1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  4. Volume 2, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Volume 2, 2015

Time in Individual-Level Organizational Studies: What Is It, How Is It Used, and Why Isn’t It Exploited More Often?

Abstract

Time is an important concern in organizational science, yet we lack a systematic review of research on time within individual-level studies. Following a brief introduction, we consider conceptual ideas about time and elaborate on why temporal factors are important for micro-organizational studies. Then, in two sections—one devoted to time-related constructs and the other to the experience of time as a within-person phenomenon—we selectively review both theoretical and empirical studies. On the basis of this review, we note which topics have received more or less attention to inform our evaluation of the current state of research on time. Finally, we develop an agenda for future research to help move micro-organizational research to a completely temporal view.

Keyword(s): change, dynamic, longitudinal, temporal, time, timing
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111245
2015-04-10
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/2/1/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111245.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111245&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Allen TD, Cho E, Meier LL. 2014. Work-family boundary dynamics. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:99–121 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amabile T, Barsade S, Mueller J, Staw B. 2005. Affect and creativity at work. Adm. Sci. Q. 50:3367–403 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ancona DG, Goodman PS, Lawrence BS, Tushman ML. 2001a. Time: a new research lens. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:4645–63 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ancona DG, Okhuysen GA, Perlow LA. 2001b. Taking time to integrate temporal research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:4512–29 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashforth BE, Harrison SH, Sluss DM. 2014. Becoming: the interaction of socialization and identity in organizations over time. Time and Work: How Time Impacts Individuals Shipp AJ, Fried Y. 11–39 New York: Psychology Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel AI. 2014. Burnout and work engagement: the JD-R approach. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:389–411 [Google Scholar]
  7. Balliet D, Ferris DL. 2013. Ostracism and prosocial behavior: a social dilemma perspective. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 120:2298–308 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barling J, Cheung D, Kelloway EK. 1996. Time management and achievement striving interact to predict car sales performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 81:6821–26 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnes CM, Wagner DT. 2009. Changing to daylight saving time cuts into sleep and increases workplace injuries. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:51305–17 [Google Scholar]
  10. Beal DJ. 2012. Industrial/organizational psychology. Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life Mehl MR, Conner TS. 601–19 New York: Guilford [Google Scholar]
  11. Beal DJ, Ghandour L. 2011. Stability, change, and the stability of change in daily workplace affect. J. Organ. Behav. 32:4526–46 [Google Scholar]
  12. Beal DJ, Trougakos JP, Weiss HM, Dalal RS. 2013. Affect spin and the emotion regulation process at work. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:4593–605 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bentein K, Vandenberghe C, Vandenberg R, Stinglhamber F. 2005. The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: a latent growth modeling approach. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:3468–82 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bergeron DM, Shipp AJ, Rosen B, Furst SA. 2013. Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: the cost of being a good citizen. J. Manag. 39:4958–84 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bhaskar-Shrinivas P, Harrison DA, Shaffer MA, Luk DM. 2005. Adjusting to international assignments: theory-based extensions and accumulations of evidence. Acad. Manag. J. 48:257–80 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bliese PD, Ployhart RE. 2002. Growth modeling using random coefficient models: model building, testing, and illustrations. Organ. Res. Methods 5:362–87 [Google Scholar]
  17. Blount S, Janicik GA. 2001. When plans change: examining how people evaluate timing changes in work organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:4566–85 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bluedorn AC. 2002. The Human Organization of Time: Temporal Realities and Experience Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  19. Bluedorn AC, Denhardt RB. 1988. Time and organizations. J. Manag. 14:2299–320 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bluedorn AC, Jaussi KS. 2008. Leaders, followers, and time. Leadersh. Q. 19:6654–68 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bluedorn AC, Kalliath TJ, Strube MJ, Martin GD. 1999. Polychronicity and the inventory of polychronic values (IPV): the development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. J. Manag. Psychol. 14:3/4205–31 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bluedorn AC, Martin G. 2008. The time frames of entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Ventur. 23:1–20 [Google Scholar]
