1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 51, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 51, 2022

Intimacy and the Politics of Love

Abstract

This review provides an overview of the anthropology of love and some of the main bodies of ethnographic work and theoretical debates around studies of love. It surveys specific studies that make the politics of intimacy and love central to their analysis and that seek to make theoretical sense of its meaning and broader significance. This discussion is followed by work that draws together an example of the politicization of love in the shape of a claim around “love jihad,” which has dominated recent discussions of love in India and has begun to receive anthropological attention. In conclusion, the review argues that the politics of love will need to account for the meanings, constraints, and everyday vulnerabilities through which intimate lives become entangled with and illuminate political projects of every scale.

Keyword(s): India, inter-religious, intimacy, love, love jihad, politicization
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011401
2022-10-24
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/51/1/annurev-anthro-102218-011401.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011401&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abeyasekera AL. 2016. Narratives of choice: marriage, choosing right, and the responsibility of agency in urban middle-class Sri Lanka. Fem. Rev. 113:11–16
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahearn L. 2006. Invitations to Love: Literacy, Love Letters, and Social Change in Nepal Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  3. Ahmed S. 2003. In the name of love. Borderlands e-J. 2:31–41 https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20040818112659/http://www.borderlandsejournal.adelaide.edu.au/vol2no3_2003/ahmed_love.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmed S. 2015. The Cultural Politics of Emotion New York: Routledge. , 2nd ed..
  5. Ahmed S. 2016. Fascism as love. feministkilljoys Nov. 9. https://feministkilljoys.com/2016/11/09/fascism-as-love/comment-page-1
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexy A. 2020. Intimate Disconnections: Divorce and the Romance of Independence in Contemporary Japan Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  7. Alter JS. 2000. Gandhi's Body: Sex, Diet, and the Politics of Nationalism Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  8. Anderson E 2015.. ‘ Neo-Hindutva’: the Asia House M. F. Husain campaign and the mainstreaming of Hindu nationalist rhetoric in Britain. Contemp. South Asia 23:145–66
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Appadurai A. 1997. Fieldwork in the era of globalisation. Anthropol. Hum. 22:1115–18
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Archambault JS. 2016. Taking love seriously in human-plant relations in Mozambique: toward an anthropology of affective encounters. Cult. Anthropol. 31:2244–71
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Baas M. 2007.. “ Arranged love”: marriage in a transnational work environment. Int. Inst. Asian Stud. Newsl. 45:9
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Basu S. 2015. The Trouble with Marriage: Feminists Confront Law and Violence in India Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
  13. Baxi P. 2006. Habeas corpus in the realm of love: litigating marriages of choice in India. Aust. Fem. Law J. 25:59–78
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Benson S. 2008. Mixed race children in south London: the management of an ambiguous ethnic identity. Camb. Anthropol. 27:210–19
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Berlant L. 2011. A properly political concept of love: three approaches in ten pages. Cult. Anthropol. 26:4683–91
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bernstein E. 2007. Temporarily Yours: Intimacy, Authenticity, and the Commerce of Sex Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  17. Bessire L. 2021. Running Out: In Search of Water on the High Plains Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  18. Bharucha R. 1998. Politicians’ grin, not the Buddha's smile. Econ. Political Wkly. 33:221295–97
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bhatia R. 2017. The year of love jihad in India. New Yorker Dec. 31. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/2017-in-review/the-year-of-love-jihad-in-india
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Bodenhorn B. 2013. On the road again: movement, marriage, mestizaje, and the race of kinship. Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship S McKinnon, F. Cannell 131–54 Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Adv. Res. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Boellstorff T. 2005. The Gay Archipelago: Sexuality and Nation in Indonesia Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  22. Boellstorff T. 2007. Queer studies in the house of anthropology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 36:17–35
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Boellstorff T. 2016. Against state straightism: five principles for including LGBT Indonesians. E-International Relations May 21. https://www.e-ir.info/2016/03/21/against-state-straightism-five-principles-for-including-lgbt-indonesians
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Boris E, Parreñas RS 2010. Intimate Labors: Cultures, Technologies and the Politics of Care Stanford, CA: Stanford Soc. Sci.
