1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  4. Volume 2, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Volume 2, 2015

Organizational Routines as Patterns of Action: Implications for Organizational Behavior

Abstract

In recent years, organizational routines have been studied in a wide variety of settings, including law, medicine, accounting, and engineering. This fieldwork has led to a broader understanding of organizational routines as repetitive, recognizable patterns of interdependent action, carried out by multiple actors. Routines are seen as practices that are situated in a social/material context. Within an organizational routine, individual actions are situated in a broader pattern of actions that can be represented as a network. Recognizing patterns of interdependent action as a unit of analysis entails a research paradigm that has implications for a range of topics in organizational behavior.

Keyword(s): behavioral decision making, narrative network, patterns of action, practice theory
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111412
2015-04-10
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/2/1/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111412.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111412&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott A. 1992. From causes to events: notes on narrative positivism. Sociol. Methods Res. 20:4428–55 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbott A. 1995. Sequence analysis: new methods for old ideas. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 21:193–113 [Google Scholar]
  3. Abell P. 1987. The syntax of social life: the theory and method of comparative narratives Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Abell P, Felin T, Foss NJ. 2008. Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Manag. Decis. Econ 29:489–502 [Google Scholar]
  5. Aldrich H. 1999. Organizations Evolving Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  6. Allison C, Hayes J. 2012. The Cognitive Style Index London: Pearson
  7. Ashforth BE, Fried Y. 1988. The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Hum. Relat. 41:4305–29 [Google Scholar]
  8. Autor DH, Dorn D. 2013. The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:51553–97 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bal M. 1985. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press
  10. Becker MC. 2004. Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Ind. Corp. Change 13:643–78 [Google Scholar]
  11. Becker MC. 2005. The concept of routines: some clarifications. Camb. J. Econ. 29:249–62 [Google Scholar]
  12. Becker MC. 2008. Handbook of Organizational Routines Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
  13. Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoch SV. 2007. Organizational character: on the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci 18:2315–32 [Google Scholar]
  14. Blau P. 1955. The Dynamics of Bureaucracy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  15. Boland RJ Jr, Collopy F. 2004. Managing as Designing Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  16. Boudreau MC, Robey D. 2005. Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16:13–18 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bourdieu P. 1990. The Logic of Practice Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  18. Bresman H. 2013. Changing routines: a process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Acad. Manag. J. 56:35–61 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bromiley P. 2010. Looking at prospect theory. Strateg. Manag. J. 31:1357–70 [Google Scholar]
  20. Brown AD, Lewis MA. 2011. Identities, discipline and routines. Organ. Stud. 32:7871–95 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bruns HC. 2009. Leveraging functionality in safety routines: examining the divergence of rules and performance. Hum. Relat. 62:1399–426 [Google Scholar]
  22. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A. 2011. Race Against the Machine Lexington, MA: Dig. Front.
  23. Burns J, Quinn M. 2011. The routinisation of management controls in software. J. Manag. Control 22:15–24 [Google Scholar]
  24. Burns J, Scapens RW. 2008. Organizational routines in accounting. See Becker 2008, pp. 15–30 [Google Scholar]
  25. Chan D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psychol. 83:2234–46 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cohen MD. 2007. Reading Dewey: reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28:5773–86 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cohen MD. 2012. Perceiving and remembering routine action: fundamental micro-level origins. J. Manag. Stud. 49:1383–88 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cohen MD, Bacdayan P. 1994. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5:4554–68 [Google Scholar]
  29. Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G, Egidi M, Marengo L et al. 1996. Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: contemporary research issues. Ind. Corp. Change 5:3653–98 [Google Scholar]
  30. Cohen MD, Levinthal DA, Warglien M. 2014. Collective performance: modeling the interaction of habit-based actions. Ind. Corp. Change 23:329–60 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cohendet P, Llerena P. 2003. Routines and incentives: the role of communities in the firm. Ind. Corp. Change 12:271–97 [Google Scholar]
  32. Constantinides P, Barrett M. 2012. A narrative networks approach to understanding coordination practices in emergency response. Inf. Organ. 22:4273–94 [Google Scholar]
