Event Perception and Memory

Literature Cited

1. Abelson RP. 1981. Psychological status of the script concept. Am. Psychol. 36:715–29
   [Google Scholar]
2. Addis DR, Wong AT, Schacter DL 2007. Remembering the past and imagining the future: common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia 45:1363–77
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allen K, Ibara S, Seymour A, Cordova N, Botvinick M 2010. Abstract structural representations of goal-directed behavior. Psychol. Sci. 21:1518–24
   [Google Scholar]
4. Altmann GTM, Mirkovic J. 2009. Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cogn. Sci. 33:583–609
   [Google Scholar]
5. Amoruso L, Gelormini C, Aboitiz FA, González Alvarez, Manes F et al. 2013. N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:57
   [Google Scholar]
6. Avni-Babad D, Ritov I. 2003. Routine and the perception of time. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132:543–50
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bailey HR, Kurby CA, Giovannetti T, Zacks JM 2013a. Action perception predicts action performance. Neuropsychologia 51:2294–304
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bailey HR, Zacks JM, Hambrick DZ, Zacks RT, Head D et al. 2013b. Medial temporal lobe volume predicts elders’ everyday memory. Psychol. Sci. 24:1113–22
   [Google Scholar]
9. Baker LJ, Levin DT. 2015. The role of relational triggers in event perception. Cognition 136:14–29
   [Google Scholar]
10. Baldassano C, Chen J, Zadbood A, Pillow JW, Hasson U, Norman KA 2017. Discovering event structure in continuous narrative perception and memory. Neuron 95:709–721
    [Google Scholar]
11. Baldassano C, Hasson U, Norman KA 2018. Representation of real-world event schemas during narrative perception. J. Neurosci. 38:9689–99
    [Google Scholar]
12. Baldwin DA, Baird JA, Saylor MM, Clark MA 2001. Infants parse dynamic action. Child Dev 72:708–17
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bangert AS, Kurby CA, Zacks JM 2019. The influence of everyday events on prospective timing “in the moment.”. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 26:677–84
    [Google Scholar]
14. Barbey A, Krueger F, Grafman J 2009. Structured event complexes in the medial prefrontal cortex support counterfactual representations for future planning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364:1291–300
    [Google Scholar]
15. Barker RG 1963. The Stream of Behavior: Explorations of Its Structure and Content New York: Appleton-Century-CroftsReviews ecological studies of the structure of human behavior by Barker's field research station.
16. Bauer PJ. 2006. Event memory. Handbook of Child Psychology: Cognition, Perception, and Language Vol. 2 D Kuhn, RS Siegler, W Damon, RM Lerner 373–425 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. , 6th ed.Describes theory and data on how event memory develops in children.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ben-Yakov A, Dudai Y. 2011. Constructing realistic engrams: poststimulus activity of hippocampus and dorsal striatum predicts subsequent episodic memory. J. Neurosci. 31:9032–42
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ben-Yakov A, Eshel N, Dudai Y 2013. Hippocampal immediate poststimulus activity in the encoding of consecutive naturalistic episodes. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142:1255–63
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ben-Yakov A, Rubinson M, Dudai Y 2014. Shifting gears in hippocampus: temporal dissociation between familiarity and novelty signatures in a single event. J. Neurosci. 34:12973–81
    [Google Scholar]
20. Berntsen D. 2010. The unbidden past: involuntary autobiographical memories as a basic mode of remembering. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19:138–42Proposes that many experiences of remembering events result from involuntary associative retrieval.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Bläsing B, Tenenbaum G, Schack T 2009. The cognitive structure of movements in classical dance. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 10:350–60
    [Google Scholar]
22. Bonasia K, Blommesteyn J, Moscovitch M 2016. Memory and navigation: compression of space varies with route length and turns. Hippocampus 26:9–12
    [Google Scholar]
23. Bonasia K, Sekeres MJ, Gilboa A, Grady CL, Winocur G, Moscovitch M 2018. Prior knowledge modulates the neural substrates of encoding and retrieving naturalistic events at short and long delays. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 153:26–39
    [Google Scholar]
24. Brewer WF, Dupree DA. 1983. Use of plan schemata in the recall and recognition of goal-directed actions. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 9:117–29
    [Google Scholar]
