1932

Abstract

Metrics focus attention on what is important. Balanced metrics of primary health care inform purpose and aspiration as well as performance. Purpose in primary health care is about improving the health of people and populations in their community contexts. It is informed by metrics that include long-term, meaning- and relationship-focused perspectives. Aspirational uses of metrics inspire evolving insights and iterative improvement, using a collaborative, developmental perspective. Performance metrics assess the complex interactions among primary care tenets of accessibility, a whole-person focus, integration and coordination of care, and ongoing relationships with individuals, families, and communities; primary health care principles of inclusion and equity, a focus on people's needs, multilevel integration of health, collaborative policy dialogue, and stakeholder participation; basic and goal-directed health care, prioritization, development, and multilevel health outcomes. Environments that support reflection, development, and collaborative action are necessary for metrics to advance health and minimize unintended consequences.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182438
2014-03-18
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/publhealth/35/1/annurev-publhealth-032013-182438.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182438&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abdool S, Amin A, Jara L. 1. PAHO (Pan Am. Health Org.)/World Health Org. (WHO) 2010. A policy dialogue on better evidence to improve women's health through gender and health statistics Policy Dialogue to Strength. Evid. to Improv. Women's Health through Gend. and Health Stat. Meet. rep., Oct. 25–27, Washington, DC. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=17254&Itemid=
  2. Ackoff RL. 2.  1989. From data to wisdom. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 16:3–9 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ansari Z, Laditka JN, Laditka SB. 3.  2006. Access to health care and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Med. Care Res. Rev. 63:719–41 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baicker K, Chandra A. 4.  2004. Medicare spending, the physician workforce, and beneficiaries' quality of care. Health Aff. (Millwood) Suppl. Web Exclus.:W4-184–97 [Google Scholar]
  5. Balasubramanian BA, Chase SM, Nutting PA, Cohen DJ, Strickland PA. 5.  et al. 2010. Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation (ULTRA): insights from a team-based change management strategy in primary care. Ann. Fam. Med. 8:425–32 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barr VJ, Robinson S, Marin-Link B, Underhill L, Dotts A. 6.  et al. 2003. The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model. Hosp. Q. 7:73–82 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beach MC, Inui T. 7. Relatsh.-Cent. Care Res. Netw 2006. Relationship-centered care. A constructive reframing. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 21:Suppl. 1S3–8 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bellinger G, Castro D, Mills A. 8.  2004. Data, information, knowledge, and wisdom Syst. Think. website. http://www.systems-thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm
  9. Berenson RA, Rich EC. 9.  2010. US approaches to physician payment: the deconstruction of primary care. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 25:613–18 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. 10.  1981. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med. Care 19:787–805 [Google Scholar]
  11. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. 11.  2008. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  12. Bierly PE III, Kessler EH, Christensen EW. 12.  2000. Organizational learning, knowledge and wisdom. J. Organ. Change Manag. 13:595–618 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bobiak SN, Zyzanski SJ, Ruhe MC, Carter CA, Ragan B. 13.  et al. 2009. Measuring practice capacity for change: a tool for guiding quality improvement in primary care settings. Qual. Manag. Health Care 18:278–84 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bodenheimer T, Berenson RA, Rudolf P. 14.  2007. The primary care-specialty income gap: why it matters. Ann. Intern. Med. 146:301–6 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, VonKorff M. 15.  2002. Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv. Res. 37:791–820 [Google Scholar]