  23. Boswell WR, Boudreau JW, Tichy J. 2005. The relationship between employee job change and job satisfaction: the honeymoon-hangover effect. J. Appl. Psychol. 90882–92
  24. Boswell WR, Shipp AJ, Payne SC, Youngcourt SS. 2009. Changes in newcomer job satisfaction over time: examining the pattern of honeymoons and hangovers. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:844–58 [Google Scholar]
  25. Chan D. 1998. The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: an integrative approach incorporating longitudinal means and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organ. Res. Methods 1:421–83 [Google Scholar]
  26. Chan D. 2014. Time and methodological choices. Time and Work, Vol. 2: How Time Impacts Groups, Organizations and Methodological Choices Shipp AJ, Fried Y. 146–76 London: Taylor & Francis [Google Scholar]
  27. Chan D, Schmitt N. 2000. Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: a latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. J. Appl. Psychol. 85:190–210 [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen G. 2005. Newcomer adaptation in teams: multilevel antecedents and outcomes. Acad. Manag. J. 48:1101–16 [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen G, Ployhart RE, Cooper-Thomas HD, Anderson N, Bliese PD. 2011. The power of momentum: a new model of dynamic relationships between job satisfaction change and turnover decisions. Acad. Manag. J. 54:159–81 [Google Scholar]
  30. Claessens BJ, Van Eerde W, Rutte CG, Roe RA. 2004. Planning behavior and perceived control of time at work. J. Organ. Behav. 25:8937–50 [Google Scholar]
  31. Claessens BJ, Van Eerde W, Rutte CG, Roe RA. 2010. Things to do today…: a daily diary study on task completion at work. Appl. Psychol. 59:2273–95 [Google Scholar]
  32. Cojuharenco I, Patient D, Bashshur MR. 2011. Seeing the “forest” or the “trees” of organizational justice: effects of temporal perspective on employee concerns about unfair treatment at work. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 116:117–31 [Google Scholar]
  33. Conte JM, Gintoft JN. 2005. Polychronicity, big five personality dimensions, and sales performance. Hum. Perform. 18:4427–44 [Google Scholar]
  34. Conte JM, Jacobs RR. 2003. Validity evidence linking polychronicity and big five personality dimensions to absence, lateness, and supervisory performance ratings. Hum. Perform. 16:2107–29 [Google Scholar]
  35. Conte JM, Landy FJ, Mathieu JE. 1995. Time urgency: conceptual and construct development. J. Appl. Psychol. 80:1178–85 [Google Scholar]
  36. Conte JM, Mathieu JE, Landy FJ. 1998. The nomological and predictive validity of time urgency. J. Organ. Behav. 19:11–13 [Google Scholar]
  37. Das TK. 1987. Strategic planning and individual temporal orientation. Strateg. Manag. J. 8:2203–9 [Google Scholar]
  38. Day DV, Sin HP. 2011. Longitudinal tests of an integrative model of leader development: charting and understanding developmental trajectories. Leadersh. Q. 22:3545–60 [Google Scholar]
  39. DeVoe SE, Pfeffer J. 2007. When time is money: the effect of hourly payment on the evaluation of time. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 104:11–13 [Google Scholar]
  40. DeVoe SE, Pfeffer J. 2011. Time is tight: how higher economic value of time increases feelings of time pressure. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:4665–76 [Google Scholar]
  41. Dunford BB, Shipp AJ, Boss RW, Angermeier I, Boss AD. 2012. Is burnout static or dynamic? A career transition perspective of employee burnout trajectories. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:3637–50 [Google Scholar]
  42. Edwards JR, Baglioni AJ, Cooper CL. 1990. Examining the relationships among self-report measures of the Type A behavior pattern: the effects of dimensionality, measurement error, and differences in underlying constructs. J. Appl. Psychol. 75:4440–54 [Google Scholar]
  43. Evans JA, Kunda G, Barley SR. 2004. Beach time, bridge time, and billable hours: the temporal structure of technical contracting. Adm. Sci. Q. 49:11–38 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ferris DL, Spence JR, Brown DJ, Heller D. 2012. Interpersonal injustice and workplace deviance: the role of esteem threat. J. Manag. 38:61788–811 [Google Scholar]
  45. Firth BM, Chen G, Kirkman B, Kim H. 2014. Newcomers abroad: expatriate adjustment during early phases of international assignments. Acad. Manag. J 57:280–300 [Google Scholar]
  46. Foo MD, Uy MA, Baron RA. 2009. How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs’ affect and venture effort. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:41086–94 [Google Scholar]
  47. Fried Y, Slowik LH. 2004. Enriching goal setting theory with time: an integrated approach. Acad. Manag. Rev. 29:404–22 [Google Scholar]
