ELECTORAL FRAUD: Causes, Types, and Consequences

Literature Cited

1. Anderson ML. 2000. Practicing Democracy: Elections and Political Culture in Imperial Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press 483 pp. [Google Scholar]
2. Annino A. ed 1995. Historia de las elecciones en Iberoamérica, Siglo XIX. Buenos Aires: FCE 481pp. [Google Scholar]
3. Aparicio R. 2002. La magnitud de la manipulación del voto en las elecciones federales del año 2000.. Perfiles Latinoam. 20:79–100 [Google Scholar]
4. Argersinger P. 1992. Structure, Process and Party: Essays in American Political History. Armonk, NY: Sharpe 219 pp. [Google Scholar]
5. Aziz-Nassif A. 1987. Chihuahua y los límites de la democracia electoral.. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 49:159–226 [Google Scholar]
6. Basadre J. 1980. Elecciones y centralismo en el Perú: Apuntes para un esquema histórico. Lima: Univ. del Pacifico 173 pp. [Google Scholar]
7. Baum D. 1991. Pinpointing apparent fraud in the 1861 Texas secession referendum.. J. Int. Hist. 22:201–21 [Google Scholar]
8. Botana N. 1979. El orden conservador: la política Argentina entre 1880–1916. Buenos Aires: Ed. Sudamericana 345 pp. [Google Scholar]
9. Calderón-Alzati E, Cazés D. 1996. Las elecciones presidenciales de 1994. México, DF: La Jornada/CIICH, UNAM 257 pp. [Google Scholar]
10. Callahan W. 2000. Pollwatching, Elections and Civil Society in Southeast Asia. Burlington, VT: Ashgate 218 pp. [Google Scholar]
11. Callahan W, McCargo D. 1996. Vote-buying in Thailand's northeast.. Asian Surv. 26:376–92 [Google Scholar]
12. Carter J. 1992. Turning Point: a Candidate, a State, and a Nation Come of Age. New York: Times Books 273 pp. [Google Scholar]
13. Cazés D. and 843 coauthors 1996. Memorial de las elecciones de 1994: testimonios de observadores. México, DF: La Jornada/CIICH, UNAM 422 pp. [Google Scholar]
14. Charnay JP. 1964. Les scrutins politiques en France de 1815 à 1962: contestations et invalidations. Paris: Cah. De la Fond. Nat. Des Sci. Polit 281 pp. [Google Scholar]
15. Cornelius W. 2002. La eficacia de la compra y coacción del voto en las elecciones mexicanas de 2000.. Perfiles Latinoam. 20:11–32 [Google Scholar]
16. Cox GW. 1988. Closeness and turnout: a methodological note.. J. Polit. 50:768–75 [Google Scholar]
17. Cox GW. 1999. Electoral rules and the calculus of mobilization.. Leg. Stud. Q. 24:387–419 [Google Scholar]
18. Cox GW, Kousser JM. 1981. Turnout and rural corruption: New York as a test case.. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 25:646–63 [Google Scholar]
19. Dardé C. 1996. Fraud and passivity of the electorate in Spain, 1875–1923. In Elections Before Democracy, ed. E Posada-Carbó 201–23 New York: St. Martin's
20. Domínguez JI, McCann JA. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press 269 pp. [Google Scholar]
21. Eisenstadt TA. 1998. Courting democracy in Mexico: party strategies, electoral institution-building, and political opening.. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., San Diego 379 pp.
