1932

Abstract

The classical sociology of parties was born alongside parties themselves. It explored their dynamic interrelationships with states and society, as well as the tensions inherent in the fact that parties are simultaneously representatives and power seekers. Despite these rich foundations, from the 1960s the sociological approach came to be narrowly identified with a one-dimensional conception of parties, and political sociologists focused their attention elsewhere. This review contributes to efforts that began in the 1990s to reclaim the political party as a full-fledged sociological object. To this end, we track the hourglass-shaped trajectory of the sociology of parties: from broad Marxian and Weberian roots, to narrowing and near-eclipse after the 1960s, to a reemergence that reclaims the breadth of the classical traditions. We conclude by suggesting six lines of inquiry that we believe would be fruitful, emphasizing both classical concerns that deserve more attention and innovative approaches that point in novel directions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145632
2014-07-30
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/40/1/annurev-soc-071312-145632.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145632&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott A. 2005. Linked ecologies: states and universities as environments for professions. Sociol. Theory 23:3245–74 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldrich JR. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  3. Alexander JC. 2004. Cultural pragmatics: social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociol. Theory 22:4527–73 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexander JC. 2010. Barack Obama meets celebrity metaphor. Society 47:410–18 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alford R, Friedland R. 1974. Nations, parties, and participation: a critique of political sociology. Theory Soc. 1:307–28 [Google Scholar]
  6. Almond GA. 1956. Comparative political systems. J. Polit. 18:3391–409 [Google Scholar]
  7. Amenta E. 1998. Bold Relief: Institutional Politics and the Origins of American Social Policy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  8. Amenta E, Caren N, Chairello E, Su Y. 2010. The political consequences of social movements. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:287–307 [Google Scholar]
  9. Amenta E, Halfmann D. 2000. Wage wars: institutional politics, WPA wages, and the struggle for U.S. social policy. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65:4506–28 [Google Scholar]
  10. Aminzade R. 1993. Ballots and Barricades: Class Formation and Republican Politics in France, 1830–1871 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  11. Anderson P. 1976a. Considerations on Western Marxism London: Verso
  12. Anderson P. 1976b. The antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Rev. 1:1005–78 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ansolabehere S, Snyder JM Jr, Stewart C III. 2001. Candidate positioning in U.S. House elections. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 45:1135–59 [Google Scholar]
  14. Archer R. 2008. Why Is There No Labor Party in the United States? Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  15. Baldassarri D. 2011. Partisan joiners: associational membership and political polarization in the United States (1974–2004). Soc. Sci. Q. 92:3631–55 [Google Scholar]
  16. Baldassarri D, Bearman P. 2007. Dynamics of political polarization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72:784–811 [Google Scholar]
  17. Baldassarri D, Gelman A. 2008. Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in American public opinion. Am. J. Sociol. 114:2408–46 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bartels LM. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  19. Bartolini S, Mair P. 2001. Challenges to contemporary political parties. Political Parties and Democracy L Diamond, R Gunther 327–43 Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Bawn K, Cohen M, Karol D, Masket S, Noel H, Zaller J. 2012. A theory of political parties: groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspect. Polit. 10:3571–91 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bawn K, Noel H. 2007. Long coalitions under electoral uncertainty: zero sum conflict and the electoral origins of political parties Presented at Annu. Meet. Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc., Chicago, Apr 12–16