  16. Breslow L. 16.  2004. Perspectives: the third revolution in health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 25:xiii–xviii [Google Scholar]
  17. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. 17.  1991. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J. Palliat. Care 7:6–9 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bush JW. 18.  1984. General Health Policy Model/Quality of Well-being (QWB) scale. Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies NK Wenger, ME Mattson, CD Furberg, J Elinson 189 New York: LeJacq [Google Scholar]
  19. Campbell SM, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Sibbald B, Roland M. 19.  2009. Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. N. Engl. J. Med. 361:368–78 [Google Scholar]
  20. Carter CA, Ruhe MC, Weyer SM, Litaker D, Fry RE, Stange KC. 20.  2007. An appreciative inquiry approach to practice improvement and transformative change in health care settings. Qual. Manag. Health Care 16:194–204 [Google Scholar]
  21. Caserta MS, Lund DA, Wright SD. 21.  1996. Exploring the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI): further evidence for a multidimensional view of burden. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 43:21–34 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cassady CE, Starfield B, Hurtado MP, Berk RA, Nanda JP, Friedenberg LA. 22.  2000. Measuring consumer experiences with primary care. Pediatrics 105:998–1003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B. 23.  et al. 2010. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 63:1179–94 [Google Scholar]
  24. Chambers LW. 24.  1988. The McMaster Health Index Questionnaire: an update. See Ref. 154 113–31
  25. Chan M. 25.  2009. Primary health care as a route to health security. Lancet 373:1586–87 [Google Scholar]
  26. Charbonneau A, Rosen AK, Ash AS, Owen RR, Kader B. 26.  et al. 2003. Measuring the quality of depression care in a large integrated health system. Med. Care 41:669–80 [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. Comm. Integr. Primary Care Public Health of the Board on Popul. Health Public Health Pract 2012. Primary Care and Public Health: Exploring Integration to Improve Population Health. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  28. Connor E, Mullan F. 28.  1983. Community Oriented Primary Care: New Directions for Health Service Delivery Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  29. Cooley WC, McAllister JW, Sherrieb K, Clark RE. 29.  2003. The Medical Home Index: development and validation of a new practice-level measure of implementation of the Medical Home model. Ambul. Pediatr. 3:173–80 [Google Scholar]
  30. Crabtree BF, Nutting PA, Miller WL, McDaniel RR, Stange KC. 30.  et al. 2011. Primary care practice transformation is hard work: insights from a 15-year developmental program of research. Med. Care 49:Suppl.S28–35 [Google Scholar]
  31. Crabtree BF, Nutting PA, Miller WL, Stange KC, Stewart EE, Jaén CR. 31.  2010. Summary of the National Demonstration Project and recommendations for the Patient-Centered Medical Home. Ann. Fam. Med. 8:S80–90 [Google Scholar]
  32. Davis K. 32.  2007. Paying for care episodes and care coordination. N. Engl. J. Med. 356:1166–68 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dentzer S. 33.  2010. Reinventing primary care: a task that is far ‘too important to fail.’. Health Aff. 29:757 [Google Scholar]
  34. Doherty WJ, Mendenhall TJ. 34.  2006. Citizen health care: a model for engaging patients, families, and communities as coproducers of health. Fam. Syst. Health 24:251–63 [Google Scholar]
  35. Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, Vanselow NA. 35.  1996. Primary Care: America's Health in a New Era Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  36. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, Wensing M, Wilkinson C. 36.  et al. 2001. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ. Couns. 43:5–22 [Google Scholar]
  37. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R. 37.  2003. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual. Saf. Health Care 12:93–99 [Google Scholar]
  38. Epstein RM. 38.  1999. Mindful practice. JAMA 282:833–39 [Google Scholar]
  39. Eriksson M, Lindstrom B. 39.  2005. Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59:460–66 [Google Scholar]
