, Chi G, Petrov E, Rohde PR. 84.  et al. 2014. Bacterial mechanosensitive channels: models for studying mechanosensory transduction. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 20:952–69 [Google Scholar]
85. Matsumoto S, Kumasaki S, Soga K, Wakabayashi K, Hashimoto T, Hoson T. 85.  2010. Gravity-induced modifications to development in hypocotyls of Arabidopsis tubulin mutants. Plant Physiol. 152:918–26 [Google Scholar]
86. Monshausen GB, Bibikova TN, Weisenseel MH, Gilroy S. 86.  2009. Ca²⁺ regulates reactive oxygen species production and pH during mechanosensing in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 21:2341–56 [Google Scholar]
87. Monshausen GB, Haswell ES. 87.  2013. A force of nature: molecular mechanisms of mechanoperception in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 64:4663–80 [Google Scholar]
88. Moran N, Yueh Y, Crain R. 88.  1996. Signal transduction and cell volume regulation in plant leaflet movements. Physiology 11:108–14 [Google Scholar]
89. Morgan CP, Barr-Gillespie PG. 89.  2013. Mechanotransduction: the elusive hair cell transduction channel revealed?. Curr. Biol. 23:R887–90 [Google Scholar]
90. Nakagawa Y, Katagiri T, Shinozaki K, Qi Z, Tatsumi H. 90.  et al. 2007. Arabidopsis plasma membrane protein crucial for Ca²⁺ influx and touch sensing in roots. PNAS 104:3639–44 [Google Scholar]
91. Nakano M, Iida K, Nyunoya H, Iida H. 91.  2011. Determination of structural regions important for Ca²⁺ uptake activity in Arabidopsis MCA1 and MCA2 expressed in yeast. Plant Cell Physiol. 52:1915–30 [Google Scholar]
92. Nakayama Y, Fujiu K, Sokabe M, Yoshimura K. 92.  2007. Molecular and electrophysiological characterization of a mechanosensitive channel expressed in the chloroplasts of Chlamydomonas. PNAS 104:5883–88 [Google Scholar]
93. Nakayama Y, Yoshimura K, Iida H. 93.  2012. Organellar mechanosensitive channels in fission yeast regulate the hypo-osmotic shock response. Nat. Commun. 3:1020 [Google Scholar]
94. Nakayama Y, Yoshimura K, Iida H. 94.  2013. Electrophysiological characterization of the mechanosensitive channel MscCG in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biophys. J. 105:1366–75 [Google Scholar]
95. Nilius B, Honoré E. 95.  2012. Sensing pressure with ion channels. Trends Neurosci. 35:477–86 [Google Scholar]
96. Ohme-Takagi M, Shinshi H. 96.  1995. Ethylene-inducible DNA binding proteins that interact with an ethylene-responsive element. Plant Cell 7:173–82 [Google Scholar]
97. Perozo E, Kloda A, Cortes DM, Martinac B. 97.  2002. Physical principles underlying the transduction of bilayer deformation forces during mechanosensitive channel gating. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:696–703 [Google Scholar]
98. Peyronnet R, Haswell ES, Barbier-Brygoo H, Frachisse J-M. 98.  2008. AtMSL9 and AtMSL10 sensors of plasma membrane tension in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Signal. Behav. 3:726–29 [Google Scholar]
99. Phillips R, Ursell T, Wiggins P, Sens P. 99.  2009. Emerging roles for lipids in shaping membrane-protein function. Nature 459:379–85 [Google Scholar]
100. Pivetti CD, Yen M, Miller S, Busch W, Tseng Y. 100.  et al. 2003. Two families of mechanosensitive channel proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67:66–85 [Google Scholar]
101. Porter BW, Zhu YJ, Webb DT, Christopher DA. 101.  2009. Novel thigmomorphogenetic responses in Carica papaya: Touch decreases anthocyanin levels and stimulates petiole cork outgrowths. Ann. Bot. 103:847–58 [Google Scholar]
102. Prole DL, Taylor CW. 102.  2013. Identification and analysis of putative homologues of mechanosensitive channels in pathogenic protozoa. PLOS ONE 8:e66068 [Google Scholar]
103. Purves D, Augustine G, Fitzpatrick D, Hall WC, LaMantia A-S, White LE. 103.  2001. Neuroscience Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 2nd ed..
