1932

Abstract

Animals pollinate 87% of the world's flowering plant species. Therefore, how pollinators respond to human-induced land-use change has important implications for plants and the species that depend on them. Here, we synthesize the published literature on how land-use change affects the main groups of pollinators: bees, butterflies, flies, birds, and bats. Responses to land-use change are predominantly negative but are highly variable within and across taxa. The directionality of pollinator response varies according to study design, with comparisons across gradients in surrounding landscape cover finding largely negative responses and comparisons across local land-use types finding largely positive responses. Furthermore, among the studies using landscape designs, most were performed in systems where land-use change is extreme, and such studies find stronger negative effects than those performed in more moderate systems. Across multiple taxa, dietary specialists show greater sensitivity to land use than do generalists. There is a need for studies of pollinator species composition and relative abundance, rather than simply species richness and aggregate abundance, to identify the species that are lost and gained with increasing land-use change.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145042
2011-12-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ecolsys/42/1/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145042.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145042&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen M. 2006. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 9:968–80 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aizen MA, Feinsinger P. 1994. Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and feral honey bees in Argentine “chaco serrano.”. Ecol. Appl. 4:378–92 [Google Scholar]
  3. Balmer O, Erhardt A. 2000. Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for Central European butterfly communities: rethinking conservation practices. Conserv. Biol. 14:746–57 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS, Ávila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB. et al. 2007. Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:18555–60One of few experimental studies, and one of the few to examine community composition. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartomeus I, Vila M, Steffan-Dewenter I. 2010. Combined effects of Impatiens glandulifera invasion and landscape structure on native plant pollination. J. Ecol. 98:440–50 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergman K-O, Ask L, Askling J, Ignell H, Wahlman H, Milberg P. 2008. Importance of boreal grasslands in Sweden for butterfly diversity and effects of local and landscape habitat factors. Biodivers. Conserv. 17:139–53 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernhardt P. 2000. Convergent evolution and adaptive radiation of beetle-pollinated angiosperms. Plant Syst. Evol. 222:293–320 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Oholemuller R, Edwards M. et al. 2006. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–54 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blair RB. 1999. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity?. Ecol. Appl. 9:164–70 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonebrake TC, Ponisio LC, Boggs CL, Ehrlich PR. 2010. More than just indicators: a review of tropical butterfly ecology and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 143:1831–41 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brosi BJ. 2009. The effects of forest fragmentation on euglossine bee communities (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini). Biol. Conserv. 142:414–23 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brosi BJ, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. 2007. Bee community shifts with landscape context in a tropical countryside. Ecol. Appl. 17:418–30 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brosi BJ, Daily GC, Shih TM, Oviedo F, Duran G. 2008. The effects of forest fragmentation on bee communities in tropical countryside. J. Appl. Ecol. 45:773–83 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cane JH, Minckley R, Kervin L, Roulston T, Williams N. 2006. Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecol. Appl. 16:632–44 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carthew SM, Goldingay RL. 1997. Non-flying mammals as pollinators. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:104–8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Deans AM, Smith SM, Malcolm JR, Crins WJ, Bellocq MI. 2007. Hoverfly (Syrphidae) communities respond to varying structural retention after harvesting in Canadian peatland black spruce forests. Environ. Entomol. 36:308–18 [Google Scholar]
  17. Elberling H, Olesen JM. 1999. The structure of a high latitude plant-flower visitor system: the dominance of flies. Ecography 22:314–23 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellis EC, Goldewijk KK, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N. 2010. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19:589–606 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:487–515 [Google Scholar]
  20. Filippi-Codaccioni O, Devictor V, Bas Y, Julliard R. 2010. Toward more concern for specialisation and less for species diversity in conserving farmland biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 143:1493–500 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fleming TH, Geiselman C, Kress WJ. 2009. The evolution of bat pollination: a phylogenetic perspective. Ann. Bot. 104:1017–43 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fleming TH, Muchhala N. 2008. Nectar-feeding bird and bat niches in two worlds: pantropical comparisons of vertebrate pollination systems. J. Biogeogr. 35:764–80 [Google Scholar]
