The Dynamics of Microtubule/Motor-Protein Assemblies in Biology and Physics

Literature Cited

1. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ. 1987. Computer Simulation of Liquids Oxford: Clarendon
2. Bendix P, Koenderink G, Cuvelier D, Dogic Z, Koeleman B. et al. 2008. A quantitative analysis of contractility in active cytoskeletal protein networks. Biophys. J. 94:3126–36 [Google Scholar]
3. Brugués J, Needleman DJ. 2014. Physical basis of spindle self-organization. PNAS 111:18496–500 [Google Scholar]
4. Brugués J, Nuzzo V, Mazur E, Needleman DJ. 2012. Nucleation and transport organize microtubules in metaphase spindles. Cell 149:554–64 [Google Scholar]
5. Cisneros LH, Kessler JO, Ganguly S, Goldstein RE. 2011. Dynamics of swimming bacteria: transition to directional order at high concentration. Phys. Rev. E 83:061907 [Google Scholar]
6. Daniels BR, Masi BC, Wirtz D. 2006. Probing single-cell micromechanics in vivo: the microrheology of C. elegans developing embryos. Biophys. J. 90:4712–19 [Google Scholar]
7. Desai A, Mitchison TJ. 1997. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:83–117 [Google Scholar]
8. Doi M, Edwards S. 1988. The Theory of Polymer Dynamics New York: Oxford Univ. Press
9. Ezhilan B, Shelley MJ, Saintillan D. 2013. Instabilities and nonlinear dynamics of concentrated active suspensions. Phys. Fluids 25:070607 [Google Scholar]
10. Forest M, Wang Q, Zhou R. 2013. Kinetic theory and simulations of active polar liquid crystalline polymers. Soft Matter 9:5207–22 [Google Scholar]
11. Ganguly S, Williams LS, Palacios IM, Goldstein RE. 2012. Cytoplasmic streaming in Drosophila oocytes varies with kinesin activity and correlates with the microtubule cytoskeleton architecture. PNAS 109:15109–14 [Google Scholar]
12. Gao T, Blackwell R, Glaser MA, Betterton M, Shelley MJ. 2015. Multiscale polar theory of microtubule and motor-protein assemblies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114:048101 [Google Scholar]
13. Giomi L, Bowick M, Ma X, Marchetti M. 2013. Defect annihilation and proliferation in active nematics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110:228101 [Google Scholar]
14. Giomi L, Bowick MJ, Mishra P, Sknepnek R, Marchetti MC. 2014. Defect dynamics in active nematics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 372:20130365 [Google Scholar]
15. Gittes F, Mickey B, Nettleton J, Howard J. 1993. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J. Cell Biol. 120:923–34 [Google Scholar]
16. Glowinski R, Pan TW, Hesla TI, Joseph DD. 1999. A distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 25:755–94 [Google Scholar]
17. Greengard L, Rokhlin V. 1987. A fast algorithm for particle simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 73:325–48 [Google Scholar]
18. Grill SW, Gönczy P, Stelzer EH, Hyman AA. 2001. Polarity controls forces governing asymmetric spindle positioning in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Nature 409:630–33 [Google Scholar]
19. Hämäläinen J, Lindström S, Hämäläinen T, Niskanen H. 2011. Papermaking fibre-suspension flow simulations at multiple scales. J. Eng. Math. 71:55–79 [Google Scholar]
20. Heald R, Tournebize R, Blank T, Sandaltzopoulos R, Becker P. et al. 1996. Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts. Nature 382:420–25 [Google Scholar]
21. Hird SN, White JG. 1993. Cortical and cytoplasmic flow polarity in early embryonic cells of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 121:1343–55 [Google Scholar]
22. Hohenegger C, Cook S, Shinar T. 2014. Dimensional reduction of a multiscale continuum model of microtubule gliding assays. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 74:1338–53 [Google Scholar]
23. Jeffery G. 1922. The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 102:161–79 [Google Scholar]
24. Juelicher F, Kruse K, Prost J, Joanny JF. 2007. Active behavior of the cytoskeleton. Phys. Rep. 449:3–28 [Google Scholar]
