Why Legal Transplants?

Literature Cited

1. Abel RL. 2010. Law and society: project and practice. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:1–23
   [Google Scholar]
2. Affolder N. 2019. Contagious environmental lawmaking. J. Environ. Law. 2019:1–26
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ajani G. 1995. By chance and prestige: legal transplants in Russia and Eastern Europe. Am. J. Comp. Law 43:193–117
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ajani G. 2007. Transplants, legal borrowing and reception. Encyclopedia of Law & Society: American and Global Perspectives 1 DS Clark 1509–12 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   [Google Scholar]
5. Alkon C. 2011. Lost in translation: Can exporting ADR harm rule of law development?. J. Disput. Resolut. 2011:1165–87
   [Google Scholar]
6. Alter KJ, Helfer LR, Saldias O 2012. Transplanting the European Court of Justice: the experience of the Andean Tribunal of Justice. Am. J. Comp. Law 60:3629–64
   [Google Scholar]
7. Amos M. 2013. Transplanting human rights norms: the case of the United Kingdom's Human Rights Act. Hum. Rights Q. 35:2386–407
   [Google Scholar]
8. Barnett M, Duvall R. 2005. Power in international politics. Int. Organ. 59:139–75
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beckstrom JH. 1973. Transplantation of legal systems: an early report on the reception of Western laws in Ethiopia. Am. J. Comp. Law 21:3557–83
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bergoglio MI. 2017. The dissemination of jury trials: a reading from Argentina: the dissemination of jury trials. Law Soc. Rev. 51:3510–16
    [Google Scholar]
11. Berkowitz D, Pistor K, Richard J 2003. Economic development, legality, and the transplant effect. Eur. Econ. Rev. 47:1165–95
    [Google Scholar]
12. Botero JC, Porta RL, López-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Volokh A 2003. Judicial reform. World Bank Res. Obs. 18:161–88
    [Google Scholar]
13. Brake B, Katzenstein PJ. 2013. Lost in translation? Nonstate actors and the transnational movement of procedural law. Int. Organ. 67:4725–57
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cabrelli D, Siems M. 2015. Convergence, legal origins, and transplants in comparative corporate law: a case-based and quantitative analysis. Am. J. Comp. Law 63:1109–53
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cairns JW. 2013. Watson, Walton, and the history of “legal transplants” Ga. J. Int. Comp. Law 41:3637–96
    [Google Scholar]
16. Carothers T. 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve Washington, DC: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
17. Cohn M. 2010. Legal transplant chronicles: the evolution of unreasonableness and proportionality review of the administration in the United Kingdom. Am. J. Comp. Law 58:3583–629
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cotterrell R. 2006. Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory Aldershot, UK: Ashgate
19. Cuniberti G. 2012. Enhancing judicial reputation through legal transplants—Estoppel travels to France. Am. J. Comp. Law 60:2383–400
    [Google Scholar]
20. Damaška M. 1997. The uncertain fate of evidentiary transplants: Anglo-American and Continental experiments. Am. J. Comp. Law 45:4839–52
    [Google Scholar]
21. Daniels RJ, Trebilcock MJ, Carson LD 2011. The legacy of empire: the common law inheritance and commitments to legality in former British colonies. Am. J. Comp. Law 59:1111–78
    [Google Scholar]
22. Davis KE, Kruse MB. 2007. Taking the measure of law: the case of the Doing Business Project. Law Soc. Inq. 32:41095–119
    [Google Scholar]
23. Davis KE, Trebilcock MJ. 2008. The relationship between law and development: optimists versus skeptics. Am. J. Comp. Law 56:4895–946
    [Google Scholar]
24. Del Duca LF, Levasseur AA 2010. Impact of legal culture and legal transplants on the evolution of the U.S. legal system. Am. J. Comp. Law 58:11–29
    [Google Scholar]
25. Desai D, Woolcock M. 2015. Experimental justice reform: lessons from the World Bank and beyond. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 11:155–74