  23. Forister ML, McCall AC, Sanders NJ, Fordyce JA, Thorne JH. et al. 2010. Compounded effects of climate change and habitat alteration shift patterns of butterfly diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:2088–92 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gabriel D, Sait SM, Hodgson JA, Schmutz U, Kunin WE, Benton TG. 2010. Scale matters: the impact of organic farming on biodiversity at different spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 13:858–69 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goulson D, Lepais O, O'Connor S, Osborne JL, Sanderson RA. et al. 2010. Effects of land use at a landscape scale on bumblebee nest density and survival. J. Appl. Ecol. 47:1207–15 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gurevitch J, Hedges VL. 2001. Meta-analysis: combining the results of independent experiments. In Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments SM Scheiner, J Gurevitch 347–69 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Haenke S, Scheid B, Schaefer M, Tscharntke T, Thies C. 2009. Increasing syrphid fly diversity and density in sown flower strips within simple versus complex landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:1106–14 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hagen M, Kraemer M. 2010. Agricultural surroundings support flower-visitor networks in an Afrotropical rain forest. Biol. Conserv. 143:1654–63 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hannon LE, Sisk TD. 2009. Hedgerows in an agri-natural landscape: potential habitat value for native bees. Biol. Conserv. 142:2140–54 [Google Scholar]
  30. Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J. 2004. Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodivers. Conserv. 13:207–51 [Google Scholar]
  31. Herrera CM. 1987. Components of pollinator “quality”: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50:79–90 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hodgson JA, Kunin WE, Thomas CD, Benton TG, Gabriel D. 2010. Comparing organic farming and land sparing: optimizing yield and butterfly populations at a landscape scale. Ecol. Lett. 13:1358–67 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hogsden KL, Hutchinson T. 2004. Butterfly assemblages along a human disturbance gradient in Ontario, Canada. Can. J. Zool. 82:739–48 [Google Scholar]
  34. Holzschuh A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. 2010. How do landscape composition and configuration, organic farming and fallow strips affect the diversity of bees, wasps and their parasitoids?. J. Anim. Ecol. 79:491–500 [Google Scholar]
  35. Johst K, Drechsler M, Thomas J, Settele J. 2006. Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. J. Appl. Ecol. 43:333–42 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM. 1998. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29:83–112 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kessler M, Abrahamczyk S, Bos M, Buchori D, Putra DD. et al. 2009. Alpha and beta diversity of plants and animals along a tropical land-use gradient. Ecol. Appl. 19:2142–56 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kitahara M, Sei K. 2001. A comparison of the diversity and structure of butterfly communities in semi-natural and human-modified grassland habitats at the foot of Mt. Fuji, central Japan. Biodivers. Conserv. 10:331–51 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kleijn D, Baquero RA, Clough Y, Diaz M, De Esteban J. et al. 2006. Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol. Lett. 9:243–54 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kleijn D, Raemakers I. 2008. A retrospective analysis of pollen host plant use by stable and declining bumble bee species. Ecology 89:1811–23 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kleijn D, van Langevelde F. 2006. Interacting effects of landscape context and habitat quality on flower visiting insects in agricultural landscapes. Basic Appl. Ecol. 7:201–14 [Google Scholar]
  42. Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. 2003. Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 270:955–61Finds, in one of the first studies to do so, that the effects of land-use change vary by pollinator life history. [Google Scholar]
  43. Koh LP. 2007. Impacts of land use change on South-east Asian forest butterflies: a review. J. Appl. Ecol. 44:703–13Reviews butterfly responses to land-use change in Southeast Asia, an area experiencing rapid development and in need of conservation attention. [Google Scholar]
  44. Koh LP, Sodhi NS. 2004. Importance of reserves, fragments, and parks for butterfly conservation in a tropical urban landscape. Ecol. Appl. 14:1695–708 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kotiaho JS, Kaitala V, Komonen A, Päivinen J. 2005. Predicting the risk of extinction from shared ecological characteristics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:1963–67 [Google Scholar]
  46. Krauss J, Alfert T, Steffan-Dewenter I. 2009. Habitat area but not habitat age determines wild bee richness in limestone quarries. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:194–202 [Google Scholar]
  47. Krauss J, Bommarco R, Guardiola M, Heikkinen RK, Helm A. et al. 2010. Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels. Ecol. Lett. 13:597–605 [Google Scholar]
  48. Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I. 2003. How does landscape context contribute to effects of habitat fragmentation on diversity and population density of butterflies?. J. Biogeogr. 30:889–900 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kremen C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecol. Lett. 8:468–79 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kremen C, Williams NM, Thorp RW. 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16812–16Demonstrates the negative impacts of agricultural intensification on native bees. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lara C. 2006. Temporal dynamics of flower use by hummingbirds in a highland temperate forest in Mexico. Ecoscience 13:23–29 [Google Scholar]
  52. Larson BMH, Kevan PG, Inouye DW. 2001. Flies and flowers: taxonomic diversity of anthophiles and pollinators. Can. Entomol. 133:439–65 [Google Scholar]
  53. Law BS. 1993. Roosting and foraging ecology of the Queensland blossom bat (Syconycteris australis) in north-eastern New South Wales: flexibility in response to seasonal variation. Wildl. Res. 20:419–31 [Google Scholar]
  54. Lewis OT. 2009. Biodiversity change and ecosystem function in tropical forests. Basic Appl. Ecol. 10:97–102Highlights the importance of studying species composition and function to detect land-use effects. [Google Scholar]
  55. Littlewood NA. 2008. Grazing impacts on moth diversity and abundance on a Scottish upland estate. Insect Conserv. Divers. 1:151–60 [Google Scholar]
  56. Menz MHM, Phillips RD, Winfree R, Kremen C, Aizen MA. et al. 2011. Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the ecological restoration of pollination mutualisms. Trends Plant Sci 16:4–12 [Google Scholar]
  57. Meyer B, Jauker F, Steffan-Dewenter I. 2009. Contrasting resource-dependent responses of hoverfly richness and density to landscape structure. Basic Appl. Ecol. 10:178–86Addresses feeding guild responses of syrphid flies to land use and demonstrates that richness and abundance may have different responses. [Google Scholar]