  33. Corsaro WA, Heise DR. 1990. Event structure models from ethnographic data. Sociol. Methodol. 20:1–57 [Google Scholar]
  34. Cyert RM, March JG. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  35. D’Adderio L. 2003. Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: the influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Ind. Corp. Change 12:321–50 [Google Scholar]
  36. D’Adderio L. 2008. The performativity of routines: theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res. Policy 37:5769–89 [Google Scholar]
  37. D’Adderio L. 2011. Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory. J. Inst. Econ 7:2197–230 [Google Scholar]
  38. D’Adderio L, Feldman MS, Lazaric N, Pentland BT. 2012. Call for papers—special issue on routine dynamics: exploring sources of stability and change in organizations. Organ. Sci. 23:61782–83 [Google Scholar]
  39. Dane E, Pratt MG. 2007. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:133–54 [Google Scholar]
  40. DeSanctis G, Poole MS. 1994. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5:2121–47 [Google Scholar]
  41. Dionysiou DD, Tsoukas H. 2013. Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: a symbolic interactionist perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38:2181–205 [Google Scholar]
  42. Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP. 2001. Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Adm. Sci. Q. 46:4685–716 [Google Scholar]
  43. Evans JSB. 2008. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59:255–78 [Google Scholar]
  44. Farjoun M. 2010. Beyond dualism: stability and change as a duality. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:2202–25 [Google Scholar]
  45. Feldman MS. 2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11:6611–29 [Google Scholar]
  46. Feldman MS. 2003. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Ind. Corp. Change 12:4727–52 [Google Scholar]
  47. Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ. 2011. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22:51240–53 [Google Scholar]
  48. Feldman MS, Pentland BT. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Adm. Sci. Q. 48:194–118 [Google Scholar]
  49. Felin T, Foss NJ. 2005. Strategic organization: a field in search of micro-foundations. Strateg. Organ 3:4441–55 [Google Scholar]
  50. Felin T, Foss NJ, Heimeriks KH, Madsen TL. 2012. Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: individuals, processes, and structure. J. Manag. Stud. 49:81351–74 [Google Scholar]
  51. Foldy EG, Buckley TR. 2010. Re-creating street-level practice: the role of routines, work groups, and team learning. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 20:23–52 [Google Scholar]
  52. Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Karnøe P. 2010. Path dependence or path creation?. J. Manag. Stud. 47:760–74 [Google Scholar]
  53. Gaskin JE, Schutz DM, Berente N, Lyytinen K. 2010. The DNA of design work: physical and digital materiality in project-based design organizations. Acad. Manag. Proc 2010:11–6 [Google Scholar]
  54. Geertz C. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture New York: Basic Books
  55. Gersick CJG, Hackman JR. 1990. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 47:65–97 [Google Scholar]
  56. Gherardi S. 2000. Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization 7:2211–23 [Google Scholar]
  57. Giddens A. 1984. The Constitution of Society Oxford, UK: Polity
  58. Gigerenzer G. 2000. Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  59. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM. 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  60. Goh JM, Gao G, Agarwal R. 2011. Evolving work routines: adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Inf. Syst. Res. 22:3565–85 [Google Scholar]
  61. Greenhalgh T. 2008. Role of routines in collaborative work in healthcare organisations. BMJ 337:a2448 [Google Scholar]
  62. Greve HR. 2013. Microfoundations of management: behavioral strategies and levels of rationality in organizational action. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 27:2103–19 [Google Scholar]
  63. Grote G. 2012. Safety management in different high-risk domains—all the same?. Saf. Sci. 50:101983–92 [Google Scholar]
  64. Grote G, Weichbrodt JC, Günter H, Zala-Mezö E, Künzle B. 2009. Coordination in high-risk organizations: the need for flexible routines. Cogn. Technol. Work 11:117–27 [Google Scholar]
  65. Gupta N, Hollingshead AB. 2010. Differentiated versus integrated transactive memory effectiveness: It depends on the task. Group Dyn. 14:4384–98 [Google Scholar]
  66. Hackman JR, Wageman R. 1995. Total quality management: empirical, conceptual and practical issues. Adm. Sci. Q. 40:309–43 [Google Scholar]
  67. Hærem T, Pentland BT, Miller KD. 2015. Task complexity: extending a core concept. Acad. Manag. Rev In press. doi: 10.5465/amr.2013.0350 [Google Scholar]
  68. Hayes GR, Lee CP, Dourish P. 2011. Organizational routines, innovation, and flexibility: the application of narrative networks to dynamic workflow. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80:8e161–77 [Google Scholar]
  69. Hendricks WO. 1973. Methodology of narrative structural analysis. Semiotica 7:163–84 [Google Scholar]
  70. Hodgkinson GP, Sadler-Smith E, Burke LA, Claxton G, Sparrow PR. 2009. Intuition in organizations: implications for strategic management. Long Range Plann. 42:3277–97 [Google Scholar]
  71. Hodgson GM. 2008. The concept of a routine. See Becker 2008, pp. 15–30 [Google Scholar]
  72. Hogarth RM. 2001. Educating Intuition Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  73. Hollingshead AB. 2001. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 81:61080–89 [Google Scholar]
