1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Resource Economics
  4. Volume 6, 2014
  5. Article

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volume 6, 2014

Trade Liberalization and Poverty: What Have We Learned in a Decade?

Abstract

This article reviews key recent literature on the effects of trade liberalization on poverty in developing countries and asks whether our knowledge has changed significantly over a decade. The conclusion that liberalization generally boosts income and thus reduces poverty has not changed; some authors suggest that this finding is not true for very poor countries, but this suggestion is far from proven at present. With regard to microeconomics, recent literature again confirms that liberalization has very heterogeneous effects on poor households, depending, inter alia, on what trade policies are liberalized and how the household earns its living. Working in the export sector predicts gains, and working in the import-competing sector predicts losses, a finding that is reinforced by studies of the effects of liberalization on wages. New research has suggested several ways in which intrasectoral wage inequality is increased by trade, but this research generally does not indicate that the poor actually lose. A fairly common finding is that female workers gain from trade liberalization.

Keyword(s): developing countries, economic growth, globalization, inequality, tariffs
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-110713-105054
2014-10-05
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/6/1/annurev-resource-110713-105054.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-110713-105054&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aguayo-Tellez E, Airola J, Juhn C. 2010. Did trade liberalization help women? The case of Mexico in the 1990s. NBER Work. Pap. 16195
  2. Akerman A, Helpman E, Itskhoki O, Muendler M, Redding S. 2013. Sources of wage inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 103:3214–19 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aleman-Castilla B. 2006. The effect of trade liberalization on informality and wages: evidence from Mexico. Discuss. Pap. 763, CEP
  4. Alkire S, Foster J. 2011. Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement. J. Econ. Inequal. 9:2289–314 [Google Scholar]
  5. Almeida R, Fernandes AM. 2008. Openness and technological innovations in developing countries: evidence from firm-level surveys. J. Dev. Stud. 44:5701–27 [Google Scholar]
  6. Amiti M, Cameron L. 2012. Trade liberalization and the wage skill premium: evidence from Indonesia. J. Int. Econ. 87:2277–87 [Google Scholar]
  7. Amiti M, Davis D. 2011. Trade, firms, and wages: theory and evidence. Rev. Econ. Stud. 79:11–36 [Google Scholar]
  8. Amiti M, Konings J. 2007. Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: evidence from Indonesia. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:51611–38 [Google Scholar]
  9. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson G. 2013. The China Syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:62121–68 [Google Scholar]
  10. Awokuse T. 2005. Exports, economic growth and causality in Korea. Appl. Econ. Lett. 12:11693–96 [Google Scholar]
  11. Balat J, Brambilla I, Porto G. 2009. Realizing the gains from trade: export crops, marketing costs, and poverty. J. Int. Econ. 78:121–31 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bazzi S, Clemens MA. 2013. Blunt instruments: avoiding common pitfalls in identifying the causes of economic growth. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 5:2152–86 [Google Scholar]
  13. Becker G. 1971. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  14. Bhattacharyya S, Dowrick S, Golley J. 2009. Institutions and trade: competitors or complements in economic development?. Econ. Rec. 85:270318–30 [Google Scholar]
  15. Billmeier A, Nannicini T. 2009. Trade openness and growth: pursuing empirical glasnost. IMF Staff Pap. 56:447–75 [Google Scholar]