25. Keber FC, Loiseau E, Sanchez T, DeCamp SJ, Giomi L. et al. 2014. Topology and dynamics of active nematic vesicles. Science 345:1135–39 [Google Scholar]
26. Keller J, Rubinow S. 1976. Slender-body theory for slow viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 75:705–14 [Google Scholar]
27. Kimura A, Onami S. 2005. Computer simulations and image processing reveal length-dependent pulling force as the primary mechanism for C. elegans male pronuclear migration. Dev. Cell 8:765–75 [Google Scholar]
28. Kimura A, Onami S. 2007. Local cortical pulling-force repression switches centrosomal centration and posterior displacement in C. elegans. J. Cell Biol. 179:1347–54 [Google Scholar]
29. Kimura K, Kimura A. 2011. Intracellular organelles mediate cytoplasmic pulling force for centrosome centration in the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryo. PNAS 108:137–42 [Google Scholar]
30. Koch D, Subramanian G. 2011. Collective hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms: living fluids. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43:637–59 [Google Scholar]
31. Lindner A, Shelley MJ. 2015. Elastic fibers in flows. Fluid-Structure Interactions in Low-Reynolds-Number Flows C Duprat, H Stone Cambridge, UK: R. Soc. Chem. In press [Google Scholar]
32. Loughlin R, Heald R, Nédélec F. 2010. A computational model predicts Xenopus meiotic spindle organization. J. Cell Biol. 191:1239–49 [Google Scholar]
33. Maier W, Saupe A. 1958. Eine einfache molekulare Theorie des nematischen kristallinflüssigen Zustandes. Z. Nat. A 13:564–66 [Google Scholar]
34. Mardin BR, Schiebel E. 2012. Breaking the ties that bind: new advances in centrosome biology. J. Cell Biol. 197:11–18 [Google Scholar]
35. McIntosh JR, Molodtsov MI, Ataullakhanov FI. 2012. Biophysics of mitosis. Q. Rev. Biophys. 45:147–207 [Google Scholar]
36. Mickey B, Howard J. 1995. Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents. J. Cell Biol. 130:909–17 [Google Scholar]
37. Mitchison T, Kirschner M. 1984. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 312:237–42 [Google Scholar]
38. Moeendarbary E, Valon L, Fritzsche M, Harris AR, Moulding DA. et al. 2013. The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material. Nat. Mater. 12:253–61 [Google Scholar]
39. Nakazawa H, Sekimoto K. 1996. Polarity sorting in a bundle of actin filaments by two-headed myosins. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65:2404–7 [Google Scholar]
40. Nédélec F, Foethke D. 2007. Collective Langevin dynamics of flexible cytoskeletal fibers. N. J. Phys. 9:427 [Google Scholar]
41. Nédélec F, Surrey T, Maggs A, Leibler S. 1997. Self-organization of microtubules and motors. Nature 389:305–8 [Google Scholar]
42. Nguyen H, Fauci L. 2014. Hydrodynamics of diatom chains and semiflexible fibres. J. R. Soc. Interface 11:20140314 [Google Scholar]
43. Niwayama R, Shinohara K, Kimura A. 2011. Hydrodynamic property of the cytoplasm is sufficient to mediate cytoplasmic streaming in the Caenorhabiditis elegans embryo. PNAS 108:11900–5 [Google Scholar]
44. Olson SD, Lim S, Cortez R. 2013. Modeling the dynamics of an elastic rod with intrinsic curvature and twist using a regularized stokes formulation. J. Comput. Phys. 238:169–87 [Google Scholar]
45. Peskin C. 2002. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer. 11:479–517 [Google Scholar]
46. Power H, Miranda G. 1987. Second kind integral equation formulation of Stokes' flows past a particle of arbitrary shape. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 47:689–98 [Google Scholar]
47. Pozrikidis C. 1992. Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
48. Prost J, Jülicher F, Joanny J. 2015. Active gel physics. Nat. Phys. 11:111–17 [Google Scholar]
49. Reinsch S, Gonczy P. 1998. Mechanisms of nuclear positioning. J. Cell Sci. 111:2283–95 [Google Scholar]
50. Saad Y, Schultz MH. 1986. GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7:856–69 [Google Scholar]