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dezalay Y. 2007. From a symbolic boom to a marketing bust: genesis and reconstruction of a field of legal and political expertise at the crossroads of a Europe opening to the Atlantic. Law Soc. Inq. 32:1161–81
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2010. Marketing and selling transnational “judges” and global “experts”: building the credibility of (quasi)judicial regulation. Socio-Econ. Rev. 8:1113–30
    [Google Scholar]
28. DiMaggio P, Powell WW. 1991. Introduction. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis WW Powell, P DiMaggio 1–38 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ewald W. 1995. Comparative jurisprudence (II): the logic of legal transplants. Am. J. Comp. Law 43:4489–510
    [Google Scholar]
30. Forman G. 2009. A tale of two regions: diffusion of the Israeli “50 percent rule” from the Galilee to the occupied West Bank. Law Soc. Inq. 34:3671–711
    [Google Scholar]
31. Fournier P. 2010. Muslim Marriage in Western Courts: Lost in Transplantation Farnham, UK: Ashgate
32. Frankenberg G. 2013. Order from Transfer: Comparative Constitutional Design and Legal Culture Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
33. Garth B, Baird L, Lew R, Reid O'Connell B, Carter D, Rothstein B 2017. Judges teaching rule of law abroad. Southwest. J. Int. Law 23:1273–79
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gastil J, Deess EP, Weiser PJ, Simmons C 2010. The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
35. Gidi A. 2003. Class actions in Brazil: a model for civil law countries. Am. J. Comp. Law 51:2311–408
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gillespie J. 2015. Localizing global competition law in Vietnam: a bottom-up perspective. Int. Comp. Law Q. 64:4935–63
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ginsburg T. 2002. Confucian constitutionalism? The emergence of constitutional review in Korea and Taiwan. Law Soc. Inq. 27:4763–99
    [Google Scholar]
38. Goldbach TS. 2015. Instrumentalizing the expressive: transplanting sentencing circles into the Canadian criminal trial. Transnatl. Law Contemp. Probl. 25:161–107
    [Google Scholar]
39. Goldbach TS. 2016. From the court to the classroom: judges’ work in international judicial education. Cornell Int. Law J. 49:3617–82
    [Google Scholar]
40. Goldbach TS. 2018. Judicial practice in action: court reform and responsive judges in Canada. The Responsive Judge: International Perspectives T Sourdin, A Zariski 217–40 Singapore: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
41. Goldbach TS, Brake B, Katzenstein PJ 2013. The movement of U.S. criminal and administrative law: processes of transplanting and translating. Ind. J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 20:1141–84
    [Google Scholar]
42. Grande E. 2000. Italian criminal justice: borrowing and resistance. Am. J. Comp. Law 48:2227–59
    [Google Scholar]
43. Grande E. 2016. Legal transplants and the inoculation effect: how American criminal procedure has affected Continental Europe. Am. J. Comp. Law 64:3583–618
    [Google Scholar]
44. Graziadei M. 2006. Comparative law as the study of transplants and receptions. Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law R Zimmermann, M Reimann 441–75 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Graziadei M. 2009. Legal transplants and the frontiers of legal knowledge. Theor. Inq. Law 10:2723–43
    [Google Scholar]
46. Hans VP. 2017. Trial by jury: story of a legal transplant. Law Soc. Rev. 51:3471–99
    [Google Scholar]
47. Harris R. 2006. The transplantation of the legal discourse on corporate personality theories: from German codification to British political pluralism and American big business. Washington Lee Law Rev 63:41421–78
    [Google Scholar]
48. Harris R, Crystal M. 2009. Some reflections on the transplantation of British company law in post-Ottoman Palestine. Theor. Inq. Law 10:2561–87
    [Google Scholar]
49. Johnson J. 2002. In pursuit of a prosperous international system. Exporting Democracy: Rhetoric versus Reality PJ Schraeder 31–71 Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner
    [Google Scholar]
50. Jupp J. 2013. Legal transplants as solutions for post-intervention criminal law reform: Afghanistan's interim criminal procedure code. Am. J. Comp. Law 61:151–92
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kagan RA. 2007. Globalization and legal change: the “Americanization” of European law. Regul. Gov. 1:299–120
    [Google Scholar]
52. Kahn-Freund O. 1974. On uses and misuses of comparative law. Mod. Law Rev. 37:11–27
    [Google Scholar]
53. Katzenstein PJ. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
54. Kennedy D. 1997. New approaches to comparative law: comparativism and international governance. Utah Law Rev 1997:2545–637
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kessler AD. 2009. Deciding against conciliation: the nineteenth-century rejection of a European transplant and the rise of a distinctively American ideal of adversarial adjudication. Theor. Inq. Law 10:2423–83
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kroncke JJ. 2012. Law and development as anti-comparative law. Vanderbilt J. Transnatl. Law 45:1477–555
    [Google Scholar]
57. Kroncke JJ. 2016. The Futility of Law and Development: China and the Dangers of Exporting American Law New York: Oxford Univ. Press
58. Lambert-Mogiliansky A, Sonin K, Zhuravskaya E 2007. Are Russian commercial courts biased? Evidence from a bankruptcy law transplant. J. Comp. Econ. 35:2254–77
    [Google Scholar]
59. Langer M. 2004. From legal transplants to legal translations: the globalization of plea bargaining and the Americanization thesis in criminal procedure. Harvard Int. Law J. 45:11–64
    [Google Scholar]
60. Langer M. 2007. Revolution in Latin American criminal procedure: diffusion of legal ideas from the periphery. Am. J. Comp. Law 55:4617–76
    [Google Scholar]
61. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A 2008. The economic consequences of legal origins. J. Econ. Lit. 46:2285–332
    [Google Scholar]
62. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. J. Financ. 52:31131–50
    [Google Scholar]
63. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. J. Financ. Econ. 58:13–27
    [Google Scholar]
64. Lasser M. 2003. The question of understanding. Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions P Legrand, R Munday 197–239 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
65. Legrand P. 1996. European legal systems are not converging. Int. Comp. Law Q. 45:152–81
    [Google Scholar]
66. Legrand P. 1997. The impossibility of “legal transplants. Maastricht J. Eur. Comp. Law 4:2111–24
    [Google Scholar]
67. Lempert R. 1992. A jury for Japan?. Am. J. Comp. Law 40:137–71
    [Google Scholar]
68. Liao C. 2019. Social enterprise law: Friend or foe to corporate sustainability?. Cambridge Handbook of Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability B Sjåfjell, C Bruner Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
    [Google Scholar]
69. Lienau O. 2017. Law in hiding: market principles in the global legal order. Hastings Law J 68:3541–607
    [Google Scholar]
70. Lin L. 2009. Legal transplants through private contracting: codes of vendor conduct in global supply chains as an example. Am. J. Comp. Law 57:3711–44
    [Google Scholar]
71. Marcus GE. 2007. Ethnography two decades after writing culture: from the experimental to the baroque. Anthropol. Q. 80:41127–45
    [Google Scholar]
72. Mattei U. 1994a. Efficiency in legal transplants: an essay in comparative law and economics. Int. Rev. Law Econ. 14:13–19
    [Google Scholar]
73. Mattei U. 1994b. Why the wind changed: intellectual leadership in Western law. Am. J. Comp. Law 42:1195–218
    [Google Scholar]
74. Mattei U, Nader L. 2008. Plunder: When the Rule of Law is Illegal Malden, MA: Blackwell
75. McCormack G. 2018. Why “doing business” with the World Bank may be bad for you. Eur. Bus. Org. Law Rev. 19:3649–76
    [Google Scholar]
76. Merry SE. 2006. New legal realism and the ethnography of transnational law: new legal realism. Law Soc. Inq. 31:4975–95
    [Google Scholar]
77. Merryman JH. 1977. Comparative law and social change: on the origins, style, decline, and revival of the law and development movement. Am. J. Comp. Law 25:3457–91
