1932

Abstract

This integrative review focuses on leadership in the context of work groups and teams: team-centric leadership. Although the process of leadership is largely viewed as one of social influence, most theories of leadership are agnostic about the social units and context within which it occurs. The review examines recent research on mainstream leadership theories—transformational leadership and leader-member exchange—that have contextualized leadership in work teams and also on team-centric leadership theories—shared and functional leadership—that are explicitly team centric. For each theory, we examine its conceptualization and evolution, how well it maps to the input-process-output heuristic of team effectiveness (including moderators indicative of the context, process dynamics, and feedback loops), and the quality of research methods that are employed. The discussion concludes with 14 recommendations designed to advance each type of team-centric leadership and to promote more integration and synergy across the approaches in future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062429
2016-03-21
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/3/1/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062429.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062429&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aarons GA, Summerfeld DH. 2012. Leadership, innovation climate, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice during a statewide implementation. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 51:423–31 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acar FP. 2010. Analyzing the effects of diversity perceptions and shared leadership on emotional conflict: a dynamic approach. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 21:1733–53 [Google Scholar]
  3. Avolio BJ, Howell JM, Sosik JJ. 1999. A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: humor as a moderator of leadership style effects. Acad. Manag. J. 42:219–27 [Google Scholar]
  4. Avolio BJ, Jung DI, Murry W, Sivasubramaniam N. 1996. Building highly developed teams: focusing on shared leadership processes, efficacy, trust, and performance. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Leadership M Beyerlein, D Johnson 173–209 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  5. Avolio B, Walumbwa F, Weber T. 2009. Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60:421–49 [Google Scholar]
  6. Balthazard PA, Waldman DA, Warren JE. 2009. Predictors of the emergence of transformational leadership in virtual decision teams. Leadersh. Q. 20:651–63 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bass BM. 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations New York: The Free Press
  8. Bass BM, Avolio BJ. 1994. Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  9. Bass BM, Avolio BJ. 1997. Full Range Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Palo Alto, CA: Mindgarden
  10. Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Jung DI, Berson Y. 2003. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:207–18 [Google Scholar]
  11. Benoliel P, Somech A. 2015. The role of leader boundary activities in enhancing interdisciplinary team effectiveness. Small Group Res. 46:83–124 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bienefeld N, Grote G. 2014. Shared leadership in multiteam systems: how cockpit and cabin crews lead each other to safety. Hum. Factors 56:270–86 [Google Scholar]
  13. Blau JR, Alba RD. 1982. Empowering nets of participation. Adm. Sci. Q. 27:363–79 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boies K, Howell JM. 2006. Leader-member exchange in teams: an examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. Leadersh. Q. 17:246–57 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bono J, Judge T. 2003. Self-concordance at work: toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leadership. Acad. Manag. J. 46:554–71 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown FW, May DR. 2012. Organizational change and development: the efficacy of transformational leadership training. J. Manag. Dev. 31:520–36 [Google Scholar]
  17. Buljac-Samardzic M, van Woerkom M. 2015. Can managers coach their teams too much?. J. Manag. Psychol. 30:280–98 [Google Scholar]
  18. Burke CS, Stagl KC, Klein C, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Halpin SM. 2006. What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadersh. Q. 17:288–307 [Google Scholar]