25. Brouwer H, Fitz H, Hoeks J 2012. Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Res 1446:127–43
    [Google Scholar]
26. Brown D, Pipe M-E. 2003. Individual differences in children's event memory reports and the narrative elaboration technique. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:195–206
    [Google Scholar]
27. Brown NR. 2005. On the prevalence of event clusters in autobiographical memory. Soc. Cogn. 23:35–69
    [Google Scholar]
28. Butz MV, Bilkey D, Humaidan D, Knott A, Otte S 2018. Learning, planning, and control in a monolithic neural event inference architecture. Neural Netw 117:135–44
    [Google Scholar]
29. Christophel TB, Klink PC, Spitzer B, Roelfsema PR, Haynes J-D 2017. The distributed nature of working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21:111–24
    [Google Scholar]
30. Cohen LB, Amsel G. 1998. Precursors to infants’ perception of the causality of a simple event. Infant Behav. Dev. 21:713–31
    [Google Scholar]
31. Cohn N, Paczynski M. 2013. Prediction, events, and the advantage of Agents: the processing of semantic roles in visual narrative. Cogn. Psychol. 67:73–97
    [Google Scholar]
32. Cohn N, Paczynski M, Kutas M 2017. Not so secret agents: event-related potentials to semantic roles in visual event comprehension. Brain Cogn 119:Suppl. C1–9
    [Google Scholar]
33. Cutting JE. 1981. Six tenets for event perception. Cognition 10:71–78
    [Google Scholar]
34. Cutting JE. 2014. Event segmentation and seven types of narrative discontinuity in popular movies. Acta Psychol 149:69–77
    [Google Scholar]
35. Defina R. 2016. Do serial verb constructions describe single events? A study of co-speech gestures in Avatime. Language 92:890–910
    [Google Scholar]
36. DuBrow S, Davachi L. 2016. Temporal binding within and across events. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 134:107–14
    [Google Scholar]
37. Earles JL, Kersten AW, Curtayne ES, Perle JG 2008. That's the man who did it, or was it a woman? Actor similarity and binding errors in event memory. Psychon. Bull. 15:1185–89
    [Google Scholar]
38. Eisenberg ML, Zacks JM, Flores S 2018. Dynamic prediction during perception of everyday events. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 3:53
    [Google Scholar]
39. Elman JL, McRae K. 2019. A model of event knowledge. Psychol. Rev. 126:252–91Presents a recurrent connectionist model of the acquisition and deployment of event knowledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ezzyat Y, Davachi L. 2011. What constitutes an episode in episodic memory?. Psychol. Sci. 22:243–52
    [Google Scholar]
41. Faber M, D'Mello SK. 2018. How the stimulus influences mind wandering in semantically rich task contexts. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 3:35
    [Google Scholar]
42. Facebook Res 2019. Detectron. Platform for object detection research Facebook, Menlo Park CA: https://github.com/facebookresearch/Detectron
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ferretti TR, McRae K, Hatherell A 2001. Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role concepts. J. Mem. Lang. 44:516–47
    [Google Scholar]
44. Fivush R. 1997. Event memory in early childhood. The Development of Memory in Childhood N Cowan 139–61 Hove, UK: Psychology/Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
45. Flanagan JR, Johansson RS. 2003. Action plans used in action observation. Nature 424:769–71
    [Google Scholar]
46. Flecken M, Athanasopoulos P, Kuipers JR, Thierry G 2015. On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception. Cognition 141:41–51
    [Google Scholar]
47. Flecken M, von Stutterheim C, Carroll M 2014. Grammatical aspect influences motion event perception: findings from a cross-linguistic non-verbal recognition task. Interdiscip. J. Lang. Cogn. Sci. 6:45–78
    [Google Scholar]
48. Flores S, Bailey HR, Eisenberg ML, Zacks JM 2017. Event segmentation improves event memory up to one month later. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 43:1183–202
    [Google Scholar]
49. Fournier LR, Gallimore JM. 2013. What makes an event: temporal integration of stimuli or actions?. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 75:1293–305
    [Google Scholar]
50. Franklin N, Norman KA, Ranganath C, Zacks JM, Gershman SJ 2019. Structured event memory: a neuro-symbolic model of event cognition. bioRxiv 541607
51. Gennari SP, Sloman SA, Malt BC, Fitch WT 2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition 83:49–79
    [Google Scholar]
52. Gerwien J, von Stutterheim C 2018. Event segmentation: cross-linguistic differences in verbal and non-verbal tasks. Cognition 180:225–37
    [Google Scholar]
53. Gibson JJ. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception Boston: Houghton Mifflin
