1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 42, 2016
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 42, 2016

Explaining Corruption in the Developed World: The Potential of Sociological Approaches

Abstract

Corruption, in both the developing and the developed world, has been studied in many disciplines, especially economics and politics, but there is considerable scope for a sociological contribution. There has been a large body of cross-national research using indices of perceived corruption, but the clandestine nature of corruption makes it difficult to validate these indices. More fruitful are recent surveys, similar to crime victimization surveys, of respondents' experiences of being asked for a bribe. This research has found many regularities, but understanding of the causal mechanisms involved remains sketchy. Sociological concepts derived from exchange theory, and sociological variables such as Protestantism, generalized and particularistic trust, and educational level appear to be important predictors of national rates of corruption in the developed world, but the mechanisms are not well understood. We argue that more focused and disaggregated research focusing on different forms and contexts, rather than the current broad-brush approaches, is the best way forward.

Keyword(s): bribery, corruption perceptions index, exchange theory, extortion
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074213
2016-07-30
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/42/1/annurev-soc-081715-074213.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074213&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ades A, Di Tella R. 1999. Rents, competition, and corruption. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:982–93 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adut A. 2004. Scandal as norm entrepreneurship strategy: corruption and the French investigating magistrates. Theory Soc. 33:529–78 [Google Scholar]
  3. Akerlof GA, Kranton RE. 2000. Economics and identity. Q. J. Econ. 115:715–53 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson CJ, Tverdova YV. 2003. Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 47:91–109 [Google Scholar]
  5. Andersson S, Heywood PM. 2009. The politics of perception: use and abuse of Transparency International's approach to measuring corruption. Polit. Stud. 57:746–67 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ariely G, Uslaner EM. 2014. Corruption, fairness, and inequality Presented at Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc. Annu. Meet., Aug. 28–31, Washington, DC. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2460399
  7. Ashforth BE, Anand V. 2003. The normalization of corruption in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:1–52 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beetham D. 2015. Moving beyond a narrow definition of corruption. How Corrupt is Britain? D Whyte 41–46 London: Pluto Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Belousova V, Goel RK, Korhonen I. 2016. Corruption perceptions versus corruption incidence: competition for rents across Russian regions. J. Econ. Finan. 40:172–87 [Google Scholar]
  10. Blau PM. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life New York: John Wiley & Sons
  11. Brunetti A, Weder B. 2003. A free press is bad news for corruption. J. Public Econ. 87:1801–24 [Google Scholar]
  12. Charron N, Dijkstra L, Lapuente V. 2014. Regional governance matters: quality of government within European Union member states. Reg. Stud. 48:68–90 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chatterjee I, Ray R. 2012. Does the evidence on corruption depend on how it is measured? Results from a cross-country study on microdata sets. Appl. Econ. 44:3215–27 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen Y, Yaşar M, Rejesus RM. 2008. Factors influencing the incidence of bribery payouts by firms: a cross-country analysis. J. Bus. Ethics 77:231–44 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cook KS, Cheshire C, Rice ER, Nakagawa S. 2013. Social exchange theory. Handbook of Social Psychology J DeLameter, A Ward 61–88 Dordrecht, Ger.: Springer [Google Scholar]