  40. Fielding JE, Teutsch S, Breslow L. 40.  2010. A framework for public health in the United States. Public Health Rev. 32:174–89 [Google Scholar]
  41. Flocke SA. 41.  1997. Measuring attributes of primary care: development of a new instrument. J. Fam. Pract. 45:64–74 [Google Scholar]
  42. Flocke SA. 42.  1998. Primary care instrument. J. Fam. Pract. 46:12 [Google Scholar]
  43. Flocke SA, Goodwin MA, Stange KC. 43.  1998. The effect of a secondary patient on the family practice visit. J. Fam. Pract. 46:429–34 [Google Scholar]
  44. Flocke SA, Miller WL, Crabtree BF. 44.  2002. Relationships between physician practice style, patient satisfaction, and attributes of primary care. J. Fam. Pract. 51:835–40 [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. Folsom Group, Am. Board Fam. Med. Young Lead. Advis. Group 2012. Communities of solution: the Folsom Report revisited. Ann. Fam. Med. 10:250–60 [Google Scholar]
  46. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Lapointe L. 46.  2005. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Ann. Fam. Med. 3:223–28 [Google Scholar]
  47. Fortin M, Dionne J, Pinho G, Gignac J, Almirall J, Lapointe L. 47.  2006. Randomized controlled trials: Do they have external validity for patients with multiple comorbidities?. Ann. Fam. Med. 4:104–8 [Google Scholar]
  48. Franks P, Clancy CM, Nutting PA. 48.  1992. Gatekeeping revisited—protecting patients from overtreatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 327:424–29 [Google Scholar]
  49. Freund T, Campbell S, Geissler S, Ursula Kunz S, Mahler C. 49.  et al. 2013. An exploration of potentially avoidable hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Ann. Fam. Med. 11:363–70 [Google Scholar]
  50. Friedberg MW, Hussey PS, Schneider EC. 50.  2010. Primary care: a critical review of the evidence on quality and costs of health care. Health Aff. 29:766–72 [Google Scholar]
  51. George J, Phun YT, Bailey MJ, Kong DC, Stewart K. 51.  2004. Development and validation of the medication regimen complexity index. Ann. Pharmacother. 38:1369–76 [Google Scholar]
  52. Glasgow RE, Orleans CT, Wagner EH. 52.  2001. Does the chronic care model serve also as a template for improving prevention?. Milbank Q. 79:579–612 [Google Scholar]
  53. Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM. 53.  2005. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med. Care 43:436–44 [Google Scholar]
  54. Goodhart CAE. 54.  1984. The problems of monetary management: the UK experience. Monetary Theory and Practice: The UK Experience CAE Goodhart 91–121 London: Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  55. Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Zubkoff M, Manning W, Rogers W. 55.  et al. 1992. Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. Results from the medical outcomes study. JAMA 267:1624–30 [Google Scholar]
  56. Griswold KS, Lesko SE, Westfall JM. 56.  2013. Communities of solution: partnerships for population health. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 26:232–38 [Google Scholar]
  57. Heath I, Rubenstein A, Stange KC, van Driel M. 57.  2009. Quality in primary health care: a multidimensional approach to complexity. BMJ 338:b1242 [Google Scholar]
  58. Helfrich CD, Li YF, Sharp ND, Sales AE. 58.  2009. Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Implement. Sci. 4:38 [Google Scholar]
  59. Hibbard JH, Mahoney E. 59.  2010. Toward a theory of patient and consumer activation. Patient Educ. Couns. 78:377–81 [Google Scholar]
  60. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. 60.  2005. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv. Res. 40:1918–30 [Google Scholar]
  61. Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ. 61.  1998. A comparison of a patient enablement instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam. Pract. 15:165–71 [Google Scholar]
  62. Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn D, Becker ER. 62.  1988. Resource-based relative values. An overview. JAMA 260:2347–53 [Google Scholar]
  63. Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn DL, Becker ER, Yntema D. 63.  et al. 1992. An overview of the development and refinement of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. The foundation for reform of U.S. physician payment. Med. Care 30:NS1–12 [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. Inst. Med 2008. Learning Healthcare System Concepts v. 2008. Washington, DC: Inst. Med.