  22. Baylor C. 2012. First to the party: the group origins of party transformations PhD Diss., Univ. Calif., Los Angeles
  23. Berezin M. 2009. Illiberal Politics in Neoliberal Times: Culture, Security and Populism in the New Europe Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  24. Betz HG. 1994. Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe New York: St. Martin's
  25. Betz HG, Immerfall S. 1998. The New Politics of the Right: Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies. New York: St. Martin's [Google Scholar]
  26. Biezen I, Kopecky P. 2007. The state and the parties: public funding, public regulation and rent-seeking in contemporary democracies. Party Polit. 13:2235–54 [Google Scholar]
  27. Blondel J. 1968. Party systems and patterns of government in western democracies. Can. J. Polit. Sci. 1:2180–203 [Google Scholar]
  28. Boix C. 1997. Political parties and the supply side of the economy: the provision of physical and human capital in advanced economies, 1960–90. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 11:3814–45 [Google Scholar]
  29. Boix C. 2007. The emergence of parties and party systems. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics C Boix, SC Stokes 499–521 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  30. Bourdieu P. 1991. Political representation: elements for a theory of the political field. Language and Symbolic Power J Thompson 171–202 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Bourdieu P. 2002 (2008). Political Interventions: Social Science and Political Action London/New York: Verso
  32. Bradley D, Huber E, Moller S, Nielsen F, Stephens JD. 2003. Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Polit. 55:193–228 [Google Scholar]
  33. Brady D. 2003. The politics of poverty: left political institutions, the welfare state, and poverty. Soc. Forces 82:2557–88 [Google Scholar]
  34. Budge I, Klingemann HD, Volkens A, Bara J, Tanenbaum E. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Burch T. 2012. Did disenfranchisement laws help elect President Bush? New evidence on turnout rates and candidate preferences of Florida's ex-felons. Polit. Behav. 34:1–26 [Google Scholar]
  36. Burnham P. 2001. New Labour and the politics of depoliticisation. Br. J. Polit. Int. Rel. 3:2127–49 [Google Scholar]
  37. Burnham WD. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics New York: Norton
  38. Burstein P. 2010. Public opinion, public policy, and democracy. Handbook of Politics: State and Society in a Global Perspective KT Leicht, JC Jenkins 63–79 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  39. Canes-Wrone C, Brady DW, Cogan JF. 2002. Out of step, out of office: electoral accountability and House members' voting. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 96:1127–40 [Google Scholar]
  40. Carmines E, Stimson J. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  41. Carothers T. 2002. The end of the transition paradigm. J. Democr. 13:15–21 [Google Scholar]
  42. Carson J, Koger G, Lebo M, Young E. 2010. The electoral costs of party loyalty in congress. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 54:598–616 [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen AS. 2007. The party of Lincoln and the politics of state fair employment legislation in the north, 1945–1964. Am. J. Sociol. 112:61713–74 [Google Scholar]
  44. Chen AS. 2009. The Fifth Freedom: Jobs, Politics, and Civil Rights in the United States, 1941–1972. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Cohen M. 2005. Moral victories: cultural conservatism and the creation of a new Republican congressional majority PhD Diss., Univ. Calif., Los Angeles
  46. Cohen M, Karol D, Noel H, Zaller J. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  47. Comaroff J. 2011. Populism and late liberalism: a special affinity?. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 637:199–111 [Google Scholar]
  48. Cox GW, McCubbins MD. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
  49. Cox GW, McCubbins MD. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the United States House of Representatives New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  50. Dahl RA. 1966. Political Oppositions in Western Democracies New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  51. Dalton RJ, Wattenberg MP. 2000. Parties Without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  52. De Leon C. 2008. “No bourgeois mass party, no democracy”: the missing link in Barrington Moore's American Civil War. Polit. Power Soc. Theory 19:39–82 [Google Scholar]