  25. Borneman J. 1996. Until death do us part: marriage/death in anthropological discourse. Am. Ethnol. 23:2215–35
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Borneman J. 2001. Caring and being cared for: displacing marriage, kinship, gender and sexuality. Ethics of Kinship: Ethnographic Inquiries JD Faubion 29–46 Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Brettell CB. 2017. Marriage and migration. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 46:81–97
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Carsten J, Chiu H-C, Magee S, Papadaki E, Reece KM. 2021. Marriage in Past, Present and Future Tense London: Univ. Coll. London Press
  29. Chacko P. 2020. Gender and authoritarian populism: empowerment, protection, and the politics of resentful aspiration in India. Crit. Asian Stud. 52:2204–25
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Chaudhry S. 2021. Moving for Marriage: Inequalities, Intimacy, and Women's Lives in Rural North India Albany, NY: SUNY Press
  31. Cohen L. 2007. Holi in Banaras and the Mahaland of modernity. Sexualities N Menon 197–223 New Delhi: Women Unlimited
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Cole J, Thomas LM. 2009. Love in Africa Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  33. Collier JF. 1997. From Duty to Desire: Remaking Families in a Spanish Village Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  34. Constable N. 2009. The commodification of intimacy: marriage, sex and reproductive labor. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 38:49–64
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Dalley C. 2015. Love and the stranger: intimate relationships between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people in a very remote Aboriginal town, northern Australia. Aust. J. Anthropol. 26:138–54
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Das V. 2006. The figure of the abducted woman: the citizen as sexed. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary18–37 Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Das V. 2010. Engaging the life of the other: love and everyday life. See Lambek 2010 376–99
  38. Davé NN. 2012. Queer Activism in India: A Story in the Anthropology of Ethics Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  39. Day S. 2010. Ethics between public and private: sex workers’ relationships in London. See Lambek 2010 292–309
  40. De Munck VC. 1996. Love and marriage in a Sri Lankan Muslim community: toward a re-evaluation of Dravidian marriage practices. Am. Ethnol. 23:4698–716
     [Google Scholar]
  41. De Neve G. 2016. The economies of love: love marriage, kin support, and aspiration in a South Indian garment city. Mod. Asian Stud. 50:41220–49
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Donner H. 2002.. ‘ One's own marriage’: love marriages in a Calcutta neighbourhood. South Asia Res. 22:79–94
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Dyson J. 2010. Friendship in practice: girl's work in the Indian Himalayas. Am. Ethnol. 37:3482–98
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Dyson J. 2018. Love actually: youth mediators and advisors in North India. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 108:4974–88
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Faier L. 2007. Filipina migrants in rural Japan and their professions of love. Am. Ethnol. 34:148–62
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Friedner M. 2020. Disability, anonymous love, and interworldly socials in urban India. Curr. Anthropol. 61:21S37–45
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Frøystad K. 2021. Sound biting conspiracy: from India with “love jihad.”. Religions 12:1064
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Fuller CJ, Narasimhan H. 2008. Companionate marriage in India: the changing marriage system in a middle-class Brahman subcaste. J. R. Anthropol. Soc. 14:736–54
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Gay J. 1985.. “ Mummies and babies” and friends and lovers in Lesotho. J. Homosex. 11:3/497–116
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Gell A. 2011 (1996. On love. Anthropol. Century 2011:2 http://aotcpress.com/articles/love/
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Gershon I 2010. The Breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over New Media Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  52. Ghassem-Fachandi P. 2012. Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  53. Giddens A. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  54. Goode WJ. 1959. The theoretical importance of love. Am. Sociol. Rev. 24:138–47
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Govindrajan R. 2018. Animal Intimacies: Interspecies Relatedness in India's Central Himalayas Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  56. Govindrajan R. 2021. Labors of love: on the political economies and ethics of bovine politics in Himalayan India. Cult. Anthropol. 36:2193–221
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Gupta C. 2009. Hindu women, Muslim men: love jihad and conversions. Econ. Political Wkly. 44:5113–15
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Gupta C. 2016. Allegories of “love jihad” and ghar vapasi: interlocking the socio-religious with the political. Arch. Orient. 84:2291–316
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hansen TB. 1999. The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  60. Hardt M. 2011. For love or money. Cult. Anthropol. 26:4676–82
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Härkönen H. 2018. Money, love, and fragile reciprocity in contemporary Havana, Cuba. J. Latin Am. Caribb. Anthropol. 24:2370–87
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Hart K. 2007. Love by arrangement: the ambiguity of ‘spousal choice’ in a Turkish village. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 13:345–62
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Hendriks T. 2016. SIM cards of desire: sexual versatility and the male homoerotic economy in urban Congo. Am. Ethnol. 43:2230–42
