1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  4. Volume 4, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Volume 4, 2017

Evidence-Based Management: Foundations, Development, Controversies and Future

Abstract

We review the recent development of evidence-based management (EBMgt), tracing its origins to longstanding gaps between research and practice, discrepant findings across studies, and the emergence of evidence-based medicine (EBMed). We provide a definition of EBMgt and review four foundational articles advocating its use. We then review categories of articles that comprise the EBMgt canon: advocacy articles, essays or perspectives, teaching-related, empirical, reviews, and critiques and responses. Critiques include political, epistemological, and methodological issues directly pertinent to EBMgt as well as broader concerns about the scholarly research base on which EBMgt depends. Our suggestions for future research emphasize, first and foremost, increasing the production of high-quality empirical studies in EBMgt. Topics of particular interest include research co-creation by academics and practitioners, process and outcome studies of EBMgt implementations, and practitioners’ use of evidence in their working environments. We also call for broader types of systematic reviews (SRs) than have generally been conducted in the organization sciences.

Keyword(s): academic–practitioner relationships, evidence-based management, evidence-based practice, research–practice gap, systematic reviews
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113306
2017-03-21
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/4/1/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113306.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113306&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrahamson E. 1996. Management fashion. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21:1254–85 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams RJ, Smart P, Huff AS. 2016. Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. Int. J. Manag. Rev. In press. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12102
  3. Aguinis H, Pierce CA, Bosco FA, Dalton DR, Dalton CM. 2011. Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organ. Res. Methods 14:306–31 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 50:179–211 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alvesson M, Sandberg J. 2014. Habitat and habitus: boxed-in versus box-breaking research. Organ. Stud. 35:7967–87 [Google Scholar]
  6. APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice 2006. Evidence-based practice in psychology. Am. Psychol. 61:271–85 [Google Scholar]
  7. Arthur JB. 1994. Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Acad. Manag. J. 37:3670–87 [Google Scholar]
  8. Banks CG, Murphy KR. 1985. Toward narrowing the research‐practice gap in performance appraisal. Pers. Psychol. 38:335–45 [Google Scholar]
  9. Banks GC, Pollack JM, Bochantin JE, O'Boyle EH, Kirkman BL, Whelpley CE. 2016. Management's science-practice gap: a grand challenge for all stakeholders. Acad. Manag. J. 59:2205–31 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bansal P, Bertels S, Ewart T, MacConnachie P, O'Brien J. 2012. Bridging the research–practice gap. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 26:73–92 [Google Scholar]
  11. Barends E, Briner R. 2014. Teaching evidence-based practice: lessons from the pioneers. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 13:476–83 [Google Scholar]
  12. Barends E, Janssen B, ten Have W, ten Have S. 2014a. Effects of change interventions: What kind of evidence do we really have. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 50:5–27 [Google Scholar]
  13. Barends E, Rousseau DM, Briner RB. 2014b. Evidence-Based Management: The Basic Principles. Amsterdam, Neth.: CEBMa https://www.cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Evidence-Based-Practice-The-Basic-Principles-vs-Dec-2015.pdf
  14. Baritz L. 1960. The Servants of Power: A History of the Use of Social Science in American Industry Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press
  15. Barker JR. 1993. Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in self-managing teams. Admin. Sci. Q. 38:408–37 [Google Scholar]
  16. Barley SR, Meyer GW, Gash DC. 1988. Cultures of culture: academics, practitioners and the pragmatics of normative control. Admin. Sci. Q. 33:24–60 [Google Scholar]