  53. De Leon C. 2010. Vicarious revolutionaries: martial discourse and the origins of mass party competition in the United States, 1789–1848. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 24:121–41 [Google Scholar]
  54. De Leon C. 2014. Parties and Society Malden, MA: Polity
  55. De Leon C, Desai M, Tuğal C. 2009. Political articulation: parties and the constitution of cleavages in the United States, India, and Turkey. Sociol. Theory 27:3193–219 [Google Scholar]
  56. Desai M. 2002. The relative autonomy of party practices: a counterfactual analysis of left party ascendancy in Kerala, India, 1934–1940. Am. J. Sociol. 108:3616–57 [Google Scholar]
  57. Desai M. 2003. From movement to party to government: why social policies in Kerala and West Bengal are so different. See Goldstone 2003b 170–96
  58. Desai M. 2007. State Formation and Radical Democracy in India Abingdon, Oxon/New York: Routledge
  59. Desai M. 2011. Parties and the articulation of neoliberalism: from ‘The Emergency’ to reforms in India, 1975–1991. Polit. Power Soc. Theory 23:27–63 [Google Scholar]
  60. DiSalvo D. 2012. Engines of Change: Party Factions in American Politics, 1868–2010. New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  61. Downs A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy New York: Prentice Hall
  62. Duverger M. 1951 (1954). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State New York: Wiley
  63. Ebbinghaus B. 1995. The Siamese twins: citizenship rights, cleavage formation, and party-union relations in Western Europe. Int. Rev. Soc. Hist. 40:351–89 [Google Scholar]
  64. Ebbinghaus B. 2003. Ever larger unions: organisational restructuring and its impact on union confederations. Ind. Rel. J. 34:5446–60 [Google Scholar]
  65. Eidlin CB. 2012. The class idea: politics, ideology, and class formation in the United States and Canada in the twentieth century PhD Diss., Univ. Calif., Berkeley
  66. Eldersveld S. 1964. Political Parties: A Behavioral Analysis Chicago: Rand McNally
  67. Eley G. 2002. Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe, 1850–2000. New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Engels F. 1895 (1978). The tactics of social democracy (Engels' introduction to Marx's The Class Struggles In France, 1848–1850). See Tucker 1978 566–76
  69. Epstein L. 1967. Political Parties in Western Democracies New York: Praeger
  70. Evans P, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T. 1985. Bringing the State Back In New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  71. Feinstein B, Schickler E. 2008. Platforms and partners: the civil rights realignment reconsidered. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 22:1–31 [Google Scholar]
  72. Ferguson T. 1983. Party realignment and American industrial structure: the investment theory of political parties in historical perspective. Res. Polit. Econ. 6:1–82 [Google Scholar]
  73. Ferguson T. 1995. Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  74. Ferguson T, Rogers J. 1986. Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics New York: Hill & Wang
  75. Franklin MN, Mackie TT, Valen H. 1992. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Nations Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  76. Galvin D. 2010. Presidential Party Building: Dwight D. Eisenhower to George W. Bush. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  77. Galvin D. 2012. The transformation of political institutions: investments in institutional resources and gradual change in national party committees. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 26:50–70 [Google Scholar]
  78. Gamson WA. 1975 (1990).. The Strategy of Social Protest Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
  79. Gilens M. 2005. Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opin. Q. 69:778–96 [Google Scholar]
  80. Gilens M. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  81. Goldstone JA. 2003a. Introduction. See Goldstone 2003b 1–24
  82. Goldstone JA. 2003b. States, Parties, and Social Movements Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  83. Goldstone JA. 2004. More social movements or fewer? Beyond political opportunity structures to relational fields. Theory Soc. 33:3/4333–65 [Google Scholar]
  84. Goldstone JA. 2011. Understanding the revolutions of 2011: weakness and resilience in Middle Eastern autocracies. For. Aff. 9:May/June8–16 [Google Scholar]
  85. Gramsci A. 1921 (2008). The parties and the masses. L'Ordine Nuovo, 25 Sept. (unsigned article). http://www.marxists.org/archive/gramsci/1921/09/parties-masses.htm