  19. Burns JM. 1978. Leadership New York: Harper & Row
  20. Carson JB, Tesluk PE, Marrone JA. 2007. Shared leadership in teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 50:1217–34 [Google Scholar]
  21. Carte TA, Chidambaram L, Becker A. 2006. Emergent leadership in self-managed virtual teams: a longitudinal study of concentrated and shared leadership behaviors. Group Decis. Negotiation 15:323–43 [Google Scholar]
  22. Carter DR, DeChurch LA, Braun MT, Contractor NS. 2015. Social network approaches to leadership: an integrative conceptual review. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:597–622 [Google Scholar]
  23. Chan D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psychol. 83:234–46 [Google Scholar]
  24. Charbonnier-Voirin A, El Ahnemi A, Vandenberghe C. 2010. A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group Organ. Manag. 35:699–726 [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen G, Kirkman BL, Kanfer R, Allen D, Rosen B. 2007. A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:331–46 [Google Scholar]
  26. Chi NW, Chung YY, Tsai WC. 2011. How do happy leaders enhance team success? The mediating roles of transformational leadership, group affective tone and team processes. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 41:1421–54 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cho J, Dansereau F. 2010. Are transformational leaders fair? A multi-level study of transformational leadership, justice perceptions, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadersh. Q. 21:409–21 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cogliser CC, Schriesheim CA. 2000. Exploring work unit context and leader-member exchange: a multi-level perspective. J. Organ. Behav. 21:487–511 [Google Scholar]
  29. Conger JA, Kanungo RN. 1988. The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Acad. Manag. Rev. 13:639–52 [Google Scholar]
  30. Contractor N, DeChurch L, Carson J, Carter D, Keegan B. 2012. The topology of collective leadership. Leadersh. Q. 23:994–1011 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cronin MA, Weingart LR, Todorova G. 2011. Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet?. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5:571–612 [Google Scholar]
  32. Dansereau F, Graen GB, Haga W. 1975. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organizations. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 13:46–78 [Google Scholar]
  33. Daspit J, Tillman CJ, Boyd NG, Mckee V. 2013. Cross-functional team effectiveness: an examination of internal team environment, shared leadership, and cohesion influences. Team Perform. Manag. 19:34–56 [Google Scholar]
  34. Day DV. 2012. Leadership. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology 1 SWJ Kozlowski 696–729 New York: Oxford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  35. Day DV, Gronn P, Salas E. 2004. Leadership capacity in teams. Leadersh. Q. 15:6857–80 [Google Scholar]
  36. DeRue DS, Barnes CM, Morgeson FP. 2010. Understanding the motivational contingencies of team leadership. Small Group Res. 41:621–51 [Google Scholar]
  37. Diaz-Saenz HR. 2011. Transformational leadership. The SAGE Handbook of Leadership A Bryman, D Collinson, K Grint, B Jackson, M Uhl-Bien 299–310 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  38. D'Innocenzo L, Mathieu JE, Kukenberger MR. 2014. A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership—team performance relations. J. Manag. 2014:1–28 [Google Scholar]
  39. Dockery TM, Steiner DD. 1990. The role of the initial interaction in leader member exchange. Group Organ. Stud. 15:395–413 [Google Scholar]
  40. Drescher M, Korsgaard M, Welpe I, Picot A, Wigand R. 2014. The dynamics of shared leadership: building trust and enhancing performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:771–83 [Google Scholar]
  41. Dulebohn JH, Bommer WH, Liden RC, Brouer RL, Ferris GR. 2012. A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: integrating the past with an eye toward the future. J. Manag. 38:715–59 [Google Scholar]
  42. Eisenbeiss SA, van Knippenberg D, Boerner S. 2008. Transformational leadership and team innovation: integrating team climate principles. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:1438–46 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ensley MD, Hmieleski KM, Pearce CL. 2006. The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: implications for the performance of startups. Leadersh. Q. 17:217–31 [Google Scholar]