  58. Michener CD. 2007. The Bees of the World. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press953, 2nd. ed.
  59. Mound LA. 2005. Thysanoptera: diversity and interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50:247–69 [Google Scholar]
  60. Murray TE, Kuhlmann M, Potts SG. 2009. Conservation ecology of bees: populations, species and communities. Apidologie 40:211–36 [Google Scholar]
  61. Natl. Res. Counc. 2007. Status of Pollinators in North America. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press304
  62. Natuhara Y, Imai C, Takahashi M. 1999. Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan. Ecol. Res. 14:105–18 [Google Scholar]
  63. Neff JL, Simpson BB. 1993. Bees, pollination systems and plant diversity. Hymenoptera and Biodiversity J LaSalle, ID Gauld 143–67 Wallingford, UK: CAB Int. [Google Scholar]
  64. Nilsson S, Franzén M, Jönsson E. 2008. Long-term land-use changes and extinction of specialised butterflies. Insect Conserv. Divers. 1:197–207 [Google Scholar]
  65. Ockinger E, Schweiger O, Crist TO, Debinski DM, Krauss J. et al. 2010. Life-history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: a cross-continental synthesis. Ecol. Lett. 13:969–79Highlights the power of using pollinator life-history traits to explain the effects of land-use change on butterflies. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ockinger E, Smith HG. 2006. Landscape composition and habitat area affects butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands. Oecologia 149:526–34 [Google Scholar]
  67. Ohwaki A, Tanabe S-I, Nakamura K. 2007. Butterfly assemblages in a traditional agricultural landscape: importance of secondary forests for conserving diversity, life history specialists and endemics. Biodivers. Conserv. 16:1521–39 [Google Scholar]
  68. Ohwaki A, Tanabe S-I, Nakamura K. 2008. Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on the butterfly assemblage in an urban green area: the changes from 1990 to 2005 in Kanazawa Castle Park, Japan. Ecol. Res. 23:697–708 [Google Scholar]
  69. Olden JD. 2006. Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 33:2027–39 [Google Scholar]
  70. Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S. 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?. Oikos 120:321–26 [Google Scholar]
  71. Patiny S, Rasmont P, Michez D. 2009. A survey and review of the status of wild bees in the West-Palaearctic region. Apidologie 40:313–31 [Google Scholar]
  72. Pereira HM, Leadley PW, Proenca V, Alkemade R, Scharlemann JPW. et al. 2010. Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330:1496–501 [Google Scholar]
  73. Polus E, Vandewoestijne S, Choutt J, Baguette M. 2007. Tracking the effects of one century of habitat loss and fragmentation on calcareous grassland butterfly communities. Biodivers. Conserv. 16:3423–36 [Google Scholar]
  74. Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE. 2010. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:345–53 [Google Scholar]
  75. Rathcke BJ, Jules ES. 1993. Habitat fragmentation and plant-pollinator interactions. Curr. Sci. 65:273–77 [Google Scholar]
  76. Ricketts TH, Regetz J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C. et al. 2008. Landscape effects on crop pollination services: Are there general patterns?. Ecol. Lett. 11:499–515 [Google Scholar]
  77. Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS. 2006. Ecology of Ant-Plant Interactions Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press331
  78. Ries L, Fletcher RJ, Battin J, Sisk TD. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variabilty explained. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 35:491–522 [Google Scholar]
  79. Roulston TH, Goodell K. 2011. The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56:293–312 [Google Scholar]
  80. Sahli HF, Conner JK. 2007. Visitation, effectiveness, and efficiency of 15 genera of visitors to wild radish, Raphanus raphanismum (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 94:203–9 [Google Scholar]
  81. Sang A, Teder T, Helm A, Pärtel M. 2010. Indirect evidence for an extinction debt of grassland butterflies half century after habitat loss. Biol. Conserv. 143:1405–13 [Google Scholar]
  82. Schweiger O, Musche M, Bailey D, Billeter R, Diekotter T. et al. 2007. Functional richness of local hoverfly communities (Diptera, Syrphidae) in response to land use across temperate Europe. Oikos 116:461–72 [Google Scholar]