  65. Jaén CR, Crabtree BF, Palmer RF, Ferrer RL, Nutting PA. 65.  et al. 2010. Methods for evaluating practice change toward a Patient-Centered Medical Home. Ann. Fam. Med. 8:Suppl. 1S9–20 [Google Scholar]
  66. Jaén CR, Ferrer RL, Miller WL, Palmer RF, Wood R. 66.  et al. 2010. Patient outcomes at 26 months in the patient-centered medical home National Demonstration Project. Ann. Fam. Med. 8:S57–67 [Google Scholar]
  67. Jaén CR, Palmer RF. 67.  2012. Shorter adaptive reserve measures. Ann. Fam. Med. 8:Suppl. 11–2 [Google Scholar]
  68. Jordan ME, Lanham HJ, Crabtree BF, Nutting PA, Miller WL. 68.  et al. 2009. The role of conversation in health care interventions: enabling sensemaking and learning. Implement. Sci. 4:15 [Google Scholar]
  69. Kanaan SB. 69. Natl. Comm. Vital Health Stat 2012. The Community as a Learning System for Health: Using Local Data To Improve Local Health. Washington, DC: US Dep. Health Hum. Serv.
  70. Kaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, Rogers W, Ware JE. 70.  1995. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians' participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med. Care 33:1176–87 [Google Scholar]
  71. Kark SL, Cassel J. 71.  2002. The Pholela Health Centre: a progress report. Am. J. Public Health 92:1743–47 [Google Scholar]
  72. Karliner LS, Napoles-Springer AM, Schillinger D, Bibbins-Domingo K, Pérez-Stable EJ. 72.  2008. Identification of limited English proficient patients in clinical care. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 23:1555–60 [Google Scholar]
  73. Koestler A, Smythies JR. 73.  1971. Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives on the Life Sciences Boston: Houghton Mifflin
  74. Koh HK, Brach C, Harris LM, Parchman ML. 74.  2013. A proposed ‘health literate care model’ would constitute a systems approach to improving patients' engagement in care. Health Aff. (Millwood) 32:357–67 [Google Scholar]
  75. Krist AH, Glenn BA, Glasgow RE, Balasubramanian BA, Chambers DA. 75.  et al. 2013. Designing a valid randomized pragmatic primary care implementation trial: the my own health report (MOHR) project. Implement. Sci. 8:73 [Google Scholar]
  76. Krist AH, Peele E, Woolf SH, Rothemich SF, Loomis JF. 76.  et al. 2011. Designing a patient-centered personal health record to promote preventive care. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 11:73 [Google Scholar]
  77. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. 77.  2001. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 16:606–13 [Google Scholar]
  78. Kuhn TS. 78.  1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press, 3rd ed..
  79. Lanham HJ, McDaniel RR Jr, Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stange KC. 79.  et al. 2009. How improving practice relationships among clinicians and nonclinicians can improve quality in primary care. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 35:457–66 [Google Scholar]
  80. Lawton MP. 80.  1988. Scales to measure competence in everyday activities. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 24:609–14 [Google Scholar]
  81. Lévesque JF, Haggerty J, Beninguisse G, Burge F, Gass D. 81.  et al. 2012. Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective. BMC Fam. Pract. 13:20 [Google Scholar]
  82. Lewin S, Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Bastias G, Chopra M. 82.  et al. 2008. Supporting the delivery of cost-effective interventions in primary health-care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Lancet 372:928–39 [Google Scholar]
  83. Longlett SK, Kruse JE, Wesley RM. 83.  2001. Community-oriented primary care: historical perspective. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract. 14:54–63 [Google Scholar]
  84. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. 84.  2001. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff. Clin. Pract. 4:256–62 [Google Scholar]