  86. Gramsci A. 1929–1935 (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks New York: Int. Publ.
  87. Hacker J, Pierson P. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class New York: Simon & Schuster
  88. Halfmann D. 2011. Doctors and Demonstrators: How Political Institutions Shape Abortion Law in the United States, Britain, and Canada Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  89. Hands G. 1971. Roberto Michels and the study of political parties. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 1:2155–72 [Google Scholar]
  90. Hawley J. 1980. Antonio Gramsci's Marxism: class, state and work. Soc. Probl. 27:5584–600 [Google Scholar]
  91. Heaney M, Rojas F. 2007. Partisans, nonpartisans, and the antiwar movement in the United States. Am. Polit. Res. 35:4431–64 [Google Scholar]
  92. Heaney M, Rojas F. 2015. Party in the Street: The Antiwar Movement and the Democratic Party After 9/11 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
  93. Hicks A. 1999. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  94. Holmes DR. 2000. Integral Europe: Fast-Capitalism, Multiculturalism, Neofascism Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  95. Hout M, Brooks C, Manza J. 1995. The democratic class struggle in the United States, 1948–1992. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60:805–28 [Google Scholar]
  96. Howell C. 2001. The end of the relationship between social democratic parties and trade unions?. Stud. Polit. Econ. 65:Summer7–37 [Google Scholar]
  97. Huber E, Ragin C, Stephens JD. 1993. Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. Am. J. Sociol. 99:711–49 [Google Scholar]
  98. Huber E, Stephens JD. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Politics and Policies in Global Markets Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press
  99. Huntington SP. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century Norman: Univ. Okla. Press
  100. Ibrahim SE. 1993. Crises, elites, and democratization in the Arab world. Middle East J. 47:2292–305 [Google Scholar]
  101. Inglehart R. 1977. Silent Revolution Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  102. Jacobs LR, Page BI. 2005. Who influences U.S. foreign policy?. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99:107–24 [Google Scholar]
  103. Jacobs LR, Soss J. 2010. The politics of inequality in America: a political economy framework. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 13:341–64 [Google Scholar]
  104. Jansen RS. 2007. Resurrection and appropriation: reputation trajectories, memory work, and the political use of historical figures. Am. J. Sociol. 112:953–1007 [Google Scholar]
  105. Jansen RS. 2011. Populist mobilization: a new theoretical approach to populism. Soc. Theory 29:275–96 [Google Scholar]
  106. Jenkins JC, Klandermans B. 1995. The Politics of Social Protest Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  107. Kandil H. 2011. Islamizing Egypt? Testing the limits of Gramscian counterhegemonic strategies. Theory Soc. 40:37–62 [Google Scholar]
  108. Karol D. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  109. Katz RS, Mair P. 1995. Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Polit. 1:15–28 [Google Scholar]
  110. Katz RS, Mair P. 2009. The cartel party thesis: a restatement. Perspect. Polit. 74753–66 [Google Scholar]
  111. Key VO Jr. 1942 (1958). Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups New York: Crowell, 4th ed..
  112. Key VO Jr. 1942 (1964). Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups New York: Crowell, 5th ed..
  113. Key VO Jr. 1955. A theory of critical elections. J. Polit. 17:3–18 [Google Scholar]
  114. Kirchheimer O. 1966. The transformation of the Western European party systems. See LaPalombara & Weiner 1966 177–200
  115. Kitschelt HP. 1993. Social movements, political parties, and democratic theory. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 528:13–29 [Google Scholar]
  116. Kitschelt HP. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  117. Klingemann HD, Volkens A, Bara J, Budge I, McDonald M. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD, 1990–2003. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  118. Knoke D. 1972. A causal model for the political party preferences of American men. Am. Sociol. Rev. 37:6679–89 [Google Scholar]
  119. Knoke D. 1973. Intergenerational occupational mobility and the political party preferences of American men. Am. J. Sociol. 78:61448–68 [Google Scholar]
  120. Korpi W. 1978. The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism: Work, Unions and Politics in Sweden London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  121. Korpi W. 2003. Welfare state regress in Western Europe: politics, institutions, globalization, and Europeanization. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 29:589–609 [Google Scholar]
  122. Korpi W. 2006. Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: protagonists, consenters, and antagonists. World Polit. 58:2167–206 [Google Scholar]
  123. Korpi W, Palme J. 2003. New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97:3425–46 [Google Scholar]
  124. Korpi W, Shalev M. 1980. Strikes, power and politics in the Western nations, 1900–1976. Polit. Power Soc. Theory 1:301–34 [Google Scholar]
  125. Krehbiel K. 1993. Where's the party?. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 23:235–66 [Google Scholar]
  126. Krehbiel K. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago. Univ. Chicago Press
  127. LaPalombara J, Weiner M. 1966. Political Parties and Political Development Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  128. Laurison D. 2013. Positions and position-takings among political producers: the field of American political consultants. Bourdieu and Data Analysis: Methodological Principles and Practice M Grenfell, F Lebaron 253–72 Oxford, UK: Peter Lang [Google Scholar]
  129. Lee T. 2002. Mobilizing Public Opinion: Black Insurgency and Racial Attitudes in the Civil Rights Era Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  130. Lenin VI. 1895 (1972. Draft and explanation of a programme for the Social-Democratic Party. Lenin Collected Works 2 G Hanna 93–121 Moscow: Progress Publ. [Google Scholar]
