1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 11, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 11, 2015

Experimental Justice Reform: Lessons from the World Bank and Beyond

Abstract

Rule of law orthodoxy—legal transplants from high- to low-income countries—has endured despite persistent critiques. A key reason for this, we argue, is the absence of positive theories of praxis that can instantiate essentially contested concepts such as rule of law. We discuss the emergence of one nascent alternative, the World Bank's Justice for the Poor program, locating it within broader turns to experimental approaches to development. In doing so, we argue that rule of law reform must be understood in the context of the politics of the relationship between development experts and the domestic political forums in and through which rules systems emerge. As such, a primary task of external agencies is to help forge and sustain such forums, to recognize the deep imbrication between the process norms of these forums and the nature of the rule of law being produced, and to ensure that the empirical foundations on which ensuing deliberations rest are both sound and accessible. We conclude with an exploration of the challenges of this approach, from methodological challenges in building an empirical foundation to political accountability concerns with respect to rule of law reformers themselves.

Keyword(s): experimentalism, expertise, legal development, rule of law
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121550
2015-11-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/11/1/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121550.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121550&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adler D, Sage C, Woolcock M. 2009. Interim institutions and the development process: opening spaces for reform in Cambodia and Indonesia Work. Pap. No. 86, Brooks World Poverty Inst., Univ. Manch.
  2. Andrews M. 2013. The Limits of Bureaucratic Reform New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  3. Andrews M, Pritchett L, Woolcock M. 2013. Responding to capability traps through Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA). World Dev. 51:11234–44 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ansell C, Gash A. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18:4543–71 [Google Scholar]
  5. Armytage L. 2012. Reforming Justice: A Journey to Fairness in Asia New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  6. Bingham T. 2011. The Rule of Law London: Penguin
  7. Booth D, Unsworth S. 2014. Politically smart, locally led development Discuss. Pap., Overseas Dev. Inst., London
  8. Brinkerhoff DW. 2005. Rebuilding governance in failed states and post-conflict societies: core concepts and cross-cutting themes. Public Adm. Dev. 25:13–14 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cameron D. 2012. Combating poverty at its roots. Wall Street Journal Online Nov. 1, Opin. Eur. Accessed March 20, 2013. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204712904578090571423009066.html
  10. Carothers T. 2006. Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge Washington, DC: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
  11. Cohen AJ. 2008. Negotiation, meet new governance: interests, skills, and selves. Law Soc. Inq. 33:2501–62 [Google Scholar]
  12. Comaroff JL, Comaroff J. 2004. Criminal justice, cultural justice: the limits of liberalism and the pragmatics of difference in the new South Africa. Am. Ethnol. 31:2188–204 [Google Scholar]
  13. Craig D, Porter D. 2014. Post-conflict pacts and inclusive political settlements: institutional perspectives from Solomon Islands Work. Pap. No. 39, Eff. States Incl. Dev. Res. Cent., Univ. Manch.