  44. Epitropaki O. 2013. A multi-level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: testing a moderated-mediated model. J. Organ. Behav. 34:65–86 [Google Scholar]
  45. Epitropaki O, Martin R. 2013. Transformational-transactional leadership and upward influence: the role of relative leader-member exchanges (RLMX) and perceived organizational support (POS). Leadersh. Q. 24:299–315 [Google Scholar]
  46. Erdogan B, Bauer TN. 2010. Differentiated leader-member exchanges: the buffering role of justice climate. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:1104–20 [Google Scholar]
  47. Erkutlu H. 2012. The impact of organizational culture on the relationship between shared leadership and team proactivity. Team Perform. Manag. 18:102–19 [Google Scholar]
  48. Fausing MS, Jeppesen HJ, Jonsson TS, Lewandowski J, Bligh MC. 2013. Moderators of shared leadership: work function and team autonomy. Team Perform. Manag. 19:244–62 [Google Scholar]
  49. Festinger L. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7:117–40 [Google Scholar]
  50. Fleishman EA, Mumford MD, Zaccaro SJ, Levin KY, Korotkin AL, Hein MB. 1991. Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: a synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadersh. Q. 2:245–87 [Google Scholar]
  51. Ford LR, Seers A. 2006. Relational and team climates: pitting differentiation versus agreement. Leadersh. Q. 17:258–70 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gajendran R, Joshi A. 2012. Innovation in globally distributed teams: the role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:1252–61 [Google Scholar]
  53. Graen GB, Scandura TA. 1987. Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior 9 LL Cummings, BM Staw 175–208 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  54. Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M. 1995. Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh. Q. 6:219–47 [Google Scholar]
  55. Grand JA, Pearce M, Rench TA, Chao GT, Fernandez R, Kozlowski SWJ. 2013. Going DEEP: guidelines for building simulation-based team assessments. BMJ Qual. Saf. 22:436–48 [Google Scholar]
  56. Gupta VK, Huang R, Niranjan S. 2010. A longitudinal examination of the relationship between team leadership and performance. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 17:335–50 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hackman JR, Wageman R. 2005. A theory of team coaching. Acad. Manag. Rev. 30:269–87 [Google Scholar]
  58. Hackman JR, Walton RE. 1986. Leading groups in organizations. Designing Effective Work Groups PS Goodman & Associates 72–119 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  59. Hallinger P, Heck RH. 2010. Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference?. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 38:654–78 [Google Scholar]
  60. Hambley LA, O'Neill TA, Kline TJB. 2007. Virtual team leadership: the effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 103:1–20 [Google Scholar]
  61. Hannah ST, Walumbwa FO, Fry J. 2011. Leadership in action teams: team leader and members' authenticity, authenticity strength, and performance outcomes. Pers. Psychol. 64:771–801 [Google Scholar]
  62. Harris T, Li N, Kirkman BL. 2014. Leader-member exchange (LMX) in context: how LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX's influence on OCB and turnover intention. Leadersh. Q. 25:314–28 [Google Scholar]
  63. Hiller NJ, Day DV, Vance RJ. 2006. Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: a field study. Leadersh. Q. 17:387–97 [Google Scholar]
  64. Hirst G, Mann L. 2004. A model of R&D leadership and team communication: the relationship with project performance. R&D Manag. 34:147–60 [Google Scholar]
  65. Hoch JE. 2013. Shared leadership and innovation: the role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. J. Bus. Psychol. 28:159–74 [Google Scholar]
  66. Hoch JE. 2014. Shared leadership, diversity, and information sharing in teams. J. Manag. Psychol. 29:541–64 [Google Scholar]
  67. Hoch JE, Kozlowski SW. 2014. Leading virtual teams: hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:390–403 [Google Scholar]
  68. Homan AC, Greer LL. 2013. Considering diversity: the positive effects of considerate leadership in diverse teams. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 16:105–25 [Google Scholar]
  69. Howell JM, Neufeld DJ, Avolio BJ. 2005. Examining the relationship of leadership and physical distance with business unit performance. Leadersh. Q. 16:273–85 [Google Scholar]