  17. Barrick MR, Mount MK. 1991. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Pers. Psychol. 44:11–26 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bartunek JM. 2007. Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: toward a relational scholarship of integration. Acad. Manag. J. 50:1323–33 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bartunek JM, Rynes SL. 2014. Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: the paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. J. Manag. 40:51181–201 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bartunek JM, Rynes SL. 2017. Narrative foundations for theorizing about academic-practitioner relationships. Academic Practitioner Research Partnerships: Developments, Complexities, and Opportunities JM Bartunek, J McKenzie London: Routledge In press [Google Scholar]
  21. Beer M. 2014. Comments on “Effects of change interventions: What kind of evidence do we really have?”. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 50:128–33 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bennis WG, O'Toole J. 2005. How business schools lost their way. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83:596–104 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bettis RA, Ethiraj S, Gambardella A, Helfat C, Mitchell W. 2016. Creating repeatable cumulative knowledge in strategic management: a call for a broad and deep conversation among authors, referees, and editors. Strateg. Manag. J. 37:257–61 [Google Scholar]
  24. Beyer JM, Trice HM. 1982. The utilization process: a conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Admin. Sci. Q. 27:591–622 [Google Scholar]
  25. Boatman JE, Sinar EF. 2011. The path forward to meaningful evidence. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 4:68–71 [Google Scholar]
  26. Boehm VR. 1980. Research in the “real world”—a conceptual model. Pers. Psychol. 33:495–503 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bosco FA, Aguinis H, Field JG, Pierce CA, Dalton DR. 2016. HARKing's threat to organizational research: Evidence from primary and meta-analytic sources. Pers. Psychol. 69:709–50 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bozionelos N. 2005. When the inferior candidate is offered the job: the selection interview as a political and power game. Hum. Relat. 58:1605–31 [Google Scholar]
  29. Briner RB, Denyer D, Rousseau DM. 2009. Evidence-based management: construct clean-up time?. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 23:419–32 [Google Scholar]
  30. Briner RB, Rousseau DM. 2011. Evidence-based I-O psychology: not there yet. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 4:3–22 [Google Scholar]
  31. Burke MJ. 2011. Is there a fly in the “systematic review” ointment?. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 4:36–39 [Google Scholar]
  32. Burke MJ, Salvador RO, Smith-Crowe K, Chan-Serafin S, Smith A, Sonesh S. 2011. The dread factor: How hazards and safety training influence learning and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:46–70 [Google Scholar]
  33. Burke MJ, Sarpy SA, Smith-Crowe K, Chan-Serafin S, Salvador RO, Islam G. 2006. Relative effectiveness of worker safety and health training methods. Am. J. Public Health 96:315–24 [Google Scholar]
  34. Calvard TS. 2016. Big data, organizational learning, and sensemaking: theorizing interpretive challenges under conditions of dynamic complexity. Manag. Learn. 47:65–82 [Google Scholar]
  35. Campbell JP, Daft RL, Hulin CL. 1982. What to study: Generating and developing research questions Beverly Hills: Sage
  36. Caprar D, Do B, Rynes SL, Bartunek JM. 2016. It's personal: An exploration of students’ (non) acceptance of management research. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 15:27–231 [Google Scholar]
  37. Cascio WF, Aguinis H. 2008. Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:1062–81 [Google Scholar]
  38. Charlier SD, Brown KG, Rynes SL. 2011. Teaching evidence-based management in MBA programs: What evidence is there?. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 10:2222–36 [Google Scholar]
  39. Chiaburu DS. 2016. Analytics: A catalyst for stagnant science?. Jour. Man. Inquir. 25:111–15 [Google Scholar]
  40. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2nd ed..
  41. Courtright SH, Stewart GL, Ward MM. 2012. Applying research to save lives: learning from team training approaches in aviation and health care. Organ. Dyn. 41:4291–301 [Google Scholar]
  42. Cronin MA, Klimoski R. 2011. Broadening the view of what constitutes “evidence.”. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 4:57–61 [Google Scholar]
