1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Financial Economics
  4. Volume 7, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Financial Economics

Volume 7, 2015

Contributions to Defined Contribution Pension Plans

Abstract

Defined contribution (DC) pension plans are an increasingly important means of financing retirement consumption. Because individuals often have substantial discretion over how much is contributed to their DC pension plan, studying DC contribution choices provides general insights into the determinants of individual economic decision making. The literature has found strong deviations from many predictions of classical frictionless optimizing models. I provide an overview of the US DC pension system and review the literature on the effect of matching contributions, automatic enrollment, active choice deadlines, choice overload, financial literacy, peer effects, mental accounting, and personal experience on individuals' DC contributions.

Keyword(s): 401(k), behavioral economics, Individual Retirement Account, nudges, retirement, saving
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111914-041834
2015-12-07
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/7/1/annurev-financial-111914-041834.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111914-041834&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ameriks J, Caplin A, Leahy J. 2003. Wealth accumulation and the propensity to plan. Q. J. Econ. 118:1007–46 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews ES. 1992. The growth and distribution of 401(k) plans. Trends in Pensions 1992 JA Turner, DJ Beller 149–76 Washington, DC: US Dep. Labor [Google Scholar]
  3. Argento R, Bryant VL, Sabelhaus J. 2015. Early withdrawals from retirement accounts during the Great Recession. Contemp. Econ. Policy 33:1–16 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bassett WF, Fleming MJ, Rodrigues AP. 1998. How workers use 401(k) plans: the participation, contribution, and withdrawal decisions. Natl. Tax J. 51:263–89 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayer PJ, Bernheim BD, Scholz JK. 2009. The effects of financial education in the workplace: evidence from a survey of employers. Econ. Inq. 47:605–24 [Google Scholar]
  6. Benartzi S, Peleg E, Thaler RH. 2012. Choice architecture and retirement savings plans. The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy E Shafir 245–63 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Benartzi S, Thaler RH. 2007. Heuristics and biases in retirement savings behavior. J. Econ. Perspect. 21:381–104 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernheim BD. 1998. Financial illiteracy, education, and retirement saving. See Mitchell & Schieber 1998 38–68
  9. Bernheim BD. 2002. Taxation and saving. Handbook of Public Economics 3 AJ Auerbach, M Feldstein 1173–249 Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernheim BD, Garrett DM. 2003. The effects of financial education in the workplace: evidence from a survey of households. J. Public Econ. 87:1487–519 [Google Scholar]
  11. Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2009. The importance of default options for retirement saving outcomes: evidence from the United States. Lessons from Pension Reform in the Americas SJ Kay, T Sinha 59–87 Oxford, UK: Oxf. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2013. Simplification and saving. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 95:103–45 [Google Scholar]
  13. Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2015. The effect of providing peer information on retirement savings decisions. J. Finance 701161–201
  14. Brobeck S. 1990. U.S. Consumer Knowledge: Results of a Nationwide Test. Washington, DC: Consum. Fed. Am.
  15. Brown JR, Farrell AM, Weisbenner SJ. 2011. The downside of defaults Work. Pap., Univ. Ill. Urbana-Champaign
  16. Card D, Ransom M. 2011. Pension plan characteristics and framing effects in employee savings behavior. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:228–43 [Google Scholar]
  17. Carroll GD, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2009. Optimal defaults and active decisions. Q. J. Econ. 124:1639–74 [Google Scholar]
  18. Charness G, Levin D. 2003. When optimal choices feel wrong: a laboratory study of Bayesian updating, complexity, and affect. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:1300–9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chetty R, Friedman JN, Leth-Petersen S, Nielsen TH, Olsen T. 2014. Active versus passive decisions and crowd-out in retirement savings accounts: evidence from Denmark. Q. J. Econ. 129:1141–219 [Google Scholar]
  20. Choi JJ, Haisley E, Kurkoski J, Massey C. 2012. Small cues change savings choices NBER Work. Pap. 17843
  21. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2010. $100 bills on the sidewalk: suboptimal investment in 401(k) plans. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:748–63 [Google Scholar]
