1932

Abstract

I recount some of my early experiences in the field and how they shaped my views about conducting research. As I describe it, my entry into organizational behavior was not at all seamless, requiring a series of adjustments along the way. Like many of my colleagues who had moved into the field of organizational behavior, I had to find a source of valued added—a new perspective or set of alternative ideas to contribute to the field. This process of adjustment, I fear, is no longer so prevalent in the field today. Although many social psychologists have migrated to business schools, they are still by and large doing social psychological rather than organizational research. They often extend social psychological theories to the business context, but they rarely seek to reframe and reformulate core organizational issues and problems. For this to change, I argue that future research needs to become more contextual and phenomenon-driven. My hope is that, with the recent upsurge in talent entering the field, we can find a way to harvest more of its creativity, moving from the application of social psychology to a genuine social psychology of organizations.

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Do You Need a Program of Research?

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
For Love of Basketball: How to Stay Engaged and Motivated

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Successful Scholars Also Publish: Developing a Portfolio of Research

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Crafting a Manuscript: It's Easier to Take Your Voice Out Than to Get It Back In

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
The Inspiration Behind Escalation of Commitment Research

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Research Ideas: Where to Look for Inspiration

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Having a Broader Influence on the Field: Why Being an Editor Matters

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
The Dominance of Publishing in Top-Tier Journals: A Tale of Caution

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Where Do We Discover New Constructs?

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Beyond Hammers and Nails: Toward a Social Psychology of Organizations

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Go to Where the Action Is: Why We Need More Experience In and With Organizations