  70. Hsiung H-H. 2012. Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: a multi-level psychological process. J. Bus. Ethics 107:349–61 [Google Scholar]
  71. Hu JIA, Liden RC. 2013. Relative leader-member exchange within team contexts: how and when social comparison impacts individual effectiveness. Pers. Psychol. 66:127–72 [Google Scholar]
  72. Hur Y, van den Berg P, Wilderom C. 2011. Transformational leadership as a mediator between emotional intelligence and team outcomes. Leadersh. Q. 22:501–603 [Google Scholar]
  73. Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D. 2005. Teams in organizations: from I-P-O models to IMOI models. Annu. Rev. Psychology 56:517–43 [Google Scholar]
  74. Jaussi KS, Dionne SD. 2003. Leading for creativity: the role of unconventional leader behavior. Leadersh. Q. 14:475–98 [Google Scholar]
  75. Jung DI. 2001. Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Res. J. 13:185–95 [Google Scholar]
  76. Jung DD, Sosik JJ. 2002. Transformational leadership in work groups: the role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Res. 33:313–36 [Google Scholar]
  77. Kahai S, Sosik J, Avolio B. 2003. Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. Leadersh. Q. 14:499–524 [Google Scholar]
  78. Kark R, Shamir B. 2002. The dual effect of transformational leadership: priming relational and collective selves and further effects on followers. Transformational Leadership: The Road Ahead 2 BJ Avolio, FJ Yammarino 67–91 Oxford, UK: Elsevier Sci. [Google Scholar]
  79. Kearney E, Gebert D. 2009. Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:77–89 [Google Scholar]
  80. Kirkman BL, Chen G, Farh JL, Chen ZX, Lowe KB. 2009. Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: a cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Acad. Manag. J. 52:744–64 [Google Scholar]
  81. Klein KJ, Ziegert JC, Knight A, Xiao Y. 2006. Dynamic delegation: shared, hierarchical and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 51:590–621 [Google Scholar]
  82. Kotlyar I, Karakowsky L, Ng P. 2011. Leader behaviors, conflict and member commitment to team-generated decisions. Leadersh. Q. 22:666–79 [Google Scholar]
  83. Kozlowski SWJ, Chao GT. 2012. The dynamics of emergence: cognition and cohesion in work teams. Managerial Decis. Econ. 33:335–54 [Google Scholar]
  84. Kozlowski SWJ, Chao GT, Chang C-H, Fernandez R. 2015. Team dynamics: using “big data” to advance the science of team effectiveness. Big Data at Work: The Data Science Revolution and Organizational Psychology S Tonidandel, E King, J Cortina 272–309 New York: Routledge Acad. [Google Scholar]
  85. Kozlowski SWJ, Chao GT, Grand JA, Braun MT, Kuljanin G. 2013. Advancing multilevel research design: capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organ. Res. Methods 16:4581–615 [Google Scholar]
  86. Kozlowski SWJ, Gully SM, McHugh PP, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. 1996. A dynamic theory of leadership and team effectiveness: developmental and task contingent leader roles. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management 14 GR Ferris 253–305 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  87. Kozlowski SWJ, Gully SM, Nason ER, Smith EM. 1999. Developing adaptive teams: a theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. The Changing Nature of Work Performance: Implications for Staffing, Personnel Actions, and Development DR Ilgen, ED Pulakos 240–92 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  88. Kozlowski SWJ, Ilgen DR. 2006. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 7:377–124 [Google Scholar]
  89. Kozlowski SWJ, Klein JK. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal and emergent processes. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations KJ Klein, SWJ Kozlowski 3–90 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  90. Kozlowski SWJ, Watola DJ, Jensen JM, Kim BH, Botero IC. 2009. Developing adaptive teams: a theory of dynamic team leadership. Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches E Salas, Goodwin GF, Burke CS 113–55 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  91. Künzle B, Zala-Mezö E, Kolbe M, Wacker J, Grote G. 2010a. Leadership in anaesthesia teams: The most effective leadership is shared. Qual. Saf. Health Care 19:e46 [Google Scholar]