  83. Scoble J. 1995. The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 404.
  84. Sjodin NE, Bengtsson J, Ekbom B. 2008. The influence of grazing intensity and landscape composition on the diversity and abundance of flower-visiting insects. J. Appl. Ecol. 45:763–72 [Google Scholar]
  85. Smith DM, Finch DM, Hawksworth DL. 2009. Black-chinned hummingbird nest-site selection and nest survival in response to fuel reduction in a southwestern riparian forest. Condor 111:641–52 [Google Scholar]
  86. Sommaggio D. 1999. Syrphidae: Can they be used as environmental bioindicators?. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74:343–56 [Google Scholar]
  87. Spitzer K, Novotny V, Tonner M, Leps J. 1993. Habitat preferences, distribution and seasonality of the butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) in a montane tropical rain forest, Vietnam. J. Biogeogr. 20:109–21 [Google Scholar]
  88. Stefanescu C, Peñuelas J, Filella I. 2005. Butterflies highlight the conservation value of hay meadows highly threatened by land-use changes in a protected Mediterranean area. Biol. Conserv. 126:234–46 [Google Scholar]
  89. Stefanescu C, Peñuelas J, Filella I. 2009. Rapid changes in butterfly communities following the abandonment of grasslands: a case study. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2:261–69 [Google Scholar]
  90. Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T. 2002. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–32 [Google Scholar]
  91. Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. 2000. Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitats. Ecol. Lett. 3:449–56 [Google Scholar]
  92. Stouffer PC, Bierregaard RO, Strong C, Lovejoy TE. 2006. Long-term landscape change and bird abundance in Amazonian rainforest fragments. Conserv. Biol. 20:1212–23Examines the effect of fragment size on hummingbird abundance over time. [Google Scholar]
  93. Summerville KS, Crist TO. 2001. Effects of experimental habitat fragmentation on patch use by butterflies and skippers (Lepidoptera). Ecology 82:1360–70 [Google Scholar]
  94. Summerville KS, Crist TO. 2003. Determinants of lepidopteran community composition and species diversity in eastern deciduous forests: roles of season, eco-region and patch size. Oikos 100:134–48 [Google Scholar]
  95. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC. et al. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr. 31:79–92 [Google Scholar]
  96. Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD. et al. 2004. Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–81 [Google Scholar]
  97. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, D'Antonio C, Dobson A. et al. 2001. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–84 [Google Scholar]
  98. Tschapka M. 2004. Energy density patterns of nectar resources permit coexistence within a guild of Neotropical flower-visiting bats. J. Zool. Lond. 263:7–21 [Google Scholar]
  99. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 8:857–74 [Google Scholar]
  100. Tscharntke T, Sekercioglu CH, Dietsch TV, Sodhi NS, Hoehn P, Tylianakis JM. 2008. Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89:944–51 [Google Scholar]
  101. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C. 2002. Contribution of small habitat fragments to conservation of insect communities of grassland-cropland landscapes. Ecol. Appl. 12:354–63 [Google Scholar]
  102. Tylianakis JM, Klein A-M, Tscharntke T. 2005. Spatiotemporal variation in the diversity of hymenoptera across a tropical habitat gradient. Ecology 86:3296–302 [Google Scholar]
  103. Vázquez DP, Morris WF, Jordano P. 2005. Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants. Ecol. Lett. 8:1088–94 [Google Scholar]
  104. Vu L. 2009. Diversity and similarity of butterfly communities in five different habitat types at Tam Dao National Park, Vietnam. J. Zool. 277:15–22 [Google Scholar]
  105. Weiblen GD. 2002. How to be a fig wasp. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:299–30 [Google Scholar]
  106. Williams NM, Crone EE, Roulston TH, Minckley RL, Packer L, Potts SG. 2010. Ecological and life history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biol. Conserv. 143:2280–91 [Google Scholar]
  107. Williams NM, Kremen C. 2007. Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. Ecol. Appl. 17:910–21 [Google Scholar]
  108. Williams PH, Osborne JL. 2009. Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide. Apidologie 40:367–87 [Google Scholar]
  109. Willig MR, Presley SJ, Bloch CP, Hice CL, Yanoviak SP. et al. 2007. Phyllostomid bats of lowland Amazonia: effects of habitat alteration on abundance. Biotropica 39:737–46Shows that some nectarivorous bats benefit from moderate levels of logging, whereas insectivorous feeding guilds respond negatively. [Google Scholar]
  110. Winfree R. 2010. The conservation and restoration of wild bees. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1195:169–97 [Google Scholar]
  111. Winfree R, Aguilar R, Vazquez DP, LeBuhn G, Aizen M. 2009. A meta-analysis of bees' responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology 90:2068–76 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145042
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145042
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error