  48. Fuller JA, Stanton JM, Fisher GG, Spitzmüller C, Russell SS, Smith PC. 2003. A lengthy look at the daily grind: time series analyses of events, mood, stress, and satisfaction. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:1019–33 [Google Scholar]
  49. George G, Haas MR, Pentland A. 2014. Big data and management. Acad. Manag. J. 57:321–26 [Google Scholar]
  50. George JM, Jones GR. 2000. The role of time in theory and theory building. J. Manag. 26:4657–84 [Google Scholar]
  51. Gersick CJ. 1988. Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development. Acad. Manag. J. 31:19–41 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gevers J, Mohammed S, Baytalskaya N. 2013. The conceptualisation and measurement of pacing styles. Appl. Psychol. doi: 10.1111/apps.12016 [Google Scholar]
  53. Gevers JM, Rutte CG, Van Eerde W. 2006. Meeting deadlines in work groups: implicit and explicit mechanisms. Appl. Psychol. 55:152–72 [Google Scholar]
  54. Goodman PS, Lawrence BS, Ancona DG, Tushman ML. 2001. Introduction to the Special Issue. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:4507–11 [Google Scholar]
  55. Grant AM, Wrzesniewski A. 2010. I won’t let you down… or will I? Core self-evaluations, other-orientation, anticipated guilt and gratitude, and job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:1108–21 [Google Scholar]
  56. Guo TJ, Ji LJ, Spina L, Zhang RZ. 2012. Culture, temporal focus, and values of the past and the future. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38:81030–40 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hausknecht JP, Sturman MC, Roberson QM. 2011. Justice as a dynamic construct: effects of individual trajectories on distal work outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:4872–80 [Google Scholar]
  58. Hecht TD, Allen NJ. 2005. Exploring links between polychronicity and well-being from the perspective of person–job fit: Does it matter if you prefer to do only one thing at a time?. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 98:2155–78 [Google Scholar]
  59. Helson H. 1964. Adaptation-Level Theory Oxford, UK: Harper & Row
  60. Holman EA, Silver RC. 1998. Getting “stuck” in the past: temporal orientation and coping with trauma. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol 74:51146–63 [Google Scholar]
  61. Ibarra H, Barbulescu R. 2010. Identity as narrative: prevalence, effectiveness, and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:1135–54 [Google Scholar]
  62. Ilies R, Judge TA. 2002. Understanding the dynamic relationships among personality, mood, and job satisfaction: a field experience sampling study. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 89:21119–39 [Google Scholar]
  63. Ilies R, Judge TA. 2005. Goal regulation across time: the effects of feedback and affect. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:3453–67 [Google Scholar]
  64. Jansen KJ, Kristof-Brown AL. 2005. Marching to the beat of a different drummer: examining the impact of pacing congruence. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 97:293–105 [Google Scholar]
  65. Johns G. 2006. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:2386–408 [Google Scholar]
  66. Johnson RE, Lanaj K, Barnes CM. 2014. The good and bad of being fair: effects of procedural and interpersonal justice behaviors on regulatory resources. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:639–50 [Google Scholar]
  67. Joireman J, Kamdar D, Daniels D, Duell B. 2006. Good citizens to the end? It depends: Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on organizational citizenship behaviors. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:61307–20 [Google Scholar]
  68. Judge TA, Simon LS, Hurst C, Kelley K. 2014. What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: relationship of work motivations and behaviors to within-individual variation in the five-factor model of personality. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:2199–221 [Google Scholar]
  69. Kahneman D. 1999. Objective happiness. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology Diener E, Schwarz N, Kahneman D. 3–27 New York: Sage [Google Scholar]
  70. Kammeyer-Mueller JD, Wanberg CR, Glomb TM, Ahlburg D. 2005. The role of temporal shifts in turnover processes: It’s about time. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:644–58 [Google Scholar]
  71. Kuhn TS. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press
  72. Kühnel J, Sonnentag S. 2011. How long do you benefit from vacation? A closer look at the fade-out of vacation effects. J. Organ. Behav. 32:1125–43 [Google Scholar]
  73. Lance CE, Vandenberg RJ, Self RM. 2000. Latent growth models of individual change: the case of newcomer adjustment. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 83:1107–40 [Google Scholar]
  74. Lang JW, Bliese PD. 2009. General mental ability and two types of adaptation to unforeseen change: applying discontinuous growth models to the task-change paradigm. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:2411–28 [Google Scholar]
  75. Lapierre LM, Allen TD. 2012. Control at work, control at home, and planning behavior implications for work–family conflict. J. Manag. 38:51500–16 [Google Scholar]