  92. Künzle B, Zala-Mezö E, Kolbe M, Wacker J, Grote G. 2010b. Substitutes for leadership in anaesthesia teams and their impact on leadership effectiveness. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 19:505–31 [Google Scholar]
  93. Le Blanc PM, González-Romá V. 2012. A team level investigation of the relationship between leader-member exchange (LMX) differentiation, and commitment and performance. Leadersh. Q. 23:534–44 [Google Scholar]
  94. Li A, Liao H. 2014. How do leader-member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:847–66 [Google Scholar]
  95. Liao H, Chuang A. 2007. Transforming service employees and climate: a multilevel, multisource examination of transformational leadership in building long-term service relationships. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:1006–19 [Google Scholar]
  96. Liao H, Liu D, Loi R. 2010. Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: a social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 53:1090–109 [Google Scholar]
  97. Liden RC, Erdogan B, Wayne SJ, Sparrowe RT. 2006. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance. J. Organ. Behav. 27:723–46 [Google Scholar]
  98. Liden RC, Graen GB. 1980. Generalizability of the vertical linkage model of leadership. Acad. Manag. J. 23:451–65 [Google Scholar]
  99. Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Stilwell D. 1993. A longitudinal study on the early development of leader member exchanges. J. Appl. Psychol. 78:662–74 [Google Scholar]
  100. Lim BC, Ployhart RE. 2004. Transformational leadership: relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximal contexts. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:610–21 [Google Scholar]
  101. Liu S, Hu J, Li Y, Wang Z, Lin X. 2014. Examining the cross-level relationship between shared leadership and learning in teams: evidence from China. Leadersh. Q. 25:282–95 [Google Scholar]
  102. Liu Y, DeFrank RS. 2013. Self-interest and knowledge-sharing intentions: the impacts of transformational leadership climate and HR practices. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 24:1151–64 [Google Scholar]
  103. Lord RG. 1977. Functional leadership behavior: measurement and relation to social power and leadership perceptions. Adm. Sci. Q. 22:114–33 [Google Scholar]
  104. Lord RG, Rowzee M. 1979. Task interdependence, temporal phase, and cognitive heterogeneity as determinants of leadership behavior and behavior-performance relations. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 23:182–200 [Google Scholar]
  105. Luciano MM, Mathieu JE, Ruddy TM. 2014. Leading multiple teams: average and relative external leadership influences on team empowerment and effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:322–31 [Google Scholar]
  106. Ma L, Qu Q. 2010. Differentiation in leader-member exchange: a hierarchical linear model. Leadersh. Q. 21:733–44 [Google Scholar]
  107. Mannheim B, Halamish H. 2008. Transformational leadership as related to team outcomes and contextual moderation. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 29:617–30 [Google Scholar]
  108. Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:356–76 [Google Scholar]
  109. Marks MA, Zaccaro SJ, Mathieu JE. 2000. Performance implications of leader briefings and team interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. J. Appl. Psychol. 85:971–86 [Google Scholar]
  110. Marks MA, Panzer FJ. 2004. The influence of team monitoring on team processes and performance. Hum. Perform. 17:25–41 [Google Scholar]
  111. Mathieu JE, Kukenberger MR, D'Innocenzo L, Reilly G. 2015. Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members' competence. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:713–34 [Google Scholar]
  112. Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L. 2008. Team effectiveness 1997–2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Manag. 34:410–76 [Google Scholar]
  113. Mayo MC, Meindl JR, Pastor JC. 2003. Shared leadership in work teams: a social network approach. See Pearce & Conger 2003b 193–214
  114. McClane WE. 1991a. Implications of member role differentiation: analysis of a key concept in the LMX model of leadership. Group Organ. Stud. 16:102–13 [Google Scholar]
  115. McClane WE. 1991b. The interaction of leader and member characteristics in the leader-member exchange (LMX) model of leadership. Small Group Res. 22:283–300 [Google Scholar]
  116. McGrath JE. 1962. Leadership Behavior: Some Requirements for Leadership Training Washington, DC: US Civil Service Comm., Off. Career Dev.