  16. Billmeier A, Nannicini T. 2013. Assessing economic liberalization episodes: a synthetic control approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95:3983–1001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bolaky B, Freund C. 2008. Trade, regulations, and income. J. Dev. Econ. 82:2309–21 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bosch M, Goni E, Maloney W. 2012. Trade liberalization, labor reforms and formal-informal employment dynamics. Labour Econ. 19:653–67 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brambilla I, Porto G, Tarozzi A. 2012. Adjusting to trade policy: evidence from US antidumping duties on Vietnamese catfish. Rev. Econ. Stat. 94:1304–19 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bustos P. 2011. The impact of trade liberalization on skill upgrading evidence from Argentina. Work. Pap. 1189, Dep. Econ., Univ. Pompeu Fabra
  21. Cain JS, Hasan R, Mitra D. 2010. Trade liberalization and poverty reduction: new evidence from Indian states. Work. Pap., Prog. Indian Econ. Policies, Columbia Univ
  22. Castilho M, Menéndez M, Sztulman A. 2012. Trade liberalization, inequality, and poverty in Brazilian states. World Dev. 40:4821–35 [Google Scholar]
  23. Chang R, Kaltani L, Loayza NV. 2009. Openness can be good for growth: the role of policy complementarities. J. Dev. Econ. 90:133–49 [Google Scholar]
  24. Coello B, Fall M, Suwa-Eisenmann A. 2010. Trade liberalization and poverty dynamics in Vietnam 2002–2006. Work. Pap. 2010-13, Par. Sch. Econ
  25. Davis D. 1996. Trade liberalization and income distribution. NBER Work. Pap. 5693
  26. Davis D, Harrigan J. 2011. Good jobs, bad jobs, and trade liberalization. J. Int. Econ. 84:26–36 [Google Scholar]
  27. Davis D, Mishra P. 2007. Stolper-Samuelson is dead: and other crimes of both theory and data. Globalization and Poverty Harrison A. 87–108 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Deaton A. 1997. The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Baltimore/London: John Hopkins Univ. Press for the World Bank
  29. Deaton A. 2009. Instruments of development: randomization in the tropics, and the search for the elusive keys to economic development. NBER Work. Pap. 14690
  30. de Janvry A, Sadoulet E. 2010. The global food crisis and Guatemala: what crisis and for whom?. World Dev. 38:91328–39 [Google Scholar]
  31. DeJong DN, Ripoll M. 2006. Tariffs and growth: an empirical exploration of contingent relationships. Rev. Econ. Stat. 88:4625–40 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ederington J, Minier J, Troske K. 2010. Where the girls are: trade and labor market segregation in Colombia. Discuss. Pap. 4131, IZA
  33. Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N, Topalova P. 2010. Trade adjustment and human capital investments: evidence from Indian tariff reform. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2:42–75 [Google Scholar]
  34. Feyrer J. 2009. Trade and income: exploiting time series in geography. NBER Work. Pap. 14910
  35. Fernandes AM. 2007. Trade policy, trade volumes and plant-level productivity in Colombian manufacturing industries. J. Int. Econ. 71:152–71 [Google Scholar]
  36. Frankel JA, Romer D. 1999. Does trade cause growth?. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:3379–99 [Google Scholar]
  37. Frías J, Kaplan D, Verhoogen E. 2012. Exports and within-plant wage distributions: evidence from Mexico. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:3435–40 [Google Scholar]
  38. Fukase E. 2013. Export liberalization, job creation, and the skill premium: evidence from the US–Vietnam Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). World Dev. 41:317–37 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gaddis I, Pieters J. 2012. Trade liberalization and female labor force participation: evidence from Brazil. Discuss. Pap. 6809, IZA
  40. Goldberg PK, Khandelwal AK, Pavcnik N, Topalova P. 2010. Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: evidence from India. Q. J. Econ. 125:41727–67 [Google Scholar]