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Heywood P. 2009. Topographies of love: two discourses on the Russian ‘mail-order bride industry. .’ Camb. J. Anthropol. 29:26–45
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Hirsch J, Wardlow H, eds. 2006. Modern Loves: The Anthropology of Romantic Courtship and Companionate Marriage Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  66. Hochschild A. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialisation of Human Feeling London: Univ. Calif. Press
  67. Hunter M. 2002. The materiality of everyday sex: thinking beyond ‘prostitution.’. Afr. Stud. 61:99–120
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Hussain D. 2013. Boundaries Undermined: The Ruins of Progress on the Bangladesh-India Border London: Hurst
  69. Illouz E. 1997. Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  70. Jamieson L. 1999. Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the “pure relationship. .” Sociology 33:3477–94
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Jenkins LD. 2019. Religious Freedom and Mass Conversion in India Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  72. Khan SA. 2014. Saif Ali Khan: intermarriage is not jihad, it is India. Indian Express Oct. 16, https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/intermarriage-is-not-jihad-it-is-india/
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Kulick D. 2005. Four hundred thousand Swedish perverts. GLQ 11:2205–35
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Lambek M 2010. Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action New York: Fordham Univ. Press
  75. Magee S. 2021.. ‘ You can learn to do it right, or you can learn to do it wrong’: marriage counselling, togetherness and creative conservatism in Lynchburg, Virginia. See Carsten et al. 2021 54–75
  76. Maggi W. 2006.. “ Heart-struck”: love marriage as a marker of ethnic identity among the Kalasha of Northwest Pakistan. See Hirsch & Wardlow 2006 78–91
  77. Malji A, Raza S 2021. The securitization of love jihad. Religions 12:1074
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Maqsood A. 2021. Love as understanding: marriage, aspiration, and the joint family in middle-class Pakistan. Am. Ethnol. 48:193–104
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Marsden M. 2007. Love and elopement in northern Pakistan. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 13:91–108
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Marwaha V. 2021. Millennials prefer arranged marriages as they can't afford to fall in love, says writer Vivan Marwha. Times of India Novemb. 7. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/millennials-prefer-arranged-marriages-as-they-cant-afford-to-fall-in-love-says-writer-vivan-marwaha/articleshowprint/87563973.cms
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Meiu GP 2015. Colonialism and sexuality. The International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality P Wheelhan, A Bolin 239–42 Malden, MA: Wiley. , 1st ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Meiu GP. 2017. Ethno-Erotic Economies: Sexuality, Money, and Belonging in Kenya Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  83. Menon R, Bhasin K. 1998. Borders & Boundaries: Women in India's Partition. New Delhi: Kali for Women
  84. Mitra D. 2021.. ‘ Surplus woman’: female sexuality and the concept of endogamy. J. Asian Stud. 80:13–26
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Mody P. 2008. The Intimate State: Love-Marriage and the Law in Delhi New Delhi: Routledge
  86. Mody P. 2013a. Love jurisdiction. Camb. J. Anthropol. 31:244–59
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Mody P. 2013b. Marriages of convenience and capitulation: South Asian marriage, family and intimacy in the diaspora. Routledge Handbook of the South Asian Diaspora J Chatterji, D Washbrook 372–85 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Nielsen KB, Nilsen AG 2021. Love jihad and the governance of gender and intimacy in Hindu nationalist statecraft. Religions 12:1068
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Nisbett N. 2007. Friendship, consumption, morality: practicising identity, negotiating hierarchy in middle-class Bangalore. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 13:935–50
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Nurul Huda MR 2020. Intimacy under surveillance: illicit sexuality, moral policing, and the state in contemporary Malaysia. Hawwa. J. Women Middle East Islamic World 18:325–56
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Nurul Huda MR 2021. Nikah Express: Malay polygyny and marriage-making at the Malaysian-Thai border. Asian Stud. Rev. 45:4635–55
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Obadia J. 2020a. Assembly by aggregation: making individuals in the face of others in an American intentional community. Anthropol. Q. 93:11387–420
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Obadia J. 2020b. Introduction: overwhelmed by proximity. Anthropol. Q. 93:11329–53
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Orsini F 2006. Love in South Asia: A Cultural History Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  95. Osella C. 2012. Desires under reform: contemporary reconfigurations of family, marriage, love and gendering in a transnational south Indian matrilineal Muslim community. Cult. Relig. 13:2241–64
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Padilla MB, Hirsch JS, Muñoz-Laboy M, Sember RE, Parker RG, eds. 2007. Introduction: Cross-cultural reflections on an intimate intersection. Love and Globalisation: Transformations of Intimacy in the Contemporary Worldix–xxxi Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Papadaki E. 2021. Marriage, time, affect and the politics of compromise in Athens. See Carsten et al. 2021 76–94
  98. Parry J. 2001. Ankalu's errant wife: sex, marriage & industry in contemporary Chhatisgarh. Mod. Asian Stud. 35:4783–820
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Poddar U. 2022. How have legal cases seeking to strike down India's anti-conversion laws fared?. Scroll.in Jan. 4. https://scroll.in/article/1014042/how-have-legal-challenges-against-indias-anti-conversion-laws-fared
