1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Psychology
  4. Volume 68, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Psychology

Volume 68, 2017

Toward a Social Psychophysics of Face Communication

Abstract

As a highly social species, humans are equipped with a powerful tool for social communication—the face. Although seemingly simple, the human face can elicit multiple social perceptions due to the rich variations of its movements, morphology, and complexion. Consequently, identifying precisely what face information elicits different social perceptions is a complex empirical challenge that has largely remained beyond the reach of traditional methods. In the past decade, the emerging field of social psychophysics has developed new methods to address this challenge, with the potential to transfer psychophysical laws of social perception to the digital economy via avatars and social robots. At this exciting juncture, it is timely to review these new methodological developments. In this article, we introduce and review the foundational methodological developments of social psychophysics, present work done in the past decade that has advanced understanding of the face as a tool for social communication, and discuss the major challenges that lie ahead.

Keyword(s): culture, facial expressions, reverse correlation, social communication, social psychophysics
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044242
2017-01-03
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/68/1/annurev-psych-010416-044242.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044242&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams RB, Pauker K, Weisbuch M. 2010. Looking the other way: the role of gaze direction in the cross-race memory effect. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46:478–81 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahumada A, Lovell J. 1971. Stimulus features in signal detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49:1751–56 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arak A, Enquist M. 1993. Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci. 340:207–13 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arridge S, Moss JP, Linney AD, James DR. 1985. Three dimensional digitization of the face and skull. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 13:136–43 [Google Scholar]
  5. Atkinson AP, Dittrich WH, Gemmell AJ, Young AW. 2004. Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays. Perception 33:717–46 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bar M, Neta M, Linz H. 2006. Very first impressions. Emotion 6:269–78 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beaupré M, Cheung N, Hess U. 2000. The Montreal set of facial displays of emotion. Slides, Dep. Psychol., Univ. Quebec Montr. [Google Scholar]
  8. Belin P, Fillion-Bilodeau S, Gosselin F. 2008. The Montreal Affective Voices: a validated set of nonverbal affect bursts for research on auditory affective processing. Behav. Res. Methods 40:531–39 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bellman R. 1956. Dynamic programming and Lagrange multipliers. PNAS 42:767–69 [Google Scholar]
  10. Biehl M, Matsumoto D, Ekman P, Hearn V, Heider K. et al. 1997. Matsumoto and Ekman's Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE): reliability data and cross-national differences. J. Nonverbal Behav. 21:3–21 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bijlstra G, Holland RW, Wigboldus DH. 2010. The social face of emotion recognition: evaluations versus stereotypes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46:657–63 [Google Scholar]
  12. Blais C, Jack RE, Scheepers C, Fiset D, Caldara R. 2008. Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLOS ONE 3:e3022 [Google Scholar]
  13. Blanz V, Vetter T. 1999. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. Proc. Annu. Conf. Comput. Graph. Interact. Techn., 26th, Los Angeles, Aug. 8–13187–94 New York: ACM Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Braje WL, Kersten D, Tarr MJ, Troje NF. 1998. Illumination effects in face recognition. Psychobiology 26:371–80 [Google Scholar]
  15. Burriss RP, Little AC, Nelson EC. 2007. 2D:4D and sexually dimorphic facial characteristics. Arch. Sex. Behav. 36:377–84 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen C, Garrod O, Schyns P, Jack R. 2015. The face is the mirror of the cultural mind. J. Vis. 15:928 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cordaro DT, Keltner D, Tshering S, Wangchuk D, Flynn LM. 2015. The voice conveys emotion in ten globalized cultures and one remote village in Bhutan. Emotion 16:117–28 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cunningham DW, Kleiner M, Bülthoff HH, Wallraven C. 2004. The components of conversational facial expressions. Proc. Symp. Appl. Percept. Graph. Vis., 1st, Los Angeles, Aug. 7–8143–50 New York: ACM Press [Google Scholar]