  131. Lenin VI. 1902 (1999). What Is to Be Done? Burning Questions of Our Movement London: Int. Publ.
  132. Lijphart A. 1969. Typologies of democratic systems. Comp. Polit. Stud. 1:13–44 [Google Scholar]
  133. Linz J. 2006. Robert Michels, Political Sociology and the Future of Democracy New York: Transaction
  134. Lipset SM. 1960 (1981). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  135. Lipset SM, Marks GW. 2001. It Didn't Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States New York: Norton
  136. Lipset SM, Rokkan S. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives New York/London: Free Press/Collier-MacMillan
  137. Lukács G. 1923 (1971). History and Class Consciousness Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  138. Luxemburg. 1904–1918 (1961). The Russian Revolution and Leninism or Marxism? Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  139. Machiavelli N. 1532 (1998). The Prince Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  140. Mair P. 1990. The West European Party System Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  141. Mair P. 1997 (2004). Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  142. Mair P. 2006. Ruling the void: the hollowing of democracy. New Left Rev. 42Nov.-Dec.25–51
  143. Mair P. 2008. The challenge to party government. West Eur. Polit. 31:1211–34 [Google Scholar]
  144. Manza J, Brooks C. 1999. Social Cleavages and Political Change: Voter Alignments and US Party Coalitions Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  145. Manza J, Brooks C. 2012. How sociology lost public opinion: a genealogy of a missing concept in the study of the political. Soc. Theory 30:289–113 [Google Scholar]
  146. Manza J, Hout M, Brooks C. 1995. Class voting in capitalist democracies since World War II: dealignment, realignment, or trendless fluctuation?. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 21:137–62 [Google Scholar]
  147. Markoff J. 1996. Waves of Democracy: Social Movements and Political Change. Sociol. New Century Ser Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi: Pine Forge
  148. Martin IW. 2008. The Permanent Tax Revolt: How the Property Tax Transformed American Politics Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  149. Marx K. 1845 (1978). Theses on Feuerbach. See Tucker 1978 143–45
  150. Marx K. 1850 (1978). The class struggles in France, 1848–1850. See Tucker 1978 586–93
  151. Marx K. 1852 (1978). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. See Tucker 1978 594–617
  152. Marx K, Engels F. 1848 (1978). The manifesto of the Communist Party. See Tucker 1978 469–81
  153. Masket S. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  154. Mayhew D. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  155. Mayhew D. 1986. Placing Parties in American Politics: Organization, Electoral Settings, and Governmental Activity in the Twentieth Century Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  156. Mayhew D. 2002. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  157. McAdam D. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  158. McAdam D, Tarrow S. 2010. Ballots and barricades: on the reciprocal relationship between elections and social movements. Perspect. Polit. 8:2529–42 [Google Scholar]
  159. McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C. 2001. Dynamics of Contention New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  160. McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C. 2008. Methods for measuring mechanisms of contention. Qual. Sociol. 31:4307–31 [Google Scholar]
  161. McCarty N, Poole K, Rosenthal H. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  162. McLean PD. 2011. Patrimonialism, elite networks, and reform in late-eighteenth-century Poland. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 636:88–110 [Google Scholar]
  163. Michels R. 1911 (1962). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy New York: Free Press
  164. Molyneux J. 1978 (2008). Marxism and the Party Chicago: Haymarket Books
  165. Moore B. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon [Google Scholar]
  166. Mosca G. 1896 (1960). The Ruling Class transl. HD Kahn New York/London: McGraw-Hill