  14. De Búrca G, Keohane RO, Sabel C. 2012. New modes of pluralist global governance. N.Y. Univ. J. Int. Law Polit. 45:723–86 [Google Scholar]
  15. De Búrca G, Keohane RO, Sabel C. 2014. Global experimentalist governance. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 44:3477–86 [Google Scholar]
  16. Desai D. 2014. In search of “hire” knowledge: hiring practices and the organization of knowledge in a rule of law field. See Marshall 2014b 42–83
  17. Desai D, Isser D, Woolcock M. 2012. Rethinking justice reform in fragile and conflict-affected states: lessons for enhancing the capacity of development agencies. Hague J. Rule Law 4:54–75 [Google Scholar]
  18. Desai D, Woolcock M. 2015. The politics—and process—of rule of law systems in developmental states. The Politics of Inclusive Development: Interrogating the Evidence B Bukenya, S Hickey, K Sen 174–96 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  19. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  20. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2010. Marketing and selling transnational ‘judges’ and global ‘experts’: building the credibility of (quasi)judicial regulation. Soc. Econ. Rev. 8:113–30 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2011. Introduction: lawyers, law, and society. Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization Y Dezalay, BG Garth 1–16 Abingdon: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  22. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2012. Marketing professional expertise by (re)inventing states: professional rivalries between lawyers and economists as hegemonic strategies in the international market for the reproduction of national state elites. Development and Semi-Periphery: Post-Neoliberal Trajectories in South America and Central Eastern Europe R Boschi, CH Santana 165–80 London: Anthem [Google Scholar]
  23. Dinnen S. 2014. RAMSI ten years on: from post-conflict stabilisation to development in Solomon Islands?. J. Int. Peacekeeping 18:3–4195–213 [Google Scholar]
  24. Donaldson M, Kingsbury B. 2013. Ersatz normativity or public law in global governance: the hard case of international prescriptions for national infrastructure regulation. Chic. J. Int. Law 14:(1)1–51 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dorf MC, Sabel CF. 1998. A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Rev. 98:267–473 [Google Scholar]
  26. Duffield M. 2007. Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples Cambridge: Polity
  27. Dworkin R. 1986. Law's Empire Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  28. The Economist 2008. Order in the jungle. The EconomistMarch 13
  29. Frederickson HG. 2000. Can bureaucracy be beautiful?. Public Adm. Rev. 60:147–53 [Google Scholar]
  30. Freeman J. 1997. Collaborative governance in the administrative state. UCLA Law Rev. 45:11–98 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fuller LL. 1964. The Morality of Law 152 New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
  32. Gauri V, Woolcock M, Desai D. 2013. Intersubjective meaning and collective action in developing societies: theory, evidence and policy implications. J. Dev. Stud. 49:1160–72 [Google Scholar]
  33. Golub S. 2003. Beyond rule of law orthodoxy: the legal empowerment alternative Work. Pap. No. 41, Rule Law Ser., Oct., Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
  34. Hadfield G, Weingast B. 2014. Microfoundations of the rule of law. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 17:21–42 [Google Scholar]
  35. Haggard S, MacIntyre A, Tiede L. 2008. The rule of law and economic development. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11:205–34 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hall M, Menzies N, Woolcock M. 2014. From HiPPOs to “best fit” in justice reform: experimentalism in Sierra Leone. See Marshall 2014b 243–66
  37. Halliday TC, Osinsky P. 2006. Globalization of law. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32:447–70 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hart HLA. 2012 [1961]. The Concept of Law New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  39. Helmke G, Rosenbluth F. 2009. Regimes and the rule of law: judicial independence in comparative perspective. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 12:345–66 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hirschman A. 1995. A Propensity to Self-Subversion Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  41. Hull MS. 2012. Documents and bureaucracy. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 41:251–67 [Google Scholar]