  85. Lubben JE. 85.  1988. Assessing social networks among elderly populations. Fam. Community Health 11:42–52 [Google Scholar]
  86. Marshall GN, Hays RD, Mazel R. 86.  1996. Health status and satisfaction with health care: results from the medical outcomes study. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 64:380–90 [Google Scholar]
  87. McDonald R, Roland M. 87.  2009. Pay for performance in primary care in England and California: comparison of unintended consequences. Ann. Fam. Med. 7:121–27 [Google Scholar]
  88. McEwen J. 88.  1988. The Nottingham Health Profile. See Ref. 154 95
  89. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. 89.  1993. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med. Care 31:247–63 [Google Scholar]
  90. McWhinney IR. 90.  1989. ‘An acquaintance with particulars…’. Fam. Med. 21:296–98 [Google Scholar]
  91. McWhinney IR, Freeman T. 91.  2009. Textbook of Family Medicine New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  92. Meads G. 92.  2006. Primary Care in the Twenty-First Century Seattle, WA: Radcliffe
  93. Mercer SW, Howie JG. 93.  2006. CQI-2—a new measure of holistic interpersonal care in primary care consultations. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 56:262–68 [Google Scholar]
  94. Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GCM. 94.  2004. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam. Pract. 21:699–705 [Google Scholar]
  95. 95. MGMA Gov. Aff. Dep 2010. CMS defines ‘meaningful use’. Proposed rule outlines requirements for EHR incentive payments. MGMA Connex 10:10–13 [Google Scholar]
  96. Miller WL, Crabtree BF, Nutting PA, Stange KC, Jaén CR. 96.  2010. Primary care practice development: a relationship-centered approach. Ann. Fam. Med. 8:S68–79 [Google Scholar]
  97. Mold JW, Blake GH, Becker LA. 97.  1991. Goal-oriented medical care. Fam. Med. 23:46–51 [Google Scholar]
  98. Mullan F, Epstein L. 98.  2002. Community-oriented primary care: new relevance in a changing world. Am. J. Public Health 92:1748–55 [Google Scholar]
  99. 99. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol 2013. Metrics and measures. Softw. Assur. Metrics Tool Eval. http://samate.nist.gov/index.php/Metrics_and_Measures.html
  100. 100. Natl. Quality Forum 2012. Report from the National Quality Forum: 2012 NQF Measure Gap Analysis. Washington, DC: Natl. Quality Forum http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2013/03/2012_NQF_Measure_Gap_Analysis.aspx
  101. 101. NCQA 2011. 2011 PCMH Standard and Guidelines Electronic Pub (Single User) Washington, DC: NCQA https://inetshop01.pub.ncqa.org/publications/product.asp?dept_id=2&pf_id=30004-301-11 [Google Scholar]
  102. 102. OECD 2013. OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-Being Paris: OECD http://www.oecd.org/statistics/Guidelines%20on%20Measuring%20Subjective%20Well-being.pdf
  103. Payne RK. 103.  2012. From Understanding Poverty to Developing Human Capacity Highlands, TX: aha! Process
  104. Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG Jr, Richards ML. 104.  2002. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 126:41–47 [Google Scholar]
  105. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. 105.  2001. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 323:625–28 [Google Scholar]
  106. 106. Promot. Health Across Bound. (PHAB) 2012. What is health? PHAB, Cleveland, Ohio. http://www.phab.us/about/what-is-health/
  107. Rehm J, Üstün TB, Saxena S, Nelson CB, Chatterji S. 107.  et al. 1999. On the development and psychometric testing of the WHO screening instrument to assess disablement in the general population. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 8:110–22 [Google Scholar]
  108. Reuben DB, Tinetti ME. 108.  2012. Goal-oriented patient care—an alternative health outcomes paradigm. N. Engl. J. Med. 366:777–79 [Google Scholar]
  109. Rhyne R, Bogue R, Kukulka G, Fulmer H. 109.  1998. Community-Oriented Primary Care: Health Care for the 21st Century Washington, DC: Am. Public Health Assoc.