  19. Dael N, Mortillaro M, Scherer KR. 2012. The body action and posture coding system (BAP): development and reliability. J. Nonverbal Behav. 36:97–121 [Google Scholar]
  20. Darwin C. 1999 (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals London: Fontana Press
  21. Davis JA. 1963. Intellectual climates in 135 American colleges and universities: a study in “social psychophysics.”. Sociol. Educ. 37:110–28 [Google Scholar]
  22. de Gelder B. 2009. Why bodies? Twelve reasons for including bodily expressions in affective neuroscience. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 364:3475–84 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dezecache G, Mercier H, Scott-Phillips TC. 2013. An evolutionary approach to emotional communication. J. Pragmat. 59:221–33 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dotsch R, Wigboldus DH, Langner O, van Knippenberg A. 2008. Ethnic out-group faces are biased in the prejudiced mind. Psychol. Sci. 19:978–80 [Google Scholar]
  25. Doty TJ, Japee S, Ingvar M, Ungerleider LG. 2014. Intersubject variability in fearful face processing: the link between behavior and neural activation. Cogn. Aff. Behav. Neurosci. 14:1438–53 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dukas R. 1998. Cognitive Ecology: The Evolutionary Ecology of Information Processing and Decision Making Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  27. Eberhardt JL, Davies PG, Purdie-Vaughns VJ, Johnson SL. 2006. Looking deathworthy: perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychol. Sci. 17:383–86 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ekman P, Friesen W. 1978. Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement Sunnyvale, CA: Consult. Psychol. Press
  29. Ekman P, Sorenson ER, Friesen WV. 1969. Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science 164:86–88 [Google Scholar]
  30. Elfenbein HA. 2015. In-group advantage and other-group bias in facial emotion recognition. Understanding Facial Expressions in Communication MK Mandal, A Awasthi 57–71 Berlin: Springer [Google Scholar]
  31. Eriksen CW, James JDS. 1986. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model. Percept. Psychophys. 40:225–40 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fink B, Grammer K, Matts PJ. 2006. Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27:433–42 [Google Scholar]
  33. Freeman JB, Johnson KL, Ambady N, Rule NO. 2010. Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 36:1318–31 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Anderson AW, Skudlarski P, Gore JC. 1999. Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat. Neurosci. 2:568–73 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gill D, Garrod OG, Jack RE, Schyns PG. 2014. Facial movements strategically camouflage involuntary social signals of face morphology. Psychol. Sci. 25:1079–86 [Google Scholar]
  36. Gosselin F, Schyns PG. 2001. Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vis. Res. 41:2261–71 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gosselin F, Schyns PG. 2002. RAP: a new framework for visual categorization. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6:70–77 [Google Scholar]
  38. Gosselin F, Schyns PG. 2003. Superstitious perceptions reveal properties of internal representations. Psychol. Sci. 14:505–9 [Google Scholar]
  39. Grammer K, Thornhill R. 1994. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J. Comp. Psychol. 108:233–42 [Google Scholar]
  40. Grezes J, Pichon S, De Gelder B. 2007. Perceiving fear in dynamic body expressions. NeuroImage 35:959–67 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gross JJ, Levenson RW. 1995. Emotion elicitation using films. Cogn. Emot. 9:87–108 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hammond P, Suttie M. 2012. Large-scale objective phenotyping of 3D facial morphology. Hum. Mutat. 33:817–25 [Google Scholar]
  43. Haub C. 2002. How many people have ever lived on Earth. Popul. Today 30:3–4 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. 2007. Aging and loneliness: downhill quickly. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16:187–91 [Google Scholar]
  45. Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. 2000. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4:223–33 [Google Scholar]
