1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 40, 2014
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 40, 2014

Social Isolation in America

Abstract

We offer a new measure for social isolation for contemporary society, where opportunities for making connections with others have become ubiquitous. We develop this measure after reviewing previous research on social isolation that we segment into two perspectives. On the one side, isolation has been studied as a negative outcome of processes related to modernization; on the other side, isolation has been studied as a structural position potentially capable of delivering positive returns. Although academic interest in isolation is long-standing, recent years have seen an explosion of research on the topic. We explore the connection between this explosion and new social media and highlight a division within the literature between researchers who see new social media as creating more feelings of isolation and others who think that the jury is still out. In the final section of the article, we offer our novel conceptual framework for studying isolation.

Keyword(s): new social media, social isolation, social networks
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145646
2014-07-30
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/40/1/annurev-soc-071312-145646.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145646&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Åkerlind I, Hörnquist JO. 1992. Loneliness and alcohol abuse: a review of evidences of an interplay. Soc. Sci. Med. 34:4405–14 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashworth J. 1983. Agrarians and Aristocrats London: R. Hist. Soc.
  3. Barber J. 1990. Old Hickory: A Life Sketch of Andrew Jackson. Washington, DC: Natl. Portrait Gallery Smithson. Inst.
  4. Bauman Z. 1999. La Societa' dell'Incertezza Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino
  5. Bearman P, Parigi P. 2004. Cloning headless frogs and other important matters: conversation topics and network structure. Soc. Forces 83:2535–57 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bearman PS. 1991. The social structure of suicide. Sociol. Forum 6:3501–24Utilizes Durkheim's framework from Suicide to analyze suicide rates among teenagers; emphasizes cognitive dissonance. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bearman PS, Moody J. 2004. Suicide and friendships among American adolescents. Am. J. Public Health 94:189–95 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bedini SA. 1990. Thomas Jefferson: Statesman of Science New York: Macmillan
  9. Bellah RN. 2007. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  10. Berkman LF, Syme LS. 1979. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality. Am. J. Epidemiol. 109:2186–204 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bishop B. 2009. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded American Is Tearing Us Apart Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  12. Bott E. 1964. Family and Social Structure London: Tavistock
  13. Boulianne S. 2009. Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Polit. Commun. 26:2193–211 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brashears ME. 2010. Anomia and the sacred canopy: testing a network theory. Soc. Netw. 32:3187–96 [Google Scholar]
  15. Burt RS. 1987. A note on strangers, friends and happiness. Soc. Netw. 9:4311–31 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cacioppo JT, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. 2009. Alone in the crowd: the structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 97:6977–91 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC. 2009. Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13:10447–54 [Google Scholar]
  18. Campbell SW, Kwak N. 2011. Political involvement in “mobilized” society: the interactive relationships among mobile communication, network characteristics, and political participation. J. Commun. 61:61005–24 [Google Scholar]
  19. Casilli AA. 2011. Bums, bridges, and primates: some elements for a sociology of online interactions Presented at Web Culture: New Modes of Knowledge, New Sociabilities, Feb. 10, Lyon, France. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1940773
  20. Centola D, Macy M. 2007. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Am. J. Sociol. 113:3702–34 [Google Scholar]
  21. Chomsky N, Foucault M. 2006. The Chomsky-Foucault Debate: On Human Nature New York: New Press
  22. Cohen S. 2004. Social relationships and health. Am. Psychol. 59:8676–84 [Google Scholar]
  23. Conley D. 2010. Elsewhere, U.S.A.: How We Got from the Company Man, Family Dinners, and the Affluent Society to the Home Office, BlackBerry Moms, and Economic Anxiety. New York: Vintage
  24. Constant D, Sproull L, Kiesler S. 1996. The kindness of strangers: the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. 7:2119–35 [Google Scholar]
  25. DiMaggio P, Hargittai E, Neuman WR, Robinson JP. 2001. Social implications of the Internet. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:307–36 [Google Scholar]
  26. DiMaggio P, Louch H. 1998. Socially embedded consumer transactions: For what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks?. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63:5619–37 [Google Scholar]
  27. Donati P. 2011. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences New York: Routledge
  28. Durkheim E. 1897 (1951). Suicide New York: Free Press
  29. Eisenstadt SN. 2003. Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities Boston: Brill
  30. Emirbayer M. 1997. Manifesto for a relational sociology. Am. J. Sociol. 103:2281–317A manifesto for a relational sociology focused on processes rather than on variables. [Google Scholar]
  31. Feezell JT, Conroy M, Guerrero M. 2009. Facebook is…fostering political engagement: a study of online social networking groups and offline participation Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., Sept. 3–6, Toronto. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1451456&rec=1&srcabs=1331029
  32. Fischer CS. 1982. To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  33. Fischer CS. 2009. The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: an artifact?. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:4657–69Argues that the results of McPherson et al. (2006) were methodological artifacts. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fischer CS. 2011. Still Connected: Family and Friends in America Since 1970 New York: Russell Sage Found.