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Are We Getting Further Away from Organizations?
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062524
2016-03-21
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/3/1/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062524.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062524&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Akinola M. 2010. Measuring the pulse of an organization: integrating physiological measures into the organizational scholar's toolbox. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:203–23 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C, Berdhal JL. 2002. The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83:1362–77 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson C, Brion S. 2014. Perspectives on power in organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:67–97 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson C, Brown C. 2010. The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:55–89 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson C, Galinsky AD. 2006. Power, optimism, and risk-taking. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 36:511–36 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashforth BE, Anand V. 2003. The normalization of corruption in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:1–52 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bazerman MH. 1994. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making New York: Wiley
  8. Bazerman MH, Watkins MD. 2004. Predictable Surprises: The Disasters You Should Have Seen Coming and How to Prevent Them Boston: Harvard Bus. Sch. Press
  9. Becker HS. 1967. Whose side are we on?. Soc. Probl. 14:239–47 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brief AP, Smith-Crowe K. 2016. Organizations matter. The Social Psychology of Good and Evil AG Miller New York: Guilford Press, 2nd. In press [Google Scholar]
  11. Brockner J. 1992. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: toward theoretical progress. Acad. Manag. Rev. 17:39–61 [Google Scholar]
  12. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. 1966. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
  13. Carney DR, Cuddy AJC, Yap AJ. 2010. Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays cause changes in neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychol. Sci. 21:1363–68 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chatman JA, Flynn FJ. 2005. Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organ. Sci. 16:434–47 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC. 2007. It's all about me: narcissistic CEOs and their effects on company strategy and performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 52:351–86 [Google Scholar]
  16. Clinard M. 1983. Corporate Ethics and Crime: The Role of Middle Management Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publ.
  17. Dalal RS, Bonaccio S, Highhouse S, Ilgen D, Mohammed S, Slaughter JE. 2010. What if industrial–organizational psychology decided to take workplace decisions seriously?. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 3:386–405 [Google Scholar]
  18. Darley J. 1992. Social organization for the production of evil. Psychol. Inq. 3:199–218 [Google Scholar]
  19. Darley JM, Latané B. 1968. Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 8:377–83 [Google Scholar]
  20. Galinsky A, Gruenfeld D, Magee JC. 2003. From power to action. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85:3453–66 [Google Scholar]
  21. Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Inesi ME, Gruenfeld DH. 2006. Power and perspectives not taken. Psychol. Sci. 17:121068–74 [Google Scholar]
  22. Grant AM. 2012. Leading with meaning: beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Acad. Manag. J. 55:458–76 [Google Scholar]
  23. Greenberg J. 1990. Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: the hidden cost of pay cuts. J. Appl. Psychol. 75:5561–68 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16:250–79 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hayward M, Hambrick DC. 1997. Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: evidence of CEO hubris. Adm. Sci. Q. 42:103–27 [Google Scholar]
  26. Janis IL. 1972. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascos Boston: Houghton Mifflin
  27. Kahneman D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux
  28. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  29. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 2000. Choices, Values and Frames New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  30. Katz D, Kahn RL. 1966. The Social Psychology of Organizations New York: John Wiley
  31. Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C. 2003. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychol. Rev. 110:2265–84 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ku G, Wang C, Galinsky A. 2015. The promise and perversity of perspective-taking in organizations. Res. Org. Behav. 35:79–102 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lerner JS, Tetlock PE. 1999. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychol. Bull. 125:255–75 [Google Scholar]
  34. Locke CC, Anderson C. 2015. The downside of looking like a leader: power, nonverbal confidence, and participative decision-making. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 58:42–47 [Google Scholar]
  35. March JG, Olsen JP. 1976. Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget [Google Scholar]
  36. Markus HR, Schwartz B. 2010. Does choice mean freedom and well-being?. J. Consum. Res. 37:2344–55 [Google Scholar]
  37. McGrath JE, Martin J, Kulka RA. 1982. Judgment Calls in Research Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publ.
  38. McGuire WJ. 1983. A contextualist theory of knowledge: its implications for innovation and reform in psychological research. Advances Exp. Social Psychol. 16:1–47 [Google Scholar]
  39. Moore C, Gino F. 2013. Ethically adrift: how others pull our moral compass from true north, and how we can fix it. Res. Org. Behav. 33:53–77 [Google Scholar]
  40. Morgeson FP, Mitchell TR, Liu D. 2015. Event system theory: an event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Acad. Manag. J. 40:4515–37 [Google Scholar]
  41. Nisbett R. 2003. The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently…and Why New York: The Free Press
  42. Notz WW. 1977. A failure of common sense: an empirical study of the impact of the draft on college disenrollment decisions. J. Appl. Psychol. 62:4517–20 [Google Scholar]
  43. Notz WW, Staw BM, Cook TD. 1971. Attitude toward troop withdrawal from Indochina as a function of draft number: dissonance or self-interest. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 20:118–26 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ordóñez LD, Schweitzer ME, Galinsky AD, Bazerman MH. 2009. Goals gone wild: the systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 23:16–16 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pfeffer J. 1981. Power in Organizations Marshfield, MA: Pitman
  46. Porter LW, Schneider B. 2014. What was, what is, and what may be in OP/OB. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:1–24 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ross J, Staw BM. 1986. Expo 86: an escalation prototype. Admin. Sci. Q. 31:274–97 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ross J, Staw BM. 1993. Organizational escalation and exit: the case of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant. Acad. Manag. J. 36:701–32 [Google Scholar]
  49. Salancik GR, Pfeffer J. 1978. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Adm. Sci. Q. 23:224–53 [Google Scholar]
  50. Schein EH. 2015. Organizational psychology then and now: Some observations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2:1–19 [Google Scholar]
  51. Simon HA. 1957. Models of Man. Social and Rational New York: Wiley
  52. Sleesman DJ, Conlon DE, McNamara G, Miles JE. 2012. Cleaning up the big muddy: a meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment. Acad. Manag. J. 55:541–62 [Google Scholar]
  53. Staw BM. 1974. The attitudinal and behavioral consequences of changing a major organizational reward: a natural field experiment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 29:742–51 [Google Scholar]
  54. Staw BM. 1976. Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment toward a chosen course of action. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 20:27–49 [Google Scholar]
  55. Staw BM. 1984. Organizational behavior: a review and reformulation of the field's outcome variables. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 35:627–66 [Google Scholar]
  56. Staw BM. 1997. The escalation of commitment: an update and appraisal. Organizational Decision Making Z Shapira New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Staw BM, Bell NE, Clausen JA. 1986. The dispositional approach to job attitudes: a lifetime longitudinal test. Adm. Sci. Q. 31:56–77 [Google Scholar]
  58. Staw BM, Hoang H. 1995. Sunk costs in the NBA: why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Adm. Sci. Q. 40:474–49 [Google Scholar]
  59. Staw BM, Ross J. 1985. Stability in the midst of change: a dispositional approach to job attitudes. J. Appl. Psychol. 70:469–80 [Google Scholar]
  60. Staw BM, Sutton RI. 1993. Macro organizational psychology. Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research JK Murnighan 350–84 Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall [Google Scholar]
  61. Sutton RI. 2010. The No Asshole Rule: Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn't New York: Business Plus
  62. Tannenbaum AS. 1968. Control in Organizations New York: McGraw-Hill
  63. Tetlock PE. 1985. Accountability: the neglected social context of judgment and choice. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:297–332 [Google Scholar]
  64. Tiedens LZ. 2001. Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: the effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80:86–94 [Google Scholar]
  65. Tost LP. 2016. When, why, and how do powerholders “feel the power”? Examining the links between structural and psychological power and reviving the connection between power and responsibility. Res. Organ. Behav 35:29–56 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tost LP, Gino F, Larrick RP. 2013. When power makes others speechless: the negative impact of leader power on team performance. Acad. Manag. J. 56:1465–86 [Google Scholar]
  67. Weick KE. 1969. The Social Psychology of Organizing Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  68. Zsambok CE, Klein G. 2014. Naturalistic Decision Making New York: Psychology Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062524
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062524
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error