  76. Lewin K. 1943. Defining the ‘field at a given time.'. Psychol. Rev. 50:292–310 [Google Scholar]
  77. Loi R, Yang J, Diefendorff JM. 2009. Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: a multilevel investigation. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:3770–81 [Google Scholar]
  78. Macan TH. 1994. Time management: test of a process model. J. Appl. Psychol. 79:3381–91 [Google Scholar]
  79. Major VS, Klein KJ, Ehrhart MG. 2002. Work time, work interference with family, and psychological distress. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:3427–36 [Google Scholar]
  80. Mathieu JE, Tannenbaum SI, Donsbach JS, Alliger GM. 2014. A review and integration of team composition models: moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. J. Manag. 40:130–60 [Google Scholar]
  81. McArdle JJ. 2009. Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60:577–605 [Google Scholar]
  82. McGrath JE, Kelly JR. 1986. Time and Human Interaction: Toward a Social Psychology of Time New York: Guilford
  83. McGrath JE, Rotchford NL. 1983. Time and behavior in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 5:57–101 [Google Scholar]
  84. McGrath JE, Tschan F. 2004. Temporal Matters in Social Psychology: Examining the Role of Time in the Lives of Groups and Individuals Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
  85. Mitchell TR, James LR. 2001. Building better theory: time and the specification of when things happen. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:4530–47 [Google Scholar]
  86. Mitchell TR, Thompson L, Peterson E, Cronk R. 1997. Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: the “rosy view.”. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 33:421–48 [Google Scholar]
  87. Murray HA. 1938. Explorations in Personality: a Clinical and Experimental Study of Fifty Men of College Age New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  88. Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Ilies R. 2009. The development of leader-member exchanges: exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 108:2256–66 [Google Scholar]
  89. Northcraft GB, Schmidt AM, Ashford SJ. 2011. Feedback and the rationing of time and effort among competing tasks. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:51076–86 [Google Scholar]
  90. Okhuysen GA, Bonardi J. 2011. Editors’ comments: the challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36:16–11 [Google Scholar]
  91. Okhuysen GA, Galinsky AD, Uptigrove TA. 2003. Saving the worst for last: the effect of time horizon on the efficiency of negotiating benefits and burdens. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 91:2269–79 [Google Scholar]
  92. Perlow LA. 1999. The time famine: toward a sociology of work time. Adm. Sci. Q. 44:157–81 [Google Scholar]
  93. Pettigrew AM. 1990. Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ. Sci 1:3267–92 [Google Scholar]
  94. Pitariu A, Ployhart RE. 2010. Explaining change: theorizing and testing dynamic mediated longitudinal relationships. J. Manag. 36:405–29 [Google Scholar]
  95. Ployhart RE, Vandenberg RJ. 2010. Longitudinal research: the theory, design, and analysis of change. J. Manag. 36:94–120 [Google Scholar]
  96. Ployhart RE, Ward AK. 2011. The “quick start guide” for conducting and publishing longitudinal research. J. Bus. Psychol 26:4413–22 [Google Scholar]
  97. Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB. 2006. Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad. Manag. J. 49:2235–62 [Google Scholar]
  98. Quintens L, Matthyssens P. 2010. Involving the process dimensions of time in case-based research. Ind. Mark. Manag. 39:191–99 [Google Scholar]
  99. Rapp AA, Bachrach DG, Rapp TL. 2013. The influence of time management skill on the curvilinear relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and task performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:4668–77 [Google Scholar]
  100. Roberts BW, Walton KE, Viechtbauer W. 2006. Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol. Bull. 132:11–25 [Google Scholar]
  101. Rodell JB, Colquitt JA. 2009. Looking ahead in times of uncertainty: the role of anticipatory justice in an organizational change context. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:4989–1002 [Google Scholar]
  102. Roe RA. 2008. Time in applied psychology: studying what happens rather than what is. Eur. Psychol. 13:137–52 [Google Scholar]
  103. Roe RA. 2014. Time, performance and motivation. Time and Work: How Time Impacts Individuals Shipp AJ, Fried Y. 63–110 New York: Psychology Press [Google Scholar]
  104. Rousseau DM, Fried Y. 2001. Location, location, location: contextualizing organizational research. J. Organ. Behav. 22:1–13 [Google Scholar]
  105. Schmidt AM, DeShon RP. 2007. What to do? The effects of discrepancies, incentives, and time on dynamic goal prioritization. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:4928–41 [Google Scholar]
  106. Schmidt AM, Dolis CM, Tolli AP. 2009. A matter of time: individual differences, contextual dynamics, and goal progress effects on multiple-goal self-regulation. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:3692–709 [Google Scholar]