  41. Goldberg PK, Pavcnik N. 2003. The response of the informal sector to trade liberalization. J. Dev. Econ. 72:463–96 [Google Scholar]
  42. Goldberg PK, Pavcnik N. 2007. Distributional effects of globalization in developing countries. J. Econ. Lit. 45:39–82 [Google Scholar]
  43. Gries T, Kraft M, Meierrieks D. 2009. Linkages between financial deepening, trade openness, and economic development: causality evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev. 37:121849–60 [Google Scholar]
  44. Gries T, Redlin M. 2012. Trade openness and economic growth: a panel causality analysis. Work. Pap. 52, Univ. Paderborn, Ger
  45. Harrison A, McLaren J, McMillan M. 2011. Recent perspectives on trade and inequality. Annu. Rev. Econ. 3::261–89 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hasan R, Mitra D, Ural BP. 2007. Trade liberalization, labor-market institutions and poverty reduction: evidence from Indian states. India Policy Forum 3:71–122 [Google Scholar]
  47. Helpman E, Itskhoki O, Muendler M, Redding S. 2012. Trade and inequality: from theory to estimation. NBER Work. Pap. 17991
  48. Helpman E, Itskhoki O, Redding S. 2010. Inequality and unemployment in a global economy. Econometrica 78:41239–83 [Google Scholar]
  49. Hertel TW, Keeney R, Ivanic M, Winters LA. 2009. Why isn't the Doha Development Agenda more poverty friendly?. Rev. Dev. Econ. 13:4543–59 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hertel TW, Winters LA. 2006. Poverty and the WTO: Impacts of the Doha Development Agenda. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan/World Bank
  51. Hoekman B, Olarreaga M. 2007. Global Trade and Poor Nations: The Poverty Impacts and Policy Implications of Liberalization. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
  52. Ivanic M, Martin W. 2011. Short and long-run impacts of food price changes on poverty. Presented at Annu. Meet., IATRC, St. Petersburg, Fla., Dec. 11–13
  53. Ivanic M, Martin W, Zama H. 2012. Estimating the short-run poverty impacts of the 2010–11 surge in food prices. World Dev. 40:112302–17 [Google Scholar]
  54. Jacoby H. 2013. Food prices, wages, and welfare in rural India. Policy Res. Work. Pap. 6412, World Bank
  55. Juhn C, Ujhelyi G, Villegas-Sanchez C. 2012. Men, women, and machines: how trade impacts gender inequality. NBER Work. Pap. 18106
  56. Juhn C, Ujhelyi G, Villegas-Sanchez C. 2013. Trade liberalization and gender inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:3269–73 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kneller R, Morgan CW, Kanchanahatakij S. 2008. Trade liberalisation and economic growth. World Econ. 31:6701–19 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kraay A. 2006. When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries. J. Dev. Econ. 80:1198–227 [Google Scholar]
  59. Krishna P, Mitra D, Sundaram A. 2010. Trade, poverty and the lagging regions of South Asia. NBER Work. Pap. 16322
  60. Krishna P, Poole J, Senses M. 2011. Wage effects of trade reform with endogenous worker mobility. NBER Work. Pap. 17256
  61. Liu D. 2013. International trade and wage inequality: a non-monotonic relationship. Econ. Lett. 121:244–46 [Google Scholar]
  62. Maertens M, Colen L, Swinnen JF. 2011. Globalisation and poverty in Senegal: a worst case scenario?. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 38:131–54 [Google Scholar]
  63. Maertens M, Swinnen JF. 2009. Trade, standards, and poverty: evidence from Senegal. World Dev. 37:1161–78 [Google Scholar]
  64. Maertens M, Swinnen JF. 2012. Gender and modern supply chains in developing countries. J. Dev. Stud. 48:101412–30 [Google Scholar]
  65. Marchand BU. 2012. Tariff pass-through and the distributional effects of trade liberalization. J. Dev. Econ. 99:2265–81 [Google Scholar]
  66. McCaig B. 2011. Exporting out of poverty: provincial poverty in Vietnam and US market access. J. Int. Econ. 85:1102–13 [Google Scholar]