54. Giovannetti T, Bettcher BM, Brennan L, Libron DJ, Kessler RK, Duey K 2008. Coffee with jelly or unbuttered toast: Commissions and omissions are dissociable aspects of everyday action impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology 22:235–45
    [Google Scholar]
55. Gold DA, Park NW, Troyer AK, Murphy KJ 2015. Compromised naturalistic action performance in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology 29:320–33
    [Google Scholar]
56. Gold DA, Zacks JM, Flores S 2017. Effects of cues to event segmentation on subsequent memory. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 2:1
    [Google Scholar]
57. Google 2019. Google Cloud. AI and machine learning products https://cloud.google.com/vision/ Google Mountain View, CA:
    [Google Scholar]
58. Gravina MT, Sederberg PB. 2017. The neural architecture of prediction over a continuum of spatiotemporal scales. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 17:Suppl. C194–202
    [Google Scholar]
59. Hafri A, Papafragou A, Trueswell JC 2012. Getting the gist of events: recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142:880–905
    [Google Scholar]
60. Hafri A, Trueswell JC, Strickland B 2018. Encoding of event roles from visual scenes is rapid, spontaneous, and interacts with higher-level visual processing. Cognition 175:36–52
    [Google Scholar]
61. Hard BM, Recchia G, Tversky B 2011. The shape of action. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 140:586–604
    [Google Scholar]
62. Hard BM, Tversky B, Lang D 2006. Making sense of abstract events: building event schemas. Mem. Cogn. 34:1221–35
    [Google Scholar]
63. Hasson U, Chen J, Honey CJ 2015. Hierarchical process memory: memory as an integral component of information processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19:304–13Proposes, on the basis of neuroimaging studies using naturalistic materials, that there is a hierarchy of ranges of time dependence on the human cortex.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Hasson U, Yang E, Vallines I, Heeger DJ, Rubin N 2008. A hierarchy of temporal receptive windows in human cortex. J. Neurosci. 28:2539–50
    [Google Scholar]
65. Hayhoe M, Ballard D. 2005. Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9:188–94
    [Google Scholar]
66. Heberlein AS. 2008. Animacy and intention in the brain: neuroscience of social event perception. Understanding Events: From Perception to Action Vol. 4 TF Shipley, JM Zacks 363–88 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
67. Hemeren PE, Thill S. 2011. Deriving motor primitives through action segmentation. Front. Psychol. 1:243
    [Google Scholar]
68. Herath S, Harandi M, Porikli F 2017. Going deeper into action recognition: a survey. Image Vis. Comput. 60:4–21
    [Google Scholar]
69. Hespos SJ, Grossman SR, Saylor MM 2010. Infants’ ability to parse continuous actions: further evidence. Neural Netw 23:1026–32
    [Google Scholar]
70. Hespos SJ, Saylor MM, Grossman SR 2009. Infants’ ability to parse continuous actions. Dev. Psychol. 45:575–85
    [Google Scholar]
71. Hohman TJ, Peynircioğlu ZF, Beason-Held LL 2013. Flexibility of event boundaries in autobiographical memory. Memory 21:249–60
    [Google Scholar]
72. Hommel B, Muesseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W 2001. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav. Brain Sci. 24:849–937Describes the TEC and reviews a wide range of empirical support.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Hsieh L-T, Gruber MJ, Jenkins LJ, Ranganath C 2014. Hippocampal activity patterns carry information about objects in temporal context. Neuron 81:1165–78
    [Google Scholar]
74. Hudson JA, Fivush R, Kuebli J 1992. Scripts and episodes: the development of event memory. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 6:483–505
    [Google Scholar]
75. Huff M, Meitz TGK, Papenmeier F 2014. Changes in situation models modulate processes of event perception in audiovisual narratives. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 40:1377–88
    [Google Scholar]
76. Huff M, Papenmeier F, Zacks JM 2012. Visual target detection is impaired at event boundaries. Vis. Cogn. 20:848–64
    [Google Scholar]
77. Intraub H. 2010. Rethinking scene perception: a multisource model. Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 52 BH Ross 231–64 San Diego: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
78. James W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology Vol. 1 New York: Holt
79. Jeunehomme O, D'Argembeau A. 2018. Event segmentation and the temporal compression of experience in episodic memory. Psychol. Res. In press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1047-y
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