  74. Howard-Grenville JA. 2005. The persistence of flexible organizational routines: the role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16:6618–36 [Google Scholar]
  75. Hutchins E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  76. Kahneman D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow New York: Macmillan
  77. Kahneman D, Klein G. 2009. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. Am. Psychol. 64:6515 [Google Scholar]
  78. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1974. Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness. The Concept of Probability in Psychological Experiments Staël von Holstein CA. 25–48 Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer [Google Scholar]
  79. Keren G, Schul Y. 2009. Two is not always better than one: a critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspect. Psychol. Sci 4:6533–50 [Google Scholar]
  80. Kozlowski SWJ, Chao GT, Grand JA, Braun MT, Kuljanin G. 2013. Advancing multilevel research design: capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organ. Res. Methods 16:4581–615 [Google Scholar]
  81. Kruglanski AW, Gigerenzer G. 2011. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychol. Rev. 118:197–109 [Google Scholar]
  82. Langer EJ. 1989. Mindfulness Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  83. Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  84. Lave J. 1988. Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
  85. Law J. 1992. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Syst. Pract. 5:4379–93 [Google Scholar]
  86. Lazaric N. 2011. Organizational routines and cognition: an introduction to empirical and analytical contributions. J. Inst. Econ. 7:2147–56 [Google Scholar]
  87. Lazaric N, Denis B. 2005. Routinization and memorization of tasks in a workshop: the case of the introduction of ISO norms. Ind. Corp. Change 14:873–96 [Google Scholar]
  88. Leonardi PM. 2011. When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 35:1147–67 [Google Scholar]
  89. Levinthal D, Rerup C. 2006. Crossing an apparent chasm: bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17:4502–13 [Google Scholar]
  90. Lewin AY, Massini S, Peeters C. 2011. Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organ. Sci. 22:181–98 [Google Scholar]
  91. Lewis K. 2003. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:4587–604 [Google Scholar]
  92. March JG. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci 2:171–87 [Google Scholar]
  93. March JG, Simon HA. 1958. Organizations Newark: NJ: Wiley
  94. Meyer RD, Dalal RS, Hermida R. 2010. A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. J. Manag. 36:1121–40 [Google Scholar]
  95. Milkman KL, Chugh D, Bazerman MH. 2009. How can decision making be improved?. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4:4379–83 [Google Scholar]
  96. Miller KD, Pentland BT, Choi S. 2012. Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. J. Manag. Stud. 49:81536–58 [Google Scholar]
  97. Nelson RR, Winter SG. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  98. Nicolini D. 2011. Practice as the site of knowing: insights from the field of telemedicine. Organ. Sci. 22:3602–20 [Google Scholar]
  99. Norman DA. 2002. The Design of Everyday Things New York: Basic Books
  100. Nyberg D. 2009. Computers, customer service operatives and cyborgs: intra-actions in call centres. Organ. Sci. 30:111181–99 [Google Scholar]
  101. Orlikowski WJ. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28:91435–48 [Google Scholar]
  102. Pacini R, Epstein S. 1999. The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 76:6972–87 [Google Scholar]
  103. Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville J. 2011. Routines revisited: exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5:1413–53 [Google Scholar]
  104. Pentland BT. 2003. Conceptualizing and measuring variety in organizational work processes. Manag. Sci. 49:7857–70 [Google Scholar]
  105. Pentland BT, Feldman MS. 2005. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Ind. Corp. Change 14:5793–815 [Google Scholar]
  106. Pentland BT, Feldman MS. 2007. Narrative networks: patterns of technology and organization. Organ. Sci 18:5781–95 [Google Scholar]
  107. Pentland BT, Feldman MS. 2008. Designing routines: on the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Inf. Organ. 18:4235–50 [Google Scholar]
  108. Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Liu P. 2012. Dynamics of organizational routines: a generative model. J. Manag. Stud. 49:81484–508 [Google Scholar]
  109. Pentland BT, Hærem T, Hillison D. 2010. Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organ. Stud. 31:7917–40 [Google Scholar]
  110. Pentland BT, Hærem T, Hillison D. 2011. The (n)ever changing world: stability and change in organizational routines. Organ. Sci 22:61369–83 [Google Scholar]
  111. Pentland BT, Rueter HH. 1994. Organizational routines as grammars of action. Adm. Sci. Q. 39:3484–510 [Google Scholar]
  112. Plous S. 1993. The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making New York: McGraw-Hill
  113. Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T. 2012. Organization design: the epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 37:3419–40 [Google Scholar]
  114. Quinn M. 2014. Stability and change in management accounting over time: a century or so of evidence from Guinness. Manag. Account. Res. 25:76–92 [Google Scholar]
  115. Radwan L, Kinder S. 2013. Practising the diffusion of organizational routines. Environ. Plann. A 45:2442–58 [Google Scholar]