22. Eisenstadt TA. 1999. Weak electoral institutions or legacies of social conflict? Modeling causes of Mexico's local post-electoral mobilizations, 1989–1998.. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., 95th, Atlanta, GA
23. Eisenstadt TA. 2002. Measuring electoral court failure in Mexico.. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 23:47–68 [Google Scholar]
24. Fairbairn B. 1990. Authority vs. democracy: Prussian officials in the German elections of 1898 and 1903.. Hist. J. 33:811–38 [Google Scholar]
25. Fairbairn B. 1997. Democracy in the Undemocratic State: the German Reichstag Elections of 1898 and 1903. Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press 328 pp. [Google Scholar]
26. Ferrero RA. 1983. Los fraudes electorales.. Todo es Hist. 197:48–64 [Google Scholar]
27. Garber M, Frank A. 1990. Contested Elections and Recounts. 2 vols. Washington, DC: Gov. Print. Off [Google Scholar]
28. Gist G. 1961. Progressive reform in a rural community: the Adams County vote-fraud case.. Miss. Valley Hist. Rev. 48:60–78 [Google Scholar]
29. Gómez-Tagle S. 1988. Conflictos y contradicciones en el sistema electoral mexicano.. Estud. Sociol. 6:3–38 [Google Scholar]
30. Graham R. 1990. Politics and Patronage in Nineteenth Century Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press 382 pp. [Google Scholar]
31. Grofman B, Lee SC, Winckler EA, Woodall B. eds 1999. Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: the Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press 390 pp. [Google Scholar]
32. Gueniffey P. 1993. Le nombre et la raison: la Révolution française et les élections. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Ciencias Sociales 559 pp. [Google Scholar]
33. Hanham HJ. 1959. Elections and Party Management: Politics in the Time of Disraeli and Gladstone. London: Longmanns 468 pp. [Google Scholar]
34. Hasen RL. 2000. Vote buying.. Calif. Law Rev. 88:1323–71 [Google Scholar]
35. Hicken AD. 2002. Parties, pork and policy: policymaking in developing democracies.. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., San Diego
36. Hoppen KT. 1984. Elections, Politics and Society in Ireland, 1832–1885. Oxford, UK: Clarendon 569 pp. [Google Scholar]
37. Karlan P. 1994. Not by money but by virtue won? Vote trafficking and the voting rights system.. Va. Law Rev. 80:1455–75 [Google Scholar]
38. King RF. 2001. Counting the votes: South Carolina's stolen election of 1876.. J. Interdiscip. Hist. 32:169–91 [Google Scholar]
39. King G, Keohane RO, Verba S. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
40. Kochin MS, Kochin LA. 1998. When is buying votes wrong?. Public Choice 97:645–62 [Google Scholar]
41. Kousser JM. 1974. The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880–1910. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press 319 pp. [Google Scholar]
42. Lehoucq FE. 2002a. Can parties police themselves? Electoral governance and democratization.. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 23:29–46 [Google Scholar]
43. Lehoucq FE. 2002b. When do parties buy votes? Theoretical and empirical perspectives on electoral corruption.. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., 98th, Boston, MA, Aug. 28–Sep. 1
44. Lehoucq FE, Molina I. 2002. Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press 277 pp. [Google Scholar]
45. Malamud C. ed 2000. Legitimidad, representación y alternancia en España y América Latina: las reformas electorales (1880–1930). México, DF: FCE 318 pp. [Google Scholar]
46. McCann JA, Domínguez JI. 1998. Mexicans react to electoral fraud and political corruption: an assessment of public opinion voting behavior.. Elec. Stud. 17:483–503 [Google Scholar]
47. McDonald RH. 1967. Electoral fraud and regime controls in Latin America.. West. Polit. Q. 20:694–708 [Google Scholar]
48. Middlebrook KJ. ed 1998. Electoral Observation and Democratic Transitions in Latin America. La Jolla, CA: Cent. US-Mexican Stud., Univ. Calif., San Diego [Google Scholar]
49. Molina I, Lehoucq FE. 1999. Political competition and electoral fraud: a Latin American case study.. J. Interdiscip. Hist. 30:199–234 [Google Scholar]
50. Molinar-Horcasitas J. 1991. El tiempo de la legitimidad: elecciones, autoritarismo y democracia en México. México, DF: Cal y Arena 265 pp. [Google Scholar]
51. Mücke U. 2001. Elections and political participation in nineteenth century Peru: the 1871/1872 presidential campaign.. J. Latin Am. Stud. 33:311–46 [Google Scholar]
52. National Commission on Federal Electoral Reform 2002. To Assure Pride and Confidence in the Electoral Process. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst 385 pp. [Google Scholar]
53. Oberst RC, Weilage A. 1990. Quantitative tests of electoral fraud: the 1982 Sri Lankan referendum.. Corrupt. Ref. 5:49–62 [Google Scholar]
