1932

Abstract

American political development (APD) endeavors to understand the dynamism and durability of institutions. This focus has much in common with kindred scholarship in political science on the temporal construction of politics, yet the points of connection between APD and other fields are not always clear. As a remedy, this article reviews the various modes of institutional change found in the literature, the causal mechanisms in each, and the metaphors scholars sometimes use to capture processes that are difficult to observe directly. Using these various modes, mechanisms, and metaphors, scholars of APD explore institutional dynamics at different levels of analysis, highlighting the connections between the micropolitics of situated action and broader transformations at the macro level of the polity. The review concludes by showing how the study of APD speaks to issues of power and political economy that are once again central to political science scholarship.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040113-161139
2014-05-11
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/17/1/annurev-polisci-040113-161139.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040113-161139&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Bensel RF. 2000. The Political Economy of American Industrialization: 1877–1900 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  2. Berk G. 2009. Louis Brandeis and the Making of Regulated Competition: 1900–1932 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  3. Berk G, Galvan D. 2009. How people experience and change institutions: a field guide to creative syncretism. Theory Soc. 38:6543–80 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown CS. 2007. Big History: From the Big Bang to the Present New York: New Press
  5. Campbell AL. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Activism and the American Welfare State Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  6. Carpenter DP. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  7. Clemens ES. 1997. The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  8. Clemens ES. 2006. Lineages of the Rube Goldberg state: building and blurring public programs. Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State I Shapiro, S Skowronek, D Galvin 187–215 New York: NYU Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Falleti TG, Lynch JF. 2009. Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comp. Polit. Stud. 42:91143–66 [Google Scholar]
  10. Frymer P. 2008. Black and Blue: African Americans, the Labor Movement, and the Decline of the Democratic Party Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  11. Gerring J. 2003. APD from a methodological point of view. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 17:182–102 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gerring J. 2008. The mechanismic worldview: thinking inside the box. Brit. J. Polit. Sci. 38:1161–79 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gottschalk M. 2006. The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  14. Hacker JS. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  15. Hacker JS. 2004. Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: the hidden politics of social policy retrenchment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98:2243–60 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hacker JS, Pierson P. 2011. The case for policy-focused political analysis Work. Pap., Inst. Soc. Policy Stud., Yale Univ.
  17. Hall PA. 2015. Politics as a process structured in space and time. The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism O Fioretes, T Falleti, A Sheingate New York: Oxford Univ. Press In press [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacobs LR, Soss J. 2010. The politics of inequality in America: a political economy framework. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 13:341–64 [Google Scholar]
  19. Katznelson I, Shefter M. 2002. Shaped by War and Trade: International Influences on American Political Development Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  20. King DS, Smith RM. 2005. Racial orders in American political development. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99:175–92 [Google Scholar]
  21. King DS, Smith RM. 2011. Still a House Divided: Race and Politics in Obama's America Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  22. Krasner S. 1984. Approaches to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comp. Polit. 16:2223–46 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lawrence T, Suddaby R. 2006. Institutions and institutional work. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies SR Clegg, C Hardy, TB Lawrence, WR Nord 215–54 London: Sage, 2nd. ed. [Google Scholar]
  24. Levi-Strauss C. 1966. The Savage Mind Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  25. Levitsky S, Way LA. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  26. Lieberman R. 2002. Ideas, institutions, and political order: explaining political change. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 96:4697–712 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lipsky M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services New York: Russell Sage Found.
  28. Mahoney J. 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory Soc. 29:4507–48 [Google Scholar]
  29. Mahoney J. 2001. Beyond correlational analysis: recent innovations in theory and method. Sociol. Forum 16:3575–93 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mahoney J, Thelen K. 2010. A theory of gradual institutional change. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power J Mahoney, K Thelen 1–37 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Mayes R. 2004. Causal chains and cost-shifting: how Medicare's rescue inadvertently triggered the managed care revolution. J. Polit. Hist. 16:2144–74 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mettler S. 2007. The transformed welfare state and the redistribution of political voice. The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism P Pierson, T Skocpol 191–222 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  33. Mettler S. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  34. Mickey R. 2013. Paths Out of Dixie: The Democratization of Authoritarian Enclaves in America's Deep South Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  35. Morgan KJ, Campbell AL. 2011. The Delegated Welfare State: Medicare, Markets, and the Governance of Social Policy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  36. Morone J. 2003. Hellfire Nation: The Politics of Sin in American History New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  37. Novak WJ. 2008. The myth of the “weak” American state. Am. Hist. Rev. 113:3752–72 [Google Scholar]
  38. Oberlander J. 2003. The Political Life of Medicare Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  39. Orren K, Skowronek S. 1994. Beyond the iconography of order: notes for a new institutionalism. The Dynamics of American Politics L Dodd, C Jillison 311–30 Boulder, CO: Westview [Google Scholar]
  40. Orren K, Skowronek S. 2004. The Search for American Political Development New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  41. Pierson P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94:2251–67 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pierson P. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  43. Plotke D. 1996. Building a Democratic Political Order: Reshaping American Liberalism in the 1940s New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  44. Polsky AJ. 2012. Partisan regimes in American politics. Polity 44:151–80 [Google Scholar]
  45. Schickler E. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  46. Shefter M. 1977. Party and patronage: Germany, England, and Italy. Polit. Soc. 7:4403–52 [Google Scholar]
  47. Shefter M. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  48. Sheingate A. 2003. Political entrepreneurship, institutional change, and American political development. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 17:2185–203 [Google Scholar]
  49. Sheingate A. 2010. Rethinking rules: creativity and constraint in the U.S. House of Representatives. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power J Mahoney, K Thelen 168–203 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  50. Skocpol T. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  51. Skowronek S. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  52. Skowronek S. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  53. Skowronek S, Glassman M. 2007. Formative acts. Formative Acts: American Politics in the Making S Skowronek, M Glassman 1–9 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  54. Soss J. 1999. Lessons of welfare: policy design, political learning, and political action. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 93:2363–80 [Google Scholar]
  55. Soss J, Fording RC, Schram SF. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  56. Steinmo S. 2010. The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan, and the United States New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  57. Steinmo S, Thelen K. 1992. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis S Steinmo, K Thelen, F Longstreth 1–32 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  58. Steinmo S, Watts J. 1995. It's the institutions, stupid! Why comprehensive national health insurance always fails in America. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 20:2329–72 [Google Scholar]
  59. Streeck W. 2009. Institutions in history: bringing capitalism back in Work. Pap., Max Planck Inst. Study Soc., Cologne, Ger.
  60. Streeck W, Thelen K. 2005. Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies W Streeck, K Thelen 1–39 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  61. Thelen K. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  62. Thelen K. 2010. Beyond comparative statics: historical institutional approaches to stability and change in the political economy of labor. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis G Morgan, JL Campbell, C Crouch, OK Pedersen, R Whitley 41–62 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  63. Tulis J. 1988. The Rhetorical Presidency Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  64. Wilson W. 1908. Constitutional Government in the United States New York: Columbia Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040113-161139
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040113-161139
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error