Metered Verse

Literature Cited

1. Attridge D. 1974. Well-Weighed Syllables: Elizabethan Verse in Classical Metres Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
2. Beissinger MH. 2012. Oral poetry. The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics G Roland, S Cushman 978–81 Princeton, NJ/Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blumenfeld L. 2015. Meter as faithfulness. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 33:79–125
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blumenfeld L. 2016. End-weight effects in verse and language. Stud. Metr. Poet. 3:7–32
   [Google Scholar]
5. Borgeson S, Anttila A, Heuser R, Kiparsky P The rise and fall of antimetricality Forthcoming. https://web.stanford.edu/∼kiparsky/Papers/Antimetricality-Draft-2018-04-20.pdf
6. Dell F, Halle J. 2009. Comparing musical textsetting in French and in English songs. Towards a Typology of Poetic Forms: From Language to Metrics and Beyond J-L Aroui, A Arleo 63–78 Amsterdam: Benjamins
   [Google Scholar]
7. Deo AS. 2007. The metrical organization of classical Sanskrit verse. J. Linguist. 43:63–114
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fabb N, Halle M. 2008. Meter in Poetry: A New Theory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
9. Fussell P. 1979. Poetic Meter and Poetic Form New York: Random House
10. Golston C, Riad T. 2000. The phonology of Classical Greek meter. Linguistics 38:99–167
    [Google Scholar]
11. Halle J, Lerdahl F. 1993. A generative textsetting model. Curr. Musicol. 55:3–23
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hanson K. 2001. Quantitative meter in English: the lesson of Sir Philip Sidney. Engl. Lang. Linguist. 5:41–91
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hanson K. 2006. Shakespeare's lyric and dramatic metrical styles. Formal Approaches to Poetry BE Dresher, N Friedberg 111–33 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hanson K, Kiparsky P. 1996. A parametric theory of poetic meter. Language 72:287–335
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hanson K, Kiparsky P. 1997. The nature of verse and its consequences for the mixed form. Prosimetrum: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Narrative in Prose and Verse J Harris, T Ziolkowski 17–44 Cambridge, UK: Brewer
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hayes B. 1989. The prosodic hierarchy in meter. Phonetics and Phonology, Vol. 1: Rhythm and Meter P Kiparsky, G Youmans 201–60 San Diego: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hayes B. 2009. Textsetting as constraint conflict. Towards a Typology of Poetic Forms: From Language to Metrics and Beyond J-L Aroui, A Arleo 43–61 Amsterdam: Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hayes B. 2016. Stochastic constraint-based grammars for Hausa verse and song Paper presented at Old World Conf. Phonol Budapest: Jan 16
19. Hayes B, Schuh R. 2018. Metrical structure and sung rhythm of the Hausa Rajaz. Phonol. Anal. Forthcoming. https://roa.rutgers.edu/content/article/files/1768_hayes_1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
20. Herder JG. 1960 (1768). Fragmente. Sprachphilosophische Schriften E Heintel 91–154 Hamburg, Ger: Meiner
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hollander J. 1985. Observations in the art of English quantity. Vision and Resonance: Two Senses of Poetic Form59–70 New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
22. Itô J, Mester A. 2003 (1992). Weak layering and word binarity. A New Century of Phonology and Phonological Theory: A Festschrift for Professor Shosuke Haraguchi on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday T Honma, M Okazaki, T Tabata, S Tanaka 25–65 Tokyo: Kaitakusha
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kahn D. 1976. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology PhD Thesis, MIT Cambridge, MA: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/16397
24. Keppel-Jones D. 2001. The Strict Metrical Tradition: Variations in the Literary Iambic Pentameter from Sidney and Spenser to Matthew Arnold Montreal, Can: McGill/Queen's Univ. Press
25. Kiparsky P. 1977. The rhythmic structure of English verse. Linguist. Inq. 8:189–247
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kiparsky P. 1989. Sprung rhythm. Phonetics and Phonology, Vol. 1: Rhythm and Meter P Kiparsky, G Youmans 305–40 San Diego: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kiparsky P. 2006. A modular metrics for folk verse. Formal Approaches to Poetry BE Dresher, N Friedberg 7–49 The Hague: Mouton
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kiparsky P. 2007. Iambic inversion in Finnish. A Man of Measure: Festschrift in Honour of Fred Karlsson on His 60th Birthday M Suominen, A Arppe, A Airola, O Heinämäki 138–48 Turku, Finl.: Linguist. Assoc. Finl.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kiparsky P. 2018a. Formal and empirical issues in phonological typology. Phonological Typology L Hyman, F Plank 54–106 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kiparsky P. 2018b. Indo-European origins of the Greek hexameter. Sprache und Metrik D Gunkel, O Hackstein 77–127 Leiden, Neth./Boston: Brill
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lerdahl F, Jackendoff R. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
32. Liberman M, Prince A. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguist. Inq. 8:249–336
    [Google Scholar]
33. Prince AS. 1983. Relating to the grid. Linguist. Inq. 14:19–100
    [Google Scholar]
34. Riad T. 2016. The meter of Tashlhiyt Berber songs. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 35:499–548
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ryan KM. 2017. The stress–weight interface in metre. Phonology 34:581–613
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ryan KM. 2019. Prosodic end-weight reflects phrasal stress. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 37:315–56
    [Google Scholar]
37. Saintsbury G. 1908. A History of English Prosody from the Twelfth Century to the Present Day, Vol. 2: From Shakespeare to Crabbe London: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
38. Schlerman BJ. 1989. The Meters of John Webster New York: Lang
39. Schuh RG. 1995. The metrics of three Hausa songs on marriage by Ɗan Maraya Jos Unpubl. ms. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.584.6468&rep=rep1&type=pdf
40. Steele T. 1999. All the Fun's in How You Say a Thing Athens: Ohio Univ. Press
41. Tarlinskaja M. 2014. Shakespeare and the Versification of English Drama, 1561–1622 Farnham, UK: Ashgate
42. West ML. 1982. Greek Metre Oxford, UK: Clarendon
43. Zec D. 2009. The prosodic word as a unit in poetic meter. The Nature of the Word: Essays in Honor of Paul Kiparsky K Hanson, S Inkelas 63–94 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]