  46. Henrich J, Heine S, Norenzayan A. 2010. The weirdest people in the world. Behav. Brain Sci. 33:61–83 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hill H, Bruce V, Akamatsu S. 1995. Perceiving the sex and race of faces: the role of shape and colour. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci. 261:367–73 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hill H, Schyns PG, Akamatsu S. 1997. Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Cognition 62:201–22 [Google Scholar]
  49. Howells WW. 1960. The distribution of man. Sci. Am. 203:113–30 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hsiao JH-W, Cottrell G. 2008. Two fixations suffice in face recognition. Psychol. Sci. 19:998–1006 [Google Scholar]
  51. Hummert ML. 2014. Age changes in facial morphology, emotional communication, and age stereotyping. The Oxford Handbook of Emotion, Social Cognition, and Problem Solving in Adulthood P Verhaeghen, C Hertzog 47–60 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  52. Ince RA, Van Rijsbergen NJ, Thut G, Rousselet GA, Gross J. et al. 2015. Tracing the flow of perceptual features in an algorithmic brain network. Sci. Rep. 5:17681 [Google Scholar]
  53. Jack RE. 2013. Culture and facial expressions of emotion. Vis. Cogn. 21:1248–86 [Google Scholar]
  54. Jack RE, Blais C, Scheepers C, Schyns PG, Caldara R. 2009. Cultural confusions show that facial expressions are not universal. Curr. Biol. 19:1543–48 [Google Scholar]
  55. Jack RE, Caldara R, Schyns PG. 2011. Internal representations reveal cultural diversity in expectations of facial expressions of emotion. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 141:19–25. doi: [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Jack RE, Garrod OG, Yu H, Caldara R, Schyns PG. 2012. Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal. PNAS 109:7241–44 [Google Scholar]
  57. Jack RE, Garrod OGB, Schyns PG. 2014. Dynamic facial expressions of emotion transmit an evolving hierarchy of signals over time. Curr. Biol. 24:187–92 [Google Scholar]
  58. Jack RE, Sun W, Delis I, Garrod O, Schyns P. 2016. Four not six: revealing culturally common facial expressions of emotion. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145:708–30 [Google Scholar]
  59. Johnson SK, Podratz KE, Dipboye RL, Gibbons E. 2010. Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: tracking down the “beauty is beastly” effect. J. Soc. Psychol. 150:301–18 [Google Scholar]
  60. Johnston A, Hill H, Carman N. 2013. Recognising faces: effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception 42:1227–37 [Google Scholar]
  61. Jones AL, Kramer RS, Ward R. 2012. Signals of personality and health: the contributions of facial shape, skin texture, and viewing angle. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 38:1353–61 [Google Scholar]
  62. Karremans JC, Dotsch R, Corneille O. 2011. Romantic relationship status biases memory of faces of attractive opposite-sex others: evidence from a reverse-correlation paradigm. Cognition 121:422–26 [Google Scholar]
  63. Krumhuber EG, Kappas A, Manstead AS. 2013. Effects of dynamic aspects of facial expressions: a review. Emot. Rev. 5:41–46 [Google Scholar]
  64. Krumhuber EG, Manstead AS, Cosker D, Marshall D, Rosin PL, Kappas A. 2007. Facial dynamics as indicators of trustworthiness and cooperative behavior. Emotion 7:730–35 [Google Scholar]
  65. Labarre W. 1947. The cultural basis of emotions and gestures. J. Personal. 16:49–68 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lai M, I Oruç, Barton JJ. 2013. The role of skin texture and facial shape in representations of age and identity. Cortex 49:252–65 [Google Scholar]
  67. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. 2005. International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual Rep. No. A-8, Cent. Study Emot. Atten., Univ. Fla., Gainesville:
  68. Langner O, Dotsch R, Bijlstra G, Wigboldus DHJ, Hawk ST, van Knippenberg A. 2010. Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cogn. Emot. 24:1377–88 [Google Scholar]
  69. Leopold DA, O'Toole AJ, Vetter T, Blanz V. 2001. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nat. Neurosci. 4:89–94 [Google Scholar]
  70. Little AC, Jones BC, Waitt C, Tiddeman BP, Feinberg DR. et al. 2008. Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species. PLOS ONE 3:e2106 [Google Scholar]
  71. Little AC, Perrett DI. 2007. Using composite images to assess accuracy in personality attribution to faces. Br. J. Psychol. 98:111–26 [Google Scholar]