  35. Fischer CS, Mattson G. 2009. Is America fragmenting?. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 35:1435–55 [Google Scholar]
  36. Flache A, Macy M. 1996. The weakness of strong ties: collective action failure in a highly cohesive group. J. Math. Sociol. 21:13–28 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gennero CD, Dutton WH. 2007. Reconfiguring friendships: social relationships and the Internet. Inf. Commun. Soc. 10:5591–618 [Google Scholar]
  38. Giddens A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  39. Gil de Zúñiga H, Veenstra A, Vraga E, Shah D. 2010. Digital democracy: reimagining pathways to political participation. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 7:136–51 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gilmore HW. 1933. Social isolation of the French speaking people of rural Louisiana. Soc. Forces 12:178–84 [Google Scholar]
  41. Granovetter MS. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78:61360–80 [Google Scholar]
  42. Granovetter MS. 1995. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  43. Hammer M. 1983. “Core” and “extended” social networks in relation to health and illness. Soc. Sci. Med. 17:7405–11 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hampton K, Sessions Goulet L, Her EJ, Rainie L. 2009. Social isolation and new technology: how the Internet and mobile phones impact Americans' social networks Rep. Pew Res. Cent., Washington, DC. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/18–Social-Isolation-and-New-Technology/Executive-Summary.aspx
  45. Hanson GH. 2008. YouTube users watching and sharing the news: a uses and gratifications approach. J. Electron. Publ. 11:3 doi: 10.3998/3336451.0011.305 [Google Scholar]
  46. Haridakis P, Hanson G. 2009. Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: blending mass communication reception and social connection. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 53:2317–35 [Google Scholar]
  47. Haythornthwaite C. 2002. Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. Inf. Soc. 18:5385–401 [Google Scholar]
  48. Heckathorn DD. 1988. Collective sanctions and the creation of prisoner's dilemma norms. Am. J. Sociol. 94:3535–62 [Google Scholar]
  49. Heider F. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  50. Hollenbaugh EE. 2011. Motives for maintaining personal journal blogs. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14:1–213–20 [Google Scholar]
  51. Homans GC. 1941. English Villagers of the Thirteenth Century Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  52. House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D. 1988. Social relationships and health. Science 241:4865540–45 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hurlbert JS, Haines VA, Beggs JJ. 2000. Core networks and tie activations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65:4598–618 [Google Scholar]
  54. Joiner T. 2011. Lonely at the Top: The High Cost of Men's Success New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  55. Kavanaugh AL, Patterson SJ. 2001. The impact of community computer networks on social capital and community involvement. Am. Behav. Sci. 45:3496–509 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kirk R, Schill D. 2011. A digital agora: citizen participation in the 2008 presidential debates. Am. Behav. Sci. 55:3325–47 [Google Scholar]
  57. Klinenberg E. 2012. Going Solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone New York: Penguin
  58. Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukophadhyay T, Scherlis W. 1998. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?. Am. Psychol. 53:91017–31 [Google Scholar]
  59. Larkin G. 1974. Isolation, integration and secularization: a case study of the Netherlands. Sociol. Rev. 22:401–18 [Google Scholar]
  60. Leighley JE. 1990. Social interaction and contextual influences on political participation. Am. Polit. Res. 18:4459–75 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lesch JE. 1975. Role of isolation in evolution: George J. Romanes and John T. Gulick. Isis 66:483–503 [Google Scholar]
