Statistical Ecology

Literature Cited

1. Abadi F, Gimenez O, Arlettaz R, Schaub M. 2010. An assessment of integrated population models: bias, accuracy, and violation of the assumption of independence. Ecology 91:7–14 [Google Scholar]
2. Arnold R, Hayakawa Y, Yip P. 2010. Capture-recapture estimation using finite mixtures of arbitrary dimension. Biometrics 66:644–55 [Google Scholar]
3. Barker RJ. 1997. Joint modelling of live recapture, tag-resight and tag-recovery data. Biometrics 53:666–77 [Google Scholar]
4. Besbeas P, Borysiewicz RS, Morgan BJT. 2009. Completing the ecological jigsaw. See Thomson et al. 2009 513–39
5. Besbeas P, Freeman SN, Morgan BJT, Catchpole EA. 2002. Integrating mark-recapture-recovery and census data to estimate animal abundance and demographic parameters. Biometrics 58:540–47Develops an integrated modeling approach for abundance and ring-recovery data. [Google Scholar]
6. Besbeas P, Lebreton JD, Morgan BJT. 2003. The efficient integration of abundance and demographic data. J. R. Stat. Soc. C 52:95–102 [Google Scholar]
7. Besbeas P, Morgan BJT. 2011. A threshold model for heron productivity. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat 17:128–41 [Google Scholar]
8. Bestley S, Jonsen ID, Hindell MA, Guinet C, Charrassin J-B. 2013. Integrative modelling of animal movement: incorporating in situ habitat and behavioural information for a migratory marine predator. Proc. R. Soc. B 280:20122262 [Google Scholar]
9. Blackwell PG. 2003. Bayesian inference for Markov processes with diffusion and discrete components. Biometrika 90:613–27 [Google Scholar]
10. Bonner SJ, Morgan BJT, King R. 2010. Continuous covariates in mark-recapture-recovery analysis: a comparison of methods. Biometrics 66:1256–65 [Google Scholar]
11. Bonner SJ, Schwarz CJ. 2006. An extension of the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model for continuous covariates with application to Microtus pennsylvanicus. Biometrics 62:142–49 [Google Scholar]
12. Bonner SJ, Thomson DL, Schwarz CJ. 2009. Time-varying covariates and semi-parametric regression in capture-recapture: an adaptive spline approach. See Thomson et al. 2009 657–76
13. Borchers DL, Buckland ST, Zucchini W. 2002. Estimating Animal Abundance, Closed Populations London: Springer314
14. Borchers DL, Efford MG. 2008. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 64:377–85Develops a likelihood-based model for spatially explicit capture-recapture data. [Google Scholar]
15. Borchers DL, Laake JL, Southwell C, Paxton CGM. 2006. Accommodating unmodeled heterogeneity in double-observer distance sampling surveys. Biometrics 62:372–78 [Google Scholar]
16. Borchers DL, Marques TA, Gunnlaugsson T, Jupp PE. 2010. Estimating distance sampling detection functions when distances are measured with errors. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat 15:346–61 [Google Scholar]
17. Borchers DL, Zucchini W, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Cañadas A, Langrock R. 2013. Using hidden Markov models to deal with availability bias on line transect surveys. Biometrics 69:703–13 [Google Scholar]
18. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L. 2001. Introduction to Distance Sampling Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press448Provides the fundamental ideas for distance sampling methods.
19. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L. 2004. Advanced Distance Sampling Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press416
20. Buckland ST, Laake JL, Borchers DL. 2010. Double-observer line transect methods: levels of independence. Biometrics 66:169–77 [Google Scholar]
21. Buckland ST, Newman KB, Fernández C, Thomas L, Harwood J. 2007. Embedding population dynamics models in inference. Stat. Sci. 22:44–58 [Google Scholar]
22. Bunge JA. 2013. A survey of software for fitting capture-recapture models. WIREs Comput. Stat. 5:114–20 [Google Scholar]
23. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach London: Springer488, 2nd ed..