  22. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2011. Reducing the complexity costs of 401(k) participation through Quick Enrollment™. Developments in the Economics of Aging DA Wise 57–82 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chic. Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2002. Defined contribution pensions: plan rules, participant decisions, and the path of least resistance. Tax Policy and the Economy 16 JM Poterba 67–114 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2003. Optimal defaults. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:180–85 [Google Scholar]
  25. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2004. For better or for worse: default effects and 401(k) savings behavior. Perspectives in the Economics of Aging DA Wise 81–121 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chic. Press [Google Scholar]
  26. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2006. Saving for retirement on the path of least resistance. Behavioral Public Finance: Toward a New Agenda EJ McCaffrey, J Slemrod 304–51 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  27. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2009. Reinforcement learning and savings behavior. J. Finance 64:2515–34 [Google Scholar]
  28. Clark RL, Goodfellow GP, Schieber SJ, Warwick D. 2000. Making the most of 401(k) plans: Who's choosing what and why?. Forecasting Retirement Needs and Retirement Wealth OS Mitchell, PB Hammond, AM Rappaport 95–138 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  29. Clark RL, Schieber SJ. 1998. Factors affecting participation rates and contribution levels in 401(k) plans. See Mitchell & Schieber 1998 69–97
  30. Copeland C. 2013. Retirement plan participation: Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) data, 2012. EBRI Notes 34:82–13 [Google Scholar]
  31. Duflo E, Gale W, Liebman J, Orszag P, Saez E. 2006. Saving incentives for low- and middle-income families: evidence from a field experiment with H&R Block. Q. J. Econ. 121:1311–46 [Google Scholar]
  32. Duflo E, Saez E. 2002. Participation and investment decisions in a retirement plan: the influence of colleagues' choices. J. Public Econ. 85:121–48 [Google Scholar]
  33. Duflo E, Saez E. 2003. The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: evidence from a randomized experiment. Q. J. Econ. 118:815–42 [Google Scholar]
  34. Dworak-Fisher K. 2011. Matching matters in 401(k) plan participation. Ind. Relat. 50:713–37 [Google Scholar]
  35. Engelhardt GV, Kumar A. 2007. Employer matching and 401(k) saving: evidence from the health and retirement study. J. Public Econ. 91:1920–43 [Google Scholar]
  36. Erev I, Roth AE. 1998. Predicting how people play games: reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. Am. Econ. Rev. 88:848–81 [Google Scholar]
  37. Even WE, Macpherson DA. 2005. The effects of employer matching in 401(k) plans. Ind. Relat. 44:525–49 [Google Scholar]
  38. Goda GS, Manchester CF, Sojourner AJ. 2014. What will my account really be worth? Experimental evidence on how retirement income projections affect saving. J. Public Econ. 119:80–92 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hastings JS, Madrian BC, Skimmyhorn WL. 2013. Financial literacy, financial education, and economic outcomes. Annu. Rev. Econ. 5:347–73 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hertwig R, Barron G, Weber EU, Erev I. 2004. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychol. Sci. 15:534–39 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hilgert MA, Hogarth JM, Beverly SG. 2003. Household financial management: the connection between knowledge and behavior. Fed. Reserve Bull. 89:7309–22 [Google Scholar]
  42. Holden S, Schrass D. 2013. The role of IRAs in U.S. households' saving for retirement, 2013. ICI Res. Perspect. 19:111–38 [Google Scholar]
  43. Huberman G, Iyengar SS, Jiang W. 2007. Defined contribution pension plans: determinants of participation and contributions rates. J. Financ. Serv. Res. 31:1–32 [Google Scholar]
  44. Invest. Co. Inst 2014. The U.S. retirement market, second quarter 2014. ICI Glob. Q. Rep., Washington, DC
  45. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–92 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1982. The psychology of preferences. Sci. Am. 246:160–73 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kusko AL, Poterba JM, Wilcox DW. 1998. Employee decisions with respect to 401(k) plans. See Mitchell & Schieber 1998 98–112
  48. Laibson D. 1997. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q. J. Econ. 112:443–77 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lusardi A, Mitchell OS. 2007. Baby Boomer retirement security: the roles of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth. J. Monet. Econ. 54:205–24 [Google Scholar]