54. O'Gorman F. 1989. Voters, Patrons and Parties: The Unreformed Electoral System of Hanaverian England, 1734–1832. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press 445 pp. [Google Scholar]
55. O'Leary C. 1962. The Elimination of Corrupt Practices in British Elections, 1868–1911. Oxford, UK: Clarendon 253 pp. [Google Scholar]
56. Pastor R. 1999. The role of electoral administration in democratic transitions: implications for policy and research.. Democratization 6:1–27 [Google Scholar]
57. Perman M. 2001. Struggle for Mastery: Disfranchisement of the South, 1888–1908. Chapel Hill: Univ. North Carol. Press 416 pp. [Google Scholar]
58. Posada-Carbó E. 1994. Elections and civil wars in nineteenth-century Colombia: the 1875 presidential campaign.. J. Latin Am. Stud. 26:621–49 [Google Scholar]
59. Posada-Carbó E. ed 1996. Elections Before Democracy. New York: St. Martin's [Google Scholar]
60. Posada-Carbó E. 1997. Limits to power: elections under the conservative hegemony in Colombia, 1886–1930.. Hispan. Am. Hist. Rev. 77:245–79 [Google Scholar]
61. Posada-Carbó E. 2000. Electoral juggling: a comparative history of the corruption of the suffrage in Latin America, 1830–1930.. J. Latin Am. Stud. 32:611–44 [Google Scholar]
62. Powell LN. 1989. Correcting for fraud: a quantitative reassessment of the Mississippi ratification election of 1868.. J. South. Hist. 5:633–58 [Google Scholar]
63. Renzato G. 1991. La forja de la soberanía nacional: las elecciones en los sistemas liberales italiano y español.. Ayer 3:115–38 [Google Scholar]
64. Rigger S. 2002. Weighing a shadow: toward a technique for estimating the effects of vote-buying in Taiwan. Presented at “Trading Political Rights: The Comparative Politics of Vote-Buying,” Mass. Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA [Google Scholar]
65. Riker WH. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: The Theory of Social Choice Confronts the Theory of Populism. San Francisco: Freeman 311 pp. [Google Scholar]
66. Rose-Ackerman S. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press 266 pp. [Google Scholar]
67. Sabato H. ed 1999. Ciudadanía política y formación de las naciones: perspectivas históricas de América Latina. México, DF: FCE 449 pp. [Google Scholar]
68. Sabato H. 2001. The Many and the Few: Political Participation in Republican Buenos Aires. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
69. Sambruccetti SIR. 1980. El fraude electoral en 1886.. Bol. Inst. Hist. Argent. y Am. “Dr. Emilio Ravgnon” 16:415–82 [Google Scholar]
70. Schedler A. 1999. Percepciones públicas de fraude electoral en México.. Perfiles Latinoam. 14:103–27 [Google Scholar]
71. Schedler A. 2002a. The menu of manipulation.. J. Democracy 13:36–50 [Google Scholar]
72. Schedler A. 2002b. Citizens resent clientelism: on the moral economy of vote trading in México.. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., 98th, Boston, MA
73. Schaffer F. 1998. Democracy in Translation: Understanding Politics in an Unfamiliar Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press 168 pp. [Google Scholar]
74. Schaffer F. 2001. Clean elections and the “great unwashed”: electoral reform and the class divide in the Philippines.. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Pol. Sci. Assoc., 97th, San Francisco, CA
75. Seymour C. 1915. Electoral Reform in England and Wales: The Development and Operation of the Parliamentary Franchise, 1832–1885. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press 564 pp. [Google Scholar]
76. Sloan JW. 1970. Electoral fraud and social change: the Guatemalan example.. Sci. Soc. 34:78–91 [Google Scholar]
77. Tjarks GOE. 1963. Las elecciones salteñas de 1876 (un estudio de fraude electoral).. Anuario de Historia 1:417–75 [Google Scholar]
78. Trejo G, Aguilar-Rivera JA. 2002. Etnicidad y consolidación democrática: la organización de las elecciones en las regiones indígenas de México. In Los Dilemas de la democracia en México, ed. A Hémond, D Recondo 195–224 México, DF: CEMCA and IFE
79. Tusell J. 1970. Para la sociología política de la España contemporánea: el impacto de la ley de 1907 en el comportamiento electoral.. Hispania 30:571–631 [Google Scholar]
80. Tusell J. 1991. El sufragio universal en España (1891–1936): un balance historiográfico.. Ayer 3:13–62 [Google Scholar]
81. Varela Ortega J. 2001a. Los amigos políticos: partidos, elecciones y caciquismo en la restauración, 1875–1900. Madrid: Marcial Pons/Junta de Castilla y León, Consejería de Educación y Cultura 568 pp. [Google Scholar]
82. Varela-Ortega J. ed 2001b. El poder de la influencia: geografía del caciquismo en España (1875–1923). Madrid: Marcial Pons/CEPC 776 pp. [Google Scholar]