  72. Littlewood W. 2001. Cultural awareness and the negotiation of meaning in intercultural communication. Lang. Aware. 10:189–99 [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu F, van der Lijn F, Schurmann C, Zhu G, Chakravarty MM. et al. 2012. A genome-wide association study identifies five loci influencing facial morphology in Europeans. PLOS Genet 8:e1002932 [Google Scholar]
  74. Lundqvist D, Flykt A, Öhman A. 1998. The Karolinska directed emotional faces CD-ROM, Dep. Clin. Neurosci., Psychol. Sect., Karolinska Inst. Stockholm:
  75. Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV. 2000. Thinking categorically about others. Annu. Rev. Psych. 51:93–120 [Google Scholar]
  76. Mangini M, Biederman I. 2004. Making the ineffable explicit: estimating the information employed for face classifications. Cogn. Sci. 28:209–26 [Google Scholar]
  77. Matsumoto D, Ekman P. 1988. Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE) and Neutral Faces (JACNeuF) Slides, Dep. Psychiatry, Univ. Calif. San Francisco:
  78. Mautz BS, Wong BB, Peters RA, Jennions MD. 2013. Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness. PNAS 110:6925–30 [Google Scholar]
  79. Miellet S, Caldara R, Schyns PG. 2011. Local Jekyll and global Hyde: the dual identity of face identification. Psychol. Sci. 22:1518–26 [Google Scholar]
  80. Morency L-P, Stratou G, DeVault D, Hartholt A, Lhommet M. et al. 2015. SimSensei demonstration: a perceptive virtual human interviewer for healthcare applications Presented at AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., 29th, Jan 25–30 Austin, TX:
  81. Morris D. 1979. Gestures, Their Origins and Distribution New York: Stein and Day
  82. Nelson NL, Russell JA. 2013. Universality revisited. Emot. Rev. 5:8–15 [Google Scholar]
  83. Nusseck M, Cunningham DW, Wallraven C, Bulthoff HH. 2008. The contribution of different facial regions to the recognition of conversational expressions. J. Vis. 8:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  84. Oosterhof NN, Todorov A. 2008. The functional basis of face evaluation. PNAS 105:11087–92 [Google Scholar]
  85. O'Toole AJ, Deffenbacher KA, Valentin D, Abdi H. 1994. Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Mem. Cogn. 22:208–24 [Google Scholar]
  86. Palmer SE. 1999. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  87. Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S. et al. 1998. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394:884–87 [Google Scholar]
  88. Peterson MF, Eckstein MP. 2012. Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks. PNAS 109:E3314–23 [Google Scholar]
  89. Pollick FE, Paterson HM, Bruderlin A, Sanford AJ. 2001. Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition 82:B51–B61 [Google Scholar]
  90. Rhodes G. 2006. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57:199–226 [Google Scholar]
  91. Rhodes MG, Anastasi JS. 2012. The own-age bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol. Bull. 138:146–74 [Google Scholar]
  92. Roberts A. 2010. The Incredible Human Journey London: A&C Black
  93. Roether CL, Omlor L, Christensen A, Giese MA. 2009. Critical features for the perception of emotion from gait. J. Vis. 9:151–32 [Google Scholar]
  94. Rule NO, Garrett JV, Ambady N. 2010. On the perception of religious group membership from faces. PLOS ONE 5:e14241 [Google Scholar]
  95. Scheiner E, Fischer J. 2011. Emotion expression: the evolutionary heritage in the human voice. Interdisciplinary Anthropology: Continuing Evolution of Man W Welsch, WJ Singer, A Wunder 105–29 Berlin: Springer [Google Scholar]
  96. Schyns PG. 1998. Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions. Cognition 67:147–79 [Google Scholar]
  97. Schyns PG, Goldstone RL, Thibaut JP. 1998. The development of features in object concepts. Behav. Brain Sci. 21:1–17 discussion 17–54 [Google Scholar]
  98. Schyns PG, Gosselin F, Smith ML. 2009. Information processing algorithms in the brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13:20–26 [Google Scholar]
  99. Schyns PG, Petro LS, Smith ML. 2007. Dynamics of visual information integration in the brain for categorizing facial expressions. Curr. Biol. 17:1580–85 [Google Scholar]
  100. Schyns PG, Thut G, Gross J. 2011. Cracking the code of oscillatory activity. PLOS Biol 9:e1001064 [Google Scholar]
  101. Scott-Phillips TC. 2008. Defining biological communication. J. Evol. Biol. 21:387–95 [Google Scholar]
  102. Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 5:3–55 [Google Scholar]
  103. Simons DJ, Rensink RA. 2005. Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9:16–20 [Google Scholar]