  50. Madrian BC, Shea DF. 2001. The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Q. J. Econ. 116:1149–87 [Google Scholar]
  51. Manski C. 1993. Identification of exogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev. Econ. Stud. 60:531–42 [Google Scholar]
  52. Meier S, Sprenger C. 2010. Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2:1193–210 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mitchell OS, Schieber SJ. 1998. Living with Defined Contribution Pensions: Remaking Responsibility for Retirement Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  54. Mitchell OS, Utkus SP, Yang T. 2007. Turning workers into savers? Incentives, liquidity, and choice in 401(k) plan design. Natl. Tax J. 60:469–89 [Google Scholar]
  55. Nisbett RE, Ross LD. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  56. O'Donoghue T, Rabin M. 1999. Doing it now or later. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:103–24 [Google Scholar]
  57. Org. Econ. Co-op. Dev 2013. Pension markets in focus: 2013. Annu. Rep. Work. Party Priv. Pensions, Task Force Pension Stat., Paris. http://www.oecd.org/pensions/PensionMarketsInFocus2013.pdf
  58. Papke LE. 1995. Participation in and contributions to 401(k) pension plans: evidence from plan data. J. Hum. Resour. 30:311–25 [Google Scholar]
  59. Papke LE, Poterba JM. 1995. Survey evidence on employer match rates and employee saving behavior in 401(k) plans. Econ. Lett. 49:313–17 [Google Scholar]
  60. Poterba JM, Venti SF, Wise DA. 2010. The rise of 401(k) plans, lifetime earnings, and wealth at retirement. Research Findings in the Economics of Aging DA Wise 271–304 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chic. Press [Google Scholar]
  61. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. 1988. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertain. 1:7–59 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sethi-Iyengar S, Huberman G, Jiang W. 2004. How much choie is too much? Contributions to 401(k) retirement plans. Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance OS Mitchell, SP Utkus 83–95 Oxford, UK: Oxf. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  63. Sims CA. 2006. Rational inattention: beyond the linear-quadratic case. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:158–63 [Google Scholar]
  64. Skimmyhorn W. 2013. Assessing financial education: evidence from a personal financial management course Work. Pap., US Milit. Acad. West Point
  65. Steyer R. 2014. Adoption of automatic enrollment slows down. Pensions Invest. Feb. 12. http://www.pionline.com/article/20140212/ONLINE/140219961/adoption-of-auto-enrollment-slows-down
  66. Strotz RH. 1955–1956. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 23:165–80 [Google Scholar]
  67. T. Rowe Price Assoc 2014. Getting beyond the ordinary—managing plan costs in automatic programs. https://www2.troweprice.com/rms/rps/Marketing/Articles/ManagingPlanCostsinAutomaticPrograms.pdf
  68. Thaler RH. 1980. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1:39–60 [Google Scholar]
  69. Thaler RH. 1985. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Mark. Sci. 4:199–214 [Google Scholar]
  70. Thaler RH. 1990. Anomalies: saving, fungibility, and mental accounts. J. Econ. Perspect. 4:1193–205 [Google Scholar]
  71. Thaler RH. 1999. Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 12:183–206 [Google Scholar]
  72. Thaler RH, Benartzi S. 2004. Save more tomorrow: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Polit. Econ. 112:S164–87 [Google Scholar]
  73. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
  74. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–31 [Google Scholar]
  75. US Dep. Labor, US Bur. Labor Stat 2013. National Compensation Survey: employee benefits in the United States, March 2013. Bull. 2776, Washington, DC. http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/benefits/2013/ebbl0052.pdf
  76. US Gen. Account. Off 1997. 401(k) pension plans: loan provisions enhance participation but may affect income security for some. Rep. HEHS-98-5, Heath Educ. Serv., Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  77. Vanguard 2014. How America saves 2014: a report on Vanguard 2013 defined contribution plan data Rep., Vanguard Inst. Invest. Group, Valley Forge, PA
  78. Weber EU, Böckenholt U, Hilton DJ, Wallace B. 1993. Determinants of diagnostic hypothesis generation: effects of information, base rates, and experience. J. Exp. Psychol. 19:1151–64 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111914-041834
Loading
Contributions to Defined Contribution Pension Plans
Annual Review of Financial Economics 7, 161 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-111914-041834
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111914-041834
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111914-041834
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error