  16. D'Souza A, Kaufmann D. 2013. Who bribes in public contracting and why: worldwide evidence from firms. Econ. Gov. 14:333–67 [Google Scholar]
  17. Darity WA, Mason PL, Stewart JB. 2006. The economics of identity: the origin and persistence of racial identity norms. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 60:283–305 [Google Scholar]
  18. Davidov E, Meuleman B, Cieciuch J, Schmidt P, Billiet J. 2014. Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40:55–76 [Google Scholar]
  19. De Sardan J. 1999. A moral economy of corruption in Africa?. J. Mod. Afr. Stud. 37:25–52 [Google Scholar]
  20. De Sousa L. 2008. “I don't bribe, I just pull strings”: assessing the fluidity of social representations of corruption in Portuguese society. Perspect. Eur. Polit. Soc. 9:8–23 [Google Scholar]
  21. Delavallade C. 2006. Corruption and distribution of public spending in developing countries. J. Econ. Finan. 30:222–39 [Google Scholar]
  22. Della Porta D, Vannucci A. 1999. Corrupt Exchanges: Actors, Resources, and Mechanisms of Political Corruption New York: Aldine de Gruyter
  23. Della Porta D, Vannucci A. 2012. The Hidden Order of Corruption: An Institutional Approach Farnham, UK: Ashgate
  24. Dininio P, Orttung R. 2005. Explaining patterns of corruption in the Russian regions. World Polit. 57:500–29 [Google Scholar]
  25. Djankov S, La Porta R. 2002. The regulation of entry. Q. J. Econ. 117:1–37 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dollar D, Fisman R, Gatti R. 2001. Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 46:423–29 [Google Scholar]
  27. Donchev D, Ujhelyi G. 2014. What do corruption indices measure?. Econ. Polit. 26:309–31 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ellis A, Heath A. 1983. Positional competition, or an offer you can't refuse. Dilemmas of Liberal Democracies A Ellis, K Kumar 1–22 London: Tavistock [Google Scholar]
  29. Ferraz C, Finan F. 2008. Exposing corrupt politicians: the effects of Brazil's publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. Q. J. Econ. 123:703–45 [Google Scholar]
  30. Fisman R, Miguel E. 2006. Corruption, norms and legal enforcement: evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. J. Polit. Econ. 115:1020–48 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fried BJ, Lagunes P, Venkataramani A. 2010. Corruption and inequality at the crossroad: a multimethod study of bribery and discrimination in Latin America. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 45:76–97 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gill SS. 1998. The Pathology of Corruption New Delhi: Harper Collins
  33. Gino R, Ayal S, Ariely D. 2009. Contagion and differentiation in unethical behaviour: the effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychol. Sci. 20:393–98 [Google Scholar]
  34. Glaeser EL, Saks RE. 2006. Corruption in America. J. Public Econ. 90:1053–72 [Google Scholar]
  35. Goel RK, Budak J, Rajh E. 2012. Factors driving bribe payments: survey evidence from Croatia. Transit. Stud. Rev. 19:13–22 [Google Scholar]
  36. Goel RK, Nelson MA. 2011. Measures of corruption and determinants of US corruption. Econ. Gov. 12:155–76 [Google Scholar]
  37. Granovetter M. 2007. The social construction of corruption. On Capitalism V Nee, R Swedberg 152–74 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  38. Habib M, Zurawicki L. 2002. Corruption and foreign direct investment. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 33:291–307 [Google Scholar]
  39. Heath A. 1976. Rational Choice and Social Exchange: A Critique of Exchange Theory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  40. Heath A, Fisher S, Smith S. 2005. The globalization of public opinion research. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 8:297–333 [Google Scholar]
  41. Heath AF, Martin J, Spreckelsen T. 2009. Cross-national comparability of survey attitude measures. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 21:293–315 [Google Scholar]