  62. Levin DZ, Cross R. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manag. Sci. 50:111477–90 [Google Scholar]
  63. Lin N, Dumin M. 1986. Access to occupations through social ties. Soc. Netw. 8:365–83 [Google Scholar]
  64. Lin N, Ensel WM, Vaughn JC. 1981. Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors in occupational status attainment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 46:4393–405 [Google Scholar]
  65. Ling RS. 2008. New Tech, New Ties Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  66. Lipset SM. 1997. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword New York: Norton
  67. Luhmann N. 1998. Love as Passion: The Codification of Intimacy Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  68. Lyon F. 2000. Trust, networks and norms: the creation of social capital in agricultural economies in Ghana. World Dev. 28:4663–81 [Google Scholar]
  69. Marche S. 2012. Is Facebook making us lonely?. Atlantic May. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/05/is-facebook-making-us-lonely/308930/
  70. Marsden PV. 1987. Core discussion networks of Americans. Am. Sociol. Rev. 52:1122–31 [Google Scholar]
  71. Martin ET. 1952. Thomas Jefferson: Scientist New York: H. Schuman
  72. Martinson OB. 1976. Feelings of powerlessness and social isolation among large-scale farm personnel. Rural Sociol. 41:452–72 [Google Scholar]
  73. Marvin C. 2009. When Old Technologies Were New New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  74. McAdam D, Paulsen R. 1993. Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. Am. J. Sociol. 99:3640–67 [Google Scholar]
  75. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Brashears ME. 2006. Social isolation in America: changes in core discussion networks over two decades. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71:3353–75Analyzes 20 years of General Social Survey data; shows that Americans' immediate network size decreased with the number of people they talked to. [Google Scholar]
  76. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Brashears ME. 2009. Models and marginals: using survey evidence to study social networks. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:4670–81 [Google Scholar]
  77. Mesch G, Talmud I. 2006. The quality of online and offline relationships: the role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships. Inf. Soc. 22:3137–48 [Google Scholar]
  78. Mirande AM. 1973. Social mobility and participation: the dissociative and socialization hypotheses. Sociol. Q. 14:19–31 [Google Scholar]
  79. Mok D, Wellman B. 2007. Did distance matter before the Internet? Interpersonal contact and support in the 1970s. Soc. Netw. 29:3430–61 [Google Scholar]
  80. Mollenhorst G. 2008. Context overlap and multiplexity in personal relationships. Why Context Matters TN Friemel 55–77 Wiesbaden, Ger.: VS Verlag für Soz. [Google Scholar]
  81. Muhlin GL. 1979. Mental hospitalization of the foreign-born and the role of cultural isolation. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 25:258–66 [Google Scholar]
  82. Neal AG, Seeman M. 1964. Organizations and powerlessness: a test of the mediation hypothesis. Am. Sociol. Rev. 29:216–26 [Google Scholar]
  83. Nie NH. 2001. Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet. Am. Behav. Sci. 45:3420–35 [Google Scholar]
  84. Olds J. 2010. The Lonely American: Drifting Apart in the Twenty-First Century Boston: Beacon
  85. Paik A, Sanchagrin K. 2012. Social isolation in America: an artifact. Am. Sociol. Rev. 78:339–60 [Google Scholar]
  86. Pappano L. 2001. The Connection Gap: Why Americans Feel So Alone New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  87. Perloff RM. 1983. Loneliness, depression and the uses of television. Journal. Q. 60:352–56 [Google Scholar]
  88. Pescosolido BA, Rubin BA. 2000. The web of group affiliations revisited: social life, postmodernism, and sociology. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65:52–76Recasts Simmel's social geometry in network terms. [Google Scholar]
  89. Phillips DJ. 2011. Structural disconnectedness and the emergence of a jazz canon. Am. J. Sociol. 117:2420–83 [Google Scholar]