    [Google Scholar]
78. Merryman JH. 1981. On the convergence (and divergence) of the civil law and the common law. Stanford J. Int. Law 17:2357–88
    [Google Scholar]
79. Michaels R. 2009. Comparative law by numbers? Legal origins thesis, Doing Business reports, and the silence of traditional comparative law. Am. J. Comp. Law 57:4765–95
    [Google Scholar]
80. Milhaupt CJ. 2009. Beyond legal origin: rethinking law's relationship to the economy: implications for policy. Am. J. Comp. Law 57:4831–46
    [Google Scholar]
81. Milhaupt CJ, Pistor K. 2008. Law and Capitalism: What Corporate Crises Reveal about Legal Systems and Economic Development Around the World Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
82. Miller JM. 2003. A typology of legal transplants: using sociology, legal history, and Argentine examples to explain the transplant process. Am. J. Comp. Law 51:4839–85
    [Google Scholar]
83. Miller JM. 2007. Transplants, legal exports as. Encyclopedia of Law & Society: American and Global Perspectives 1 DS Clark 1513–16 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
84. Nader L, Grande E. 2002. Current illusions and delusions about conflict management in Africa and elsewhere. Law Soc. Inq. 27:3573–94
    [Google Scholar]
85. Nelken D. 2003. Comparatists and transferability. Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions P Legrand, R Munday 197–239 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
86. Nelken D. 2016. Comparative legal research and legal culture: facts, approaches, and values. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 12:45–62
    [Google Scholar]
87. Nicola FG. 2010. Family law exceptionalism in comparative law. Am. J. Comp. Law 58:4777–810
    [Google Scholar]
88. North D. 1991. Institutions. J. Econ. Perspect. 5:197–112
    [Google Scholar]
89. Ohnesorge J. 2016. The regulatory state in East Asia. Comparative Law and Regulation: Understanding the Global Regulatory Process F Bignami, D Zaring 92–106 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
90. Örücü E. 2004. The Enigma of Comparative Law: Variations on a Theme for the Twenty-First Century Leiden, Neth: Martinus Nijhoff
91. Penca J. 2016. Transnational legal transplants and legitimacy: the example of “clean” and “green” development mechanisms. Leg. Stud. 36:4706–24
    [Google Scholar]
92. Perju V. 2012. Constitutional transplants, borrowing, and migrations. Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law M Rosenfeld, A Sajó 1304–27 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
93. Pistor K, Keinan Y, Kleinheisterkamp J, West MD 2003. Evolution of corporate law and the transplant effect: lessons from six countries. World Bank Res. Obs. 18:189–112
    [Google Scholar]
94. Puchniak DW, Lan LL. 2017. Independent directors in Singapore: puzzling compliance requiring explanation. Am. J. Comp. Law 65:2265–333
    [Google Scholar]
95. Puri P. 2009. Legal origins, investor protection, and Canada. Brigham Young Univ. Law Rev. 6:1671–700
    [Google Scholar]
96. Reyna VF, Hans VP, Corbin JC, Yeh R, Lin K, Royer C 2015. The gist of juries: testing a model of damage award decision-making. Psychol. Public Policy Law 21:3280–94
    [Google Scholar]
97. Riles A. 2005. A new agenda for the cultural study of law: taking on the technicalities. Buffalo Law Rev 53:3973–1033
    [Google Scholar]
98. Riles A. 2006. Anthropology, human rights, and legal knowledge: culture in the iron cage. Am. Anthropol. 108:152–65
    [Google Scholar]
99. Rittich K. 2004. The future of law and development: second generation reforms and the incorporation of the social. Mich. J. Int. Law 26:1199–243
    [Google Scholar]
100. Rodríguez-Garavito C. 2011. Ethnicity.gov: global governance, indigenous peoples, and the right to prior consultation in social minefields. Ind. J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 18:1263–305
     [Google Scholar]
101. Sacco R. 1991. Legal formants: a dynamic approach to comparative law (installment II of II). Am. J. Comp. Law 39:2343–401
     [Google Scholar]