  104. Smith FW, Schyns PG. 2009. Smile through your fear and sadness. Psychol. Sci. 20:1202–8 [Google Scholar]
  105. Smith ML, Cottrell GW, Gosselin F, Schyns PG. 2005. Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychol. Sci. 16:184–89 [Google Scholar]
  106. Smith ML, Gosselin F, Schyns PG. 2012. Measuring internal representations from behavioral and brain data. Curr. Biol. 22:191–96 [Google Scholar]
  107. Snodgrass JG. 1975. Psychophysics. Experimental Sensory Psychology B Scharf 17–67 Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman [Google Scholar]
  108. Swets JA, Green DM, Shipley EF, Sewall SE, Wasserman AG. 1963. Signal detection by human observers DTIC Doc., Camb. Res. Lab. Electron., Mass. Inst. Technol. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/52270/RLE_QPR_053_XX.pdf?sequence=1
  109. Swiatoniowski AK, Quillen EE, Shriver MD, Jablonski NG. 2013. Technical note: comparing von Luschan skin color tiles and modern spectrophotometry for measuring human skin pigmentation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 151:325–30 [Google Scholar]
  110. Tanaka J. 2013. Introduction. Vis. Cogn. 21:1077–80 [Google Scholar]
  111. Tanaka JW, Kiefer M, Bukach CM. 2004. A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition 93:B1–9 [Google Scholar]
  112. Telles E. 2014. Pigmentocracies: Ethnicity, Race, and Color in Latin America Chapel Hill: Univ. N.C. Press
  113. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 2006. Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27:131–44 [Google Scholar]
  114. Tinbergen N. 1948. Social releasers and the experimental method required for their study. Wilson Bull 60:6–51 [Google Scholar]
  115. Todorov A, Mandisodza AN, Goren A, Hall CC. 2005. Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science 308:1623–26 [Google Scholar]
  116. Troje NF, Bülthoff HH. 1996. Face recognition under varying poses: the role of texture and shape. Vis. Res. 36:1761–71 [Google Scholar]
  117. Tskhay KO, Feriozzo MM, Rule NO. 2013. Facial features influence the categorization of female sexual orientation. Perception 42:1090–94 [Google Scholar]
  118. Van Bavel JJ, Mende-Siedlecki P, Brady WJ, Reinero DA. 2016. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility. PNAS 113:6454–59 [Google Scholar]
  119. van Rijsbergen N, Jaworska K, Rousselet GA, Schyns PG. 2014. With age comes representational wisdom in social signals. Curr. Biol. 24:2792–96 [Google Scholar]
  120. van Rijsbergen NJ, Schyns PG. 2009. Dynamics of trimming the content of face representations for categorization in the brain. PLOS Comput. Biol. 5:e1000561 [Google Scholar]
  121. Vetter T, Troje NF. 1997. Separation of texture and shape in images of faces for image coding and synthesis. JoSAA 14:2152–61 [Google Scholar]
  122. Vick S-J, Waller BM, Parr LA, Pasqualini MCS, Bard KA. 2007. A cross-species comparison of facial morphology and movement in humans and chimpanzees using the facial action coding system (FACS). J. Nonverbal Behav. 31:1–20 [Google Scholar]
  123. Vinciarelli A, Pantic M, Bourlard H. 2009. Social signal processing: survey of an emerging domain. Image Vis. Comput. 27:1743–59 [Google Scholar]
  124. Volterra V. 1930. Theory of Functionals and of Integral and Integro-Differential Equations London: Blackie
  125. Wiener N. 1958. Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  126. Wilson EO. 2012. The Social Conquest of Earth New York: WW Norton & Co.
  127. Winter RM. 1996. What's in a face. Nat. Genet. 12:124–29 [Google Scholar]
  128. Wu MC-K, David SV, Gallant JL. 2006. Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29:477–505 [Google Scholar]
  129. Young SG, Hugenberg K. 2012. Individuation motivation and face experience can operate jointly to produce the own-race bias. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3:80–87 [Google Scholar]
  130. Yu H, Garrod OGB, Schyns PG. 2012. Perception-driven facial expression synthesis. Comput. Graph. 36:152–62 [Google Scholar]
  131. Zacharopoulos GV, Manios A, Kau CH, Velagrakis G, Tzanakakis GN, de Bree E. 2016. Anthropometric analysis of the face. J. Craniofac. Surg. 27:e71–e75 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044242
Loading
Toward a Social Psychophysics of Face Communication
Annual Review of Psychology 68, 269 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044242
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044242
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044242
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error