  116. Ragin CC, Becker HS. 1992. What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  117. Rerup C, Feldman MS. 2011. Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: the role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Manag. J. 54:577–610 [Google Scholar]
  118. Reynaud B. 2005. The void at the heart of rules: routines in the context of rule-following. The case of the Paris Metro Workshop. Ind. Corp. Change 14:847–71 [Google Scholar]
  119. Rice RE, Cooper SD. 2010. Organizations and Unusual Routines: A Systems Analysis of Dysfunctional Feedback Processes Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  120. Robey D, Raymond B, Anderson C. 2012. Theorizing information technology as a material artifact in information systems research. Materiality and Organizing Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J. 217–36 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  121. Rousseau DM. 1997. Organizational behavior in the new organizational era. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48:1515–46 [Google Scholar]
  122. Russo JE, Schoemaker PJH. 2002. Winning Decisions: Getting It Right the First Time New York: Random House
  123. Ryle G. 1949. The Concept of Mind London: Hutchinson House
  124. Sánchez D, Tentori M, Favela J. 2008. Activity recognition for the smart hospital. IEEE Intell. Syst. 23:250–57 [Google Scholar]
  125. Schneider W, Chein JM. 2003. Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cogn. Sci. 27:3525–59 [Google Scholar]
  126. Schulz M. 2008. Staying on track: a voyage to the internal mechanisms of routine reproduction. See Becker 2008, pp. 228–55 [Google Scholar]
  127. Silver MS. 1991. Decisional guidance for computer-based decision support. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 15:1105–22 [Google Scholar]
  128. Simon HA. 1959. Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. Am. Econ. Rev. 49:3253–83 [Google Scholar]
  129. Simon HA. 1987. Making management decisions: the role of intuition and emotion. Acad. Manag. Exec. 1:157–64 [Google Scholar]
  130. Simon HA. 1992. What is an “explanation” of behavior?. Psychol. Sci 3:3150–61 [Google Scholar]
  131. Sleesman DJ, Conlon DE, McNamara G, Miles JE. 2012. Cleaning up the big muddy: a meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment. Acad. Manag. J 55:3541–62 [Google Scholar]
  132. Stanovich KE, West RF. 2000. Advancing the rationality debate. Behav. Brain Sci. 23:05701–17 [Google Scholar]
  133. Su NM, Brdiczka O, Begole B. 2013. The routineness of routines: measuring rhythms of media interaction. Hum. Comput. Interact. 28:4287–334 [Google Scholar]
  134. Suchman LA. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  135. Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J. 2009. Organizational path dependence: opening the black box. Acad. Manag. Rev. 34:4689–709 [Google Scholar]
  136. Thompson JD. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory New York: McGraw-Hill
  137. Tsoukas H, Chia R. 2002. On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13:5567–82 [Google Scholar]
  138. Turner SF, Fern MJ. 2012. Examining the stability and variability of routine performances: the effects of experience and context change. J. Manag. Stud. 49:81407–34 [Google Scholar]
  139. Turner SF, Rindova V. 2012. A balancing act: how organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ. Sci. 23:124–46 [Google Scholar]
  140. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1973. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn. Psychol. 5:2207–32 [Google Scholar]
  141. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:41571124–31 [Google Scholar]
  142. Vromen JJ. 2011. Routines as multilevel mechanisms. J. Inst. Econ. 7:175–96 [Google Scholar]
  143. Weick KE. 1969. The Social Psychology of Organizing Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  144. Weick KE, Roberts KH. 1993. Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm. Sci. Q. 38:3357–81 [Google Scholar]
  145. Wenger E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  146. Whyte G. 1989. Groupthink reconsidered. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14:140–56 [Google Scholar]
  147. Winter SG. 1985. The case for “mechanistic” decision making. Organizational Strategy and Change Pennings JM. 99–113 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  148. Winter SG. 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 24:10991–95 [Google Scholar]
  149. Winter SG. 2013. Habit, deliberation, and action: strengthening the microfoundations of routines and capabilities. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 27:2120–37 [Google Scholar]
  150. Yeow A, Faraj S. 2011. Using narrative networks to study enterprise systems and organizational change. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 12:2116–25 [Google Scholar]
  151. Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S. 2007. Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18:5749–62 [Google Scholar]
  152. Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M. 2010. When truces collapse: a longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21:5955–72 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111412
Loading
Organizational Routines as Patterns of Action: Implications for Organizational Behavior
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2, 465 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111412
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111412
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111412
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error