1932

Abstract

This essay reviews two research programs. The first focuses on variations in the number of women elected to national parliaments in the world (descriptive representation), and the second focuses on effects of women's presence in parliament (substantive representation). The theory of the politics of presence (Phillips 1995) provides reasons for expecting a link between descriptive and substantive representation. The safest position would be to say that results are “mixed” when it comes to empirical support for the theory of the politics of presence. However, when a large number of studies covering a wide set of indicators on the importance of gender in the parliamentary process are piled together, the picture that emerges shows that female politicians contribute to strengthening the position of women's interests.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839
2009-06-15
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/12/1/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Atkeson LR, Carrillo N. 2007. More is better: the influence of collective female descriptive representation on external efficacy. Polit. Gender 3:0179–101 [Google Scholar]
  2. Banducci SA, Karp JA. 2000. Gender, leadership and choice in multiparty systems. Polit. Res. Q. 53:4815–48 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beckwith K. 2007. Numbers and newness. The descriptive and substantive representation of women. Can. J. Polit. Sci. 40:127–49 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergqvist C. et al. 2000. Equal Democracies? Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries Oslo: Norwegian Univ. Press
  5. Box-Steffensmeier JM, de Boef S, Lin TM. 2004. The dynamics of the partisan gender gap. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98:3515–28 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bratton KA, Ray LP. 2002. Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46:2428–37 [Google Scholar]
  7. Celis K. 2006. Substantive representation of women: the representation of women's interests and the impact of descriptive representation in the Belgian parliament (1900–1979). J. Wom. Polit. Policy 28:285–114 [Google Scholar]
  8. Childs S, Krook ML. 2006. Should feminists give up on critical mass? A contingent yes. Polit. Gender 2:4522–30 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cutler F. 2002. The simplest shortcut of all: sociodemographic characteristics and electoral choice. J. Polit. 64:2466–90 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dahl R. 1989. Democracy and its Critics New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  11. Dahlerup D. 1988. From a small to a large minority: women in scandinavian politics. Scand. Polit. Stud. 4:275–98 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dahlerup D. 2006a. Women, Quotas and Politics London: Routledge
  13. Dahlerup D. 2006b. The story of the theory of critical mass. Polit. Gender 2:4511–22 [Google Scholar]
  14. Devlin C, Elgie R. 2008. The effect of increased women's representation in parliament. The case of Rwanda. Parl. Aff. 61:2237–54 [Google Scholar]
  15. Diaz MM. 2005. Representing Women? Female Legislators in West European Parliaments Colchester, UK: ECPR Press
  16. Dodson DL. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  17. Dollar D, Fisman S, Gatti R. 1999. Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government. J. Econ. Behav. Org. 46:423–29 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dietz MG. 2003. Current controversies in feminist theory. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 6:1399–431 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dolan K. 2005. Do women candidates play to gender stereotypes? Do men candidates play to women? Candidate sex and issues priorities on campaign websites. Polit. Res. Q. 58:31–44 [Google Scholar]
  20. Duverger M. 1955. The Political Role of Women Paris: UN Econ. Soc. Counc.
  21. Esaiasson P. 2000. Focus of representation. See Esaiasson & Heidar 2000 51–82
  22. Esaiasson P, Heidar K. 2000. From Westminster to Congress and Beyond. The Nordic Experience Columbus: Ohio State Univ. Press
  23. Esaiasson P, Holmberg S. 1996. Representation from Above. Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth
  24. Freidenvall L. 2006. Vägen till Varannan damernas. Om kvinnorepresentation, kvotering och kandidaturval i svensk politik 19702002 [The road towards every second seat for a woman. Women's representation, quotas, and candidate selection in Swedish politics 1970–2002]. PhD thesis , Stockholm Stud. Polit. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gender quotas I 2005. Polit. Gender 14621–52
  26. Gender quotas II 2006. Polit. Gender 21101–28
  27. Graubard SR. 1986. Norden—The Passion for Equality Oslo: Norwegian Univ. Press
  28. Grey S. 2002. Does size matter? Critical mass and New Zealand's women MPs. Women, Politics and Change K Ross 19–29 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  29. Grey S. 2006. Numbers and beyond. The relevance of critical mass in gender research. Polit. Gender 2:4492–502 [Google Scholar]
  30. Haavio-Mannila E. et al. 1983. Det uferdige demokratiet. Kvinner i nordisk politikk [Unfinished Democracy. Women in Nordic Politics] Oslo: Nordisk Ministerråd [Google Scholar]
  31. Heath RM, Schwindt-Bayer LA, Taylor-Robinson MM. 2005. Women on the sidelines: women's representation on committees in Latin American legislatures. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49:2420–36 [Google Scholar]
  32. Heidar K, Pedersen K. 2006. Party feminism: gender gaps within Nordic political parties. Scand. Polit. Stud. 29:3192–218 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hernes H. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism Oslo: Oslo Norwegian Press
  34. Inglehart R, Norris P. 2003. Rising Tide. Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  35. Iversen T, Rosenbluth F. 2008. Work and power. The connection between female labor force participation and female political representation. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11:479–95 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jeydel A, Taylor AJ. 2003. Are women legislators less effective? Evidence from the U.S. House in the 103rd–105th Congress. Polit. Res. Q. 56:119–27 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kenworthy L, Malami M. 1999. Gender inequality in political representation: a worldwide comparative analysis. Soc. Forces 78:1235–68 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kimmel M. 2004. The Gendered Society Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  39. Kittilson MC. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments. Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe Columbus: Ohio State Univ. Press