80. Johansson G, von Hofsten C, Jansson G 1980. Event perception. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31:27–63
    [Google Scholar]
81. Keidel JL, Oedekoven CSH, Tut AC, Bird CM 2017. Multiscale integration of contextual information during a naturalistic task. Cereb. Cortex 28:3531–39
    [Google Scholar]
82. Kersten AW, Earles JL. 2017. Feelings of familiarity and false memory for specific associations resulting from mugshot exposure. Mem. Cogn. 45:93–104
    [Google Scholar]
83. Kersten AW, Earles JL, Upshaw C 2013. False recollection of the role played by an actor in an event. Mem. Cogn. 41:1144–58
    [Google Scholar]
84. Knoeferle P, Habets B, Crocker M, Munte T 2008. Visual scenes trigger immediate syntactic reanalysis: evidence from ERPs during situated spoken comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 18:789–95
    [Google Scholar]
85. Köhler W. 1929. Gestalt Psychology New York: Liveright
86. Koutstaal W, Schacter DL, Johnson MK, Galluccio L 1999. Facilitation and impairment of event memory produced by photograph review. Mem. Cogn. 27:478–93
    [Google Scholar]
87. Kubovy M. 2015. The deep structure of lives. Philos. Sci. 19:153–76
    [Google Scholar]
88. Kurby C, Zacks JM. 2011. Age differences in the perception of hierarchical structure in events. Mem. Cogn. 39:75–91
    [Google Scholar]
89. Kurby CA, Zacks JM. 2018. Preserved neural event segmentation in healthy older adults. Psychol. Aging 33:232–45
    [Google Scholar]
90. Lawrence Z, Peterson D. 2016. Mentally walking through doorways causes forgetting: the location updating effect and imagination. Memory 24:12–20
    [Google Scholar]
91. Levin DT. 2010. Spatial representations of the sets of familiar and unfamiliar television programs. Media Psychol 13:54–76
    [Google Scholar]
92. Loschky LC, Larson AM, Magliano JP, Smith TJ 2015. What would Jaws do? The tyranny of film and the relationship between gaze and higher-level narrative film comprehension. PLOS ONE 10:e0142474
    [Google Scholar]
93. Loucks J, Mutschler C, Meltzoff AN 2017. Children's representation and imitation of events: How goal organization influences 3-year-old children's memory for action sequences. Cogn. Sci. 41:1904–33
    [Google Scholar]
94. Loucks J, Pechey M. 2016. Human action perception is consistent, flexible, and orientation dependent. Perception 45:1222–39
    [Google Scholar]
95. MacLean CL, Coburn PI, Chong K, Connolly DL 2018. Breaking script: deviations and postevent information in adult memory for a repeated event. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 32:474–86
    [Google Scholar]
96. Magliano JP, Radvansky GA, Forsythe JC, Copeland DE 2014. Event segmentation during first-person continuous events. J. Cogn. Psychol. 26:649–61
    [Google Scholar]
97. Maguire EA. 2012. Studying the freely-behaving brain with fMRI. NeuroImage 62:1170–76
    [Google Scholar]
98. McNamara Q, De La Vega A, Yarkoni T 2017. Developing a comprehensive framework for multimodal feature extraction. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining1567–74 New York: ACM
    [Google Scholar]
99. McRae K, Hare M, Elman JL, Ferretti T 2005. A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns. Mem. Cogn. 33:1174–84
    [Google Scholar]
100. Michotte AE. 1946. The Perception of Causality New York: Basic
101. Miller GA, Galanter E, Pribram KH 1960. Plans and the Structure of Behavior New York: Holt
102. Miller GA, Johnson-Laird PN. 1976. Language and Perception Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
103. Monroy CD, Gerson SA, Domínguez-Martínez E, Kaduk K, Hunnius S, Reid V 2019. Sensitivity to structure in action sequences: an infant event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia 126:92–101
     [Google Scholar]
104. Monroy CD, Gerson SA, Hunnius S 2018. Translating visual information into action predictions: statistical learning in action and nonaction contexts. Mem Cogn 46:600–13
     [Google Scholar]
105. Nakano T, Kitazawa S. 2017. Development of long-term event memory in preverbal infants: an eye-tracking study. Sci. Rep. 7:44086
     [Google Scholar]
106. Newtson D. 1973. Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 28:28–38
     [Google Scholar]
107. Newtson D. 1976. Foundations of attribution: the perception of ongoing behavior. New Directions in Attribution Research JH Harvey, WJ Ickes, RF Kidd 223–48 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
108. Nielson DM, Smith TA, Sreekumar V, Dennis S, Sederberg PB 2015. Human hippocampus represents space and time during retrieval of real-world memories. PNAS 112:11078–83
     [Google Scholar]
109. Papafragou A. 2010. Source–goal asymmetries in motion representation: implications for language production and comprehension. Cogn. Sci. 34:1064–92
     [Google Scholar]
