Diachronic Semantics

Literature Cited

1. Andersen H. 2001. Actualization and the (uni)directionality. Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress Andersen H. 225–48 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
2. Aristar A. 1996. The relationship between dative and locative: Kuryłowicz’s argument from a typological perspective. Diachronica 13:207–24 [Google Scholar]
3. Beck S, Berezovskaya P, Pflugfelder K. 2009. The use of again in 19th-century English and Present Day English. Syntax 12:193–214 [Google Scholar]
4. Benz A, Jäger G, van Rooij R. 2006. Game Theory and Pragmatics New York: Palgrave Macmillan
5. Blevins J. 2004. Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns Cambridge, UK: Univ. Press
6. Blevins J. 2006. A theoretical synopsis of evolutionary phonology. Theor. Linguist. 32:117–66 [Google Scholar]
7. Blutner R. 2000. Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. J. Semant. 17:189–216 [Google Scholar]
8. Blutner R. 2004. Pragmatics and the lexicon. Handbook of Pragmatics Horn L, Ward G. 488–514 Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
9. Brinton LJ, Traugott EC. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
10. Bybee J. 1994. The grammaticization of zero: asymmetries in tense and aspect systems. Perspectives on Grammaticalization Pagliuca W. 235–54 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
11. Bybee J. 2003. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure Tomasello M. 145–67 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
12. Bybee J. 2006. From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language 82:711–33 [Google Scholar]
13. Bybee J. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
14. Bybee J, Dahl Ö. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Stud. Lang. 13:51–103 [Google Scholar]
15. Bybee J, Perkins R, Pagliuca W. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
16. Clark E. 1978. Locationals: a study of ‘existential,’ ‘locative,’ and ‘possessive’ sentences. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 4: Syntax, ed. J Greenberg, pp. 85–126. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
17. Comrie B. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
18. Condoravdi C. 2009. The informativity of negative assertions and the rise of NPIs. Presented at 3rd Int. Conf. Mod. Greek Dialects Linguist. Theory, Patras, Greece
19. Condoravdi C, Deo A. 2014. Aspect shifts in Indo-Aryan and trajectories of semantic change. Language Change at the Syntax–Semantics Interface Gianollo C, Jäger A, Penka D. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter In press [Google Scholar]
20. Croft W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
21. Dahl Ö. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems Oxford, UK: Blackwell
22. Dahl Ö. 2000. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
23. Dahl Ö. 2001. Inflationary effects in language and elsewhere. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure Bybee J, Hopper P. 2471–80 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
24. Deo A. 2009. Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: partitions as quanticational domains. Linguist. Philos. 32:475–521 [Google Scholar]
25. Deo A. 2014. Formal semantics/pragmatics and language change. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics Bowern C, Evans B. chapter 17. Oxford, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
26. Deo A. The semantic and pragmatic underpinnings of grammaticalization paths: the progressive and the imperfective. Semant. Pragmat. Forthcoming [Google Scholar]
27. Devos M, van der Auwera J. 2013. Jespersen cycles in Bantu: double and triple negation. J. Afr. Lang. Linguist. 34:205–74 [Google Scholar]
28. Eckardt R. 2001. Reanalysing selbst. Nat. Lang. Semant. 9:371–412 [Google Scholar]
29. Eckardt R. 2006. Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
30. Franke M. 2009. Signal to act: game theory in pragmatics. PhD thesis, Univ. Amsterdam. 298 pp.
31. Ginzburg J. 1995a. Resolving questions. I. Linguist. Philos 18:567–609 [Google Scholar]
32. Ginzburg J. 1995b. Resolving questions. II. Linguist. Philos 18:459–527 [Google Scholar]
33. Givón T. 1971. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: an archeologist’s field trip. Proceedings of the 7th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society Adams D, Campbell MA, Cohen V, Lovins J, Maxwell E et al.394–415 Chicago: Chicago Linguist. Soc. [Google Scholar]
34. Givón T. 1979. On Understanding Grammar New York: Academic
35. Goldsmith J, Woisetschläger E. 1982. The logic of the English progressive. Linguist. Inq. 13:79–89 [Google Scholar]
36. Grice PH. 1967. Logic and conversation. The William James Lectures41–58 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
37. Groenendijk J, Stokhof M. 1984. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. PhD thesis, Univ. Amsterdam. 566 pp .
38. Harris AC, Campbell L. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
39. Haspelmath M. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible?. Linguistics 37:1043–68 [Google Scholar]
40. Heine B. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
41. Heine B. 1997. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
42. Heine B. 2003. Grammaticalization. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics Joseph B, Janda R. 575–601 Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
43. Heine B, Claudi U, Hünnemeyer F. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
44. Hopper P. 1998. Emergent grammar. The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 1: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure Tomasello M. 155–75 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
45. Hopper PJ, Traugott EC. 2003. Grammaticalization Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
46. Horn L. 1984. Towards a new taxonomy of pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications Schiffrin D. 11–42 Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
47. Horn L. 1989. A Natural History of Negation Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
48. Horn L. 2005. Current issues in neo-Gricean pragmatics. Intercult. Pragmat. 2:191–204 [Google Scholar]
49. Horn L, Abbott B. 2012. <the, a>: (in)definiteness and implicature. In Reference and Referring, ed. W Kabasenche, M O’Rourke, M Slater, pp. 325–56. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
50. Jäger G. 2007. Evolutionary game theory and typology: a case study. Language 83:74–109 [Google Scholar]
51. Jäger G, Rosenbach A. 2008. Priming and unidirectional language change. Theor. Linguist. 34:85–113 [Google Scholar]
52. Janda R. 2001. Beyond “pathways” and “unidirectionality” on the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Lang. Sci 23:265–340 [Google Scholar]
53. Jespersen O. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages Copenhagen: Luno
54. Joseph B. 2001. Is there such a thing as grammaticalization?. Lang. Sci 23:163–86 [Google Scholar]
55. Keenan EL. 2002a. An historical explanation of some binding thoretical facts in English. The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory Moore J, Polinsky M. 152–89 Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf. [Google Scholar]
56. Keenan EL. 2002b. Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English. Studies in the History of English: A Millennial Perspective Minkova D, Stockwell R. 325–55 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
57. Keller R. 1989. Invisible-hand theory and language evolution. Lingua 77:113–27 [Google Scholar]
58. Keller R. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language Oxford, UK: Routledge
59. Kiparsky P. 2006. The amphichronic program vs. evolutionary phonology. Theor. Linguist. 32:217–36 [Google Scholar]
60. Kiparsky P, Condoravdi C. 2006. Tracking Jespersen’s cycle. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, ed. M Janse, BD Joseph, A Ralli. Mytilene, Greece: Doukas. http://web.stanford.edu/∼kiparsky/Papers/lesvosnegation.pdf .