  110. Rosenblatt RA, Cherkin DC, Schneeweiss R, Hart LG. 110.  1983. The content of ambulatory medical care in the United States: an interspecialty comparison. N. Engl. J. Med. 309:892–97 [Google Scholar]
  111. Ruhe MC, Bobiak SN, Litaker D, Carter CA, Wu L. 111.  et al. 2011. Appreciative inquiry for quality improvement in primary care practices. Qual. Manag. Health Care 20:37–48 [Google Scholar]
  112. Saba GW, Villela TJ, Chen E, Hammer H, Bodenheimer T. 112.  2012. The myth of the lone physician: toward a collaborative alternative. Ann. Fam. Med. 10:169–73 [Google Scholar]
  113. Safran DG, Karp M, Coltin K, Chang H, Li A. 113.  et al. 2006. Measuring patients' experiences with individual primary care physicians. Results of a statewide demonstration project. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 21:13–21 [Google Scholar]
  114. Safran DG, Kosinski MI, Tarlov AR, Rogers WH, Taira DA. 114.  et al. 1998. The Primary Care Assessment Survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med. Care 36:728–39 [Google Scholar]
  115. Schneeweiss R, Rosenblatt RA, Cherkin DC, Kirkwood CR, Hart G. 115.  1983. Diagnosis clusters: a new tool for analyzing the content of ambulatory medical care. Med. Care 21:105–22 [Google Scholar]
  116. Schön DA. 116.  1990. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  117. Schön DA. 117.  1991. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action New York: Basic Books
  118. Schroeder SA, Frist W. 118.  2013. Phasing out fee-for-service payment. N. Engl. J. Med. 368:2029–32 [Google Scholar]
  119. Scott JC. 119.  2012. Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  120. Shi L, Starfield B, Xu J. 120.  2001. Validating the adult primary care assessment tool. J. Fam. Pract. 50:161W–75 [Google Scholar]
  121. Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM. 121.  2005. Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science. Health Aff. 24:138–50 [Google Scholar]
  122. Solberg LI, Asche SE, Margolis KL, Whitebird RR. 122.  2008. Measuring an organization's ability to manage change: the change process capability questionnaire and its use for improving depression care. Am. J. Med. Qual. 23:193–200 [Google Scholar]
  123. Solberg LI, Crain AL, Tillema J, Scholle SH, Fontaine P, Whitebird R. 123.  2013. Medical home transformation: a gradual process and a continuum of attainment. Ann. Fam. Med. 11:S108–14 [Google Scholar]
  124. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. 124.  2006. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 166:1092–97 [Google Scholar]
  125. Stange KC. 125.  2002. The paradox of the parts and the whole in understanding and improving general practice. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 14:267–68 [Google Scholar]
  126. Stange KC. 126.  2009. The generalist approach. Ann. Fam. Med. 7:198–203 [Google Scholar]
  127. Stange KC. 127.  2009. A science of connectedness. Ann. Fam. Med. 7:387–95 [Google Scholar]
  128. Stange KC. 128.  2010. Ways of knowing, learning, and developing. Ann. Fam. Med. 8:4–10 [Google Scholar]
  129. Stange KC. 129.  2011. Refocusing knowledge generation, application and education: raising our gaze to promote health across boundaries. Am. J. Prev. Med. 41:4 Suppl. 3S164–69 [Google Scholar]
  130. Stange KC. 130.  2013. Mindfulness in practice and policy. Ann. Fam. Med. 11:398–99 [Google Scholar]
  131. Stange KC, Ferrer RL. 131.  2009. The paradox of primary care. Ann. Fam. Med. 7:293–99 [Google Scholar]
  132. Stange KC, Glasgow RE. 132.  2013. Considering and Reporting Important Contextual Factors in Research on the Patient-Centered Medical Home Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthc. Res. Qual. (AHRQ) Publ. No. 13-0045-WF
  133. Stange KC, Jaén CR, Flocke SA, Miller WL, Crabtree BF, Zyzanski SJ. 133.  1998. The value of a family physician. J. Fam. Pract. 46:363–68 [Google Scholar]
  134. Stange KC, Miller WL, McWhinney I. 134.  2001. Developing the knowledge base of family practice. Fam. Med. 33:286–97 [Google Scholar]
  135. Stange KC, Nutting PA, Miller WL, Jaén CR, Crabtree BF. 135.  et al. 2010. Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 25:601–12 [Google Scholar]
  136. Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Jaén CR, Callahan EJ, Kelly RB. 136.  et al. 1998. Illuminating the black box: a description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family doctors. J. Fam. Pract. 46:377–89 [Google Scholar]