  107. Schor JB. 1991. The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure New York: Basic Books
  108. Schriber JB, Gutek BA. 1987. Some time dimensions of work: measurement of an underlying aspect of organization culture. J. Appl. Psychol. 72:4642–50 [Google Scholar]
  109. Shipp AJ, Edwards JR, Lambert LS. 2009. Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: the subjective experience of past, present, and future. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 110:1–22 [Google Scholar]
  110. Shipp AJ, Fried Y. 2014. Time research in management: using temporal ambassadors to translate ideas into reality. Time and Work: How Time Impacts Individuals Shipp AJ, Fried Y. 1–10 New York: Psychology Press [Google Scholar]
  111. Shipp AJ, Jansen KJ. 2011. Reinterpreting time in fit theory: crafting and recrafting narratives of fit in medias res. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36:176–101 [Google Scholar]
  112. Singer JD, Willett JB. 2003. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  113. Slocombe TE, Bluedorn AC. 1999. Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work‐unit polychronicity. J. Organ. Behav. 20:175–99 [Google Scholar]
  114. Sondak H, Neale MA, Pinkley R. 1995. The negotiated allocation of benefits and burdens: the impact of outcome valence, contribution, and relationship. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 64:3249–60 [Google Scholar]
  115. Sonnentag S. 2012. Time in organizational research: catching up on a long neglected topic in order to improve theory. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 2:361–68 [Google Scholar]
  116. Spence JR, Ferris DL, Brown DJ, Heller D. 2011. Understanding daily citizenship behaviors: a social comparison perspective. J. Organ. Behav. 32:4547–71 [Google Scholar]
  117. Sturman MC, Trevor CO. 2001. The implications of linking the dynamic performance and turnover literatures. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:4684–96 [Google Scholar]
  118. Taylor SG, Bedeian AG, Cole MS, Zhang Z. 2014. Developing and testing a dynamic model of workplace incivility change. J. Manag. In press [Google Scholar]
  119. Tjosvold D, Wong ASH, Chen NYF. 2014. Constructively managing conflict in organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:545–68 [Google Scholar]
  120. Toker S, Biron M. 2012. Job burnout and depression: unraveling their temporal relationship and considering the role of physical activity. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:699–710 [Google Scholar]
  121. Trougakos J, Hideg I, Cheng G, Beal DJ. 2014. Lunch breaks unpacked: the role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Acad. Manag. J. 57:405–21 [Google Scholar]
  122. Wallace JE. 1997. It's about time: a study of hours worked and work spillover among law firm lawyers. J. Vocat. Behav. 50:2227–48 [Google Scholar]
  123. Waller MJ, Conte JM, Gibson CB, Carpenter MA. 2001. The effect of individual perceptions of deadlines on team performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:4586–600 [Google Scholar]
  124. Waller MJ, Giambatista RC, Zellmer-Bruhn ME. 1999. The effects of individual time urgency on group polychronicity. J. Manag. Psychol. 14:3/4244–57 [Google Scholar]
  125. Wanberg C, Basbug G, Van Hooft EA, Samtani A. 2012. Navigating the black hole: explicating layers of job search context and adaptational responses. Pers. Psychol. 65:4887–926 [Google Scholar]
  126. Weiss HM, Nicholas JP, Daus CS. 1999. An examination of the joint effects of affective experiences and job beliefs on job satisfaction and variations in affective experiences over time. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 78:11–24 [Google Scholar]
  127. Wheeler MA, Stuss DT, Tulving E. 1997. Toward a theory of episodic memory: the frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness. Psychol. Bull. 121:3331–54 [Google Scholar]
  128. Zacher H. 2014. Individual difference predictors of change in career adaptability over time. J. Vocat. Behav. 84:2188–98 [Google Scholar]
  129. Zaheer S, Albert S, Zaheer A. 1999. Time scales and organizational theory. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24:4725–41 [Google Scholar]
  130. Zerubavel E. 1981. Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  131. Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. 1999. Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 77:61271–88 [Google Scholar]
  132. Zyphur MJ, Chaturvedi S, Arvey RD. 2008. Job performance over time is a function of latent trajectories and previous performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:1217–24 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111245
Loading
Time in Individual-Level Organizational Studies: What Is It, How Is It Used, and Why Isn’t It Exploited More Often?
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2, 237 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111245
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111245
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111245
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error