  167. Mudge S. 2008. What is neo-liberalism?. Socio-Econ. Rev. 6:703–31 [Google Scholar]
  168. Mudge S. 2011. What's left of leftism? Neoliberal politics in Western party systems, 1945–2006. Soc. Sci. Hist. 35:3337–79 [Google Scholar]
  169. Ostrogorski MI. 1902 (1981). Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties I England transl. F. Clarke Piscataway, NJ: Transaction
  170. Ostrogorski MI. 1902 (1982). Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties II United States SM Lipset Piscataway, NJ: Transaction
  171. Pager D. 2007. The use of field experiments for studies of employment discrimination: contributions, critiques, and directions for the future. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 609:104–33 [Google Scholar]
  172. Paggi L. 1979. Gramsci's general theory of Marxism. Gramsci and Marxist Theory C Mouffe 113–67 London: Routledge, Kegan Paul [Google Scholar]
  173. Pareto V. 1902 (1991). The Rise and Fall of Elites: An Application of Theoretical Sociology Piscataway, NJ: Transaction
  174. Parigi P, Sartori L. 2014. The political party as a network of cleavages: disclosing the inner structure of Italian political parties in the seventies. Soc. Netw. 36:54–65 [Google Scholar]
  175. Pierson P. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  176. Piven FF, Cloward R. 1977. Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail New York: Random House
  177. Posusney MP. 2002. Multi-party elections in the Arab world: institutional engineering and oppositional strategies. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 36:434–62 [Google Scholar]
  178. Przeworski A. 1980. Social democracy as a historical phenomenon. New Left Rev. 122:27–58 [Google Scholar]
  179. Przeworski A, Alvarez ME, Cheibub JA, Limongi F. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  180. Przeworski A, Sprague J. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  181. Riley D. 2005. Civic associations and authoritarian regimes in interwar Europe: Italy and Spain. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:2288–310 [Google Scholar]
  182. Riley D, Desai M. 2007. The passive revolutionary route to the modern world: Italy and India in comparative perspective. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 49:4815–47 [Google Scholar]
  183. Rokkan S. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development Oslo, Nor.: Univeritetsforlaget
  184. Rose R, McAllister I. 1986. Voters Begin to Choose London: Sage
  185. Roth G. 1978. Introduction. See Roth & Wittich 1978 xxxii–cx
  186. Roth G, Wittich C. 1978. Economy and Society Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
  187. Rydgren J. 2007. The sociology of the radical right. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:241–62 [Google Scholar]
  188. Sartori G. 1968. Political development and political engineering. Public Policy XVII JD Montgomery, AO Hirschman 261–98 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  189. Sartori G. 1969. From the sociology of politics to political sociology. Gov. Opp. 4:2195–214 [Google Scholar]
  190. Sartori G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis I. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  191. Sassoon D. 1996. One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century London: IB Tauris
  192. Schattschneider EE. 1942. Party Government: American Government in Action New York: Transaction
  193. Schickler E, Kathryn P, Feinstein B. 2010. Congressional parties and civil rights politics from 1933 to 1972. J. Polit. 71:3672–89 [Google Scholar]
  194. Schwartz MA. 1990. The Party Network: The Robust Organization of Illinois Republicans. Madison: Univ. Wis. Press
  195. Schwartz MA. 1994. Party organization as a network of relations: the Republican Party of Illinois. How Political Parties Work: Perspectives from Within K. Lawson 75–102 Westport, CT: Praeger [Google Scholar]
  196. Schwartz MA. 2000. Continuity strategies among political challengers: the case of social credit. Am. Rev. Can. Stud. 30:4455–77 [Google Scholar]
  197. Schwartz MA. 2006. Party Movements in the United States and Canada: Strategies of Persistence New York: Rowman & Littlefield