  137. Starfield B. 137.  1998. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  138. Starfield B. 138.  2009. Primary care and equity in health: the importance to effectiveness and equity of responsiveness to people's needs. Humanit. Soc. 33:56–73 [Google Scholar]
  139. Starfield B. 139.  2010. Reinventing primary care: lessons from Canada for the United States. Health Aff. 29:1030–36 [Google Scholar]
  140. Starfield B, Shi L, Grover A, Macinko J. 140.  2005. The effects of specialist supply on populations' health: assessing the evidence. Health Aff.(Millwood) Suppl. Web Exclus. W5-97-W5-107 [Google Scholar]
  141. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. 141.  2005. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 83:457–502 [Google Scholar]
  142. Stewart AL, Nápoles-Springer AM, Gregorich SE, Santoyo-Olsson J. 142.  2007. Interpersonal processes of care survey: patient-reported measures for diverse groups. Health Serv. Res. 42:1235–56 [Google Scholar]
  143. Strathern M. 143.  2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy London: Routledge
  144. Sturmberg JP. 144.  2007. Systems and complexity thinking in general practice. Part 2: application in primary care research. Aust. Fam. Phys. 36:273–75 [Google Scholar]
  145. Sturmberg JP, Cilliers P. 145.  2009. Time and the consultation—an argument for a ‘certain slowness’. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 15:881–85 [Google Scholar]
  146. Sweeney K. 146.  2006. Complexity in Primary Care: Understanding Its Value Oxon, UK: Radcliffe
  147. Sweeney SA, Bazemore A, Phillips RL Jr, Etz RS, Stange KC. 147.  2012. A re-emerging political space for linking person and community through primary health care. Am. J. Public Health 102:S336–41 [Google Scholar]
  148. Tallia AF, Lanham HJ, McDaniel RR Jr, Crabtree BF. 148.  2006. Seven characteristics of successful work relationships. Fam. Pract. Manag. 13:47–50 [Google Scholar]
  149. Thomas P. 149.  2006. Integrating Primary Health Care: Leading, Managing, Facilitating Oxford, UK: Radcliffe
  150. Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Scammon DL, Waitzman NJ, Cronholm PF, Halladay JR. 150.  et al. 2013. Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann. Fam. Med. 11:S115–23 [Google Scholar]
  151. Valentine MA, Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. 151.  2014. Measuring teamwork in healthcare settings: a review of survey instruments. Med. Care. In press
  152. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. 152.  1996. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 74:511–44 [Google Scholar]
  153. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A. 153.  2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 9:5 [Google Scholar]
  154. Walker SR, Rosser RM. 154.  1988. Quality of Life: Assessment and Application Lancaster, UK: MTP
  155. Weaver L. 155.  2010. Approaches to Measuring More Community Engagement Waterloo, ON: Tamarack
  156. Weiner SJ, Schwartz A, Weaver F, Goldberg J, Yudkowsky R. 156.  et al. 2010. Contextual errors and failures in individualizing patient care: a multicenter study. Ann. Intern. Med. 153:69–75 [Google Scholar]
  157. 157. WHO (World Health Org.) 2001. International classification of functioning, disability and health WHO, Geneva. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
  158. 158. WHO (World Health Org.) 2008. Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health Geneva: WHO
  159. 159. WHO (World Health Org.) 2008. Integrated health services—what and why Tech. Brief No. 1, May, WHO, Geneva. http://www.who.int/healthsystems/technical_brief_final.pdf
  160. 160. WHO (World Health Org.) 2013. Health status statistics: mortality WHO, Geneva. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/indhale/en/
  161. 161. WHO (World Health Org.) 2013. Primary health care WHO, Geneva. http://www.who.int/topics/primary_health_care/en/
  162. Wilber K. 162.  1995. Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution Boston, MA: Shambhala
  163. Williams RL. 163.  2004. Motherhood, apple pie, and COPC. Ann. Fam. Med. 2:100–2 [Google Scholar]
  164. Willis J. 164.  2001. Friends in Low Places Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe Med. Press
  165. Willis J. 165.  2002. The Paradox of Progress Abingdon, UK: Radcliff Med. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182438
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182438
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error