  43. Cullen FT. 2013. Rehabilitation: beyond nothing works. Crime and Justice in America: 1975–2025 M. Tonry 299–376 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Dalheim A, Harthug S, Nilsen RM, Nortvedt MW. 2012. Factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice among nurses: a self-report survey. BMC Health Serv. Res. 12:367–77 [Google Scholar]
  45. Das TK. 2003. Managerial perceptions and the essence of the managerial world: What is an interloper business executive to make of the academic-researcher perceptions of managers?. Brit. J. Manag. 14:23–32 [Google Scholar]
  46. Davenport TH, Harris J, Shapiro J. 2010. Competing on talent analytics. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88:1052–58 [Google Scholar]
  47. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, Cartabellotta A, Martin J. et al. 2005. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med. Educ 5:1 [Google Scholar]
  48. Dietz J, Antonakis J, Hoffrage U, Krings F, Marewski JN, Zehnder C. 2014. Teaching evidence-based management with a focus on producing local evidence. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 13:397–414 [Google Scholar]
  49. Dipboye RL. 2014. Bridging the gap in organizational behavior: a review of Jone Pearce's Organizational Behavior: Real Research for Real Managers. . Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 13:3487–91 [Google Scholar]
  50. Dunnette MD. 1990. Blending the science and practice of industrial and organizational psychology: Where are we and where are we going?. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1 MD Dunnette LM Hough 1–27 Palo Alto, CA: Consult. Psychol. Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  51. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME. 2007. Theories from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50:25–32 [Google Scholar]
  52. Erez A, Grant AM. 2014. Separating data from intuition: bringing evidence into the management classroom. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 13:104–19 [Google Scholar]
  53. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group 1992. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:172420–25 [Google Scholar]
  54. Fanelli D. 2011. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics 90:891–904 [Google Scholar]
  55. Fanelli D, Ioannidis JP. 2013. US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research. PNAS 110:3715031–36 [Google Scholar]
  56. Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C. 2005. The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad. Manag. J. 48:117–34 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ghoshal S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 4:75–79 [Google Scholar]
  58. Gittell JH, Von Nordenflycht A, Kochan TA. 2004. Mutual gains or zero sum? Labor relations and firm performance in the airline industry. Ind. Labor. Rel. Rev. 57:2163–80 [Google Scholar]
  59. Glaub ME, Frese M, Fischer S, Hoppe M. 2014. Increasing personal initiative in small business managers or owners leads to entrepreneurial success: a theory-based controlled randomized field intervention for evidence-based management. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 13:3354–79 [Google Scholar]
  60. Goodman JS, Gary MS, Wood RE. 2014. Bibliographic search training for evidence-based management education: a review of relevant literatures. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 13:322–53 [Google Scholar]
  61. Guzzo RA. 2011. The universe of evidence-based I-O psychology is expanding. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 4:165–67 [Google Scholar]
  62. HakemZadeh F, Vishwanath VB. 2016. Toward a theory of collaboration for evidence-based management. Manag. Decis. 50:832–67 [Google Scholar]
  63. Hambrick DC. 1994. What if the Academy really mattered?. Acad. Manag. Rev. 19:11–16 [Google Scholar]
  64. Heath C, Heath D. 2013. Decisive: How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work New York: Crown Bus.
  65. Ho K. 2009. Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  66. Hodgkinson GP. 2001. Editorial. Brit. J. Manag. 12:Special IssueS1–S2 http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00106-i2 [Google Scholar]
  67. Hodgkinson GP. 2011. Why evidence‐based practice in I–O psychology is not there yet: going beyond systematic reviews. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 4:49–53 [Google Scholar]
  68. Hodgkinson GP, Rousseau DM. 2009. Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in management research: It's already happening!. J. Manag. Stud. 46:534–46 [Google Scholar]
  69. Hodgkinson GP, Starkey KK. 2011. Not simply returning to the same answer over and over again: reframing relevance. Brit. J. Manag. 22:355–69 [Google Scholar]