110. Papafragou A, Hulbert J, Trueswell J 2008. Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition 108:155–84
     [Google Scholar]
111. Papenmeier F, Brockhoff A, Huff M 2019. Filling the gap despite full attention: the role of fast backward inferences for event completion. Cogn. Res. 4:3
     [Google Scholar]
112. Pettijohn KA, Radvansky GA. 2016a. Walking through doorways causes forgetting: event structure or updating disruption?. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 69:2119–29
     [Google Scholar]
113. Pettijohn KA, Radvansky GA. 2016b. Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation. Mem. Cogn. 44:1064–75
     [Google Scholar]
114. Pettijohn KA, Thompson AN, Tamplin AK, Krawietz SA, Radvansky GA 2016. Event boundaries and memory improvement. Cognition 148:136–44
     [Google Scholar]
115. Radvansky GA. 2012. Across the event horizon. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 21:269–72
     [Google Scholar]
116. Radvansky GA, Copeland DE. 2006. Walking through doorways causes forgetting: situation models and experienced space. Mem. Cogn. 34:1150–56
     [Google Scholar]
117. Radvansky GA, Copeland DE, Berish DE, Dijkstra K 2003. Aging and situation model updating. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 10:158–66
     [Google Scholar]
118. Radvansky GA, Dijkstra K. 2007. Aging and situation model processing. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14:1027–42
     [Google Scholar]
119. Radvansky GA, Krawietz S, Tamplin A 2011. Walking through doorways causes forgetting: further explorations. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 64:1632–45
     [Google Scholar]
120. Radvansky GA, O'Rear AE, Fisher JS 2017. Event models and the fan effect. Mem. Cogn. 45:1028–44
     [Google Scholar]
121. Radvansky GA, Tamplin AK, Krawietz SA 2010. Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Environmental integration. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17:900–4
     [Google Scholar]
122. Radvansky GA, Zacks JM. 2014. Event Cognition New York: Oxford Univ. PressPresents a comprehensive review of research on event cognition and describes EST and the event horizon model in depth.
123. Radvansky GA, Zwaan RA, Federico T, Franklin N 1998. Retrieval from temporally organized situation models. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 24:1224–37
     [Google Scholar]
124. Ranganath C, Ritchey M. 2012. Two cortical systems for memory-guided behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13:713–26Presents the posterior medial/anterior temporal (PM/AT) account of how brain systems integrate knowledge-based associations and arbitrary episodic associations in memory.
     [Google Scholar]
125. Reynolds JR, Zacks JM, Braver TS 2007. A computational model of event segmentation from perceptual prediction. Cogn. Sci. 31:613–43
     [Google Scholar]
126. Richmond LL, Gold DA, Zacks JM 2017. Event perception: translations and applications. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 6:111–20
     [Google Scholar]
127. Rinck M, Bower G. 2000. Temporal and spatial distance in situation models. Mem. Cogn. 28:1310–20
     [Google Scholar]
128. Rubin DC, Umanath S. 2015. Event memory: a theory of memory for laboratory, autobiographical, and fictional events. Psychol. Rev. 122:1–23
     [Google Scholar]
129. Sargent JQ, Zacks JM, Hambrick DZ, Zacks RT, Kurby CA et al. 2013. Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory. Cognition 129:241–55
     [Google Scholar]
130. Saylor MM, Baldwin DA, Baird JA, LaBounty J 2007. Infants’ on-line segmentation of dynamic human action. J. Cogn. Dev. 8:113–28
     [Google Scholar]
131. Schacter DL, Addis DR, Hassabis D, Martin VC, Spreng RN, Szpunar KK 2012. The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain. Neuron 76:677–94
     [Google Scholar]
132. Sharon T, Wynn K. 1998. Individuation of actions from continuous motion. Psychol. Sci. 9:357–62
     [Google Scholar]
133. Sheffield EG, Hudson JA. 1994. Reactivation of toddlers’ event memory. Long-Term Retention of Infant Memories Vol. 2: Memory R Fivush 447–65 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
134. Simony E, Honey CJ, Chen J, Lositsky O, Yeshurun Y et al. 2016. Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension. Nat. Commun. 7:12141
     [Google Scholar]
135. Solomon SH, Hindy NC, Altmann GTM, Thompson-Schill SL 2015. Competition between mutually exclusive object states in event comprehension. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27:2324–38
     [Google Scholar]
136. Sols I, DuBrow S, Davachi L, Fuentemilla L 2017. Event boundaries trigger rapid memory reinstatement of the prior events to promote their representation in long-term memory. Curr. Biol. 27:3499–504
     [Google Scholar]