  198. Shefter M. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  199. Simmons BA, Dobbin F, Garrett G. 2006. Introduction: the international diffusion of liberalism. Int. Organ. 60:781–810 [Google Scholar]
  200. Skocpol T. 1979. States and Social Revolutions New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  201. Skowronek S. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  202. Slez A, Martin JL. 2007. Political action and party formation in the United States Constitutional Convention. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72(1):42–67 [Google Scholar]
  203. Smith SS. 2007. Party Influence in Congress New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  204. Sombart W. 1906 (1976). Why Is There No Socialism in the United States? White Plains, NY: Int. Arts Sci. Press
  205. Sorauf F. 1964. Political Parties in the American System Boston: Little, Brown
  206. Stephens JD. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism London: Macmillan
  207. Sundquist JL. 1973. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
  208. Sutton JR. 2004. The political economy of imprisonment in affluent Western democracies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:170–89 [Google Scholar]
  209. Tilly C. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  210. Tilly C. 1985. War making and state making as organized crime. Bringing the State Back In P Evans, D Rueschemeyer, T Skocpol 169–91 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  211. Tucker R. 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader New York: Norton
  212. Tuğal C. 2007. NATO's Islamists: hegemony and Americanization in Turkey. New Left Rev. 44:5–34 [Google Scholar]
  213. Tuğal C. 2009. Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  214. Tuğal C. 2012. Fight or acquiesce? Religion and political process in Turkey's and Egypt's neoliberalizations. Dev. Change 43:123–51 [Google Scholar]
  215. Uggen C, Manza J. 2002. Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. Am. Sociol. Rev. 67:6777–803 [Google Scholar]
  216. Van Dyke N. 2003. Protest cycles and party politics: the effects of elite allies and antagonists on student protest in the United States, 1930–1990. See Goldstone 2003b 226–45
  217. Verba S, Schlozman KL, Brady HE. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  218. Vogel D. 1989. Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America New York: Basic Books
  219. Voss K. 1993. The Making of American Exceptionalism: The Knights of Labor and Class Formation in the Nineteenth Century Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  220. Voss K. 2010. Democratic dilemmas: union democracy and union renewal. Eur. Rev. Labour Res. 16:369–82 [Google Scholar]
  221. Wacquant L. 2008. Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality Cambridge, UK: Polity
  222. Wacquant L. 2012. Three steps to a historical anthropology of actually existing neoliberalism. Soc. Anthropol. 20:66–79 [Google Scholar]
  223. Ward L. 1908. The sociology of political parties. Am. J. Sociol. 13:4439–54 [Google Scholar]
  224. Weber M. 1911 (1978). Political communities. See Roth & Wittich 1978 901–40
  225. Weber M. 1914 (1958). Class, status, and party. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology HH Gerth, CW Mills 180–95 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  226. Weber M. 1914 (1978). The types of legitimate domination. See Roth & Wittich 1978 212–301
  227. Weber M. 1917 (1978). Parliament and government in a reconstructed Germany (a contribution to the political critique of officialdom and party politics). See Roth & Wittich 1978 1381–469
  228. Weber M. 1919 (1958). Politics as a vocation. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology HH Gerth, C Mills 77–128 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  229. Western B. 2007. Punishment and Inequality in America New York: Russell Sage Found.
  230. Weyland K. 1996. Neopopulism and neoliberalism in Latin America: unexpected affinities. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 32:3–31 [Google Scholar]
  231. Weyland K. 2003. Neopopulism and neoliberalism in Latin America: how much affinity?. Third World Q 24:1095–115 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145632
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error