  42. Herrera AM, Rodriguez P. 2007. Bribery and the nature of corruption. Work. Pap. Dep. Econ. Michigan State Univ.
  43. Heywood PM, Rose J. 2014. “Close but no cigar”: the measurement of corruption. J. Public Policy 34:507–29 [Google Scholar]
  44. Jancsics D. 2013. Petty corruption in Central and Eastern Europe: the client's perspective. Crime Law Soc. Change 60:319–41 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jancsics D. 2014. Interdisciplinary perspectives on corruption. Sociol. Compass 8:358–72 [Google Scholar]
  46. Jávor I, Jancsics D. 2013. The role of power in organizational corruption: an empirical study. Adm. Soc. doi: 10.1177/0095399713514845
  47. Johnston M. 2005. Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth, Power, and Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  48. Kääriäinen JT. 2007. Trust in the police in 16 European countries: a multilevel analysis. Eur. J. Criminol. 4:409–35 [Google Scholar]
  49. Karklins R. 2005. The System Made Me Do It: Corruption in Post-Communist Societies. New York: ME Sharpe
  50. Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M. 2004. Governance matters III: governance indicators for 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002. World Bank Econ. Rev. 18:253–87 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M. 2007. Growth and governance: a reply. J. Polit. 69:555–62 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kaufmann D, Stone AHW. 2015. World Business Environment Survey (WBES) Washington, DC: World Bank http://go.worldbank.org/RV060VBJU0
  53. Lambsdorff JG. 2006. Measuring corruption—the validity and precision of subjective indicators (CPI). Measuring Corruption CJ Sampford, AH Shacklock, C Connors, F Galtung 81–99 Aldershot, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  54. Lambsdorff JG. 2010. Who accepts bribery? Evidence from a global household survey. Work. Pap., Univ. Passau, Passau, Ger. http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/55011/1/684339161.pdf
  55. Ledeneva AV. 1998. Russia's Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  56. Lee W-S, Guven C. 2013. Engaging in corruption: the influence of cultural values and contagion effects at the microlevel. J. Econ. Psychol. 39:287–300 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lessig L. 2011. Republic Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress—and a Plan to Stop It Boston: Hachette
  58. Lessig L. 2013. “Institutional corruption” defined. J. Law Med. Ethics 41:553–55 [Google Scholar]
  59. Mauro P. 1995. Corruption and growth. Q. J. Econ. 110:681–712 [Google Scholar]
  60. Miller D. 2015. Neoliberalism, politics and institutional corruption: against the “institutional malaise” hypothesis. How Corrupt is Britain? D Whyte 59–70 London: Pluto Press [Google Scholar]
  61. Mocan N. 2008. What determines corruption? International evidence from microdata. Econ. Inq. 46:493–510 [Google Scholar]
  62. Mungiu-Pippidi A. 2011. Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lessons Learned Oslo, Nor: Nor. Agency Dev. Coop https://www.norad.no/en/toolspublications/publications/2011/contextual-choices-in-fighting-corruption-lessons-learned/
  63. Mungiu-Pippidi A. 2013. The good, the bad and the ugly: controlling corruption in the European Union Presented in the European Parliament, Apr. 9, Brussels. http://www.againstcorruption.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ANTICORRP-Policy-Paper-on-Lessons-Learnt-final.pdf
  64. Nieuwbeerta P, De Geest G, Siegers J. 2003. Street-level corruption in industrialized and developing countries. Eur. Soc. 5:139–65 [Google Scholar]
  65. Obydenkova A, Libman A. 2015. Understanding the survival of post-Communist corruption in contemporary Russia: the influence of historical legacies. Post-Sov. Aff. 31:304–38 [Google Scholar]
  66. Offer A, Söderberg G. 2016. Beyond Scandinavia: from market efficiency to market corruption. The Nobel Factor: The Prize in Economics, Social Democracy, and the Market Turn Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  67. Olken BA. 2009. Corruption perceptions versus corruption reality. J. Public Econ. 93:950–64 [Google Scholar]
  68. Olson M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  69. Paldam M. 2002. The cross-country pattern of corruption: economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 18:215–40 [Google Scholar]
  70. Pellegrini L. 2011. Causes of corruption: a survey of cross-country analyses and extended results. Econ. Gov. 9:245–63 [Google Scholar]
  71. Persson A, Rothstein B, Teorell J. 2013. Why anticorruption reforms fail—systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance 26:449–71 [Google Scholar]