61. Kirby S. 1999. Function, Selection and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
62. Kirby S. 2001. Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure—an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 5:102–10 [Google Scholar]
63. Levinson S. 2000. Presumptive Meanings Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
64. Lewis D. 1969. Convention Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
65. Martinet A. 1962. A Functional View of Language London: Clarendon
66. Mattausch J. 2004. On the optimization and grammaticalization of anaphora. PhD thesis, Humboldt Univ., Berlin. 185 pp .
67. Maynard Smith J, Price G. 1973. The logic of animal conflict. Nature 146:15–18 [Google Scholar]
68. Merin A. 1996. Formal semantic theory and diachronic data: a case study in grammaticalization. Arbeitsbericht SFB 340, no. 75, Univ. Stuttgart
69. Mossé F. 1938. Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique Paris: Klincksieck
70. Newmeyer F. 2001. Deconstructing grammaticalization. Lang. Sci 23:187–229 [Google Scholar]
71. Ohala J. 1989. Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. Language Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes Breivik LE, Jahr EH. 173–98 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
72. Ohala J. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives Jones C. 237–78 London: Longman [Google Scholar]
73. Parikh P. 2001. The Use of Language Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
74. Paul H. 1888. Principles of the History of Language, transl. HA Strong London: Lowrey & Co. (From Ger.) [Google Scholar]
75. Portner P. 2003. The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguist. Philos. 26:459–510 [Google Scholar]
76. Ramat P. 1992. Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics 30:549–60 [Google Scholar]
77. Roberts C. 1996. Information structure in discourse: towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Ohio State Univ. Work. Pap. Linguist. 49:91–136
78. Schaden G. 2012. Modelling the aoristic drift of the present perfect as inflation: an essay in historical pragmatics. Int. Rev. Pragmat 4:261–92 [Google Scholar]
79. Shepherd SC. 1982. From deontic to epistemic: an analysis of modals in the history of English, creoles, and language acquisition. In Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. A Ahlqvist, pp. 316–23. Amsterdam: Benjamins
80. Smith K, Kirby S, Brighton H. 2003. Iterated learning: a framework for the emergence of language. Artif. Life 9:371–86 [Google Scholar]
81. Stalnaker R. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. Semantics and Philosophy Munitz MK, Unger P. 47–62 New York: N.Y. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
82. Stalnaker R. 1978. Assertion. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics, ed. P Cole, pp. 315–32. New York: Academic
83. Stassen L. 2009. Predicative Possession Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
84. Traugott E. 1980. Meaning change in the development of grammatical markers. Lang. Sci 2:44–61 [Google Scholar]
85. Traugott E. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic–pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. Perspectives on Historical Linguistics Lehmann WP, Malkiel Y. 245–71 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
86. Traugott E. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65:31–55 [Google Scholar]
87. Traugott E. 1999. The role of pragmatics in semantic change. Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference Verschueren J. 293–102 Antwerp: Int. Pragmat. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
88. Traugott E. 2001. Legitimate counterexamples to unidirectionality. Presented at Univ. Freiburg, Oct. 17. http://www.stanford. edu/∼traugott/papers/Freiburg.Unidirect.pdf
89. Traugott E, Dasher RB. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
90. Traugott E, König E. 1991. The semantics–pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. Approaches to Grammaticalization Traugott E, Heine B. 1189–218 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
91. Traugott EC. 2011. Grammaticalization and mechanisms of change. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization Heine B, Narrog H. 401–12 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
92. Trivers R. 2011. The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception New York: Basic
93. van Rooij R. 2004a. Evolution of conventional meaning and conversational principles. Synthese 139:331–66 [Google Scholar]
94. van Rooij R. 2004b. Signalling games select Horn strategies. Linguist. Philos. 27:493–527 [Google Scholar]
95. von Fintel K. 1995. The formal semantics of grammaticalization. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society Beckman JN. 2175–98 Amherst: Univ. Mass. Dep. Linguist. [Google Scholar]
96. Vossen F, van der Auwera J. 2014. The Jespersen cycles seen from Austronesian. The Diachrony of Negation Mosegaard MB, Visconti J. 47–84 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
97. Weinreich U, Labov W, Herzog MI. 1968. Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
98. Yanovich I. 2013. Four pieces for modality, context and usage. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA. 269 pp .
99. Yu A. 2010. Perceptual compensation is correlated with individuals’ “autistic” traits: implications for models of sound change. PLOS ONE 5:e11950 [Google Scholar]
100. Zipf GK. 1949. Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley