Nonsyntactic Explanations of Island Constraints

Literature Cited

1. Abrusán M. 2011. Presuppositional and negative islands: a semantic account. Nat. Lang. Semant. 19:257–321 [Google Scholar]
2. Allwood JS. 1976/1982. The complex NP constraint in Swedish. Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages E Engdahl, E Ejerhed 15–32 Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell [Google Scholar]
3. Ambridge B, Goldberg A. 2008. The island status of clausal complements: evidence in favor of an information-structure explanation. Cogn. Linguist. 19:357–89 [Google Scholar]
4. Beck S, Rullmann H. 1999. A flexible approach to exhaustivity in questions. Nat. Lang. Semant. 7:249–98 [Google Scholar]
5. Berwick RC, Weinberg A. 1984. The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
6. Boeckx C. 2012. Syntactic Islands: Key Topics in Syntax Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
7. Bolinger D. 1972. What did John keep the car that was in?. Linguist. Inq. 3:109–14 [Google Scholar]
8. Chaves RP. 2012. On the grammar of extraction and coordination. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 30:465–512 [Google Scholar]
9. Chomsky N. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 38. The Hague, Neth: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
10. Chomsky N. 1973. Conditions on transformations. A Festschrift for Morris Halle S Anderson, P Kiparsky 232–86 New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston [Google Scholar]
11. Chomsky N. 1975. Reflections on Language New York: Pantheon
12. Chomsky N. 1986. Barriers Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
13. Comorovski I. 1989. Discourse-linking and the wh-island constraint. North East Linguist. Soc. 19:78–96 [Google Scholar]
14. Comrie B, Keenan EL. 1979. Noun phrase accessibility revisited. Language 55:649–64 [Google Scholar]
15. Dayal V. 1996. Locality in wh-Quantification Dordrecht, Neth: Kluwer
16. Deane PD. 1991. Limits to attention: a cognitive theory of island phenomena. Cogn. Linguist. 2:1–64 [Google Scholar]
17. Deane PD. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax Cognitive Linguistics Research 2 The Hague, Neth: de Gruyter
18. Emonds JE. 1970. Root and structure-preserving transformations PhD thesis, Dep. Foreign Lang. Linguist., MIT, Cambridge, MA 246
19. Erteschik-Shir N. 1973. On the nature of island constraints PhD thesis, Dep. Foreign Lang. Linguist., MIT, Cambridge, MA 175
20. Erteschik-Shir N. 1982. Extractability in Danish and the pragmatic principle of dominance. Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages E Engdahl, E Ejerhed 175–91 Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell [Google Scholar]
21. Erteschik-Shir N, Lappin S. 1979. Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theor. Linguist. 6:41–86 [Google Scholar]
22. Farrell P. 1995. Review: Paul Deane Grammar in Mind and Brain. LINGUIST List 6.1214
23. Fodor JD. 1978. Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguist. Inq. 9:427–73 [Google Scholar]
24. Fodor JD. 1984. Constraints on gaps: Is the parser a significant influence. ? In Explanations for Language Universals B Butterworth, B Comrie, Ö Dahl 9–34 Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
25. Fox D, Hackl M. 2007. The universal density of measurement. Linguist. Philos. 29:537–86 [Google Scholar]
26. Freidin R, Quicoli AC. 1989. Zero-stimulation for parameter setting. Behav. Brain Sci. 12:338–39 [Google Scholar]
27. Givón T. 1979. On Understanding Grammar New York: Academic
28. Goldberg AE. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
29. Goldberg AE. 2014. Backgrounded constituents cannot be ‘extracted’. Experimental Syntax and Island Effects J Sprouse, N Hornstein 221–38 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
30. Grosu A. 1972. The strategic content of island constraints PhD thesis, Dep. Linguist., Ohio State Univ., Columbus 229
31. Hawkins JA. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 73 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
32. Hawkins JA. 1999. Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 75:244–85 [Google Scholar]
33. Hawkins JA. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
34. Hawkins JA. 2014. Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
35. Hofmeister P, Sag IA. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86:366–415 [Google Scholar]
36. Huang C-TJ. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar PhD thesis, Dep. Linguist. Philos., MIT, Cambridge, MA 597
37. Keenan EL, Comrie B. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguist. Inq. 8:63–99 [Google Scholar]
38. Keenan EL, Comrie B. 1979. Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55:333–52 [Google Scholar]
39. Kiparsky P, Kiparsky C. 1970. Fact. Progress in Linguistics M Bierwisch, KE Heidolph 143–73 The Hague, Neth.: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
40. Kluender R. 1990. A neurophysiological investigation of wh-islands. Berkeley Linguist. Soc. 16:187–204 [Google Scholar]
41. Kluender R. 1992. Deriving island constraints from principles of predication. Island Constraints: Theory, Acquisition, and Processing H Goodluck, M Rochemont 223–58 Dordrecht, Neth: Kluwer [Google Scholar]
42. Kluender R. 1998. On the distinction between strong and weak islands: a processing perspective. Syntax and Semantics 29 The Limits of Syntax PW Culicover, L McNally 241–79 San Diego: Academic [Google Scholar]
43. Kluender R, Kutas M. 1993. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Lang. Cogn. Process. 8:573–633 [Google Scholar]
44. Koster J. 1978. Conditions, empty nodes, and markedness. Linguist. Inq. 9:551–94 [Google Scholar]
45. Kroch AS. 1989. Amount quantification, referentiality, and long wh-movement Work. pap., Univ. Penn., Philadelphia. ftp://babel.ling.upenn.edu/papers/faculty/tony_kroch/papers/amount-quant.pdf [Google Scholar]
46. Kuno S. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
47. Lakoff G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
48. Langacker RW. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar 1 Theoretical Prerequisites Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
49. Lasnik H. 1999. On the locality of movement: formalist syntax position paper. Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics 1 General Papers M Darnell, E Moravcsik, FJ Newmeyer, M Noonan, K Wheatley 33–54 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
50. Levine RD, Hukari TE. 2006. The Unity of Unbounded Dependency Construction Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
51. Marcus M. 1980. A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
52. Miller G, Chomsky N. 1963. Finitary models of language users. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology P Luce, R Bush, E Galanter 2419–92 New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
53. Milsark G. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguist. Anal. 3:1–30 [Google Scholar]
54. Morgan JL. 1975. Some interactions of syntax and pragmatics. Syntax and Semantics 3 Speech Acts P Cole, JL Morgan 289–304 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
55. Pesetsky DM. 1987. Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding. The Representation of (In)Definiteness EJ Reuland, AGB ter Meulen 98–129 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
56. Phillips C. 1996. Order and structure PhD thesis, Dep. Linguist. Philos., MIT, Cambridge, MA 306
57. Phillips C. 2004. Linguistics and linking problems. Developmental Language Disorders: From Phenotypes to Etiologies ML Rice, SF Warren 241–87 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
58. Phillips C. 2006. The real-time status of island constraints. Language 82:795–823 [Google Scholar]
59. Phillips C. 2013. Some arguments and nonarguments for reductionist accounts of syntactic phenomena. Lang. Cogn. Process. 28:156–87 [Google Scholar]
60. Phillips C. 2014. On the nature of island constraints. I. Language processing and reductionist accounts. Experimental Syntax and Island Effects J Sprouse, N Hornstein 64–108 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
61. Phillips C, Wagers MW, Lau EF. 2011. Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. Experiments at the Interfaces JT Runner 147–80 Bingley, UK: Emerald [Google Scholar]
62. Pritchett B. 1991. Subjacency in a principle-based parser. Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics RC Berwick, SP Abney, C Tenney 301–45 Dordrecht, Neth: Kluwer [Google Scholar]
63. Rizzi L. 1982 (1978). Violations of the wh-island constraint in Italian and the subjacency condition. Issues in Italian Syntax C Dubuisson, D Lightfoot, YC Morin 49–76 Dordrecht, Neth: Foris [Google Scholar]
64. Rochemont M. 1992. Bounding rightward A′ dependencies. Island Constraints: Theory, Acquisition, and Processing H Goodluck, M Rochemont 373–97 Dordrecht, Neth: Kluwer [Google Scholar]
65. Ross JR. 1985 (1967). Infinite Syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex
66. Rullmann H. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions PhD thesis, Dep. Linguist., Univ. Mass., Amherst 238 [Google Scholar]
67. Sag IA. 2010. English filler-gap constructions. Language 86:486–545 [Google Scholar]
68. Searle JR. 1974 (1972). Chomsky's revolution in linguistics. On Noam Chomsky: Critical Essays G Harman 16–24 Garden City, NY: Anchor [Google Scholar]
69. Sprouse J, Wagers M, Phillips C. 2012. A test of the relation between working memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language 88:82–123 [Google Scholar]
70. Stowe LA. 1986. Parsing WH-constructions. Lang. Cogn. Process. 1:227–45 [Google Scholar]
71. Szabolcsi A. 2006. Strong versus weak islands. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax M Everaert, H van Riemsdijk 479–531 Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
72. Szabolcsi A, den Dikken M. 1999. Islands. GLOT Int. 4/6:3–8 [Google Scholar]
73. Szabolcsi A, Zwarts F. 1993. Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. Nat. Lang. Semant. 1:235–84 [Google Scholar]
74. Szabolcsi A, Zwarts F. 1997. Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. Ways of Scope Taking A Szabolcsi 109–55 Dordrecht, Neth: Kluwer [Google Scholar]
75. Takami K-I. 1988. Preposition stranding: arguments against syntactic analyses and an alternative functional explanation. Lingua 76:299–335 [Google Scholar]
76. Truswell R. 2007. Extraction from adjuncts and the structure of events. Lingua 117:1355–77 [Google Scholar]
77. Van Valin RD. 1993. A synopsis of role and reference grammar. Advances in Role and Reference Grammar RD Van Valin 1–164 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
78. Van Valin RD. 1998. The acquisition of WH-questions and the mechanisms of language acquisition. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure M Tomasello 334–78 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
79. Van Valin RD, LaPolla RJ. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
80. Wagers M, Phillips C. 2009. Multiple dependencies and the role of grammar in real-time comprehension. J. Linguist. 45:395–433 [Google Scholar]
81. Ward G, Birner B. 1995. Definiteness and the English existential. Language 71:722–42 [Google Scholar]
82. Yoshida M, Kazanina N, Pablos L, Sturt P. 2014. On the origin of islands. Lang. Cogn. Neuroisci. 29:761–70 [Google Scholar]