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Povinelli EA. 2002. Notes on gridlock: genealogy, intimacy, sexuality. Public Cult 14:1215–38
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Povinelli EA. 2006. The Empire of Love: Towards a Theory of Intimacy, Genealogy, and Carnality London: Durham
  102. Qureshi K. 2016. Marital Breakdown among British Asians: Conjugality, Legal Pluralism and New Kinship London: Palgrave Macmillan
  103. Rapport N. 2017. Loving recognition: a proposal for the practical efficacy of love as a public virtue. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 24:126–44
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Rathod M, Barot K. 2020. Love jihad law: a discriminatory tool in the hands of divisive Indian Politicians. Oxf. Hum. Rights Hub Dec. 14. https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/love-jihad-law-a-discriminatory-tool-in-the-hands-of-divisive-indian-politicians/
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Reddy G. 2006. With Respect to Sex: Negotiating Hijra Identity in South India New Delhi: Yoda Press
  106. Roy A. 1997. The God of Small Things London: Fourth Estate
  107. Sadana R. 2018. At the ‘love commandos’: narratives of mobility amongst intercaste couples in a Delhi safe house. Anthropol. Hum. 43:139–57
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Shaw A, Charsley K. 2006. Rishtas: adding emotion to strategy in understanding British Pakistani transnational marriages. Glob. Netw. 6:405–21
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Simpson B. 1998. Changing Families: An Ethnographic Approach to Divorce and Separation London: Bloomsbury Academic
  110. Singh B. 2011. Agonistic intimacy and moral aspiration in popular Hinduism: a study in the political theology of the neighbour. Am. Ethnol. 38:3430–50
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Singh P. 2017. At home with their queerness: same-sex relationality and the Indian family in advertising media. Fem. Media Stud. 17:5721–36
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Smith S. 2011.. ‘ She says herself, “I have no future”’: love, fate and territory in Leh District, India. Gender Place Cult. 184455–76
  113. Smith S. 2016. Intimacy and angst in the field. Gender Place Cult. 23:1134–46
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Smith SH. 2009. The domestication of geopolitics: Buddhist-Muslim conflict and the policing of marriage and the body in Ladakh, India. Geopolitics 14:2197–218
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Spronk R. 2018. Invisible desires in Ghana and Kenya: same-sex erotic experiences in cross-sex oriented lives. Sexualities 21:5–6883–98
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Spronk R, Hendriks T, eds. 2020. Readings in Sexualities from Africa Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
  117. Stevenson L. 2014. Life Beside Itself: Imagining Care in the Canadian Arctic Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
  118. Stoler A. 1992. Sexual affronts and racial frontiers: European identities and the cultural politics of exclusion in colonial Southeast Asia. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 34:3514–51
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Strohl DJ. 2019. Love jihad in India's moral imaginaries: religion, kinship, and citizenship in late liberalism. Contemp. South Asia 27:127–39
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Świtek B. 2016. Reluctant Intimacies: Japanese Eldercare in Indonesian Hands Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books
  121. Thomas LM. 2009. Love, sex, and the modern girl in 1930s Southern Africa. See Cole & Thomas 2009 31–57
  122. Thomas LM, Cole J 2009. Thinking through love in Africa. See Cole & Thomas 2009 1–30
  123. Trawick M. 1992. Notes on Love in a Tamil Family Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  124. Twamley K. 2013. The globalisation of love? Examining narratives of intimacy and marriage among middle-class Gujarati Indians in the UK and India. Fam. Relat. Soc. 2:2267–83
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Tyagi A, Sen A. 2020. Love-jihad (Muslim sexual seduction) and ched-chad (sexual harassment): Hindu nationalist discourses and the Ideal/deviant urban citizen in India. Gend. Place Cult. 27:104–25
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Van Beek M 2004. Dangerous liaisons: Hindu nationalism and Buddhist radicalism in Ladakh. Religious Radicalism and Security in South Asia SP Limaye, RG Wirsing, M Malik 193–218 Honolulu, HI: Asia-Pac. Cent. Secur. Stud.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Walter A-M. 2021. The self in a time of constant connectivity: romantic intimacy and the ambiguous promise of mobile phones for young women in Gilgit, northern Pakistan. Am. Ethnol. 48:4446–61
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Wekker G. 2006. The Politics of Passion: Women's Sexual Culture in the Afro-Surinamese Diaspora New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  129. Weston K. 1997. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  130. Weston K. 2017. Animate Planet: Making Visceral Sense of Living in a High-Tech Ecologically Damaged World London: Duke Univ. Press
  131. Wilkinson E. 2017. On love as an (im)properly political concept. Environ. Plan. D Soc. Space 35:157–71
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Wright F. 2016. Palestine, my love: the ethico-politics of love and mourning in Jewish Israeli solidarity activism. Am. Ethnol. 43:1130–43
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Wynn LL 2015. Writing affect, love, and desire into ethnography. Phenomenology in Anthropology: A Sense of Perspective K Ram, C Houston 224–47 Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Yan Y. 2003. Private Life under Socialism: Love, Intimacy, and Family Change in a Chinese Village, 1949–1999 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  135. Zelizer V. 2000. The purchase of intimacy. Law Soc. Inq. 25:817–48
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011401
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error