  42. Humphreys S. 2010. Theatre of the Rule of Law: Transnational Legal Intervention in Theory and Practice Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
  43. Irwin D. 2014. Adam Smith's “tolerable administration of justice” and the wealth of nations Work. Pap. No. 20636, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, MA
  44. Isser D. 2011. Conclusion: understanding and engaging customary justice systems. Customary Justice and the Rule of Law in War-Torn Societies D Isser 325–67 Washington, DC: US Inst. Peace [Google Scholar]
  45. Kennedy D. 1991. A semiotics of legal argument. Syracuse Law Rev. 42:75–116 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kennedy D. 2006. The ‘rule of law,’ political choices and development common sense. The New Law and Economic Development DM Trubek, A Santos 95–173 Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Kleinfeld R. 2012. Advancing the Rule of Law Abroad: Next Generation Reform Washington, DC: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
  48. Kratochwil F. 2014. The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law 129 Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
  49. Krygier M. 2012. Why the rule of law is too important to be left to lawyers. Prawo i Więź 2:30–52 [Google Scholar]
  50. Krygier M. 2015. Rule of law (and Rechtsstaat). Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences JD Wright, pp. 45–59 Atlanta, GA: Elsevier, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  51. Larson G. 2013. South Sudan: The road from the Paris Declaration to the reality of Juba, 2005–11 Work. Pap. No. 2013/141, UNU-WIDER, Helsinki
  52. Latour B. 2000. When things strike back: a possible contribution of science studies. Br. J. Sociol. 5:1105–23 [Google Scholar]
  53. Latour B. 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Crit. Inq. 30:2225–48 [Google Scholar]
  54. Levy B. 2014. Working with the Grain: Integrating Governance and Growth in Development Strategies New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  55. Levy D, Scully M. 2007. The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: the strategic face of power in contested fields. Organ. Stud. 28:7971–91 [Google Scholar]
  56. Magen A. 2009. The rule of law and its promotion abroad: three problems of scope. Stanford J. Int. Law 45:51–116 [Google Scholar]
  57. Manderson D. 2012. Modernism, polarity, and the rule of law. Yale J. Law Humanit. 24:475–505 [Google Scholar]
  58. Mani R. 1999. Contextualizing police reform: security, the rule of law and post-conflict peacebuilding. Int. Peacekeeping 6:49–26 [Google Scholar]
  59. Marks S. 2000. International law, democracy, and the end of history. Democratic Governance and International Law GH Fox, BR Roth 532–66 Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1st ed.. [Google Scholar]
  60. Marshall D. 2014a. Reboot required: the United Nations' engagement in rule of law reform in postconflict and fragile states. See Marshall 2014b 85–134
  61. Marshall D. 2014b. The International Rule of Law Movement: A Crisis of Legitimacy and the Way Forward Human Rights Program Series. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School
  62. Maru V. 2006. Between law and society: paralegals and the provision of justice services in Sierra Leone and worldwide. Yale J. Int. Law 31:427–76 [Google Scholar]
  63. Mosse D. 2004. Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Dev. Change 35:639–71 [Google Scholar]
  64. Ohnesorge J. 2007. The rule of law. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:99–114 [Google Scholar]
  65. Pahuja S. 2004. Power and the rule of law in the global context. Melb. Univ. Law Rev. 28:232–52 [Google Scholar]
  66. Peerenboom R. 2009. The future of rule of law: challenges and prospects for the field. Hague J. Rule Law 1:15–14 [Google Scholar]
  67. Peerenboom R, Zürn M, Nollkaemper A. 2012. Conclusion: from rule of law promotion to rule of law dynamics. Rule of Law Dynamics in an Era of International and Transnational Governance M Zürn, A Nollkaemper, R Peerenboom 305–24 Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Porter D, Isser D, Berg L-A. 2013. The justice-security-development nexus: theory and practice in fragile and conflict-affected states. Hague J. Rule Law 5:2310–28 [Google Scholar]
  69. Pouligny B. 2005. Civil society and post-conflict peacebuilding: ambiguities of international programmes aimed at building ‘new’ societies. Secur. Dialogue 36:4495–510 [Google Scholar]
  70. Pritchett L. 2013. The Rebirth of Education: Schooling Ain't Learning Washington, DC: Cent. Global Dev.
  71. Pritchett L, Woolcock M. 2004. Solutions when the solution is the problem: arraying the disarray in development. World Dev. 32:2191–212 [Google Scholar]
  72. Pritchett L, Woolcock M, Andrews M. 2013. Looking like a state: techniques of persistent failure in building state capability for implementation. J. Dev. Stud. 49:11–18 [Google Scholar]
  73. Rajagopal B. 2008. Invoking the rule of law in post-conflict rebuilding: a critical examination. Wm. Mary Law Rev. 49:41347–76 [Google Scholar]
  74. Rao V, Woolcock M. 2007. The disciplinary monopoly in development research at the World Bank. Glob. Gov. 13:4479–84 [Google Scholar]
  75. Raz J. 1977. The rule of law and its virtue. Law Q. Rev. 93:195–202 [Google Scholar]
  76. Raz J. 2009. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  77. Rodríguez-Garavito CA. 2005. Global governance and labor rights: codes of conduct and anti-sweatshop struggles in global apparel factories in Mexico and Guatemala. Polit. Soc. 33:2203–333 [Google Scholar]
  78. Rondinelli DA. 1983. Development Projects as Policy Experiments: An Adaptive Approach to Development Administration New York: Methuen Young
  79. Rose N, Valverde M. 1998. Governed by law?. Soc. Legal Stud. 7:4541–51 [Google Scholar]
  80. Sabel CF. 1993. Learning by monitoring: the institutions of economic development Work. Pap. #102, Cent. Law Econ. Stud., Columbia Univ. School Law
  81. Sage C, Menzies N, Woolcock M. 2010. Taking the rules of the game seriously: mainstreaming justice in development. Legal Empowerment: Practitioners' Perspectives S Golub 19–37 Rome: Int. Dev. Law Organ. [Google Scholar]
  82. Samuels K. 2005. Post-conflict peace-building and constitution-making. Chic. J. Int. Law 6:663–82 [Google Scholar]
  83. Sannerholm R. 2007. Legal, judicial and administrative reforms in post-conflict societies: beyond the rule of law template. J. Confl. Secur. Law 12:165–94 [Google Scholar]
  84. Santos A. 2006. The World Bank's uses of the “rule of law” promise in economic development. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal DM Trubek, A Santos 253–300 Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  85. Selznick P. 1999. Legal cultures and the rule of law. The Rule of Law after Communism M Krygier, A Czarnota, pp. 21–38 Farnham, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  86. Sen A. 2006. What is the role of legal and judicial reform in the development process?. World Bank Legal Review 2 Law, Equity and Development C Sage, M Woolcock 33–50 Washington, DC: Martinus Nijhoff, World Bank [Google Scholar]
  87. Simon WH. 2004. Solving problems versus claiming rights: the pragmatist challenge to legal liberalism. Wm. Mary Law Rev. 46:127–212 [Google Scholar]
  88. Soros G, Abed FH. 2012. The rule of law can rid the world of poverty and injustice. Financial Times Sept. 27 13
  89. Stewart R, Knaus G. 2011. Can Intervention Work? New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  90. Stromseth J. 2007. Post-conflict rule of law building: the need for a multi-layered, synergistic approach. Wm. Mary Law Rev. 49:1443–71 [Google Scholar]
  91. Suhrke A. 2007. Reconstruction as modernisation: the ‘post-conflict’ project in Afghanistan. Third World Q. 28:71291–308 [Google Scholar]
  92. Tamanaha B. 2004. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  93. Tamanaha B. 2011. The primacy of society and the failures of law and development. Cornell Int. Law J. 44:209–47 [Google Scholar]
  94. Tamanaha B, Sage C, Woolcock M. 2012. Legal Pluralism and Development: Scholars and Practitioners in Dialogue New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  95. Thompson EP. 1975. Whigs and Hunters. The Origins of the Black Acts New York: Pantheon Books
  96. Trebilcock MJ, Daniels RJ. 2008. Rule of Law Reform and Development: Charting the Fragile Path of Progress Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
  97. Trubek D, Galanter M. 1974. Scholars in self-estrangement: some reflections on the crisis in law and development studies in the United States. Wis. Law Rev. 4:1062–102 [Google Scholar]
  98. Unger RM. 1996. What Should Legal Analysis Become? Brooklyn, NY: Verso
  99. Unger RM. 2000. Democracy Realized: The Progressive Alternative Brooklyn, NY: Verso
  100. Waldron J. 2002. Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)?. Law Philos. 21:137–64 [Google Scholar]
  101. Weber M. 1947. The Theory of Economic and Social Organization trans. AM Henderson, T Parsons New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  102. Weber M. 1968. On Charisma and Institution Building Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  103. Zoellick R. 2010. Opening address to the inaugural meeting of the International Corruption Hunters Alliance. Presented at Meet. Int. Corrupt. Hunt. Alliance, 1st, Dec. 7, Washington, DC. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/speech/2010/12/07/world-bank-group-president-robert-b-zoellick-remarks-international-corruption-hunters-alliance
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121550
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error