  67. McCulloch N, Winters LA, Cirera X. 2001. Trade Liberalization and Poverty: A Handbook. London: CEPR
  68. McMillan M, Rodrik D. 2011. Globalization, structural change and productivity growth. NBER Work. Pap. 17143
  69. Melitz M. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71:61695–725 [Google Scholar]
  70. Menezes-Filho N, Muendler M. 2011. Labor reallocation in response to trade reform. NBER Work. Pap. 17372
  71. Menon N, Rodgers Y. 2009. International trade and the gender wage gap: new evidence from India’s manufacturing sector. World Dev. 37:5965–81 [Google Scholar]
  72. Moretti E. 2013. Real wage inequality. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 5:165–103 [Google Scholar]
  73. Nicita A. 2009. The price effect of tariff liberalization: measuring the impact on household welfare. J. Dev. Econ. 89:119–27 [Google Scholar]
  74. Nicita A, Olarreaga M, Porto G. 2014. Pro-poor trade policy in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Int. Econ. 92:2252–65 [Google Scholar]
  75. Niimi YP, Vasuveda-Dutta P, Winters LA. 2007. Trade liberalisation and poverty dynamics in Vietnam. J. Econ. Integr. 22:4819–51 [Google Scholar]
  76. Noguer M, Siscart M. 2005. Trade raises income: a precise and robust result. J. Int. Econ. 65:2447–60 [Google Scholar]
  77. Oxfam. 1999. Loaded Against the Poor. Oxford, UK: Oxfam
  78. Papyrakis E, Covarrubias A, Verschoor A. 2012. Gender and trade aspects of labour markets. J. Dev. Stud. 48:181–98 [Google Scholar]
  79. Paz L. 2014. The impacts of trade liberalization on informal labor markets: a theoretical and empirical evaluation of the Brazilian case. J. Int. Econ. 92:2330–48 [Google Scholar]
  80. Peri G, Poole J. 2013. Offshoring and firm-level task composition: Is there a gender component? Presented at Annu. Meet., AEA, San Diego, Calif., Jan. 4–6
  81. Porto GG. 2006. Using survey data to assess the distributional effects of trade policy. J. Int. Econ. 70:1140–60 [Google Scholar]
  82. Porto GG. 2010. International market access and poverty in Argentina. Rev. Int. Econ. 18:2396–407 [Google Scholar]
  83. Romalis J. 2007. Market access, openness and growth. NBER Work. Pap. 13048
  84. Sakyi D, Villaverde J, Maza A, Chittedi KR. 2012. Trade openness, growth and development: evidence from heterogeneous panel cointegration analysis for middle-income countries. Cuad. Econ. 31:5721–40 [Google Scholar]
  85. Sen A. 1993. Capability and well-being. The Quality of Life Nussbaum M, Sen A. 30–53 Oxford, UK: Clarendon [Google Scholar]
  86. Timmer MP, de Vries GJ. 2009. Structural change and growth accelerations in Asia and Latin America: a new sectoral data set. Cliometrica 3:2165–90 [Google Scholar]
  87. Topalova P. 2007. Trade liberalization, poverty and inequality: evidence from Indian districts. Globalization and Poverty Harrison A. 291–336 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  88. Topalova P. 2010. Factor immobility and regional impacts of trade liberalization: evidence on poverty from India. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2:41–41 [Google Scholar]
  89. Verhoogen E. 2008. Trade, quality upgrading, and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector. Q. J. Econ. 123:2489–530 [Google Scholar]
  90. Viollaz M. 2013. Trade liberalization and labor informality: inspecting the mechanisms. Presented at IZA Young Sch. Progr., Washington, DC, Sept. 23–27
  91. Wacziarg R, Welch K. 2008. Trade liberalisation and growth: new evidence. World Bank Econ. Rev. 22:2187–231 [Google Scholar]
  92. Winters LA. 2002. Trade liberalisation and poverty: What are the links?. World Econ. 25:91339–67 [Google Scholar]
  93. Winters LA. 2004. Trade liberalisation and economic performance: an overview. Econ. J. 114:493F4–21 [Google Scholar]
  94. Winters LA, McCulloch N, McKay A. 2004. Trade liberalization and poverty: the evidence so far. J. Econ. Lit. 42:72–115 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-110713-105054
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error