24. Catchpole EA, Freeman SN, Morgan BJT, Harris MP. 1998. Integrated recovery/recapture data analysis. Biometrics 54:33–46 [Google Scholar]
25. Catchpole EA, Morgan BJT, Coulson T. 2004. Conditional methodology for individual case history data. J. R. Stat. Soc. C 53:123–31 [Google Scholar]
26. Catchpole EA, Morgan BJT, Coulson TN, Freeman SN, Albon MP. 2000. Factors influencing Soay sheep survival. J. R. Stat. Soc. C 49:453–72 [Google Scholar]
27. Catchpole EA, Morgan BJT, Tavecchia G. 2008. A new method for analysing discrete life history data with missing covariate values. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 70:445–60 [Google Scholar]
28. Cave VM, King R, Freeman SN. 2009. An integrated population model from constant effort bird-ringing data. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat 15:119–37 [Google Scholar]
29. Chandler RB, Royle JA. 2013. Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations. Ann. Appl. Stat. 7:936–54 [Google Scholar]
30. Choquet R, Viallefont A, Rouan L, Gaanoun K, Gaillard J-M. 2011. A semi-Markov model to assess reliably survival patterns from birth to death in free-ranging populations. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2:383–89 [Google Scholar]
31. Cole DJ, Morgan BJT, Titterington DM. 2010. Determining the parametric structure of models. Math. Biosci. 228:16–30 [Google Scholar]
32. Coull B, Agresti A. 1999. The use of mixed logit models to reflect heterogeneity in capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 55:294–301 [Google Scholar]
33. Cowen L, Schwarz CJ. 2006. The Jolly-Seber model with tag-loss. Biometrics 62:699–705 [Google Scholar]
34. de Valpine P. 2012. Frequentist analysis of hierarchical models for population dynamics and demographic data. J. Ornithol. 7152:S393–408 [Google Scholar]
35. Dorazio RM, Royle JA. 2003. Mixture models for estimating the size of a closed population when capture rates vary among individuals. Biometrics 59:351–64 [Google Scholar]
36. Dupuis JA. 1995. Bayesian estimation of movement and survival probabilities from capture-recapture data. Biometrika 82:761–72Constructs the hidden Markov model (HMM) formulation for multistate capture-recapture data (without using HMM terminology). [Google Scholar]
37. Dupuis JA, Badia J, Maublanc ML, Bon R. 2002. Spatial fidelity of mouflon: a Bayesian analysis of an age-dependent capture-recapture model. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 7:277–98 [Google Scholar]
38. Dupuis JA, Schwarz CJ. 2007. A Bayesian approach to the multistate Jolly–Seber capture-recapture model. Biometrics 63:1015–22 [Google Scholar]
39. Durbin J, Koopman SJ. 2001. Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press253
40. Efford MG. 2004. Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106:598–610 [Google Scholar]
41. Efford MG. 2011. Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches. Ecology 92:2202–7 [Google Scholar]
42. Efford MG, Borchers DL, Byrom AE. 2009a. Density estimation by spatially explicit capture-recapture: likelihood-based methods. See Thomson et al. 2009 255–69
43. Efford MG, Borchers DL, Mowat G. 2013. Varying effort in capture-recapture studies. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4:629–36 [Google Scholar]
44. Efford MG, Dawson DK, Borchers DL. 2009b. Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array. Ecology 90:2676–82 [Google Scholar]
45. Fearnhead P. 2011. MCMC for state-space models. Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo SP Brooks, A Gelman, GL Jones, X-L Meng 513–29 Boca Raton, FL: CRC [Google Scholar]
46. Ford JH, Bravington MV, Robbins J. 2012. Incorporating individual variability into mark-recapture models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:1047–54 [Google Scholar]
47. Gardner B, Reppucci J, Lucherini M, Royle JA. 2010. Spatially explicit inference for open populations: estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies. Ecology 91:3376–83 [Google Scholar]
48. Gardner B, Royle JA, Wegan MT. 2009. Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies. Ecology 90:1106–15 [Google Scholar]
49. Gimenez O, Choquet R. 2010. Incorporating individual heterogeneity in studies on marked animals using numerical integration: capture-recapture mixed models. Ecology 91:951–57 [Google Scholar]