  40. Koch JW. 2002. Gender stereotypes and citizens' impressions of House candidates' ideological orientations. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46:2453–62 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lovenduski J. 2005a. Feminizing Politics Cambridge, UK: Polity
  42. Lovenduski J. 2005b. State Feminism and Political Representation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  43. Lovenduski J, Norris P. 1993. Gender and Party Politics London: Sage
  44. Lovenduski J, Norris P. 2003. Westminster women: the politics of presence. Polit. Stud. 51:184–102 [Google Scholar]
  45. Matland RE. 1998. Women's representation in national legislatures: developed and developing countries. Legis. Stud. Q. 23:1109–25 [Google Scholar]
  46. Matland RE, Brown DD. 1992. District magnitude's effect on female representation in the U.S. state legislatures. Legis. Stud. Q. 17:4469–92 [Google Scholar]
  47. McAllister I, Studlar D. 1992. Gender and representation among legislative candidates in Australia. Comp. Polit. Stud. 3:388–411 [Google Scholar]
  48. Narud HM, Valen H. 2000. Does social background matter?. See Esaiasson & Heidar 2000 83–106
  49. Norris P. 1993. Conclusions: comparing legislative recruitment. See Lovenduski & Norris 1993 309–30
  50. Norris P. 1996. Legislative recruitment. Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective L LeDuc, RG Niemi, P Norris 184–215 London: Sage [Google Scholar]
  51. Norris P, Lovenduski J. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  52. Ondercin HL, Bernstein JL. 2007. Context matters: the influence of state and campaign factors on the gender gap in senate elections, 1988–2000. Polit. Gender 3:133–53 [Google Scholar]
  53. Paxton P, Kunovich S. 2003. Women's political representation: the importance of ideology. Soc. Forces 82:187–113 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pfau-Effinger B. 1998. Gender cultures and the gender arrangement—a theoretical framework for cross-national comparisons on gender. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 11:2147–66 [Google Scholar]
  55. Phillips A. 1995. The Politics of Presence Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  56. Phillips A. 2007. Multiculturalism without Culture Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  57. Pitkin HF. 1967. The Concept of Representation Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  58. Poggione S. 2004. Exploring gender differences in state legislators' policy preferences. Polit. Res. Q. 57:2305–14 [Google Scholar]
  59. Reignold B. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. North Carolina Press
  60. Rosenbluth F, Salmond R, Thies MF. 2006. Welfare works: explaining female legislative representation. Polit. Gender 2:02165–92 [Google Scholar]
  61. Rule W. 1987. Electoral systems, contextual factors and women's opportunity for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. West. Polit. Q. 40:03477–98 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sainsbury D. 1993. The politics of increased women's representation: the Swedish case. See Lovenduski & Norris 1993 263–90
  63. Salmond R. 2006. Proportional representation and female parliamentarians. Legis. Stud. Q. 31:2175–204 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sanbonmatsu K. 2003. Gender-related political knowledge and the descriptive representation of women. Polit. Beh. 25:4367–88 [Google Scholar]
  65. Sawer M. 2002. The representation of women in Australia: meaning and make-believe. Women, Politics, and Change K Ross 5–18 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  66. Schwindt-Bayer LA, Mishler W. 2005. An integrated model of women's representation. J. Polit. 67:2407–28 [Google Scholar]
  67. Skjeie H. 1992. Den politiske betydningen av kjønn. En studie av norsk topp-politikk [The political importance of gender. A study of Norwegian top-politics] Oslo: Inst. Samfunnsforskning rapport 9211 ( PhD thesis) [Google Scholar]
  68. Squires J, Wickham-Jones M. 2001. Women in parliament: a comparative analysis Equal Opportunities Commission, Res. Disc. Ser. (UK Gov. Publ.) 88–99
  69. Studlar DT, McAllister I. 2002. Does a critical mass exist? A comparative analysis of women's legislative representation since 1950. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 41:233–53 [Google Scholar]
  70. Sung H. 2003. Fairer sex or fairer system? Gender and corruption revisited. Soc. Forces 82:2703–23 [Google Scholar]
  71. Swers ML. 1998. Are women more likely to vote for women's issue bills than their male colleagues?. Legis. Stud. Q. 23:3435–48 [Google Scholar]
  72. Teigen M, Wängnerud L. 2009. Tracing gender equality cultures. Elite perceptions of gender equality in Norway and Sweden. Polit. Gender 5:1 In press [Google Scholar]
  73. Thomas S. 1994. How Women Legislate Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  74. Vega A, Firestone JM. 1995. The effects of gender on congressional behavior and the substantive representation of women. Legis. Stud. Q. 20:2213–22 [Google Scholar]
  75. Weldon LS. 2002. Beyond bodies: institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policymaking. J. Polit. 64:41153–74 [Google Scholar]
  76. Wide J. 2006. Kvinnors politiska representation i ett jämförande perspektiv. Nationell och lokal nivå [Women's political representation in a comparative perspective—national and local level] PhD thesis, Statsvetenskapliga Inst., Umeå Universitet) [Google Scholar]
  77. Wängnerud L. 1998. Politikens andra sida. Om kvinnorepresentation i Sveriges Riksdag [The second face of democracy. Women's representation in the Swedish parliament] PhD thesis, Göteborg Stud. Polit., Göteborg Univ. [Google Scholar]
  78. Wängnerud L. 2000a. Testing the politics of presence. Women's representation in the Swedish riksdag. Scand. Polit. Stud. 23:167–91 [Google Scholar]
  79. Wängnerud L. 2000b. Representing women. See Esaiasson & Heidar 2000 132–54
  80. Wängnerud L. 2006. A step-wise development: women in parliament in Sweden. Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers J Ballington, A Karam 238–48 Stockholm: IDEA Handbook. Rev. version [Google Scholar]
  81. Young IM. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error