137. Sonne T, Kingo OS, Krøjgaard P 2016. Occlusions at event boundaries during encoding have a negative effect on infant memory. Conscious. Cogn. 41:72–82
     [Google Scholar]
138. Sonne T, Kingo OS, Krøjgaard P 2017. Bound to remember: Infants show superior memory for objects presented at event boundaries. Scand. J. Psychol. 58:107–13
     [Google Scholar]
139. Speer NK, Reynolds JR, Zacks JM 2007. Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries. Psychol. Sci. 18:449–55
     [Google Scholar]
140. Stawarczyk D, Bezdek MA, Zacks JM 2019. Event representations and predictive processing: the role of the midline default network core. Topics Cogn. Sci. In press. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12450
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
141. Strickland B, Keil F. 2011. Event completion: Event based inferences distort memory in a matter of seconds. Cognition 121:409–15
     [Google Scholar]
142. Strickland B, Scholl BJ. 2015. Visual perception involves event-type representations: the case of containment versus occlusion. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144:570–80
     [Google Scholar]
143. Swallow KM, Barch DM, Head D, Maley CJ, Holder D, Zacks JM 2011. Changes in events alter how people remember recent information. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23:1052–64
     [Google Scholar]
144. Swallow KM, Kemp JT, Candan Simsek A 2018. The role of perspective in event segmentation. Cognition 177:249–62
     [Google Scholar]
145. Swallow KM, Zacks JM, Abrams RA 2009. Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 138:236–57
     [Google Scholar]
146. Tauzin T. 2015. Simple visual cues of event boundaries. Acta Psychol 158:8–18
     [Google Scholar]
147. Trabasso T, Stein NL. 1997. Narrating, representing, and remembering event sequences. Developmental Spans in Event Comprehension and Representation: Bridging Fictional and Actual Events P van den Broek 237–70 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
148. Tulving E. 1983. Elements of Episodic Memory New York: Oxford Univ. Press
149. Wahlheim CN, Zacks JM. 2019. Memory guides the comprehension of event changes for older and younger adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148:30–50
     [Google Scholar]
150. Wang Y, Gennari SP. 2019. How language and event recall can shape memory for time. Cogn. Psychol. 108:1–21
     [Google Scholar]
151. Warren WH, Shaw RE, eds. 1985. Persistence and Change: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Event Perception Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
152. Webb A, Knott A, MacAskill MR 2010. Eye movements during transitive action observation have sequential structure. Acta Psychol 133:51–56
     [Google Scholar]
153. Whitney C, Huber W, Klann J, Weis S, Krach S, Kircher T 2009. Neural correlates of narrative shifts during auditory story comprehension. NeuroImage 47:360–66
     [Google Scholar]
154. Woodward AL. 2009. Infants’ grasp of others’ intentions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18:53–57
     [Google Scholar]
155. Wyer RS, Bodenhausen GV. 1985. Event memory: the effects of processing objectives and time delay on memory for action sequences. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 49:301–16
     [Google Scholar]
156. Wynn K. 1996. Infants’ individuation and enumeration of actions. Psychol. Sci. 7:164–69
     [Google Scholar]
157. Zacks JM, Braver TS, Sheridan MA, Donaldson DI, Snyder AZ et al. 2001. Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nat. Neurosci. 4:651–55
     [Google Scholar]
158. Zacks JM, Kurby CA, Eisenberg ML, Haroutunian N 2011. Prediction error associated with the perceptual segmentation of naturalistic events. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23:4057–66
     [Google Scholar]
159. Zacks JM, Sargent JQ. 2010. Event perception: a theory and its application to clinical neuroscience. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 53 BH Ross 253–99 San Diego: Elsevier
     [Google Scholar]
160. Zacks JM, Speer NK, Swallow KM, Braver TS, Reynolds JR 2007. Event perception: a mind/brain perspective. Psychol. Bull. 133:273–93
     [Google Scholar]
161. Zhuang Y, Belkin M, Dennis S 2012. Metric based automatic event segmentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services129–48 Berlin: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
162. Zwaan RA, Radvansky GA. 1998. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychol. Bull. 123:162–85Reviews research on event representations in discourse comprehension.
     [Google Scholar]
163. Zwickel J, Prinz W. 2012. Assimilation and contrast: the two sides of specific interference between action and perception. Psychol. Res. 76:171–82
     [Google Scholar]