  90. Pitts JR. 1964. The structural-functional approach. Handbook of Marriage and the Family HT Christensen 51–124 Chicago: Rand McNally [Google Scholar]
  91. Plickert G, Côté RR, Wellman B. 2007. It's not who you know, it's how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom?. Soc. Netw. 29:3405–29 [Google Scholar]
  92. Podolny JM, Baron JN. 1997. Resources and relationships: social networks and mobility in the workplace. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62:5673–93 [Google Scholar]
  93. Pomeroy S. 2007. The Murder of Regilla Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  94. Portes A, Sensenbrenner J. 1993. Embeddedness and immigration: notes on the social determinants of economic action. Am. J. Sociol. 98:61320–50 [Google Scholar]
  95. Pursell CWJ. 1981. Technology in America Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  96. Putnam R. 2000. Bowling Alone New York: Simon & Schuster
  97. Qualls PE, Justice B, Allen R. 1980. Isolation and psychosocial functioning. Psychol. Rep. 46:279–85 [Google Scholar]
  98. Reeder LG, Reeder SJ. 1969. Social isolation and illegitimacy. J. Marriage Fam. 31:451–61 [Google Scholar]
  99. Riesman D, Glazer N, Denney R. 2001. The Lonely Crowd, Revised Edition: A Study of the Changing American Character New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  100. Ruef M, Aldrich HE, Carter NM. 2003. The structure of founding teams: homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Am. Sociol. Rev. 68:2195–222 [Google Scholar]
  101. Saith R. 2001. Social exclusion: the concept and application to developing countries Queen Elizabeth House Work. Pap., Univ. Oxford, Oxford, UK
  102. Schmidt KA. 2012. Alienational normlessness, isolation, and estrangement: a neo-Thomistic approach. J. Sociol. Integr. Relig. Soc. 2:136–54 [Google Scholar]
  103. Schulman M. 2007. Social studies. New Yorker Sept 17
  104. Seeman M. 1967. On the personal consequences of alienation in work. Am. Sociol. Rev. 32:2273 [Google Scholar]
  105. Seeman M. 1975. Alienation studies. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1:91–123Provides a wide-reaching and sophisticated review of alienation studies. [Google Scholar]
  106. Segal HP. 1994. Future Imperfect: The Mixed Blessings of Technology in America Amherst: Univ. Mass. Press
  107. Sennett R. 1992. The Fall of Public Man New York: Norton
  108. Shklovski I, Kiesler S, Kraut R. 2006. The Internet and social interaction: a meta-analysis and critique of studies, 1995–2003. Computers, Phones, and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology R Kraut, M Brynin, S Kiesler 251–64 New York: Oxford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  109. Simmel G. 1908 (1971). The stranger. George Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms DN Levine 143–49 Chicago: Univ. Chicago PressIntroduces the concept of the stranger, a person who is part of a network yet disconnected in some critical way. [Google Scholar]
  110. Simmel G. 1955. Conflict & The Web of Group-Affiliations, transl. KH Wolff, R Bendix New York: Free Press
  111. Slade G. 2012. Big Disconnect: The Story of Technology and Loneliness Amherst, NY: Prometheus
  112. Smajda J. 2012. Theda Skocpol on civic participation. Office Hours podcast audio, Society Pages, Jan. 31. http://thesocietypages.org/officehours/2012/01/31/theda-skocpol-on-civic-participation
  113. Small ML. 2009. Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  114. Snow DA, Zurcher LA Jr, Ekland-Olson S. 1980. Social networks and social movements: a microstructural approach to differential recruitment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 45:5787–801 [Google Scholar]
  115. Stark W. 1966. The Sociology of Religion: A Study of Christendom London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  116. Stern MJ. 2008. How locality, frequency of communication and Internet usage affect modes of communication within core social networks. Inf. Commun. Soc. 11:5591–616 [Google Scholar]
  117. Tocqueville A. 1889 (2003). Democracy in America B Frohnen Washington, DC: Regnery GatewayDescribes freedom and loneliness as intrinsically related parts of the American experience.