  70. Hofstadter R. 1963. Anti-Intellectualism in American Life New York: Vintage, 3rd ed..
  71. Hoon C. 2013. Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: an approach to theory building. Organ. Res. Methods 16:522–56 [Google Scholar]
  72. Hornung S. 2012. Beyond “new scientific management?” Critical reflections on the epistemology of evidence-based management. See Rousseau 2012b 389–403
  73. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL, Jackson GB. 1982. Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies Newbury Park, CA: Sage
  74. Ioannidis JPA. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Med 2:8e124 [Google Scholar]
  75. Jarzabkowski P, Mohrman SA, Scherer AG. 2010. Organization studies as applied science: the generation and use of academic knowledge about organizations: introduction to the special issue. Organ. Stud. 31:1189–207 [Google Scholar]
  76. Judge TA, Cable DM, Colbert AE, Rynes SL. 2007. What causes a management article to be cited—article, author, or journal. Acad. Manag. J. 50:3491–506 [Google Scholar]
  77. Kepes S, Bennett AA, McDaniel MA. 2014. Evidence-based management and the trustworthiness of our cumulative scientific knowledge: implications for teaching, research, and practice. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 13:446–66 [Google Scholar]
  78. Kieser A, Leiner L. 2009. Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. J. Manag. Stud. 46:516–33 [Google Scholar]
  79. Kim Y, Ployhart RE. 2014. The effects of staffing and training on firm productivity and profit growth before, during, and after the Great Recession. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:361–89 [Google Scholar]
  80. Kovner AR. 2014. Evidence-based management: implications for nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Manag. Lead. 24:417–24 [Google Scholar]
  81. Kuncel NR, Rigdon J. 2012. Communicating research findings. Handbook of Psychology 12 Ind & Organ Psychol N Schmitt, S Highhouse 43–58 New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  82. Learmonth M. 2006. Dialogue. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:1089–91 [Google Scholar]
  83. Learmonth M. 2008. Evidence-based management: a backlash against pluralism in organizational studies. Organization 15:2283–91 [Google Scholar]
  84. Leicht KT, Fennell ML. 2001. Professional Work: A Sociological Approach Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
  85. Marcos J, Denyer D. 2012. Crossing the sea from they to we? The unfolding of knowing and practising in collaborative research. Manag. Learn. 43:443–59 [Google Scholar]
  86. Mathieu JE, Zajac DM. 1990. A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychol. Bull. 108:2171–94 [Google Scholar]
  87. Mayer-Schönberger V, Cukier K. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  88. McWilliams A, Lockett A, Katz J, Van Fleet DD. 2009. Who is talking to whom? The network of intellectual influence in management research. J. Appl. Manag. Entrep. 14:61–81 [Google Scholar]
  89. Mele V, Compagni A, Cavazza M. 2013. Governing through evidence: a study of technological innovation in health care. J. Publ. Adm. Res. Theor. 24:843–77 [Google Scholar]
  90. Morrell K, Learmonth M. 2015. Against evidence-based management, for management learning. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 14:520–33 [Google Scholar]
  91. O'Boyle EH, Banks GC, Gonzalez-Mulé E. 2014. The chrysalis effect: how ugly initial results turn into beautiful butterflies. J. Manag. 43:376–99 [Google Scholar]
  92. Open Science Collaboration 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349:6251 http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 [Google Scholar]
  93. Oviatt BM, Miller WD. 1989. Irrelevance, intransigence, and business professors. Acad. Manag. Exec. 10:304–312 [Google Scholar]
  94. Petticrew M, Roberts H. 2003. Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 57:527–29 [Google Scholar]
  95. Pfeffer J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Manag. Rev. 18:599–620 [Google Scholar]
  96. Pfeffer J, Sutton RI. 2006a. Evidence-based management. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84:162–74 [Google Scholar]
  97. Pfeffer J, Sutton RI. 2006b. Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense: Profiting From Evidence-Based Management Boston: Harvard Bus. Sch. Press
  98. Pritchard RD, Harrell MM, DizaGranados D, Guzman MJ. 2008. The productivity measurement and enhancement system: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:3540–67 [Google Scholar]
  99. Reay T, Berta W, Kohn MK. 2009. What's the evidence on evidence-based management. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 23:5–18 [Google Scholar]
  100. Robson LS, Stephenson CM, Schulte PA, Amick BC, Chan S. et al. 2010. A Systematic Review of the Training and Education for the Protection of Workers Toronto: Inst. Work Health
  101. Romme AGL, Avenier MJ, Denyer D, Hodgkinson GP, Pandza K. et al. 2015. Towards common ground and trading zones in management research and practice. Brit. J. Manag. 26:544–59 [Google Scholar]
  102. Rousseau DM. 2006. Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”?. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:256–69 [Google Scholar]
  103. Rousseau DM. 2012a. Designing a better business school. J. Manag. Stud. 49:600–18 [Google Scholar]
  104. Rousseau DM. 2012b. The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  105. Rousseau DM, Gunia BC. 2016. Evidence-based practice: the psychology of EBP implementation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67:667–92 [Google Scholar]