102. Sarfaty GA. 2009. Why culture matters in international institutions: the marginality of human rights at the World Bank. Am. J. Int. Law 103:4647–83
     [Google Scholar]
103. Schauer F. 2017. Preferences for law. Law Soc. Inq. 42:187–99
     [Google Scholar]
104. Seron C, Silbey SS. 2004. Profession, science, and culture: an emergent canon of law and society research. Blackwell Companion to Law and Society A Sarat 30–60 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
105. Shaffer G. 2016. Theorizing transnational legal ordering. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 12:231–53
     [Google Scholar]
106. Siems MM. 2014. The curious case of overfitting legal transplants. The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke M Adams, D Heirbaut 133–45 Oxford, UK: Hart
     [Google Scholar]
107. Siems MM. 2018. Malicious legal transplants. Leg. Stud. 38:1103–19
     [Google Scholar]
108. Silbey SS. 2005. After legal consciousness. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1:323–68
     [Google Scholar]
109. Silbey SS, Sarat A. 1987. Critical traditions in law and society research. Law Soc. Rev. 21:1165–74
     [Google Scholar]
110. Simoni A, Whitecross RW. 2007. Gross national happiness and the heavenly stream of justice: modernization and dispute resolution in the Kingdom of Bhutan. Am. J. Comp. Law 55:1165–95
     [Google Scholar]
111. Stein P. 1980. Legal Evolution: The Story of an Idea New York/Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
112. Teubner G. 1998. Legal irritants: good faith in British law, or how unifying law ends up in new divergencies. Mod. Law Rev. 61:111–32
     [Google Scholar]
113. Thomas C. 2011. Law and neoclassical economic development in theory and practice: toward an institutionalist critique of institutionalism. Cornell Law Rev 96:4967–1024
     [Google Scholar]
114. Tomlins C. 2009. Transplants and timing: passages in the creation of an Anglo-American law of slavery. Theor. Inq. Law 10:2389–421
     [Google Scholar]
115. Torres G. 2007. Legal change. Clevel. State Law Rev. 55:2135–46
     [Google Scholar]
116. Trubek DM. 2016. Law and development: forty years after “scholars in self-estrangement. Univ. Tor. Law J. 66:3301–29
     [Google Scholar]
117. Tsai C-H, Wu Y-N. 2018. What conflict minerals rules tell us about the legal transplantation of corporate social responsibility standards without the state: from the United Nations to the United States to Taiwan. Northwest. J. Int. Law Bus. 38:2233–84
     [Google Scholar]
118. Tshuma L. 1999. The political economy of the World Bank's legal framework for economic development. Soc. Leg. Stud. 8:175–96
     [Google Scholar]
119. Twining W. 2005. Social science and diffusion of law. J. Law Soc. 32:2203–40
     [Google Scholar]
120. Valverde M. 2009. Jurisdiction and scale: legal “technicalities” as resources for theory. Soc. Leg. Stud. 18:2139–57
     [Google Scholar]
121. Waelde TW, Gunderson JL. 1994. Legislative reform in transition economies: Western transplants—a short-cut to social market economy status?. Int. Comp. Law Q. 43:2347–78
     [Google Scholar]
122. Wanis-St. John A 2000. Implementing ADR in transitioning states: lessons learned from practice. Harvard Negot. Law Rev. 5:3339–82
     [Google Scholar]
123. Watson A. 1978. Comparative law and legal change. Cambridge Law J 37:2313–36
     [Google Scholar]
124. Watson A. 1993. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law Athens: Univ. Ga. Press. , 2nd ed..
125. Watson A. 1995. From legal transplants to legal formants. Am. J. Comp. Law 43:3469–76
     [Google Scholar]
126. Wiegand W. 1991. The reception of American law in Europe. Am. J. Comp. Law 39:2229–48
     [Google Scholar]
127. Wise EM. 1990. The transplant of legal patterns. Am. J. Comp. Law 38:Suppl.1–22
     [Google Scholar]
128. World Bank (Legal Vice Presidency) 2002. Initiatives in legal and judicial reform Rep., World Bank Washington, DC:
129. Zimmerman R. 1994. Civil code and civil law: the “Europeanization” of private law within the European Community and the re-emergence of a European legal science. Columbia J. Eur. Law 1:163–105
     [Google Scholar]