51. Saintillan D, Shelley MJ. 2008a. Instabilities and pattern formation in active particle suspensions: kinetic theory and continuum simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100:178103 [Google Scholar]
52. Saintillan D, Shelley MJ. 2008b. Instabilities, pattern formation, and mixing in active suspensions. Phys. Fluids 20:123304 [Google Scholar]
53. Saintillan D, Shelley MJ. 2013. Active suspensions and their nonlinear models. C. R. Phys. 14:497–517 [Google Scholar]
54. Sanchez T, Chen D, DeCamp S, Heymann M, Dogic Z. 2012. Spontaneous motion in hierarchically assembled active matter. Nature 491:431–34 [Google Scholar]
55. Sanchez T, Welch D, Nicastro D, Dogic Z. 2011. Cilia-like beating of active microtubule bundles. Science 333:456–59 [Google Scholar]
56. Saunders WS, Hoyt MA. 1992. Kinesin-related proteins required for structural integrity of the mitotic spindle. Cell 70:451–58 [Google Scholar]
57. Schaller V, Weber C, Semmrich C, Frey E, Bausch A. 2010. Polar patterns of driven filaments. Nature 467:73–77 [Google Scholar]
58. Shinar T, Mano M, Piano F, Shelley MJ. 2011. A model of cytoplasmically driven microtubule-based motion in the single-celled Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. PNAS 108:10508–13 [Google Scholar]
59. Simha R, Ramaswamy S. 2002. Statistical hydrodynamics of ordered suspensions of self-propelled particles: waves, giant number fluctuations and instabilities. Physica A 306:262–69 [Google Scholar]
60. Strychalski W, Copos CA, Lewis OL, Guy RD. 2015. A poroelastic immersed boundary method with applications to cell biology. J. Comput. Phys. 282:77–97 [Google Scholar]
61. Subramanian G, Koch D. 2009. Critical bacterial concentration for the onset of collective swimming. J. Fluid Mech. 632:359–400 [Google Scholar]
62. Sumino Y, Nagai KH, Shitaka Y, Tanaka D, Yoshikawa K. et al. 2012. Large-scale vortex lattice emerging from collectively moving microtubules. Nature 483:448–52 [Google Scholar]
63. Surrey T, Nédélec F, Leibler S, Karsenti E. 2001. Physical properties determining self-organization of motors and microtubules. Science 292:1167–71 [Google Scholar]
64. Thampi S, Golestanian R, Yeomans J. 2013. Velocity correlations in an active nematic. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111:118101 [Google Scholar]
65. Thampi S, Golestanian R, Yeomans J. 2014. Instabilities and topological defects in active nematics. Europhys. Lett. 105:18001 [Google Scholar]
66. Tornberg AK, Shelley MJ. 2004. Simulating the dynamics and interactions of elastic filaments in Stokes flows. J. Comput. Phys. 196:8–40 [Google Scholar]
67. Verchot-Lubicz J, Goldstein RE. 2010. Cytoplasmic streaming enables the distribution of molecules and vesicles in large plant cells. Protoplasma 240:99–107 [Google Scholar]
68. Verde F, Berrez JM, Antony C, Karsenti E. 1991. Taxol-induced microtubule asters in mitotic extracts of Xenopus eggs: requirement for phosphorylated factors and cytoplasmic dynein. J. Cell Biol. 112:1177–87 [Google Scholar]
69. Vignaud T, Blanchoin L, Théry M. 2012. Directed cytoskeleton self-organization. Trends Cell Biol. 22:671–82 [Google Scholar]
70. Visscher K, Schnitzer M, Block S. 1999. Single kinesin molecules studied with a molecular force clamp. Nature 400:184–89 [Google Scholar]
71. Ward JJ, Roque H, Antony C, Nédélec F. 2015. Mechanical design principles of a mitotic spindle. eLife 3:e03398 [Google Scholar]
72. Woodhouse FG, Goldstein RE. 2012. Spontaneous circulation of confined active suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109:168105 [Google Scholar]
73. Woodhouse FG, Goldstein RE. 2013. Cytoplasmic streaming in plant cells emerges naturally by microfilament self-organization. PNAS 110:14132–37 [Google Scholar]
74. Ying L, Biros G, Zorin D. 2004. A kernel-independent adaptive fast multipole algorithm in two and three dimensions. J. Comput. Phys. 196:591–626 [Google Scholar]