  117. McGrath JE. 1964. Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
  118. McGrath JE, Arrow H, Berdahl JL. 2000. The study of groups: past, present and future. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4:95–105 [Google Scholar]
  119. Mohammed S, Nadkarni S. 2011. Temporal diversity and team performance: the moderating role of team temporal leadership. Acad. Manag. J. 54:489–508 [Google Scholar]
  120. Morgeson FP. 2005. The external leadership of self-managing teams: intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:497–508 [Google Scholar]
  121. Morgeson FP, DeRue DS, Karam EP. 2010. Leadership in teams: a functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. J. Manag. 36:5–39 [Google Scholar]
  122. Muethel M, Gehrlein S, Hoegl M. 2012. Socio-demographic factors and shared leadership behaviors in dispersed teams: implications for human resource management. Hum. Resour. Manag. 51:525–48 [Google Scholar]
  123. Naidoo LJ, Scherbaum CA, Goldstein HW, Graen GB. 2011. A longitudinal examination of the effects of LMX, ability, and differentiation on team performance. J. Bus. Psychol. 26:347–57 [Google Scholar]
  124. Nemanich LA, Vera D. 2009. Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. Leadersh. Q. 20:19–33 [Google Scholar]
  125. Nicolaides VC, LaPort KA, Chen TR, Tomassetti AJ, Weis EJ. et al. 2014. The shared leadership of teams: a meta-analysis of proximal, distal, and moderating relationships. Leadersh. Q. 25:923–42 [Google Scholar]
  126. Olsson L, Hemlin S, Pousette A. 2012. A multi-level analysis of leader-member exchange and creative performance in research groups. Leadersh. Q. 23:604–19 [Google Scholar]
  127. Pan W, Sun L, Chow IHS. 2012. Leader-member exchange and employee creativity: test of a multilevel moderated mediation model. Hum. Perform. 25:432–51 [Google Scholar]
  128. Park S, Sturman MC, Vanderpool C, Chan E. 2015. Only time will tell: the changing relationships between LMX, job performance, and justice. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:660–80 [Google Scholar]
  129. Pearce CL, Ensley MD. 2004. A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: the central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). J. Organ. Behav. 25:259–78 [Google Scholar]
  130. Pearce CL, Sims HP. 2002. Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: an examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dyn.: Theory, Res. Pract. 6:172–97 [Google Scholar]
  131. Pearce CL, Conger JA. 2003a. All those years ago: the historical underpinnings of shared leadership. See Pearce & Conger 2003b 1–18
  132. Pearce CL, Conger JA. 2003b. Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. London: Sage
  133. Pentland AS. 2010. To signal is human: real-time data mining unmasks the power of imitation, kith and charisma in our face-to-face social networks. Am. Sci. 98:203–11 [Google Scholar]
  134. Perry ML, Pearce CL, Sims HP. 1999. Empowered selling teams: how shared leadership can contribute to selling team outcomes. J. Pers. Selling Sales Manag. 19:35–52 [Google Scholar]
  135. Purvanova RK, Bono JE. 2009. Transformational leadership in context: face-to-face and virtual teams. Leadersh. Q. 20:343–57 [Google Scholar]
  136. Randall KR, Resick CJ, DeChurch LA. 2011. Building team adaptive capacity: the roles of sensegiving and team composition. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:525–40 [Google Scholar]
  137. Resick CJ, Murase T, Randall KR, DeChurch LA. 2014. Information elaboration and team performance: examining the psychological origins and environmental contingencies. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 124:165–76 [Google Scholar]
  138. Rico R, Sanchez-Manzanares M, Antino M, Lau D. 2012. Bridging team faultlines by combining task role assignment and goal structure strategies. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:407–20 [Google Scholar]
  139. Rogosa DR. 1995. Myths and methods: “myths about longitudinal research” plus supplemental questions. The Analysis of Change JM Gottman 3–66 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  140. Rosenbaum LL, Rosenbaum WB. 1971. Morale and productivity consequences of group leadership style, stress, and type of task. J. Appl. Psychol. 55:343–48 [Google Scholar]
  141. Ruggieri S. 2009. Leadership in virtual teams: a comparison of transformational and transactional leaders. Soc. Behav. Pers. 37:1017–22 [Google Scholar]
  142. Santos JP, Caetano A, Tavares SM. 2015. Is training leaders in functional leadership a useful tool for improving the performance of leadership functions. Leadersh. Q. 26:470–84 [Google Scholar]