104. Qi Z, Kishigami A, Nakagawa Y, Iida H, Sokabe M. 104.  2004. A mechanosensitive anion channel in Arabidopsis thaliana mesophyll cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 45:1704–8 [Google Scholar]
105. Saitou N, Nei M. 105.  1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406–25 [Google Scholar]
106. Sakmann B, Neher E. 106.  1984. Patch clamp techniques for studying ionic channels in excitable membranes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 46:455–72 [Google Scholar]
107. Schroeder JI, Hedrich R. 107.  1989. Involvement of ion channels and active transport in osmoregulation and signaling of higher plant cells. Trends Biochem. Sci. 14:187–92 [Google Scholar]
108. Schumann U, Edwards MD, Rasmussen T, Bartlett W, van West P, Booth IR. 108.  2010. YbdG in Escherichia coli is a threshold-setting mechanosensitive channel with MscM activity. PNAS 108:12664–69 [Google Scholar]
109. Shabala SN, Lew RR. 109.  2002. Turgor regulation in osmotically stressed Arabidopsis epidermal root cells. Direct support for the role of cell turgor measurements. Plant Physiol. 129:290–99 [Google Scholar]
110. Shigematsu H, Iida K, Nakano M, Chaudhuri P, Iida H, Nagayama K. 110.  2014. Structural characterization of the mechanosensitive channel candidate MCA2 from Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS ONE 9:e87724 [Google Scholar]
111. Spalding EP, Goldsmith M. 111.  1993. Activation of K⁺ channels in the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis by ATP produced photosynthetically. Plant Cell 5:477–84 [Google Scholar]
112. Steinbacher S, Bass R, Strop P, Rees DC. 112.  2007. Structures of the prokaryotic mechanosensitive channels MscL and MscS. Curr. Top. Membr. 58:1–24 [Google Scholar]
113. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 113.  2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:2725–29 [Google Scholar]
114. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 114.  1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673–80 [Google Scholar]
115. Toyota M, Gilroy S. 115.  2013. Gravitropism and mechanical signaling in plants. Am. J. Bot. 100:111–25 [Google Scholar]
116. Turner M, Sens P. 116.  2004. Gating-by-tilt of mechanically sensitive membrane channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:118103 [Google Scholar]
117. Veley KM, Maksaev G, Frick EM, January E, Kloepper SC, Haswell ES. 117.  2014. Arabidopsis MSL10 has a regulated cell death signaling activity that is separable from its mechanosensitive ion channel activity. Plant Cell 26:3115–31 [Google Scholar]
118. Veley KM, Marshburn S, Clure CE, Haswell ES. 118.  2012. Mechanosensitive channels protect plastids from hypoosmotic stress during normal plant growth. Curr. Biol. 22:408–13 [Google Scholar]
119. Voelker C, Gomez-Porras JL, Becker D, Hamamoto S, Uozumi N. 119.  et al. 2010. Roles of tandem-pore K⁺ channels in plants—a puzzle still to be solved. Plant Biol. 12:56–63 [Google Scholar]
120. Volkers L, Mechioukhi Y, Coste B. 120.  2015. Piezo channels: from structure to function. Pflügers Arch. 46795–99
121. Wang P, Xue L, Batelli G, Lee S, Hou Y-J. 121.  et al. 2013. Quantitative phosphoproteomics identifies SnRK2 protein kinase substrates and reveals the effectors of abscisic acid action. PNAS 110:11205–10 [Google Scholar]
122. Ward JM, Mäser P, Schroeder JI. 122.  2009. Plant ion channels: gene families, physiology, and functional genomics analyses. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 71:59–82 [Google Scholar]
123. Wayne R. 123.  1994. The excitability of plant cells: with a special emphasis on Characean internodal cells. Bot. Rev. 60:265–367 [Google Scholar]
124. Wilson ME, Basu MR, Bhaskara GB, Verslues PE, Haswell ES. 124.  2014. Plastid osmotic stress activates cellular stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 165:119–28 [Google Scholar]
125. Wilson ME, Haswell ES. 125.  2012. A role for mechanosensitive channels in chloroplast and bacterial fission. Plant Signal. Behav. 7:157–60 [Google Scholar]
126. Wilson ME, Jensen GS, Haswell ES. 126.  2011. Two mechanosensitive channel homologs influence division ring placement in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Cell 23:2939–49 [Google Scholar]
127. Wilson ME, Maksaev G, Haswell ES. 127.  2013. MscS-like mechanosensitive channels in plants and microbes. Biochemistry 52:5708–22 [Google Scholar]
128. Wormit A, Butt SM, Chairam I, McKenna JF, Nunes-Nesi A. 128.  et al. 2012. Osmosensitive changes of carbohydrate metabolism in response to cellulose biosynthesis inhibition. Plant Physiol. 159:105–17 [Google Scholar]
129. Xiao R, Xu XZS. 129.  2010. Mechanosensitive channels: in touch with Piezo. Curr. Biol. 20:R936–38 [Google Scholar]
130. Yamanaka T, Nakagawa Y, Mori K, Nakano M, Imamura T. 130.  et al. 2010. MCA1 and MCA2 that mediate Ca²⁺ uptake have distinct and overlapping roles in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 152:1284–96 [Google Scholar]
131. Yuan F, Yang H, Xue Y, Kong D, Ye R. 131.  et al. 2014. OSCA1 mediates osmotic-stress-evoked Ca²⁺ increases vital for osmosensing in Arabidopsis. Nature 514:367–71 [Google Scholar]
132. Zhang W, Fan L-M, Wu W-H. 132.  2007. Osmo-sensitive and stretch-activated calcium-permeable channels in Vicia faba guard cells are regulated by actin dynamics. Plant Physiol. 143:1140–51 [Google Scholar]
133. Zhang X, Wang J, Feng Y, Ge J, Li W. 133.  et al. 2012. Structure and molecular mechanism of an anion-selective mechanosensitive channel of small conductance. PNAS 109:18180–85 [Google Scholar]
134. Zhu J-K. 134.  2003. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6:441–45 [Google Scholar]