  118. Tönnies F. 1887 (1988). Community and Society New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
  119. Turkle S. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic“Alone together” coined to describe the trade-off created by the expanded connectivity afforded by technology. [Google Scholar]
  120. Useem B. 1980. Solidarity model, breakdown model, and the Boston antibusing movement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 45:357–69 [Google Scholar]
  121. Uzzi B, Spiro J. 2005. Collaboration and creativity: the small world problem. Am. J. Sociol. 111:2447–504 [Google Scholar]
  122. Vela-McConnell JA. 2010. Unlikely Friends: Bridging Ties and Diverse Friendships Lanham, MD: Lexington Books
  123. Wahler RG. 1980. Insular mother: her problems in parent-child treatment. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 13:207–19 [Google Scholar]
  124. Warburton J, Lui CW. 2007. Social isolation and loneliness in older people: a literature review Australasian Cent. Ageing Dep. Tech. Rep., Univ. Queensland, Queensland, Aust. http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:160390
  125. Warren RL. 1975. Context and isolation: the teaching experience in an elementary school. Hum. Organ. 34:139–48 [Google Scholar]
  126. Weber M. 1905 (2001). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism transl. S Kalberg New York: Roxbury, 3rd ed..
  127. Wellman B. 1979. The community question: the intimate networks of East Yorkers. Am. J. Sociol. 84:51201–31 [Google Scholar]
  128. Wellman B. 1996. Are personal communities local? A Dumptarian reconsideration. Soc. Netw. 18:4347–54 [Google Scholar]
  129. Wellman B, Boase J, Chen W. 2002. The networked nature of community: online and offline. IT Soc. 1:1151–65 [Google Scholar]
  130. Wellman B, Wortley S. 1990. Different strokes from different folks: community ties and social support. Am. J. Sociol. 96:3558–88 [Google Scholar]
  131. White E. 2010. Lonely: A Memoir New York: HarperCollins
  132. White HC. 1995a. Times from reflexive talk Pre-print Ser., Cent. Soc. Sci., Columbia Univ., New York
  133. White HC. 1995b. Where do languages come from? Pre-print Ser., Cent. Soc. Sci., Columbia Univ., New York
  134. Wilkening EA. 1951. Social isolation and response of farmers to agricultural programs. Am. Sociol. Rev. 16:836–37 [Google Scholar]
  135. Wilkin P. 2011. Chomsky and Foucault on human nature and politics. Soc. Theory Pract. 25:2177–210 [Google Scholar]
  136. Wirth L. 1938. Urbanism as a way of life. Am. J. Sociol. 44:3–24 [Google Scholar]
  137. Witvliet M, Brendgen M, Lier PAC, Koot HM, Vitaro F. 2010. Early adolescent depressive symptoms: prediction from clique isolation, loneliness, and perceived social acceptance. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 38:81045–56 [Google Scholar]
  138. Yamane T, Nonoyama H. 1967. Isolation of the nuclear family and kinship organization in Japan: a hypothetical approach to the relationships between the family and society. J. Marriage Fam. 29:783–96 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145646
Loading
Social Isolation in America
Annual Review of Sociology 40, 153 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145646
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145646
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145646
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error