  106. Rousseau DM, Manning J, Denyer D. 2008. Evidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2:475–515 [Google Scholar]
  107. Rousseau DM, McCarthy S. 2007. Educating managers from an evidence-based perspective. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 6:184–101 [Google Scholar]
  108. Rozeboom WW. 1960. The fallacy of the null hypothesis significance test. Psychol. Bull. 57:416–28 [Google Scholar]
  109. Rynes SL. 2012. The research-practice gap in industrial-organizational psychology and related fields: challenges and potential solutions. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology SWJ Kozlowski 409–52 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  110. Rynes SL, Bartunek J, Daft RL. 2001. Across the great divide: knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Acad. Manag. J. 44:340–55 [Google Scholar]
  111. Rynes SL, Colbert AE, Brown KG. 2002. HR professionals' beliefs about effective human resource practices: correspondence between research and practice. Hum. Resour. Manag. 41:2149–74 [Google Scholar]
  112. Rynes SL, Giluk TL, Brown KG. 2007. The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Acad. Manag. J. 50:987–1008 [Google Scholar]
  113. Rynes SL, Rousseau DM, Barends E. 2014. From the guest editors: Change the world: Teach evidence-based practice!. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 13:305–21 [Google Scholar]
  114. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. 1996. Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. Brit. Med. J. 312:702371–72 [Google Scholar]
  115. Schmidt FL. 1992. What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. Am. Psychol. 47:101173–81 [Google Scholar]
  116. Schmidt FL. 1996. Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: implications for training of researchers. Psychol. Methods 1:2115–29 [Google Scholar]
  117. Schmidt FL. 2009. Select on intelligence. Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior EA Locke 3–17 Chichester, UK: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  118. Schulz A, Nicolai AT. 2015. The intellectual link between management research and popularization media: a bibliometric analysis of the Harvard Business Review. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 14:131–49 [Google Scholar]
  119. Shaffer LS. 1977. The golden fleece: anti-intellectualism and social science. Am. Psychol. 32:814–23 [Google Scholar]
  120. Shapiro DL, Kirkman BL, Courtney HG. 2007. Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Acad. Manag. J. 50:2249–66 [Google Scholar]
  121. Shollo A, Constantiou I, Kreiner K. 2015. The interplay between evidence and judgment in the IT project prioritization process. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 24:171–88 [Google Scholar]
  122. Sholomskas DE, Syracuse-Siewert G, Rounsaville BJ, Ball SA, Nuro KF, Carroll KM. 2005. We don't train in vain: a dissemination trial of three strategies of training clinicians in cognitive–behavioral therapy. J. Consult. Clin. Psyc. 73:1106–15 [Google Scholar]
  123. Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. 2011. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol. Sci. 22:1359–66 [Google Scholar]
  124. Starbuck WH. 2016. 60th anniversary essay: how journals could improve research practices in social science. Admin. Sci. Q. 61:165–83 [Google Scholar]
  125. Straus SE, Glasiou PP, Richardson S, Haynes B. 2011. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach It Amsterdam: Elsevier, 4th ed..
  126. Thayer AL, Wildman JL, Salas E. 2011. I–O psychology: We have the evidence; we just don't use it (or care to). Ind. Organ. Psychol. 4:132–35 [Google Scholar]
  127. Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Brit. J. Manag. 14:3207–22 [Google Scholar]
  128. Trank CQ. 2014. “Reading” evidence-based management: the possibilities of interpretation. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 13:381–95 [Google Scholar]
  129. Tucker AL, Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. 2007. Implementing new practices: an empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Mgt Sci 53:894–907 [Google Scholar]
  130. Van Aken JE. 2005. Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. Brit. J. Manag. 16:19–36 [Google Scholar]
  131. Van Aken JE, Romme G. 2009. Reinventing the future: adding design science to the repertoire of organization and management studies. Organ. Manag. J. 6:5–12 [Google Scholar]
  132. Walsh JP, Weber K, Margolis JD. 2003. Social issues and management: our lost cause found. J. Manag. 29:859–81 [Google Scholar]
  133. Weisz JR, Kuppens S, Eckshtain D, Ugueto AM, Hawley KM, Jensen-Doss A. 2013a. Performance of evidence-based youth psychotherapies compared with usual clinical care: a multilevel meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 70:750–61 [Google Scholar]
  134. Weisz JR, Ugueto AM, Cheron DM, Herren J. 2013b. Evidence-based youth psychotherapy in the mental health ecosystem. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 42:274–86 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113306
Loading
Evidence-Based Management: Foundations, Development, Controversies and Future
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 4, 235 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113306
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113306
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113306
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error