  143. Schaubroeck J, Lam SS, Cha SE. 2007. Embracing transformational leadership: team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:1020–30 [Google Scholar]
  144. Schriesheim CA, Castro SL, Cogliser CC. 1999. Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: a comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadersh. Q. 10:63–113 [Google Scholar]
  145. Schriesheim CA, Castro SL, Zhou X, Yammarino FJ. 2001. The folly of theorizing ‘A’ but testing ‘B’: a selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed leader-member exchange illustration. Leadersh. Q. 12:515–51 [Google Scholar]
  146. Seers A. 1996. Better leadership through chemistry: toward a model of shared team leadership. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams M Beyerlein 145–72 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  147. Shin S, Kim T, Lee J, Bian L. 2012. Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: a cross-level interaction. Acad. Manag. J. 55:197–212 [Google Scholar]
  148. Sieweke J, Zhao B. 2015. The impact of team familiarity and team leader experience on team coordination errors: a panel analysis of professional basketball teams. J. Organ. Behav. 36:382–402 [Google Scholar]
  149. Sivasubramaniam N, Murry WD, Avolio BJ, Jung DI. 2002. A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group Organ. Manag. 27:66–96 [Google Scholar]
  150. Solansky ST. 2008. Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 14:332–41 [Google Scholar]
  151. Sosik JJ, Avolio BJ, Kahai SS. 1997. Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:89–103 [Google Scholar]
  152. Sosik JJ, Avolio BJ, Kahai SS. 1998. Inspiring group creativity: comparing anonymous and identified electronic brainstorming. Small Group Res. 29:3–31 [Google Scholar]
  153. Stewart N, Johnson O. 2009. Leader-member exchange as a moderator of the relationship between work group diversity and team performance. Group Organ. Manag. 34:507–35 [Google Scholar]
  154. Tschan F, Semmer NK, Gautschi D, Hunziker P, Spychiger M, Marsch SU. 2006. Leading to recovery: group performance and coordinative activities in medical emergency driven groups. Hum. Perform. 19:277–304 [Google Scholar]
  155. van Knippenberg D, Sitkin SB. 2013. A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?. Acad. Manag. Ann. 7:1–60 [Google Scholar]
  156. Vidyarthi PR, Liden RC, Anand S, Erdogan B, Ghosh S. 2010. Where do I stand? Examining the effects of leader-member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviors. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:849–61 [Google Scholar]
  157. Vroom VH, Yetton PW. 1973. Leadership and Decision-Making New York: Wiley
  158. Wageman R, Hackman JR, Lehman E. 2005. Team diagnostic survey: development of an instrument. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 41:373–98 [Google Scholar]
  159. Wang G, Oh S, Courtright SH, Colbert AE. 2011. Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group Organ. Manag. 36:223–70 [Google Scholar]
  160. Wang D, Waldman DA, Zhang Z. 2014. A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:181–98 [Google Scholar]
  161. Wang P, Walumbwa FO. 2007. Family-friendly programs, organizational commitment, and work withdrawal: the moderating role of transformational leadership. Pers. Psychol. 60:397–427 [Google Scholar]
  162. Wang X-H, Howell JM. 2012. A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identification, and follower outcomes. Leadersh. Q. 23:775–90 [Google Scholar]
  163. Wang X-H, Howell JM. 2010. Exploring the dual-level effects of transformational leadership on followers. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:1134–44 [Google Scholar]
  164. Wood MS, Fields D. 2007. Exploring the impact of shared leadership on management team member job outcomes. Baltic J. Manag. 2:251–72 [Google Scholar]
  165. Wu JB, Tsui AS, Kinicki AJ. 2010. Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Acad. Manag. J. 53:90–106 [Google Scholar]
  166. Zaccaro SJ, Rittman AL, Marks MA. 2001. Team leadership. Leadersh. Q. 12:451–83 [Google Scholar]
  167. Zhang XA, Li N, Ullrich J, van Dick R. 2015. Getting everyone on board: the effect of differentiated transformational leadership by CEOs on top management team effectiveness and leader-rated firm performance. J. Manag. 41:1898–33 [Google Scholar]
  168. Zhou L, Wang M, Chen G, Shi J. 2012. Supervisors' upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:668–80 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062429
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062429
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error