  72. Philp M. 2006. Corruption definition and measurement. Measuring Corruption CJ Sampford, AH Shacklock, C Connors, F Galtung 45–56 Aldershot, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  73. Philp M, Dávid-Barrett E. 2015. Realism about political corruption. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 18:387–402 [Google Scholar]
  74. Richards L, Heath AF. 2016. Explaining the incidence of bribery in Europe: a multilevel analysis Work. Pap. CSI 2016-01, Cent. Soc. Investig., Oxford, UK. http://csi.nuff.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2016-01-Explaining-the-incidence-of-bribery-in-Europe.pdf
  75. Rose R, Peiffer C. 2015. Paying Bribes for Public Services: A Global Guide To Grass-Roots Corruption Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  76. Rose-Ackerman S. 1975. The economics of corruption. J. Public Econ. 4:187–203 [Google Scholar]
  77. Rose-Ackerman S. 1978. Corruption: A Study in Political Economy New York: Academic
  78. Rothstein B. 2011. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  79. Scheppele KL. 1999. The inevitable corruption of transition. Conn. J. Int. Law 14:509 [Google Scholar]
  80. Seligson MA. 2002. The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: a comparative study of four Latin American countries. J. Polit. 64:408–33 [Google Scholar]
  81. Shen C, Williamson JB. 2005. Corruption, democracy, economic freedom, and state strength: a cross-national analysis. Int. J. Compar. Sociol. 46:327–45 [Google Scholar]
  82. Shore C, Haller D. 2005. Introduction–sharp practice: anthropology and the study of corruption. Corruption: Anthropological Perspectives D Haller, C Shore 1–26 London: Pluto Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Svensson J. 2005. Eight questions about corruption. J. Econ. Perspect. 19:19–42 [Google Scholar]
  84. Tavits M. 2007. Clarity of responsibility and corruption. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51:218–29 [Google Scholar]
  85. Tavits M. 2010. Why do people engage in corruption? The case of Estonia. Soc. Forces 88:1257–79 [Google Scholar]
  86. te Grotenhuis M, Scholte M, de Graaf ND, Pelzer B. 2015. The between and within effects of social security on church attendance in Europe 1980–1998: The danger of testing hypotheses cross-nationally. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 31:643–54 [Google Scholar]
  87. Transparency International 2013. Global Corruption Barometer 2003–2013 Berlin: Transpar. Int.
  88. Treisman D. 2000. The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J. Public Econ. 76:399–457 [Google Scholar]
  89. Treisman D. 2007. What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 10:211–44 [Google Scholar]
  90. Uslaner EM. 2004. Trust and corruption. The New Institutional Economics of Corruption M Taube, JG Lambsdorff, M Schramm 76–91 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  91. Uslaner EM, Rothstein B. 2012. Mass education, state-building and equality: searching for the roots of corruption Work. Pap., Qual. Gov. Inst., Dep. Polit. Sci., Gothenburg
  92. Van Rijckeghem C, Weder B. 2001. Bureaucratic corruption and the rate of temptation: Do wages in the civil service affect corruption, and by how much?. J. Dev. Econ. 65:307–31 [Google Scholar]
  93. Varese F. 2000. Pervasive corruption. Economic Crime in Russia A Ledeneva, M Kurkchiyan 99–111 London: Kluwer Law Int. [Google Scholar]
  94. Weber M. 1905 (1948). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism transl. T Parsons New York: Scribner
  95. Weber M. 1922 (1968). Economy and Society; an Outline of Interpretive Sociology transl. E Fischoff et al. New York: Bedminster Press
  96. Weber Abramo C. 2008. How much do perceptions of corruption really tell us?. Econ. Open-Access Open-Assess. 2:1–56 [Google Scholar]
  97. Winters MS, Weitz-Shapiro R. 2012. Lacking information or condoning corruption: When will voters support corrupt politicians?. J. Compar. Polit. 45:418–36 [Google Scholar]
  98. WVS 2009. World Values Survey 1981–2008 official aggregate. Madrid: World Values Surv. Assoc http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp?CMSID=intinfo
  99. Wu X. 2009. Determinants of bribery in Asian firms: evidence from the World Business Environment Survey. J. Bus. Ethics 87:75–88 [Google Scholar]
  100. You J-S, Khagram S. 2005. A comparative study of inequality and corruption. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:136–57 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074213
Loading
Explaining Corruption in the Developed World: The Potential of Sociological Approaches
Annual Review of Sociology 42, 51 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074213
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074213
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074213
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error